10 Most Expensive Transport Helicopters In The World 

no.

Correct......

Most expensive not most powerful or largest lol read the title

Nope the largest is the Mil Mi V-12 he’s right

Mr. Redemption at 6:16 it says second largest, which is correct (the largest is the Mil Mi V-12). did you watch the video?

Yes bro it's the real truth but when it lifted Chinook any videos

@Alfa Omega are you stupid the Mi-8 is really good

So, should it be on no. 1 in the list of "most expensive ..."?

@@piussetyo he just points out the statement@6:16.the narrator said it is 2nd largest helicopter.it is the largest MASS produced helicopter but 2nd largest helicopter EVER produced.the largest ever goes to v-12 which only 2 units were produced.i think many people are not aware of this.hence they complain about its size rank.it has nothing to do with its price.

Absolutely right👍

Me to

*most expensive race cars in the world number 10 Toyota Corolla

I was just thinking ALL of our helicopters are 2-4 times more expensive than Russia’s equivalents, alligator to Apache, super stallion to that airline lifting MI, 1/3 to 1/4th the cost of the closest helo on the Us military, care is nearly twice the soldiers , liftable weight is insanely more, I know our tech and sensors etc are greater on a lot of our helos but the alligator is nose to nose with the AH64 and a fraction of the cost with amazing tech. I dunno, I worry putting all our eggs in the sensor / fly by wire basket, we’re spending $130M per f35 and russia is cranking out the latest SU 4.5 gen aircraft that are amazing performers in large numbers . Minimizing our # of aircraft to have super tech replacements that rely 100% on sensors, AI computer flight systems , aircraft that can not be flown without the AI and these supercomputers aboard. Meanwhile Russians building a massive Airforce of amazing fighters that can take off, land , fly in any condition, can literally land with no gear on a snow flat , be jacked up lower the gear and take off again. Can be flown 100% without its computer systems when our f35 hits a bird it has to have service done that’s resicilusly expensive to maintain the stealth aspect. When they cancelled the SU-57 5th gen project after 10 amazing units, they dumped them money into cheap scramblers, jammers, EMP, Blocker tech, satellite destroying surface to air missiles, etc. when that SU30 flew over the US destroyer ost year with the new latest and insanely expensive missile defense system doing a routine low flyover that we do to each other with wings light , the defense system was armed jsut to track the aircraft for just testing obviously not going to fire on a weoponless SU and as it got close the turrets started to turn to acquire the target and then the entire system went dark. Even manually trying to operate the targeting screens were black, they tried to reset the system with the onboard Raytheon contractors and couldn’t after 3 tries and had to return to port for service where it sat for 3 1/2 weeks. Our most advanced destroyer /naval fleet protector /iron dome like system suppose to protect the fleet and Carrier especially went dark seconds before the Russian Sukhoi flies over with a second one circling observing??? The next day the Russian Air Force spokesperson “tweeted” yes tweeted that a new weapon system jamming device was successfully tested snouts a Sukhoi flying over a “western” destroyer visibly shutting down the missile rack turret nearly immidately. He said the jamming pod is relatively very inexpensive and is begging mass production for installation on aircraft, ships. Submarines, ground vehicles , hand held troop units and experimentation with small drone vehicles the fly and also others thst are underwater submersible drones small enough to not be detected that can maneuver relatively close to ships and jam systems. A single jammer pod on a 4th gen fighter jet shuts spent he most advanced and expensive new missile defense system responsible for the naval fleet protection??????? Had that been an Act of war with a wings light aircraft buzzing and jamming the system , then some long range ship destroying missiles fired from land or multiple incoming jets, the fleet would have suffered crazy losses. With hacking tech scrambling emps I’m legitimately worried about where were going. ALL new military aircraft and fighting vehicles to be fly by wire and unman capable by 2025 is taking out all our vehicles that can operate without tech, the A10 winding down, the F16, F15 and 18 4th gen aircraft , helicopters , everything that can fly regardless of some jamming pod being retired . I don’t understand why when we already HAVE ALL of the airframes and vehicles why we don’t keep half in service with the new stuff. The A10 JUST was upgraded massively with the latest sensors , more armor, range and power with new weapon systems and they’ll be retired soon? The cheapest aircraft to maintain , most reliable , a tank on the sky built to sustain heavy damage and continue fight and recently hugely updated and hell , let’s scrap em! At the very least I wish we’d not retire the super hornets , F16’s A10’s etc and move them stateside with the national guard. Im The event of an invasion or a war when EMP and jammer tech renders our new stuff useless or our satellites are all blown out of the sky at least we’d have still have the second largest Air Force when losing all our new vehicles. I hate that this multi sensor system plan was responsible for the the Marines announcing the use of the main battle tank (Abrams) jsut upgraded latest block and now an entire branch eliminating it banking on laser guided weapons that may not operate of some EMP tech works? Clearly our department of defense and congress has weighed this possibility and maybe they have some combative measures or something but if there’s one thing we know. Russia and China are genius hacker nations . I also worry about unmanned attack helicopters, fighter jets fighter jet drones. Predator drones operating on AI, could get us in a world war quick if an AI Attack drone decides a SU-27 comming to push it out is dangerous and fires on it. I’ve figured our military is prepared for all this BUT that destroyers defense system was the biggest example of what I fear and fives me NO confidence that were ready for a full fly by wire combat arsenal. Unmanned smaller electric tanks, etc, if we can’t protect a naval fleet with the most expensive and advanced defense system we’ve ever employed against a single fighter with a jammer pod, how the hell are we going to fend against this stuff in drone vehicles? Anyone with knowledge about it I’d love to have my mind set at ease but it’s really concerning.

The Architect does this take you an hour to type?

@@patriotic5698 lol

@@MZ-bl6wg the political spent 🤑

Maintenance and service costs quickly exceed the purchase price of the equipment. After five or ten years, it turns out how much which helicopter costs and what it is worth. Exactly the same situation as with Russian and Western tanks. As a result, Western higher abilities, newer technologies, quality of production or simplicity and quality of use are obtained for free.

Well I could write out the US and the latest block Abrams from that one. The US Marines announced they are ACTUALLY DISCONTINUING USE OF THE MBT MAIN BATTLE TANK COMPLETELY! As in no more used , the Abrams Marine main battle tanks will no longer be used in the Marines and the US Army is cutting their tank battalions in half as well and Artillary being cut way down along with fight force size????? We HAVE ALL OUR ABRAMS TANKS AND CREWS ALREADY WITH A RECENT BLOCK UPDATE, WHY DISCONTINUE USE??? I could understand if we were talking about purchasing all new tank battalions and putting cost elsewhere but we have them already and the trained men, I think it’s SO damn assenine the Marines and Army are doing this banking on laser guided missiles. If Russia ever invaded the US or moved west in an invasion of Europe they have the largest number of MBTs in the world, so we well cut our numbers down by 4/5ths!!???? Which would make our battalions useless and so outnumbered we’d be no help to NATO. Every big military is developing the latest new MBT’s and we’re retiring entire branch battalions??? I don’t get it. Maybe I’m wrong and if in that event the F35 targets it’s 16 tanks and fires all with multi sensor battlefield guidance and take out all 16 but we have no proof this concept we are banking on is going to dominate a massively armed military power like Russia. The first time in history a military is leaving conventional battle /combat vehicles and airframes in large numbers to go to crazy expensive super high tech AI functioning drive by wire vehicles in much smaller numbers and 5 times the cost. In the event of a superpower war with Russia or a China or both, The US will either dominate the war with never before seen success OR russia and China’s development of EMP , jammers, scramblers , blockers , satelite destroying missiles , hypersonic missiles will eff up electronic sensor signals , data, onboard AI computers and all our super tech will fall out of the sky and with no mechanical conventional equipment and smaller military force , we would be rolled over so easily in that event. Scary stuff. But back to your request, the Abrams would be on that list at the top along with Russian MBTs but we will officially be out of the Main Battle Tank game. The only military superpower to be eliminating it in a world where then next threat is a Russian and maybe Chinese invasion or much more likely , one of our or NATOs super advanced AI drones or AI flying F35 decides to launch all 16 missiles at 16 targets its picked or the number of a nuclear weapons int the world that terrorist organizations want to use to start war between the superpowers, or crazy North Korean Lim Jung Un or Iranian President decides to launch a massive nuclear strike against the US or nato. These leaders can solely order a full launch and they could easily be crazy enough to suicide it, we see this all the time with Isis. Say Kim Jung Un gets Cancer and dying a miserable death and decides hey I’m A God, so I’m ordering the mass launch of all our Nukes and suiciding the world since I can’t be here. I truly thing that’s the one of her largest possibilities of how the next world war will begin. Although if that happened and he mass launches all of their Intercontinental Nukes at Japan, Sourh Korea, the US Nato allies, the world is over, literally , even if we don’t launch a single retaliatory nuke. North Korea and Iran both have enough nuclear missiles to end the world. Fulll nuclear winter and spread of mass radiation with the trade winds and atmosphere to the entire planet refuting Earth uninhabitable a a couple million years and killing all life on earth. mr. Tesla and a few will get up to the space station with supplies to live our life , US governent leaders will go to the Colorado Nuclear fallout bunker and live our life there while we all die miserable painful deaths . We ought to be focusing on hypersonic missiles that will take out intercontinental Nukes in the atmosphere instead of all the Bs were focusing on.

Mi-8 be like

"including NATO countries": that's true but keep in mind that these countries got the Mi-8 when they were members of the Warsaw pact, not the other way around ...

Pls top 10 best military medic truck.

Like the Hueys and Cobras.

And the old Sea Knight, too.

"MiG" means Mikoyan Gurevich.

Thanks for the education, I didn’t know that. 🙂👍👍

in danish mig means me lol

In Russia Mi-17 doesnt exist :) Only Mi-8 variants.

He said it is second largest.the largest ever is mi v-12.only 2 units were ever produced.

Lol, I watched a video by GQ today where a sniper critiqued movie sniper scenes , ir was 18 minutes and had 14 ads , I was cussing RU-vid out especially because they were the damn 20 second ads you can’t skip!

Mil v-12 is larger but not mass produced

@@plebulus I know

Yes he did, the first largest helicopter is Mil Mi V-12

Also said the second most powerful lifting but carries twice weight of the next closest? 88 geared up soldiers , able to lift a freakin airline jet and 1/3 the cost of the king stallion. What is more powerful than that one? Unless I’m missing something, or is it jsut not a military helo that is #1?

The Architect read the title

Or $80M ????? Good lord it’s resiculous!!!! US contractors building our military equipment are literally raping the American people and military massively overcharging our governent for everything they build. $6M for a single defense missile on a destroyer ???? $80M for a helicopter that lifts a fraction of the Russian king that hauls nearly twice the men and can transport a military cargo jet, all for $25M? Our $130M F35 a piece verses the latest Sukhoi fighter at $25M or even the concealed SU-57 5th gen F35/f22 competitor that was extremely impressive at ONLY $42M US equivalent!?!?! It’s on par with the tech of the F22 and 35, faster, flies higher, all sheathed all condition jet that could land and take off in snow on makeshift runways, advanced thrust vectoring , stealth, I’m a Patriot and LOVE our military and equipment BUT if Russian contractors can build the contested larger more capable SU-57 5th gen F35 competition for nearly a $100M LESS A PIECE we are getting raped on the F35! Hell if India hadn’t pulled out of their 130 unit order of SU57’s Russia was procuring their entire SU57 squadrons off that deal and we would have been equally matched in the air . Our Allies buying F35’s wouldn’t have the advantage they do now. I think we should have scrapped the F35 and made a deal with Russia to order twice the number in SU57’s lol jj obviously the US involvement with India in breaking that deal was carefully deviously orchestrated to completely destroy Russia’s 5th gen program which we did and thereby leaving Russia with 10 total units and no money left in the program so they had to scrap it. A cheap shot by us but a smart one. Can u imagine how angry Putin must have been watching their entire massive wing of 5th gen fighters go up in flames with one broken deal that we aided in with a mysterious donation of some tech and funds which many think was the US strengthening relations with India , sharing some tech for the development of their own 5th gen fighter but most importantly canceling Russia’s entire program. Ouch. It was unrealistic which was why they were buying 130 SU57’s but then suddenly by deadline cancel the entire order and mysteriously have a few key tech pieces that made the 5th gen program randomly now doable when it wasn’t a realistic consideration prior. Many think the US shared some stealth tech , some AI supercomputer /sensor tech information they needed but all seem to say the information is definitely scaled back or information where the US has a back door to maintain a superior fighter. Who knows but your point of choosing the $24M over the triple cost US equivalent lol

lol, good catch

Rico Delos reyes not a transport helicopter

@@mallard3294 So, it's a plane ? It's a transport vertical lifter, even if he is in a another category.

Yeah it's 1st largest

Almost fell off my chair when he said that 😂😂😂

Technology and Russia is poor.

U have to look at the labor cost I'm the u.s, employees get 2-3 times more than Russians

Technically the mil V-12 is the largest but it never really saw production

I’ve gotta say I’m very impressed with Russia’s $25M MI that can lift so much more than the King Stalion or Chinook , transports 85 loaded soldiers and costs 1/3 the king stallion. 3 of these could bring in 250 men, a shitload more equipment or heavier combat vehicles , for the cost of one king stallion that lifts a fraction of one MI and carries 55. Russia knows how to stretch their dollar and take advantage of their personnel size, massive amounts of equipment etc. like the Amazing SU-57 5th gen fighter sadly canceled after 10 units, more capable in a number of ways that the F35 , all sheathed all comdtion 5th gen fighter that can take off and land even in snow and makeshift runways, faster, flies higher, more maneuverable, bigger payload and $42M per unit versed $90-130M per F35. I do t even think that it’s necessarily just Russia stretching the buck, Sukhoi is a Russian patriot company, they’d rather have the best military for their mother country possible and is willing to sacrifice massive profit to accomplish , maybe Russia has put some fear in their eyes too with persuasion to keep cost down but in the US, military contractors rape our governent and people. The big CEOs and chairman high ups make insane profits off the US and we jsut pay it and take the kick to the balls! It’s rediculous!!!! Companies like Raytheon make insane profits on single missile when Russia and China buy the equivalent for the smallest fraction of the cost. The SU57 is thought by many experts to be better Than the F35 in about every way and costs 1/3 of one so it’s 100% possible to build the F35 at a relative cost! Profiting SO largely off the American public and military for our own countries military equipment should not be tolerated! They could cut large amounts of cost down, stop fluffing numbers in the R&D program cost to keep our country safe. If these contractors would cut even 10% of their personal profits out we could add that much more equipment to our force.

This becomes untrue if you take into consideration the Mil W-12 (google it). This one was the largest helicopter of all times.

Maintenance and service costs quickly exceed the purchase price of the equipment. After five or ten years, it turns out how much which helicopter costs and what it is worth. Exactly the same situation as with Russian and Western tanks. As a result, Western higher abilities, newer technologies, quality of production or simplicity and quality of use are obtained for free. Huge helicopters are very inefficient, Russia is made to manufacture these due to a lack of proper airfields. Similar situation with huge off-road trucks. Russia has no roads to carry stuff so "impressive" off-road vehicles are a must not a wonder of engineering. It's in fact the lack of engineering in building roads.

B aja ,,itu juga gara² kurng perawatan & maintanance serta overhoule gara² anggaran cekak

Well, I don't think so sir. It's not that expensive.

It is no ranking by performance or weight, it is a ranking by price per unit. So the order is correct (if price information is correct).

It was retired in the UK although there are some that have been restored to flying status in Somerset. I used to love getting rides in the RAF Seakings.

Haters will be haters...uh60 got not: cargo ramp,efcs is nowhere close to the capability of nh90 and the lets say 10 troops that can be carried must be always on their knees inside the copter.Body is made of composite material which are better than sheet metal in corrosion if you treat them correctly.

1000kg = 1 Tonne

@@PrincipledNaturalLaw wow... you don't say... you completely missed the point.

@@hexagon624 Ah...ok.