Why is SEO Score for this video just 20? I use TubeBuddy to make my videos 100% SEO Score. And I still feel like I don't getting the right grow. I'm traing to learn every day so let me know is this 20% SEO score made by mistake/ by choice or/ by waiting for me to work for you guys :D
I agree! I think they should just go ahead and make it mandatory to disclose the use of any and all AI. Hopefully all the idiots who make deepfake videos which are unauthorized by the celebrity will get their asses sued. Maybe that will help 😐
I have submitted hundreds of cloned celebrity ads to RU-vid telling them these are AI produced and not endorsed by the celebs. It seems they have listened.
It's a bad policy honestly, but I believe justice will prevail at the end. Some large companies can use AI for anything, but they want to make it a lot harder for small channels. It is now hard enough to start and grow as a small channel (using a bit of Famester helps massively though), but this policy would make it a lot harder... And I don't like that.
I dont think yt will be any better with all these changes coming because now im starting to not wanna create on yt just thinking my hard work will be taken down if RU-vid doesn't agree with it Yeah i understand some videos are false clickbait and everyone hates that but some people actually work hard and it doesn't always work out so yeah i disagree with youtube this time
I see a bunch of videos that have been available and acceptable as art or opinion being removed due to "AI" reasons when it's mostly video editing of an opinion or a picture that someone disagrees with. I see (at least in the short term) RU-vid becoming a very dull, colorless, boring place to be. I see a lot of people going to Instagram, twitter, Patreon, twitch, discord, even back to Facebook (ugh). Of course, that's just my opinion.
What about for commentary videos using an ai voice or robot type voice? I want to make commentary videos but i am uncomfortable with my voice plus i want people to be able to understand but i have a speech impediment. Would i get in trouble? Also would i need to insert the disclaimer?
@peachxtaehyung Do you have a video using your actual voice? I'm not sure if you'll understand this but not only do I have no problem whatsoever with a person having a speech impediment, I find it to be very appealing. It's enchanting to be perfectly honest with you. This goes for anyone who reads this and has similar thoughts that people don't or won't like their voice.
@@professorfrink6831 i don't have any regular videos I don't think but I do have livestreams on my channel! It's not a super strong speech issue but sometimes I slur my words and have trouble getting words out if that makes sense
@@peachxtaehyung I just listened to a couple of your livestreams and hear what you're referring to. It's very easy for me to understand that what I'm hearing is a speech impediment and I think you should stick with your actual voice instead of using an artificial one. If you experience any haters of any kind, I think the non-haters within your community will stick up for you. You as a person are just as deserving to be heard, as your loving community.
Hello TubeBuddy, really well explained and understood the points..just had a doubt, will this new policy impact my channel monetization? 1k subs completed, but i havent hit 4k watch hours yet, and i'm into the Meme Niche where using ai tools is included...so could you guide me on the same? thankyou, it will be appreciated 👍
I think its always best to keep your footage real and pure, why use ai i can never understand. use your own footage its always best for you and your subscribers, so yes i totally agree with youtube.
I'm happy to see this. I don't want RU-vid to get overrun with low quality trashy AI content. I make all my videos from scratch myself with very limited or no use of AI. Just the most basic of AI built into plugins in Premiere Pro or After Effects. I don't use ChatGPT or Deepfakes or AI generated videos. Nothing beats real content. If AI can be beaten back, I think RU-vid will stay a fun platform to create on.
Wow am I going to have some work to do because my content is all basically ai created stuff... I disclose this in every video, I really hope that will be enough.
i really like how you sit on the ground for some reason lol, it makes me feel much closer like im listening to a friend and not some professional whos just trying to waste my time
Sounds like they are doing something, thats better than doing nothing at all. Such as the spamming of videos and phishing in the comments section and misleading Adds.
I'm glad this is happening tbh, AI is a blight in the creative sphere and should be pretty much either entirely disclosed in its use, or stamped out entirely.
That's what I'm confused about as well, 'cuz that's what it was originally supposed to be, but it sounds like they've expanded it to include "doctored" content, which is a really grey area. Though it sounds like basic audio and visual edits to footage that was shot with a camera, is fine.
We believe in RU-vid platform. And I am sure it is for the best of all the YT community. Yes with AI everything is possible. And these kinds of fake news and other sorts of similar contents with AI profits just one person(the creator of that content) but it may harm billions.
Thanks for this video. Although, I have a few questions: 1: Can I clone my own voice or not? 2: If I added some AI generated media (that isn't deep faking someone), is it concerning or not? 3: When to select yes and when to select no? (pretty confused)
What do u think, which one is better creating a new channel or uploading new videos by deleting old videos from old channel? Can someone recommend me what should I do?
Can you please answer my question?? Pls Has youtube also banned bluring ? I mean like if there is any sensetive thing like if I have a tech channel so like I am showing a hack or something like that and I want to blur like the phone details or like my account details so can I blur the information?❓
Same mentality as allowing the patriot act, sounds great at first but there's more negative with these rules then posisitve in the long run and most creators wont see it until its too late.
I've been using AI to help me learn how to make videos for my beats and cinematic instrumentals. Which I'd like to say I'm starting to get the hang of most of the basics. But I agree, because they have AI that can make music now... so whose to say I'll be out of business when people can just generate their own beats and film creators can generate full orchestral Soundtracks 🤷♂️ (my favorite to make)
AI can be helpful along the creative process, but for the moment no one knows precisely where should be the limits, so I think YT is right to put in place some restrictions on the AI use. Otherwise, could we end up with AI generated content for AI generated viewers?
I am fine with the label, but this is RU-vid, so it will be allowed to be abused by one group and not the other. Also, I am always iffy on youtube and censorship as they suck at it.
I think the requests of labels to remove content is too much. It will be abused a lot. Makes it even worse that creations for a single artist can be spread out to multiple record labels. The word "STYLE" is especially alarming. No one should be allowed to own style.
There is a lot of scam about how much money they made in their faceless channel. And how you can view their video and make a faceless channel. It's a scam you will not make money, it takes time and automation is a scam. There is also the rise of youtube guru's who will guide you to grow your channel which is helpful but annoying overtime.
scammer youtube must block,also if you use your video with famous people and their voice have copyright,but if you do ai art generated is okay-......nothing problem
I questioned this because doing the rounds right now one of this ads is asking viewers to make financial gain. I blocked this ad. Thanks for your reply.@@TubeBuddy
I clean up my audio with AI. It makes a massive difference. However if I had to put a disclaimer out saying I used AI then my other channel will lose all credibility and will drive viewers away. However by the sounds of it, I would need to disclose this or I might risk getting my account closed.
So now musicians/artists can request the removal of music that "sounds like them?" Isn't that wildly subjective? Like... I don't see THAT getting misused by the copyright claim/strike/DMCA takedown system and big record labels, nah... 🙄
I can't find any information as to whether this applies to OLD videos or only videos that were uploaded AFTER this policy? Some channels have hundreds even thousands of videos. They also didn't really explain how they're going to enforce this. Like the consequences if you don't check either box. They also weren't very clear as to what kind of edits count as "synthetic"
There is a massive miconception that you can write prompts and everything is done for you! No, you can spend 2 weeks producing one RU-vid video lasting 10 minutes with ai. You still have to research your data/information, write your script, produce images, put in prompts, edit everything, sych everything together. The lazy a.i is just copying and pasting other people's work, and getting ChaptGPT to change thing for you, but honesty, that is what normal content creators do, copy each others work, and that is the advise.
ok, this is just for videos that have had AI use to generate said videos? Does this apply if I've been manually editing the videos with my own voice for voice overs, with no altered footage when making reviews? Can I disclose "no" in the options in my library on studio dashboard, if that's the case?
That's the way to be. I've tried it out as part of proofreading or a second opinion. I don't know why people want it to cook stuff up from scratch when it's barely capable as a Grammer checker.
Wading through worthless content to find worthwhile videos has always been a problem. Now that AI can produce worthless content at lightning speed, it will only get worse. As a threat, this is as big as deepfakes.
Also, RU-vid needs to put a stop to these gossip channels. Talking about Preachers. Even talking about the ones that have died. Its need to stop freedom of speech is ok but a lot of RU-vidrs have taken it too far
What if the topic of my video is about decussating the challenges of AI in video creation?? And because of that, I need to use some footage created by AI.
