11 Minutes of House Having ZERO Ethics | House M.D. 

Lmao he's too arrogant to ask forgiveness either

That would mean he asks for forgiveness

It's the Moltkian principle of 'A favourable situation will never be exploited if commanders wait for orders'.

Another person comes to mind who embodies this is the character Harvey Specter from Suits

Why ask for either tho?

House: "Aha! You yawned." Wilson: "Aha! You tried to kill me." I always busted out laughing for that one, specifically.

*jazz hands*

Jazz hands

In that same episode I believe he goes "Excuse me, I have to go kill someone"

Hey Wilson! I’m gonna cut some cripple’s eye out! Wanna come? Good times

He did, after the ketamine. At least for a while.

The ketamine was before this.

@@elizastill2824 Sorry, I don't have the timeline all that clear in my head. :) Is this also after the methadone episode? Those are the two times I remember House being without pain.

@@okopnik Yeah- this happens after he moves in with Wilson when he gets out of rehab! :)

So do I, but then I remember he is a jerk and forget about it 😂

He takes it to the extreme but he's right

Take the Newsroom tv show. He was well liked because he didn’t bother anyone. But as soon he started really telling the news, everyone hated him

A friend to everyone is a friend to no one.

Extreme, but accurate.

​@@mr.e1026damn. I'm saving that one to my mental files.

If only we had a Doctor House.

@@bikernumber7180 legitimately fantasize about that sometimes. Someone magically fixing my pain. Been two years and no luck so far. Still hoping and praying.

Same here 😭

I spent a year in pain from crps, this hit me. I wouldn’t wish chronic nerve pain on anyone. Hope you get some answers

My knees have been destroyed since 16, still begging for an MRI and they're trying to push physical therapy on me when even my first appointment, the therapist said she's worried about what cartilage I have left as well as a bad meniscal tear... but yea basic stretches that make me unable to walk sure will fix me.

it's in line of morally it's incorrect but this information is going to be a sacrifice and worth the pay off.

Sure, but if you put both patients on either one of the antibiotics, you actually get the same information without the ethical dilemma. If neither gets better, then you guessed wrong, if both do, you guessed right. Either way you give all future patients the drug that works. Now, if you had two patients and three possible infections - then the split trial would make sense, you don't want both to die and still not know which of the remaining drugs is correct - but I believe they were dealing with exactly 2 possible infections here, so they changed it from being 50/50 for both to live or die, to guaranteeing one would die and one would live, and creating a massive ethical problem in that they knew they were killing one child, just not which.

Trolly problem

@@diamondmx3076 No. Because there’s still random chance. Both COULD die despite receiving the CORRECT treatment, and if it were anybody with an immune system, one or both COULD survive despite receiving the WRONG treatment. If you do what house did, there are four results (death vs recovery times two patients) Both survive despite receiving different treatment - so unlikely it would qualify as a miracle. Speed might tell us something. Baby 1 dies and baby 2 lives, or the other way around: you can conclude that the survivor got the correct treatment and apply that to the new cases, the ones currently incubating. Both die - not the most likely outcome, but entirely possible. Doesn’t directly tell you correct treatment, but if they both declined, but one much slower than the other, you can guess that baby received the correct treatment. Furthermore, if we simplify the problem such that P(death|wrong) ≈ 1 and round P(death|correct) to 0 (though it could actually be 0.25 or something, but this makes it easier without changing which option is better). If you randomly take them both off 1 treatment, with equal odds, you have a 50% treatment of it being correct. If correct, both live; if wrong, both die. So the expected number of dead infants is the weighted average (in this case, equal to the regular average), 1. However, you can expect to end up with either 0 or 2 dead infants. If you give different treatments, then you can expect exactly 1 dead infant. So in the simplest version, it doesn’t matter, unless you prefer maximizing the odds of at least one surviving. However, there’s a small chance of death even with correct treatment, and furthermore, with different treatments, if one starts to get better while the other continues to decline, you can try to update treatment before death. PS: I’m studying both Computer Science and Mathematics, and am taking an AI course this semester, which goes into probability, so that’s fresh on my mind.

@@diamondmx3076 It's basically the difference between a 50/50 chance of saving or kiIIng both kids, vs a 100% chance of saving one and kiIIng the other. Well, technically it's not 100% but you get the point.

Personally I'm with House on that one. Either way they're condemning at least one of the kids by random chance, since they don't know and have no way to find out which treatment should work.

Totally agree, because they could have been condemning both kids to die if they went by chance. This wasn't unethical to me

Okay foreman what should we do ?

@@joegreen3809 in an ideal world you'd find some piece of the puzzle you missed and realize what the right answer is. Obviously we don't actually live in an ideal world, but sometimes it's nice to think "if I just consider this problem long enough I'll find the solution." That's what Foreman would rather do, even though it wouldn't actually help.

Someone should look up triage.

Honestly you can open those things with a plastic fork. Not hard.

Lock picking is a LOT easier than you think...

He clearly had practice, which does not surprise me at all

​@sarahp936 how does one open a filing cabinet with a plastic fork?🤔

@@morganrussman use one of the prongs of the fork to pick the lock. It’s surprisingly easy.

I mean it probably would work. He doesn’t know house, so as far as he knows it’s a guy who can barely walk who wants his cane back so he can go home. Most people don’t think a crippled old guy is going to have a burglary hobby, and nobody wants to be the dude who tells the cripple he has to walk out on his own.

Though realistically the janitor would follow the guy into the room to make sure he got his cane and left. House was in there for a lot longer than it takes to wobble to a cane and wobble back out.

"that lame line" Ouch.

@@bigboy2217 ok but how would a cripple leave his therapy appointment, go home, come back after hours all whole forgetting his essential cane

Are you gonna be the one to deny a crippled person their cane?

facts

One thing wrong with that comment, it isn't the best on American TV, its the best from global TV,

@Nick West What show is Louie? I don't know if I've ever heard of it! Always on the hunt for some good entertainment :)

But it should have ended after season 3 or 4

@@teribradshaw-milling3164 OMG I totally disagree! Season 6 was utter perfection. I wouldn't give that up for the anything!!

I know they were trying to thread a line for the edelstein exit but like, cuddy would have gotten over it. That’s just how the Princeton plainsboro gang do

​@@kgoofy3297Dude, I don't know about that. Has House ever done something on that level before? I actually don't know. He's always been snarky and smarmy, highly unprofessional and manipulative, but to have him drive a car straight through your house (possibly hurting or even killing someone inside) is a whole different thing. Whenever House gets physically violent, like when he punched Chase, you know something has gone seriously wrong.

@@Profile__1 Yeah, I don't mind dark humor. And the brush part was funny. But he could have killed Cuddy or Rachel. If it was just Cuddy, I think she would forgive him cause she was into his crazy. But the kid was a step too far. I stopped watching when this happened. The show lost its way when House got locked up.

@@LB-gz3ke. House later explained that he knew Rachel went to Cuddy’s mom’s house every Friday so he knew she wasn’t there and he saw the others leave the room. Season 8 was great. It was different but I loved it.

​@@kgoofy3297Cuddy would not have gotten over it lol. House had never done anything on that level to her or to anyone else before. It's conpletely sensible if she didn't feel safe around him or didn't want her kid around him again.

That must have been a few years ago.

@@bobbierobinson6269 It was in the lower half of the 00's. Not sure how well known phantom limb pains were at that time.

@@Gumbocinno or believed. Also it's extremely hard to get pain relief these days.

As far as I know this is actually a real treatment and can work just as well as shown in the scene here. The brain is a very weird thing!

My dad had his leg amputated above the knee (complications from lymphedema) and his physical therapist used mirror therapy to help him. It really does work.

Holly you should Watch a series called "Due South" from the 90s, excellent series & actor

@@YeahYeahOkOkWhatever I’ll have to look that up. Thx.

i knew i recognised the patient from somewhere it's the guy who played Ray Vecchio

i can guarantee you no one would ever react that way. they would press charges and as soon as criminal court is done they would hit up civil.

@@humpteedumptee8629 I believe he did press charges in the show.

Ironic, he could save others from pain... but not himself.

Not for lack of trying. He tried switching to Methadone from his usual pain pills, and that actually took away his pain, but he also lost his edge and couldn't diagnose people the way he used to when he was in pain. So he gave it up and chose to live in chronic pain instead of being a just above average doctor.

He also mocked others beliefs in God or a higher power while spending all 7 seasons soul searching for it himself.

​@@Figgy20000 Desire and logic conflicting is not an irregular thing.

The shoemaker’s children go barefoot.

I 100% agree, great way to payback someone because they were jealous of him.

My favourite part about the car scene is that he made Wilson get out of the car to make sure Wilson didn't get hurt (and then he still injured his wrist) but mainly the other bit

And the way he made Wilson get out of the car so he doesn't get hurt or in trouble proves how lucid he was while he decided to crash his car into her dining room 😭 i dont know why that's so funny to me.

It destroyed the show for me. I watched House from the start and this was the most bad way to end this show. Season eight wasn't as good the previous seasons. And in the end they even killed Wilson. Like I said... they destroyed it.

​@@florianmaschke269was that the last episode

That was the best crossover episode in cinematic history

Wait a second, how are you gonna play by the rules if you don’t have the rule….ooooh😮

House Roadhouse

@@Jefethefish That too

Pretty sure criminal activity is unethical

@@CrashSable 👍🏻

@@CrashSable Depends on the crime. Remember, commenters--if you see someone stealing food, no you didn't!

@@Minumer i only steal ps5s from walmart so i can sell them on ebay at a markup so i can feed myself. see? crime isn't unethical.

Why do you think house to fake his death because all the unethical things he did and he was going to prison and he knew it. But he wanted to spend those 5 months with Wilson before he passed away

Different patient. He woke up vegetative state guy.

Different coma guy, but I get your point.

That isn’t on here??? It’s the worst thing he’s ever done!!!

These reactions lol

Apart from the House thing, he went to prison for that.

@@tianqi5008 Yeah, but because he turned himself in after being a fugitive for three months.

He also didn’t have a lawyer…

@@610Hobbies that's how the magic of story-telling works. ;-)

he could have literally killed her

Nah dude. There's no "understanding" DRIVING INTO A BUILDING over your ex. Could've killed several people, gonna cost a fortune for somebody, made an incredibly big scene over something people go through every day. If this wasn't a TV show House would've been locked up within 3 hours.

@@narpster3174 to be fair, he was locked up. it just took them longer because they weren't very good at it.

@@narpster3174 There is "understanding" of anything and everything. Understanding doesn't mean agreeing with it, it's just empathy, figuring out the reason why something is/happens. I can be empathetic to someone who murdered their spouse because of marital problems, doesn't mean I agree it's the best course of action, it's just the action that took place and the reason given was the definitive answer to what caused the action to happen.

@@blindfire3167 Situational analysis and empathy are two different things. Yes you can understand that somebody overreacted, but that doesn't mean you can understand the overreaction itself. If you can empathize with something disproportionate then you probably don't see it as all that disproportionate, which becomes really scary in the example you put forth. The guy I responded to wasn't commenting on objective cause and effect. He was saying that he understood why House reacted the way he did, empathizing with him. I'm saying there is no empathizing with house, that his actions in this scene are inexcusable and insane.

Well, it did also get rid of the terrible phantom limb pain he'd been having for the past 36 years. But point taken.

Real

Bro he malpractices on nearly every episode

S4E1, House is on his own, Cuddy and WIlson are pressuring him into building a new team and he's trying to prove he doesn't need one. So he disguises the janitor as a doctor to act in front of the patients and have someone to talk to during differential. Which obviously fails.

That's every hospital if you have a weird symptoms

99% of medicine is figuring out why you're dying. Once they do, there's a pretty well documented procedure for what the best treatment options are, so all that's left is carrying it out without any dumb mistakes. Until they know what's wrong, they have no clue what to do other than make wild guesses to try and narrow it down.

11 Minutes of House Having ZERO Ethics | House M.D. 2041pm 25.7.23 i mean you'd be sat there as he was unethical and then you'd cry cos he'd freed you from the demon of the moor or the brain ache you suffered from... i'd be sitting there saying: drop the phoney accent you idiot i'm not one of those morons you usually deal with. and we aint recreating the mirror scene.... though that was probably a decent moment in the history of mirrors. p.s i have never seen the show. this is the first time i have seen house. i have no cable tv, y'see... another man's passion. i liked fry and laurie, though...

@@JJONNYREPP are you like, deep into the spectrum? Please don’t reply to things anymore for your own sake.

@@bigboy2217 He's merely saying how he'd have responded to the scene in question. All you're doing is telling him to no longer share his views and experiences, which is just rude.

This is pretty obvious. House M.D is a TV show where things go differently from our boring reality. It's a show with larger-than-life characters, and as a result, they're capable of doing things the average boring person wouldn't get away with.

@@cooldud7071 Comments on ‘11 Minutes of House Having ZERO Ethics | House M.D.’ the word: boring is key, here. most people are boring infused with it, with boring attributes... and yet they are applauded from pillar to post. the people of this region are all would-be gestapo agents intent on watching the ne'er do-well and reporting back... that's very boring. i should think spies are the most boring people on earth. what say you.... as for being "larger than life"... ummmm, i should imagine even that's boring. as is prowling round the home which is what someone is doing right now. maybe sell tickets and have them come and have a gawp round the home... "hello, mr spy, he'll say.... come on in take the tit of your head and have a wander..." though i do say the title of the most boring person on earth was a mr reggie skidmark of east ham who was liable to pour protein plus down the sink and into the water supply. which might have been a decent scenario for house. i never saw the sit-com house. it seemed like a realllly booooring show. and it was featured on sky tv... here's an interesting fact: when sky tv first began... all those council homes one used to rent had it piped in for free!! sky 1 was a free to air channel all those years ago. people like me, boring dole dossers, got to see the very first episodes of the simpsons - for free!!!! and that ghastly talent show which featured the amazing and not boring at all - which should excuse him from this chat: charlie chuck. who later went on to critical acclaim on vic and bob show.... along with his drum kit and plank. though granted those days were odd and even boring peole got laid, then. which lessened the need for drugs. cos it's a fact that boring people take drugs. a lot!!!! i'd go outside and check that yer underwear is still on the clothes horse...

Ikr. Their method is to take a 50-50 guess at saving both or killing both. His method is to take a 50-50 guess at saving either one. His method risks one life to save 3, theirs risk 2 to save 4.

"primium non nocere"

​@@mazatlan79Pexcept by taking a 50-50 guess on which one to take the kids off, Cameron and Foreman are at risk for harming 2 lives to hopefully save 2. House is instead risking 1 life to save the other. It's a tough choice but house's decision is better.

Seen him in a few shows and am always like "oh shnip, it's Ray Vecchio!"

Ikr? Time for my yearly rendition of “I know what’s wrong with this patient because I’ve seen this episode 592 times, but I’m gonna pretend like I don’t and just go with lupus!” 😁

@@katscratchfever3506 Or Sarcoidosis. Haha.

Even a ten-second glance into his personal life would reveal he is extremely egotistical, unethical, and mean-spirited.

@@KatherineXIX Again, most people assume that because they are looking through their own glasses and make assumptions. People who are egotistical, unethical, mean-spirited, don't work hard to save people's lives and make their lives better. Instead, they spend their time tearing down others, and destroying others, in order to make themselves look good. I'd actually find the rest of the staff, "mean-spirited" as you state, because their too busy covering their behinds from getting possibly sued, and there were numerous times that House actually stepped in and saved the person's life while the rest of the staff were too busy trying to save their own.

@@KatherineXIX If I'm dying, and no one else can figure it out, I'll take all his egotism and LIFE instead of sweet, comforting nothings coupled with death. Every single time. So would anyone else who is sane.

@@okopnik not arguing that, and so would I. But I sure as hell wouldn't want to be his friend.

@@KatherineXIX I can't think of anyone - other than a masochist like Wilson - who would. But one of the key premises of the show is that what is valued in *professional* competence can be in direct conflict with social skills; in fact, House's story about the old man in the Japanese hospital makes it explicit, as well as underscoring the fact that House *knows* his behavior is socially unacceptable. But note how much people love this show, years after it ended. Sure, there was good writing and character development in it - but there are a lot of shows like that these days, and few of them get this level of fandom. People love and respect the archetype: the man follows his own path at all costs and *wins* in spite of everything including social convention. That's the core, the common thread of the entire story arc. Everyone would prefer to have a world with House in it rather than one without.

It's still pretty unethical, but understandable to get the best outcome of the situation. Leaving it up to random chance on which baby will live and which baby will likely die isn't exactly going to warm the parent's hearts knowing their death wasn't in vein, it's still killing a random child at chance for a POTENTIAL cure.

Sometimes, there are no _good_ options. Just the one that's the least bad.

@@blindfire3167 you clearly don´t know what triage means then.

@Luis Jiménez I mean I do, but it's still illegal/unethical to keep that info from the patients and just have it decided by random chance rather than it be given the opportunity to be volunteered...which I get the parents would probably never do, or at least take too long, but the option should be given rather than just at random killing a baby

@@blindfire3167 They explain it to the families in the episode, I just happened to be rewatching that season recently. They would of course do that in a real hospital as well, although this hypothetical case is naturally going to be extremely rare in the real world --> no time to test multiple medications, multiple different patients infected with the same thing, at the same time, and that thing is totally unknown, but somehow we do know it will lead to death, and there are only a few possible medications that could work.

chase didnt let him die, chase killed the dictator by using someone elses blood to get a fake diagnoses of a disease he didnt have

Unethical or not, it was Chase; not House. The video's about House's unethical moments.

U can't just do nothing and not take the blame or the responsibility because by chosing one it means u comnded to kill one of them

Not a movie, but Hugh Laurie plays a pretty scary (and very charismatic) illegal arms dealer in The Night Manager.

@@Scarecrow545 I meant Hugh Laurie. I'll check out the night manager. Thanks. P.S. he started out as a comedian! A British comedian! He definitely needs to transition into movies. I think he would be a great anything! 😊

@@vannalikehannah6776 It's a 6-episode miniseries, should be able to bang it out in a weekend! Tom Hiddleston (Loki) is also in it. I've heard, haven't seen his comedic stuff though. I agree, he'd make a fantastic movie villain!

Considering all life on and from this Earth is going to die and go extinct anyway, do my gravity test? EXISTENTIAL PHYSICS: (Current Analysis): Regardless of how we exist, the future condenses down to a singular outcome: All life (real and artificial) eventually dies and goes extinct, at least those on and from this Earth. (Subject to revision as new information might dictate). WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS): GRAVITY: (copy and paste from my files): Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. This test can speak for itself. It will either be true, partly true, or not true at all. It will either show what gravity truly is, might be, or is not. Science still wins either way and moves forward. * And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................) But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions. ** Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be? So, are you feeling lucky? Doing nothing and at least the entire human species eventually dies and goes extinct with a high degree of certainty. Doing a gravity test, (mine and/or another's), and there is at least a slim chance of literally wiping out this entire Earth and all on it, and possibly more. Do you and other's truly want me to prove my TOE idea as being really true? But also: Questions: Are at least some black holes in this universe due to a species who were trying to discern what 'gravity' truly was, came up with a test to do so, were successful, but the black hole generated (to prove what gravity truly was) self fed itself and wiped them and at least their entire planet out? What species might have existed where a black hole now resides? (Since all of life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand of scheme of things anyway, do the gravity test and see what occurs?)

The team wanted to risk 2 kids to random chance, House only wanted to condemn 1. Seems logical to me.

As far as your sock puppet ID "WhyDoI NeedaName" Consider also this copy and paste from my files: LANGUAGE: (copy and paste from my files): Consider the following: Language, the very thing we utilize to think thoughts and convey ideas. Un-named Concepts -> Given a Name (could be a sound, symbol, etc) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names with the same meaning. (Basically a Dictionary and a Thesaurus for a language). BUT: a. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that we have all the un-named concepts that could ever be named? b. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that the meanings we give named concepts are 100% correct? We truly do not know what we do not know. This is a part of the 'Great Unknown'. Never stop learning. (Always have an 'unknown' in every analysis and an 'oops' in every experiment.) Of which, an entity or a society of entities: 1. Can name their own un-named concepts. 2. Can give their own meanings to named concepts. 3. Can have alternative meanings to named concepts depending upon context. 4. Can have alternative names with the same meaning. (Basically, create their own language that only they and they alone know). Learn to function in the 'Great Unknown'. (OSICA) * Without a name, you'd just be an un-named concept. What's more important, how exactly do you know 'you' even actually exist?

How about saving one of the kids from dying based on random chance? Still based on chance, but you can't always save everybody.

@@metal100k Nobody is ever 'saved', they are only delaying the inevitable. Can ANY entity on and from this Earth be 'saved' to exist literally throughout all of future eternity? Even if an entity were to exist literally throughout all of future eternity minus one day (figure of speech), they still wouldn't actually exist literally throughout all of future eternity.