PARTNER WITH US AS WE CREATE THESE RESOURCES FOR FREE AND IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES: www.thebibleeffect.com/partner-with-tbe/ FREE STUDY GUIDES: www.thebibleeffect.com/1timothy-study/ www.thebibleeffect.com/2timothy-study/ FOR MORE VIDEOS: ru-vid.com If you like our videos, please subscribe! * Like us & Follow us: Facebook: facebook.com/experiencethebibleeffect Instagram: instagram.com/thebibleeffect
This is a really great video, I thoroughly enjoyed it. I have a few questions though on information that I have never heard before and I’m hoping that you see this comment a year later and answer them for me. 3:27 You said Paul was imprisoned for being falsely accused of bringing a gentile into the temple. Can you please share with me how you know this, and also was Timothy who they thought was a gentile, but was actually a Jew? Seeing as you mentioned Timothy was uncircumcised I was curious if Timothy was actually the reason Paul was falsely accused of that crime. Do you have a list of sources or references that gave you any additional information about Timothy such as him being mixed and details about his family that isn’t in the Bible? I’m working on a project and this information would be really helpful. Thank you!💛
Thank you Caitlyn. And we love getting inquisitive questions like yours. Regarding the accusation against Paul, for bringing in Gentile into the temple, you can find that in Acts 21:27-29. The Gentile that they accused Paul of bringing in was named Trophimus from Ephesus, however Paul was innocent of that as Trophimus was only in the city and did not enter the temple. As for extra information about Timothy, we only really know what the Bible tells us. However, Eusebius writes about 250 years later that Timothy became the bishop of the church in Ephesus (that is found in Eusebius' work, Ecclesiastical History, Book 3, ch. 4, v. 6). Of course there is no way to verify Eusebius' claims, but as he is using earlier sources available to him, there is a good possibility that it his claim is true. I hope that helps. Blessings as you study!
No matter how well spoken, well connected to Yeshua and the gospel, we are all equals. Only the messiah is the great one aka “Rabbi” and his disciples must remain humble and not in any hierarchy like the pagan churches have and practice
This is a great resource for our Bible study, but I would be careful about giving Timothy's background in detail as truth. We don't know why he was timid, we don't know what if he felt growing up in Lystra. I like your suppositions, but be sure to SAY they are suppositions. "It's possible that..." or "It could be..."
Thank you for your comment! In our background videos we strive for accuracy, and seek to provide information that will help the books come alive in ways that they didn't before. We do try to minimize areas of interpretation, however at times we will take some small interpretive steps to fill in some gaps. We are always seeking to improve, and love to hear feedback like you provided. Thank you and blessings to you!
Great video! I love that you focus on Paul and Timothy relationship. Is it possible for you to do an extended/ more in-depth video on the letters itself, what was going on historically and culturally? Thanks
Thank you for your kind words. This is a great request, and we would love to go more in depth into the content books, but at this time we are focused on creating historical background videos like these for each book of the Bible. We do hope that they can serve people to gain a deeper understanding of the Bible when they read it. But of course, if you have any questions regarding 1 Timothy or 2 Timothy, feel free to ask and we'll try to help you. Blessings!
You will find a lot of what you are looking for in the writings of the Early Church Fathers. They are amazing, and you will really see how biblical history unfolds.
Thank you Zach! We try to use a style that is specific for each video, and one that we feels reflects the content. If this one wasn't your favorite style, then hopefully you will enjoy the illustration and animation style of our other videos. Blessings!
We would love to add Hindi to the languages we offer. Until now however, we have not yet been able to create the necessary partnerships to make that happen. Please pray with us that God opens a door so we can offer these resources to the many Hindi speakers of the world.
Excelente recurso didáctico para acercarnos a la palabra de manera correcta, espero ver este video y muchos más en español. Saludos, continuen adelante!!
We believe that Bible content should be easily accessible to people of all languages. We would LOVE to help provide resources in the Shona language. You can email us directly at admin@thebibleeffect.com. Blessings!
Thank you for your comment. In this video we made the creative decision that rather than mention his mother Eunice and grandmother Lois, we would show them discipling Timothy at a young age. In the video you can see them around the 1:57 mark. We definitely wanted to honor these two great women! Blessings!
I noticed that too, but maybe because he talks about his mom being Jewish and not his father and they included the artwork of women teaching him, that it was implied, but not explicitly stated. This would be additional information I personally would choose to include myself as a woman, but I don’t think that it was intentionally downplayed in the way they chose to do it.
Thank you for this simple and yet profound presentation of the Book(s) of Timothy. It seems to be the best oratory project I have listened and watched on the subject. I think it will make more good to viewers if the scriptural references of the narrator's submissions are flashed or tagged along the scenes; even if its with tiny fonts in form of footnotes. Thanks for this helpful work.
That is great to hear that you found the video helpful in your study of 1 & 2 Timothy. Thank you for the very high praise. Also, thank you for the suggestion about giving the references. That is something we will look into. In the meantime, are there any references that you would like specifically for this video? Blessings!
The scholarly consensus is that Paul did not write any of the Pastorals. In fact, they were all written just after the turn of the 2nd century CE, long after Paul was dead. Since you have erred in this most fundamental of ways, nothing that you say can be relied on or accepted as factual. Perhaps you should study more and preach less, at least until you have the knowledge needed to present the truth.
While there are a number of scholars who do not hold to a Pauline authorship for the Pastoral Epistles, it is far from a “scholarly consensus”. For the vast majority of church history there has been widespread agreement that Paul was the author of these letters. It was not until the early 19th century, that Schleiermacher proposed Paul not to be the author of 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, and Titus. This did gain some traction in certain scholarly circles, however there are many notable scholars who reject this idea, pointing out many problems with their argument. Respected scholars such as N. T. Wright and Michael F. Bird (The New Testament in its World, 2019), and Luke Timothy Johnson (The First and Second Letters to Timothy, 2021) both have written recently on the topic, and defend Pauline authorship. If you are interested to know more about the evidence for Pauline authorship, I suggest you seek out scholars such as these. I can assure you, that plenty of study of respected scholarship goes into each one of these videos. Blessings!
@@TheBibleEffect You mention the same 3 men ; you fail to mention that virtually no other actual textual scholar agrees. And you fail to answer any of the multitude of detailed analyses which conclusively show that these writings cannot have bene written by Paul. And citing the opinions from 200 years ago hardly adds credence to your position. At that time, there was virtually no effort in christian circles to do any serious scholarship regarding these writings. Moreover, the field of textual criticism was non-existent in the christian community at that time. In what other field would you cite the conclusions from "before the early 19th century?" Would you cite the consensus in biology, or physics, or even geology? If your best evidence is 3 outlier scholars and what the church believed more than 200 years ago, you have the weakest of cases. Perhaps you would engage with some of the actual conclusions of the massive majority of scholars, rather than trying to cite some authority or ancient history.
@@petercollins7730 In my previous response, I was not attempting to give an exhaustive list of modern day scholars who hold to Pauline authorship. I was merely addressing your claim that there was a “scholarly consensus” against Pauline authorship. While this is not the platform to address the extensive and scholarly debate about the evidence used both for and against Pauline authorship, I will gladly direct you to more scholars who have written and defended precisely this topic. The (very reputable) scholars that I mentioned are not “outliers”, but are part of a large (and seemingly growing) number of scholars who are supportive of Pauline authorship. You mention the “vast majority” of scholars supporting non-Pauline authorship. Yet, as Ben Witherington says in his commentary (see reference below): “First, however, we must ask a puzzling question: Why is it that the majority of Pauline scholars who have not done a detailed study of these documents or written a scholarly commentary on the Pastoral Epistles in the last fifty years think that these letters are post-Pauline, while the majority of scholars who have written such commentaries are either open to the possibility or are convinced that these letters do indeed go back to Paul in some form or fashion?” (Witherington, p. 58) Scholarly Works supporting Pauline Authorship: Barr, George K., Scalometry and the Pauline Epistles, 2004 Fee, Gordon D., Reflections on Church Order in the Pastoral Epistles…, 1985 Guthrie, Donald, The Pastoral Epistles in Tyndale NT Commentaries, 1990 Mounce, William D., The Pastoral Epistles in World Biblical Commentary, 2017 Padilla, Osvaldo, The Pastoral Epistles in Tyndale NT Commentaries, 2022 Pitts, Andrew W., Philosophical and Epistolary Contexts for Pauline Paraenesis in Paul and the Ancient Letter Form, 2010 Porter, Stanley E., The Pastoral Epistles: A Commentary on the Greek Text, 2023 Towner, Philip H., The Letters to Timothy and Titus in New International Commentary on the NT Series, 2006 Van Nes, Jermo, Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles: A Study of Linguistic Variation in the Corpus Paulinum, in Linguistic Biblical Studies, Vol 16, Witherington III, Ben, Letters and Homilies for Hellenized Christians, Vol 1, 2006
@@TheBibleEffectgreat video, and you are right, many modern scholars have pointed out the flawed assumptions of source, form, and redaction critical approaches to identifying authors of Biblical texts. Pauline authorship is pretty widely regarded these days.
@@TheBibleEffect Sorry, but the vast majority of scholars DO reject the claim of Pauline authorship. And these scholars HAVE DONE detailed analyses. You may list off some "very reputable" scholars, but that doesn't begin to count the number who oppose your view. There are plenty of "very reputable" (in the eyes of those who accept their claims) scientists who claim a Flat Earth, or a 6000 year old earth. They are, of course, in the tiny minority, but I can list at least as many of either as you list scholars. And when one has invested one's life and reputation in claims that Paul is the author, of course you are more likely to maintain that claim, despite the evidence. Why are there no scientists who study Young Earth Creation writing that it is not true? And again, you make claims of authority, without ever mentioning even the actual evidence against Pauline authorship. If you oppose the view of the majority of scholars, it si on you that the burden of proof falls. Consensus does not automatically mean correctness, but it does require more than "here's a few guys who disagree." Instead of listing names, why don't you make arguments and provide evidence?
