Closer to the origin. Chris Voss checking out. Legit. Been the real deal for awhile, still looking for the interview where he's thinking, instead of thinking what to think. I'm running now.
@@izzojoseph2 You should *change the idea of memorizing for associating*. Not focusing on remembering like you read them but understanding: reading more about a topic will make you have better retention because you associate better the concepts. Instead of just reading, try to understand the line of thought that the person had when writing that, like right now, you don't just read, try to understand were I'm coming from and what I could be thinking while writing it. Once you get that, you will be able to read faster by paying attention to the logic of the author's argument and not the individual words. Right now I'm writing a big paragraph just to communicate a couple simple ideas, if you get them, you don't have to focus much on the other words.
@@izzojoseph2 Let me give you a very long example: >"Men suicide 3 times more than Women. Women attempt suicide 3 times more". That data seems weird if we don't understand WHY. It's easy to forget it or to fill the gaps with our own reasoning. If you add more data, suddenly the associations between different statistics/theories/concepts becomes clear: >Men are more likely to use methods with higher lethality (% success), more violent due to diferences in personality traits (biological) and less likely to ask for help. The more information you read about it, the more it makes sense (or not!) with the information that you have. It's like a tree that has many branches connected. I remember those stats because they make sense. > Suicide in cops is higher than in normal population even if psychological tests are required in order to enter the force. Many people say it's the job that causes stress and suicidality, however when we see at the statistics the suicide attempts are LOWER than the average population. The reason there are more ACTUAL suicides is because >A gun is impulsive (no ritual needed) "painless" (1 second dead) and 99% lethality. So, people in other jobs or areas could attempt suicide but they don't have acess to high lethalithy, require more preparation (hanging) that gives time for the visualization of suicide or are too complicated to figure out. The idea is that the more you read about a topic, the new information adds up to that small tree, and it grows with more branches and complexity, so when you need to add new information the foundation is already there. It's easy to forget the first statistic because it's complicated and confusing, however if you go deeper then it connects with multiple concepts, and it's easier to remember because remembering one of them brings ALL of them together, the ENTIRE TREE. I could talk about suicide statistics from memory all day, because when I recall something then the other branches of the tree appear in my mind as well. Hope it helped, see ya!
Would you say you've been successful every time at talking anyone into anything? Just curious. If you haven't, why would say you failed? Your title is a tall order, perhaps a bit pompous?
