When can we get parenthesis automatically included when we hit enter on an intellisense suggested method? Its been in resharper for years and years. And theres an open issue on github for years.
hello Tim Thank you for the tips I personally use two awesome features which is in Visual studio for some years number 1 Go to Tools, Options, Text Editor , C# , General , Statement Completion section , check the Auto list members And Parameter Information number 2 Text Editor, C#, Advanced, Inline Hint section , check the Display inline parameter name hints And Display inline type hints you will get a really rich client IDE and be informed about parameter names and types showing of by the parameters you are passing to a method, class , if call also when instantiating a class of the object
The "just whining" comment is annoying considering the history of responses from Microsoft on reports. Although there have definitely been good outcomes to submitting feedback for bugs, by and large that is where suggestions go to die and where bugs get a pardon. I cannot recall how many times in the past an actual, confirmed bug has been passed over just so it can be closed. Closing the report seems to be the priority rather than actually resolving it. It's because of those responses that I sparingly provide feedback. I've talked to plenty of other developers that feel the same.
I understand that. The problem is that the chances of getting something noticed and fixed when you don't tell Microsoft is zero. Submitting an issue gives you a greater chance of getting a resolution.
I have made my font sizes larger so they can be more easily read on smaller devices. The problem is that not everywhere in Visual Studio is able to handle larger font sizes. I have had an issue submitted to the team for a while and they have been tracking down these spots to fix them. Yes, it drives me nuts.
About the Search feature, I realize that in VS 2022 17.7 the Search behavior has just changed. Before, if we want to search for files, methods or types, we would start with f: m: or t: However, with new search skipping them will give more accurate outcome.
Thanks for the feedback about search in 17.7! We want to better understand what you're experiencing here. Could you explain more about what you mean by "skipping them will give more accurate outcome"? Are you getting the wrong results with the filter on, is the ordering of results different, or is there something else you're seeing?
@@visualstudio Yes it is true. For example, if I search "f: Something.cpp", in many cases Something.cpp is not the first outcome. But if I just search "Something.cpp" is the first outcome, which is better.
Not worth the money? I bet you never bought one of his courses. Wayyy superior what u see on udemy. Starts with how the courses are structured. Dont talk about stuff u have no knowledge about. Worth every penny.
Please for God's sake, use white background and black text. Be professional, it's very hard to read and follow your presentation! The purpose of "Dark Theme" It to be used when you work at night or in the dark room in order to ease the eyes, not in a world wide web presentation. Kids this days...
So, I've had this discussion with LOTS of people. There are people just as passionately on the other side of the argument. The value of the dark theme is that your monitor doesn't shine so brightly at you. It eases eye strain. For others, dark mode is harder on their eyes. At the end of the day, I can't satisfy both camps. As a result, I choose the one that seems to be the best choice for the most people.
Nothing professional about white backgrounds. It's a personal choice. Most of my colleages prefer dark theme. I used white backgrounds for 25 years. Now switching over due to vision issues. Takes a while to get used to it though but it's paying off.