如果要废除Matrikulasi，是不是连政府大学的一年Asasi课程也要废除？其实统一STPM也没有用。80年代末，我和朋友通过UPU申请政府大学读工程系，没申请电脑系却被录取入读，我朋友却被踢去读Perhutanan dan Perikanan科系。UPU要整蛊你有很多方法，因为热门科系都需要面试，就算你的成绩再好但他们说你的面试不过关，你也一样进不了热门科系。你认为你的面试做得很好，但面试过不过关他们说了算。所以统一STPM同样也会面对成绩好但拿不到热门科系，搞不好，很多学生因为STPM难考还需要多一年的时间完成，而转去读一年的私立大学基础课程，能快一年入读大学。阿聪你不能一直拿热门科系来说，要知道不是每个人都要读热门科系，一些人喜欢工程系，IT系，建筑设计系，人工智能系等等，这些都不会被整蛊的科系，废除掉Matrikulasi，转读STPM等于是要浪费他们一年的时间。
The government should intake chinese/ Indian/ non muslim into UPU (unit pemohonan University) as staffs in order to revamp the current system . The ultimate goals UPU is to develop talent students into right university regardless of race and religion.
Never know it was so dark in the uni allocation. Tat brought me to tink bak abt yr previous idea of having a brand new uni. Probably can propose to uncle Robert kwok to probably be main funder & brought some of his buz contacts as other funders to build this new uni. And hired renowned lecturers to setup courses tat are required for jobs in this new current space. Top stpm results students can receive scholarships but required to be bonded to work in the companies tat sponsored these scholarships. Also to hire professionals in the educational sector on how to put this new uni in the world uni ranking map. As long we keep attracting the best students in MY & from overseas, the ranking will sure overtake the best unis in MY. Let those bumi continue playing in these traditional unis & non-bumis will for sure better off in this new uni.
在某种程度上我同意你的观点，但如果你仍然没有明白要点，你可能会对你的想法感到失望。国家问题始于不公平的政策，几十年后它们已经形成了一个坚实的种族主义政策管理体系。就像毒瘾一样，某些拥有特殊权利的种族控制着民主中的投票。这就是为何非土著如此孤立于民族归属感的原因。 Some how I agreed with u, but if u still not get the point, u might disappointed with your idea. The country problem start very beginning with unfair policies, after many decades they already form a solid administration system for the racism policies. So is like drugs addiction, certain race with the special rights control the vote in democracy. That’s the reason why non bumi so isolated from the sense of National belonging.
吴医生你好 小弟认为matrikulasi的学生就已经是你所谓stpm成绩顶端的那群人了，可以进到matrikulasi的华人我敢说很大部分都是spm straight a甚至straight a+的，所以说如果你讲要拿掉matriks 10%的non bumi quota 岂不是也把那些在spm考取优异成绩的学生的努力化为泡影？我认为matrikulasi不仅要保留给华人更要给更多quota for non bumi 而不是少少的10% 以上
Are you suggesting non-Bumi to boycott "matrikulasi" ?? Turning down admission to "matrikulasi" !! ?? If so, why not suggest those who were turned down to boycott STPM ?? Could I ask you to reject admission to UM Medicine because the admission policy is not fair ??
Matrik is custom made for bumi ..the standard is lower than stpm how to compare..stpm was well recognised by overseas uni. NTU and NUS are welcome those stpm with straight A* students.
@@user-ku1ou9cp3f is the calculation of merit mark to enter matrikulasi transparent for non-bumi? assuming 5% seats, are you certain the non-bumi that get is the best 5 justified?
We should not compare a 1-year pre-U to a 2-year pre-U programs. The breath and the depth of the 2 are completely different. There are many other 1-year pre-U programs around, such as the famous AUSMAT, SAM, MUFY, and AP, etc don't have to mention the private foundation programs each university or colleague offers so do our very own matrikulasi as a feeder program for local universities. If there is a shorter and easier way to earn a degree, why want to go through a crooked and longer way? Time is money. For me, Pre-U is just a stepping stone! Furthermore, after a degree, there is a master's, a PhD, and a post-doctorate degree. A Bachelor's Degree is not everything. Who cares what pre-U program you studied if you have a PhD degree? Why keep harping on STPM or Matrikulasi? For those who love the STPM or A-Level, please go ahead but please don't criticize and discredit those who prefer a different pathway. 4.0 is not the only selection criterion, the university is also looking at your English proficiency level (MUET for Malaysia and perhaps TOEFL/IELTS for Singapore?), Co-Co, interviews, presentation skills, logical thinking tests etc. Please kindly get all the facts right before judging. For UM's medicine in particular, the candidate also has to take the MSAT or BMAT test.
I'm not sure stpm nowadays and stpm 10 years ago still the same? If not mistaken, they are lots of course works now and teachers play an important role to contribute students 'marks and a few teachers out there take this opportunity to take these students as cheap labour or personal helper. Don't know still happening or not.
why is no one talking about how many pre/post grads who are studying have been dropped/dismissed just because they found out they made a small mistake while studying😢😢
Totally bullshit. Matriculation is a one year program añd fully sponsor by the government. Stpm is self funding and needs 2 years. Blame on purely upu mistake on allocation of major is no fair, a lot of application is not serious. Result only can do applied science buy try all the major that needs higher marks. Have u studied stpm? Another major issue is not a lot of teaching resources available for STEM on stpm. Good teacher will be absorb by MOE for matriculation program. The major difference between the 2 is if u want to study overseas like Singapore, US or UK. It is like A level and will have higher chances then matriculation graduate. If the option is local uni, matriculation is the easier and cheapest option. Yearly allocation to matriculation student also much higher then stpm student.
Then allow students to choose whether to sit for matrix or STPM. If students want to study in local uni only can the students not from matrix colleges allowed to sit for matrix exam ?
No use and no point to abolish MAT as there is still a possibility that the passing could be controlled through indiscriminating marking, which is basically referred to as manipulation . Assuming MAT has been abolished for the chinese as suggested as a result of which STPM is the the only means as a requisite for admission to local Uni , It could be inferred that STPM taken is mainly made up of by all the chinese ( other races are negligible here ) , whereby marking can be susceptible to be manipulated by the markers on "specific agenda".
