这个穿红衣服的大叔说的所有的话翻译过来其实就一句“关我啥事？” Charlie Munger described some sort of wealthy people like " I have seen so many idiots get rich in easy businesses!" I think this gentleman in red t-shirt is well suited.
I actually disagree with the examples both uses. We are not becoming gods because the example carries a religious belief that God exist and there is a standard what a God should have and human behave in certain way, it is "not human". There is a level of serfdom in such belief. I also disagree that we should not consider possible situation where technology can go wrong when place in the wrong hands. It is exactly why human have laws. Mr Wang is correct that talking and worrying will not do much. He stressed the point what we can benefit from advancement and make amendment while progressing. This is also the nature of law. Empty talks, is the death of progression. This is why we see so many social problems in the West and infrastructure failure and political in bilnary nature.
Mr. Hirari, I guess you should have known about how it feel along with this kind of dialogue, you gotta listen to those arrogant words from those Chinese with little sense in their heads, if you want to make money there....
Eric Wang 为什么说辩不过呢？第一个问题，汪健回答说人工智能相对于真实智能而言是假的，只是重要的工具，讨论这个没有意义，不如探索真正的科学。尤瓦尔也只是对智能和意识加以区分，并肯定人工智能是智能，但并没有意识，之后提出需要针对人工智能可能的影响提前准备相应的经济模式。他们互相都没有说什么真正有营养的内容，而且这个问题本身确实没什么讨论的必要，非要讨论那就是科幻的范畴了。
Eric Wang 第二个问题，汪健更不像是逃避，你说他看不上人工智带来的问题还差不多，在他眼里,研究人工智能带来问题，相对于研究生老病死，人类情感、认知的形成原因而言，就像将焦点放在未来的转基因问题而不是眼下的PM2.5一样可笑。而且他也回答了人会进化成什么样，不是被动地接受现在这些科学家所设想的可能性，而是通过基础科学研究的完善，拥有自主选择的权利。 尤瓦尔同意汪健所说的应该关注当下，但同时需要重视科技的影响。汪健回应让他别担心“人工智能”，中国在“真实智能”研究上不仅没有忽视，还走的很远了，有需要还能惠及其他国家。
