截然不同的解碼方式/DAC差異性比對特輯MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI/HOLO AUDIO MAY梅 L-3/CHORD DAVE DAC

Подписаться 3,7 тыс.

Просмотров 25 тыс.

50% 1

這次以草爸實驗室的固定音響系統下，同時比較了三部非常優秀的DAC，讓大家理解一下不同的解碼方式，所帶來的差異。
很有趣的過程，希望對大家有幫助🤘🏻
🔽本次草爸測試是以
下列器材與配置List做為統一參考reference
✳️Roon Core：Grimm Audio MU-1
✳️Streamer：Aqua LinQ 數位轉盤搭配HQP NAA
✳️前級：Bespoke AudioPassive Ultimate Pre-Amp 無源前級
✳️喇叭：ATC SCM100 ASL主動監聽喇叭
✳️音樂來源：線上Tidal/Qobuz 44.1kHz/16bit
✳️使用播放介面： ROON
✳️前端來源處理：
中華電信光纖數據機+EA Hibrid電池LPS線型電源 ▶️D-Link Wi-Fi Router+Telos Audio EPS LPS線型電源▶️Ediscreation Fiberbox ii Extreme 光隔離▶️Silent Angel N16 Power Switch ▶️PPA OCXO Quad Switch 白金版本▶️Ansuz Powerswitch D2▶️Ansuz Ethernet Cable D2
✳️最後一段進數位轉盤的網路線材：Way Cable Ethernet
✳️電源/雜訊處理：Telos Audio QNR x6台 + Telos Audio Macro G數位雜訊處理器x8台 +Telos Audio Macro Q x1 +Telos Audio QRC Ver.5.1 + Telos Audio QRC (DIGITAL Ver.)
✳️接地處理：
Telos Audio GNR Ver.5.1
✳️排插：
Ansuz Mainz 8 X-TC x5
✳️統一線材（含電源線、訊號線、數位線）皆採用Telos Audio 單導向線材
✳️墊材：Ansuz Darkz D2t / T2 、Stillpoints Ultra5/6 + Ultra Bass 、 Iso Acoustic GAIA I / OREA
使用到的已盡量列出，使用的音樂片段也標示於影片內，如有未盡事項請包涵🙏🏻
如果喜歡草爸
這樣的影片表現方式
歡迎留言讓我知道❤️❤️❤️
給我們打打氣
謝謝拉🤜🏻🤛🏻
#草爸發燒筆記
00:00 前言
07:36 Track1-1
08:42 Track1-2
09:44 Track1-3
10:45 Track2-1
11:48 Track2-2
12:48 Track2-3
13:46 Track3-1
14:52 Track3-2
15:55 Track3-3
16:55 Track4-1
18:01 Track4-2
19:05 Track4-3
20:09 Track5-1
21:15 Track5-2
22:16 Track5-3
23:18 主觀聽感分享

Опубликовано:

3 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 72

@911turbojk Год назад

感謝草爸的分享, 這次的影片真的看得很過癮, 而且這次的介面讓我覺得做比較更容易讓我做比較, 真的製作很用心! 給你two thumbs up !

@ffffef1 Год назад

很喜歡第二首mola 對於口氣的詮釋 , 感覺更有情感

@user-sm3ru1fm6g Год назад

Thank you! Proper comparison, great stuff!👍

@j88889aa Год назад

MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI真的好強除了人聲的曲目其他我都給了他一票如果不像草爸擁有這麼多台DAC的話這台真的是抓到一個很棒平衡點播什麼樣的音樂都有一定的水準

@yuanmingchao9370 5 месяцев назад

Speechless... Simply the best review. Dave rules!

@brianng2335 8 месяцев назад

自身一直玩黑膠，少玩DAC。由於工作繁忙，換碟好煩，開始覺得唔使換碟好處，嘗試找部好DAC玩玩。不過現在還未有定案😂。第一次睇草爸介紹。多謝分享及給予三部機器評論。草爸揀歌顯示係高手。每個人五感各有不同，無對錯的。自身聽人聲，小提琴最多。 Hilary Hahn 我至愛😁😁。 Mola Mola各樣表現最合心水。不過價最貴。 May DAC唔差，價相對平。抵買。不過，玩音響無抵唔抵，祇有好唔好。頭痛 😒😒

@adrianm1949 Год назад

Great comparison. Small differences in sound of this three DACs. Thank you for your work.

@oliivioljy9700 6 месяцев назад

They all have their own sound structure and character. I myself listen and compare these in my living room with genelec dsp/glm studio monitors. And there really are a lot of differences if you listen more. Of course, all three are excellent dacs.

@chihungchan8325 Год назад

may的音樂味道非常好啊

@SSQ05520 День назад

很喜歡草爸的影片不過都沒字幕必須放大聲點比較遺憾

@oyajixiami3700 Год назад

感谢草爸分享，让我有机会听到这些高阶器材的声音，实话说这几台DAC定价都在自己预算之外，但还有什么可以阻挡发烧友的好奇心呢？简单听下来（无线耳塞+从头到尾听一遍，和现场聆听或者用好的耳机回放肯定没法比），厚着脸皮讲讲主观听感：TAMBAQUI的解析力、动态、分离度、规模感最佳，整体感觉是厂家希望尽量还原录音想要呈现的效果，简单来说就是真实、美、平衡；MAY音色微温，中频突出且抓耳，说R2R偏重人声确实有一定道理（当然有句话叫「得中频者得天下」）；DAVE声音偏柔和，速度稍慢些，整体感觉是比较贴近现场之余又融入了厂家的审美。

@szllee 7 месяцев назад

录音 ... 不错。

@Nightjar726 Год назад

It would be really good if you could put in a more affordable DAC in there to compare such as the high performing Bechmark DAC3. Would be super serious how it compares. Great work !

@ericelmore2742 9 месяцев назад

The chord brought more emotion to the vocal track 2! Felt the song more on Dave then other dac’s.

@Jil8840 Год назад

Great test thanks.

@squallnine Год назад

Holo May NOS模式+ HQPlayer軟體出DSD1024+HPQ選擇適合歌曲的濾波是梅的實力發揮處，細節和分層和DAVE完全不同世界，可惜沒測，沒記錯的話DAVE只「適合」最高PCM 768Khz

@willykhen9632 11 месяцев назад

個人喜好 tam > dave > may , 草爸選的曲很棒

@tomwang7937 Год назад

哎呀草爸怎麼看Denafrips 終結者 plus 跟 holo 的差異呢? 希望有機會可以加入Mytek manhattan 2

@adamos9879 4 месяца назад

Beautiful system. Must sound absolutely superb. Looks like a very comfortable room to relax and listen to music. Please excuse me. Wish I could speak / understand Mandarin.

@warmbench Год назад

Nice DAC line up, would be great if someone could give short summary of his oppinion on each of them.

@oliivioljy9700 6 месяцев назад

As a hi-fi enthusiast, I would say that holoaudio has the most accurate resolution and is therefore also the most authentic sounding. Mola Mola comes second and is slightly darker, but the tonal balance is beautiful. Chord Dave is more fuzzy and it blurs the sound a bit, at least in these samples. Of course, if the music changes to more airy pop music and rock music, then chord can be the best. Loud youth music or a young woman's voice recorded in a room doesn't really say anything about DAC. There must be significantly more rhythm and tempo in the movement so that the differences in the dac become clearer.

@wesleyho1967 12 дней назад

綜合來說，Dave最好（尤其是古典音樂，好太多）, MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI第二，May第三。

@Lethian101 Год назад

內容很棒！🎉期待將來會有一期MSB premier VS Playback MPD-8

@911turbojk Год назад

真的拜託! 快來一集, MPD8 VS HORIZON VS MSB

@labalo5 Год назад

I want a MU1 with Tambaqui vs MPD8

@911turbojk Год назад

@@labalo5 Same here ! I am sure he is going to get to it ! Full respect !

@HungryEatNow Год назад

Did you mix any of the tracks yourself?

@user-nn2sp8bw9i Год назад

Dave泛用性高

@User_not_found_403 10 месяцев назад

Subject to RU-vid compression and my system, but surprisingly I thought May > Dave > TAM. On my system, the TAM sounded a little sibilant. May slighted edged out Dave, had some strange open quality where the vocals popped out more than TAM and more of a an auro around them. Dave was very similar to May.

@chasehatton3691 Год назад

Listening to all 3 DACs, there is so little difference between them all. That speaks volumes in the favor of the Holo May. Judging in all criteria , they are all within 95% to 100% of each other.

@rustygates3367 Год назад

You'll never hear the true differences between the DACs, when its pushed through RU-vid and then re-rendered on whatever DAC you're using (and the same DAC for all comparisons). All that information is lost.

@user-nf4ob5rq4o Год назад

Tam聲音最自然最好聽。Dave比較猛有數嗎味還不錯。May聲音比較乾和柴感覺不如Denafrips.

@minatoaqutansaiko 9 месяцев назад

請問我應該怎麼改?預算萬元內大學生租屋處房東不確定給不給改壁插，現在的無接地孔。目前是電腦線和充電線和一體機共用一個延長線(占掉四個孔) 。hd660s2耳機>一體機violectric v226>電腦(用串流) 還是有其他能夠獨立作業的耳機訊源接地工程方法?

@guillaume95870 5 месяцев назад

Tambaqui pour moi et de loin ! Plus naturel avec un meilleur respect de la taille des instruments, pas de voile entre l’auditeur et la musique, la présence dans la pièce est bien meilleure et rend l’écoute plus direct comme si on y était. Plus dynamique aussi, plus d’intention dans le jeu.

@hungyatsing3600 Месяц назад

感覺最差是Dave May 的聲音保守耐聽，但對於樂器有要求會覺得不足， mola mola 通透細緻，穿透力強但有些位置覺得有些尖

@verbatim_transfer Год назад

i’m very surprised by this comparison. i was hoping the May would provide the most organic natural sound. however, they all sound fairly similar. they’re detailed and squeaky clean but in an artificial way. they sound sterile. granted a youtube video won’t convey the sound to the fullest, but even thru youtube i’ve heard some great sounding systems. there’s a clear difference between those and this. it’s all preference in the end, and all three of these DACs have plenty of happy users. 😎

@oliivioljy9700 6 месяцев назад

@saltyolive_ 4 месяца назад

use headphones

@johnchan182 Год назад

hi . got try rockna...

@asegal4677 Год назад

Tambaqui wins on dynamics for sure.

@Muchangi.K Год назад

Hello please enable auto captions on your channel

@megadoodoo5088 Год назад

價差超過3倍a… 梅那個價格還有其他水平相若的選擇嗎？

@QQ-td9id 7 месяцев назад

Denafrips Terminator Plus

@JezJerzy22 Год назад

Dave sounds a little bit harsh on violin recording (Track 3) ;/

@labalo5 Год назад

Thanks for this vid! What about a MU1/Tambaqui vs MPD-8? And then just dac only comparison? I have a tambaqui on delivery in a couple days. Pairing it with a Grimm MU1. English subtitles would be great. 👍🏼 Btw that tambaqui sounds so alive.

@asegal4677 Год назад

How are you liking the Tambaqui now that you've had it for a while?

@labalo5 Год назад

@@asegal4677 it continues to provide beautiful music to my ears. If you have the means to do so, I do highly recommend putting a MU1 in front of it or any dac for that matter. The beauty in the Tambaqui is truly realized with the MU1

@asegal4677 Год назад

@@labalo5 Thanks! Yes, I have heard that several times. Curious, how (if at all) are you handling CDs in your system? Are you just ripping them to the MU1 or do you have a transport?

@labalo5 Год назад

@@asegal4677 I’m ripping cds and the SQ is just as good. My SPDIF input on the MU1 is taken up by my tv out and let me tell you, I’ve never heard movies or tv programming sound so good in terms of full bodied-ness, impact and clarity. I’ve downsized and sold off my home theater components. I have a shared space…but the added qualities of reduced jitter is quite impressive passing through the MU1, and then allowing the amazing Tambaqui to process it with ease is pure joy.

@colorlifeStyle 3 месяца назад

个人感觉CHORD DAVE最好

@asegal4677 Год назад

Dave sounded harsh.

@johnchan182 Год назад

holo .. kind of having low high..molo kind of high vocal and fast .. than dave.. high vocal and balanced

@mancap6426 Год назад

手機聆聽 Tam... 比較拆聲，尖 , 動態大，爽快 Holo...小提琴柔，鋼琴啞聲，沉悶 Dave...在上二者之間，琴聲柔和閱耳

@vidocq1961 2 месяца назад

1) MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI..............! 2) HOLO MAY KTE... 3) CHORD DAVE...

@user-nf4ob5rq4o Год назад

不知道為什麼R2R的聲音好像沒有尾音。。。

@labalo5 Год назад

I agree.

@jerry913007 Год назад

@天线宝宝 6:23

@squallnine Год назад

@user-gj4hc1wt3o 這抬需要RUN至少500HR 影片完全沒提到,看來是不知道

@ayc868 Год назад

Dave 不行,声音太硬, 人造声

@adisonho1697 5 месяцев назад

錄音不太理想

@134564524241 Год назад

中國的r2r細節層次都很差 denafrips和holo都一樣

@user-hs3hv3en5w 8 дней назад

台灣的更是一個像樣的dac沒有

@raybest999 Год назад

Holo may 聲音分離度差，很悶的聲音表現，TAMBAQUI, 很大氣開揚，有動態，有速度，

@changshu8972 Год назад

听过边上的蓝波地平线，这三台听都听不下了

@freelancer1499 Год назад

What's 蓝波地平线?

@chieng50 Год назад

@@freelancer1499lampizator dac

@freelancer1499 Год назад

@@chieng50 nice. which model did u compare with, Amber 4?

@user-us9tg4mf2f Год назад

I didn’t really like the sound of any of these. Could be the recording. They are all too polite and dull sounding. Suppressed dynamics? Dave sounded best but it was still dull.