Finally, finally, finally. For years I've been trying to find a good series of logic lectures on RU-vid. I must've typed the right metatag this time...Glad I did. Thanks for the creation. Through your contribution, we all benefit and in turn will be able to contribute and spread knowledge to others.
Thanks for this course! It's been a while since I've been out of school and it's nice to get a refresher course without rereading the whole book! Cheers.
Thanks for this lecture, Dr. Campbell! You mentioned you were a sociologist--I'm curious if you have any practical examples of applying modal logic in this field that you could share.
It's true that a lot of people get hung up on notation. Which is a shame, not only because there is much to be learned, but because the symbols arranged semantically are quite beautiful. I can see that I'm going to enjoy this series. You're subbed. Also, anyone wanting an intro book with a decent problem set should check out Rod Girle's "Modal Logic and Philosophy"
Most of the symbols that you use are pretty conventional throughout philosophy and mathematics, with perhaps the exception of the dot symbol (conjunction is usually denoted with a ^)
Under 22 USC § 2451 Congressional statement of purpose; 22 USC § 6411 Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom. When the philosophy of science is applied to religious groups and law. eg. UN Convention Organized Crime "structured groups", and Japan Subversive Activities Prevention Act, and or Muslim Brotherhood (Mujahideen) with African American civil rights (42 USC 1985). See Also, Peral, Judea. Causality: Models Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press 2000. "epistemic".