I always thought it was a terrible shame that so many Korean nobles were against 이순신 during his life. I was very happy to see the statue in Seoul and know he is now honored. May South Koreans remember and not fight each other.
이순신의 전기는 실화를 기반한 사실이지만, 제갈량의 얘기는 문학적인 창작이 대부분입니다. 다만, 그가 저술한 '출사표'가 출중하여 오히려 충성스런 문학자로서는 존경받아 마땅하나 엄밀히 정사의 업적과 연의(창작물, 사극)의 픽션을 비교한다면 가히 그 위대함은 비할 바가 전혀 아니죠!
이 영화를 보고 느낀점: 아무리 단 한번의 패배가 없었어도 일본군을 상대하면서 고민을 많이 하고 힘들어 했던 이순신을 보았음. 일본군을 쉬운 적으로 보지 않았고 또한 얕보지 않은 모습도 보았음. 또한 만일 칠천량 해전이 영화로 나온다면 우리는 그 영화를 보면서 무슨 생각을 할까...?
그반대였죠 학인진은 이미 널리 알려진 전술중에 하나인데 이순신은 뜬금없이 바다에서 깨질게 당연한 학인진을 피고 있으니 일본의 수군들도 그냥 바보로 알고 더 얕잡아보며 들어왔죠.일본군이 신개념 전술을 봐서 놀란게 아니라 쓸데없는 상황에 불리한 전술이나 다름없는 학인진을 바다에서 피고 있으니 놀란것입니다. 물론 결과는 판옥선의 이점과 거북선의 배치로 막아낸것이 진짜 전략이였죠.
As historical accounts has shown...Korean technology and innovations are always on par with stronger and larger militaries anywhere in the world. I hope the Philippines will always patron and join hands in friendship and cooperation with Korea.
This movie is so good, normally I don’t like watching historical war film but I cry, yelled and holler in happiness when Admiral Yi won. It was such an emotional roller coaster and I cry so hard seeing the first film too. This is so good, Admiral Yi is truly a great historical hero that transcends beyond what is brave and loyalty and love for a country is about. Love love this movie!
formidable film, je l'ai déjà vu trois fois, j'attends avec impatience le troisième volet de l'histoire de ce formidable amiral et de ce peuple si digne, on peut souligner aussi que Joséon aura fabriqué le premier cuirasser et non nous, la France 훌륭한 영화, 벌써 세 번 봤어요, 이 위대한 장군과 이 가치 있는 사람들의 이야기의 세 번째 부분을 기대하고 있습니다. 또한 우리가 아닌 조선이 최초의 전함을 만들었을 것이라는 점을 지적할 수 있습니다, 프랑스
@@user-dc3tk6jh4w 참나~ 삼나무가 소나무보다 강도가 높다는 말은 처음 들어보네 .ㅋㅋ 이렇게 까지 날조라도 해야 ..정신 승리인가 ...ㅋㅋㅋ일반 목재 가구에서도 편백보다 약하고 잘 짜게지는 습성이 삼나무인대 ..;;....이렇게라도 ..날조 하고 싶은지 ..???
목재의 강도는 조선쪽이 더 강했던게 사실임. 실제로 실록에도 왜적들이 전라도에서 목재를 구해서 배를 만든다는 기록이 있음. 다만 영화처럼 들이받아서 부수는 전술은 없었음. 한반도 전통 목선은 용골이 없어서 충격에 강한 구조가 아니었고, 애초에 목선으로 적선을 부수려고 들이받으면 들이받는 쪽도 같이 부서져버림. 현대 철선도 체급 비슷한 배랑 충돌하면 대형사고가 터짐. 이순신이 당파라는 용어를 기록하긴 했는데 뒤에 대포로 적의 배를 깨부쉈다는 설명이 있음. 영화마냥 들이받는건 완전한 허구 ㅇㅇ.
도도 다카도라는 이순신의 첫 출전이었던 옥포해전 때를 시작으로 일본 수군 장수들 중에서도 제일 많이, 자주 뚜드려 맞은 장수였습니다. 영화 속 시점에서 신중론을 펼쳤다기보단 걍 자포자기인 거죠. '에휴, 망했네 망했어.....' 이런 느낌으로. 웃긴 건 정작 실제 역사에선 명량대첩 당시엔 제일 많이 당했던 도도 본인도 방심했으며 오히려 와키자카 딱 한 사람만이 신중론을 펼쳤다고 합니다
Очень интересно смотреть такие фильмы в которых физика сделана на манер Индийского кино)) Такие тяжёлые корабли шли по воде со скоростью не более 5 миль в час - это 10-11 км, немногим быстрее пешехода. А показывают так словно они летят по воде и врезаются с такой скоростью и силой, что другие корабли просто в щепки! А ведь это не парусники, а обычные весельные
Actually, this naval battle was a small-scale battle, and there was no major damage to both sides, so it was not a big event to make a movie. Certainly, Kurushima Michifusa, one of the KIA of the Japanese navy, is the only daimyo who was killed in the Imjin War, so it must be amazing...
Why do you think this battle was small-scale? In the real history of battle of Hansando, 55 Joseon warships incapacitated 59 out of 73 Japanese warships. What do you think is the standard for large-scale naval battle?
People are amazed by the technology of "turtle ships" until they realize that they were a product of the 1600s+. During this same period elsewhere in the globe there were already "ships of the line" that had unique hull designs that were practically impervious to the caliber of canon used by Koreans (mating thick and dissimilar woods to make them shatterproof), were capable of traversing blue waters safely (turtle ships were for calm waters near land only), and were firing three decks of guns, the lower of which were massively greater range and poundage (up to 48 pounders) than the turtle ships, and would have been able to sink them from great range. In fact, their naval technology was so much more advanced that when these ships reached Asia, only a handful were able to both open Japan to trade (the black ship) and cause the fall of a Chinese dynasty and create the "century of humiliation". When it comes to ships, Europeans are where its at, everyone else was practically in canoes. If you wanted to see a decisive victory, they should show the Spanish Armada show up on the horizon...
after all, the Chinese dynasty had a massive loss against Europe because their ship had no development from the past. Also, many soldiers and civilians were already addicted to the poppy drug (if I'm right). After all, countries in Asia didn't have much of a modernization in navy or other armies since 1700 or 1800. But one thing sure is that Lee Sun Sin was@@BoopSnoot a brilliant general.
@@hoonkil3060 China was actually ahead of the Japanese in technology overall too, which is why the turtle ship was so successful. Japan's ships were really just square sail shallow draft slow transport barges with buildings built on the deck, where they would hook onto and board enemy vessels and fight hand to hand, much like the Roman military from antiquity did to compensate for their worse ships than all the other naval powers. In fact, speaking of ancient ships, I wouldn't be surprised if an ancient Greek trireme formation wouldn't sink a Japanese fleet as they were far more maneuverable and with three times the rowers and their super slender shape could run circles around the Japanese ships. The turtle ship likewise was made to counter the Japanese bombard and board tactic by being designed solid and sealed (spikes I think were more for show) so you couldn't just jump on board to fight or reign down arrows, so not much strategy was involved you just went full speed and rammed the Japanese ships, and then fired smaller caliber canons at practically point blank range. I always wondered why an island nation like Japan never invested more into naval technology. My best guess is that there was just always too much infighting ON the island to worry about threats from outside the island.
@@BoopSnoot Chinese ships were not as advanced as they seemed, after the Ming dynasty's 1400 era ship travel, stopped and the Ming dynasty didn't find the importance of ship development since they would be fine on their own land. So that is the reason they built canals around the territory and after that, Ming's ship was abandoned and nearly broken. Also, the Japanese mainland, was united by Toyotomi Hideyoshi, and the mainland wasn't in very bad shape. That is the reason Japan tried to invade Korea since they looked so weak to them, however, Korea's king escaped from the capital and even though Japanese troops arrived at the capital, they couldn't surrender from the King. Overall, the Korean army was basically dead and in the Korean Peninsula, it was more of a fight between Japan and the Ming Dynasty. Also with ancient Greek trireme formation? They would be dead by guns and cannons even before they'd reach close enough. Although the ancient Greek trireme was highly manual and fast, you can't compare a gun with a sword in this era.
![이순신의 화살과 "거북선" 그리고 "바다 위의 성" 2160p60 [한산: 용의출현] [Hansan]](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
