It's all SO BEAUTIFUL!!! The clothes, the hair, make-up and models all look gorgeous! The sophisticated MODERN Chinese woman an man should wear these gorgeous clothes for special occasions!
A stellar job in terms of costuming, hair and makeup. One too often encounters Hanfu representations or recreations that are based on historical facts to not be accurate or be shoddy in craftsmanship and execution. In the dynasties preceding the T'ang and Sung, the norm was for people sit on floor mats or platforms. People did not wear shoes while sitting, but thick soled socks. The clothes worn during this time period, especially the more leisure class, were constricting and did not allow easy open access to leg strides or arm movements. So they walked and moved in ways conforming to these garments. These movements came to be codified over time, and intuitive. This was lost with the adoption of the clothing mode of the Manchus after 1644. The grace, dignity, beauty and form of the former Han manner of dressing was abandoned and in its place was clothing more adopted for nomadic horseback riding tribesmen. Like the Mongols, and not like a sedentary, civilized people, with an age old classical culture. Reviving, celebrating and wearing Hanfu is good, well and the right of the Han Chinese. But one must do more then just wear it. One must know HOW to wear it, and not move or behave as if one is wearing a Cheongsam or Gap jeans. Clothes makes a man.
History and Differences between Chinese hanfu(漢服) and Korean hanbok(한복) 중국 한푸과 한국 한복의 역사와 차이점 中国汉服与韩国韩服的历史和差异 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9uq9XXbDnvE.html
La música, el lento caminar, el diseño de los vestidos que recuerda las pinturas del arte chino, todo me lleva a sentir la ilusión de que estoy viendo a gente verdadera de aquellas épocas. Se percibe mucho respeto en esta recreación. ¡Excelente! Desde Uruguay.
Beautiful. I must say that I find Chinese fashions, at least until the late Ming dynasty, to be one of the most elegant and practical styles around. But why, and this applies to most European as well as Asians shows showcasing historical clothing, do they concentrate on the wealthy/ruling classes. The styles are always beautiful but also very exaggerated, showing that the wearer's don't need to do any work, and impractical whereas the merchant/literati/scholarly classes wore fashions which were a far more practical version of the wealthy styles. And probably of more interest to those growing numbers who are interested in wearing these styles on a daily basis in their private and working lives. I am one, I know that the huge sleeves and hemlines dragging on the ground look fabulous but are completely impractical to wear on a daily basis, then and now. Both European and Asian, including Chinese. Thank you for the video, it shows styles not usually seen. From Dublin, Ireland.
Because the ancient wealthy/ruling classes did collect most part of human wealth thus actually produce the most elegant and practical styles. Nowadays we are supposed to make this style available to most/all general people.
@@gloryxiong6068 Elegant styles, undoubtedly, in all countries. But the practical are those worn by the working merchant class, many of whom had the money for wealthier fabrics but also the need for the clothing to be practical. You can't serve in a shop if your sleeves constantly drape on the ground - whether Asian or European fashions - and the same applied when the fashions involved a hem circumference of 4-5m, totally impractical for those working. I don't mean the poor folk, although they copied the fashions as much as they were able, but those who could afford the luxurious fabrics and styles but for whom practicality was the overriding concern. You can see it in the, unfortunately few, garments in museums, even going back to Egyptian times 5000 years ago. The really wealthy not only had the luxurious fabrics but the exaggerated fashions which proved they didn't have to work, they could afford servants/slaves to do the cleaning/cooking etc. But the merchants and professional classes (lawyers for example) had the money for the fabrics but the fashions needed to be practical and this is shown in the clothing where the sleeves are more restrained in length, the volume of the fabric used is much less and the resulting garments, to me at least, look more beautiful for this. They are also garments that could easily be copied and worn on a daily basis in modern life (again both Asian and European) as is shown by the increasing numbers of people, in both continents, who are making and wearing the fashions of yesteryear but in the more restrained and practical styles that can be used daily. Which is why my dress sleeves have a circumference of around 0.5m rather than the 2.5m (approx) seen in the images of dresses worn by the really wealthy, and the dress lengths are to my ankle rather than draping on the floor around my feet. Far more practical when using trains and buses, or a laptop for that matter.
@@musicandbooklover-p2o You need to know. In ancient time, wealthy people had maids and servants to do all the work. So weathy people had no problem with long large sleeves. Large long sleeves also symbolized wealthy, civilized and educated status. Working merchant class people basically and nomrally didn't have large long sleeves.
@@haniahannslew4108 I know, as my comment made clear. I'm also aware that wealthy merchants would wear fashions aping their betters although not to quite the same ridiculous extent simply to show others that they were wealthy enough to afford servants, although as nobody can sit around all day and do absolutely nothing I suspect that in private the long draping bits were removed and put on a chair out of the way because they also get in the way of things women - especially - could and did do such as embroidery, tapestry, weaving, writing, managing the dairy/still room (which was reserved for the woman of the house rather than servants to look after) etc.
Impractical - The floor had to be dust free and dry before the master and mistress could walk over. The weather had to be good too - no rain nor gusty wind.
1、name：裳衣(both)，Sequence of Graphs（1~3），time（BC453-BC221）战国时期 2、name：曲裾袍服(both)，Sequence of Graphs（4~6），time（BC202-AD220）汉代 3、name：襦裙（woman's），Sequence of Graphs（7~9），time（AD220-AD420）魏晋时期 4、name：襦裙（woman's）、武士袴褶（man's） ，Sequence of Graphs（10~14），time（AD420-AD589）南北朝时期 5、name：衫裙（woman's），Sequence of Graphs（15~19），time（AD618-AD907）唐代
Their opulence is exquisite and a solid . This is a big step back in time to see who was wearing who and the effortless style punctuated in a endless buffet of wizard sleeves that symbolize the witches of places like Salem or any low rent bar where they can be seen rocking the wizard sleeves. Their hair is painful to watch yet compelling at the same time. Better hope it's not humid, raining, or windy girls. There's been a matinee added and a piece of the past tells me, the show must go on regardless of what you have to do. The manic choreography is deeply rooted in the tradition of mental illness and a sense of urgency.
