tribal decks (ones that focus on creature types and support for those types) are fun and can be good but won't become relevant for another few sets, unless one really focuses on that idea. but heroes and brooms are up and coming. villains and princesses also have some support but it needs more like the others.
Nice deck! Heroes is one I've been testing too. The big difference for me is I went ward with Aurora over resist with Cogsworth. My thought was buffing against direct removal was more important than resist because of where the meta is with Ruby. That and I leaned more heavy into aggro
As an aggro strategy it's actually pretty decent. Phil gets you lore upon playing small Hero characters, and then questing with them (with or without Anna) gets additional Lore. The issue remains with Ruby (and that Phil doesn't come out until turn 4). You could look to make this more aggressive by including One Jump to get Phil out a turn early, but then you may be playing too situationally.
@@QuantumMercury That makes sense. Definitely seems like generating lore outside of questing is key against Ruby. My mid range Steel Sapphire can beat everything except Ruby consistently. And this is definitely better. Though question is, does an item centric build fair better in the current evolving meta?
@@XtremeAsFanatic I just tested this some more, on the play I won against Ruby Sapphire! If you're going for items with Hiram, you're probably better off just going for the traditional SS build. I would class this deck as an aggro deck, so you want to maximize your lore (which this deck list doesn't do, I've since updated it).
Just finished the video, would love to see you test this further. I really just like the new 4 drop anna and want to see heros work the best way possible. Do you think other color combos would be better?
