14" M1 Pro MacBook vs RTX 3060 Razer Blade 14! 

That's what she said! LOLOL! That was hot shit man thanks for the easy killer.

Leave him, he is limited of space, check wall panels

did u happen to find it?

Pretty much, we need gaming laptops like apples.

Yeah, then the price is gonna be in the sky. No one will buy it except iSheep, there is a reason why I will prefer Alienware laptop to destroy the highest end Macbook Pro 16

It defeats the whole,point of a laprop

@@mechamicro Alienware laptops suck kid. You’re an idiot

@@mechamicro destroys it in what sense? Able to create more heat? The MacBook Pro 16 with M1 max configuration easily beats the Alienware if we’re talking on battery power.

@Aditya Wagh YES AND UPGRADABLE RAM finally

@Aditya Wagh I seen tests where 32 gb of ram performs the same as 16 in gaming. But thats just gaming

@@04dram04 at that price they charge we should at least be able to upgrade even if it comes stock as 16

If Razer Blade 14 came in white model I would buy it anyday, but doing so will hinder their MyBook sales, so they will never do that unless they scrap MyBook lineup which does worse than XPS/Macbook I think given the price/performance

@@axiosw0774 Same, but honestly the g14 2022 looks promising and it comes in two colors and I’m excited for that instead of the 14, unless there’s a white model and better anti touch print coating thinner bezels and upgradable ram, I’ll get it.

What comparison??? He just told you there was a comparison and that the cRapBook won! He never showed any comparison! For obvious reasons!

@@js0988???

Times haven't changed. Razer and Apple target largely different areas of expertise. Razer is a much more versatile product, it can edit videos and also game. The M1 Pro won the video editing tests solely because of the media accelerators inside. The MacBook is a productivity machine so it is optimized for that. Also, the CPU and GPU in the Razer are an year old.

@jo e don't be mean it's not nice

Sort of…but desktop components are usually higher TDP and easier to cool in a large case with large fans. But you’re right that laptop performance is good enough to use as your only PC these days, if you wanted to

You are correct. These Windows laptops are glorified desktops that need to be plugged in. I think MS makes the only ones that work well unplugged, but they drain battery way too quickly and cost more than the Apple equivalents.

@@77dris The 5900hx might be an 8-core Ryzen 9 but it’s still a laptop CPU with a TDP of 45W so you could beat it with an i5 11500k which is *only* a 6-core but because it’s a desktop CPU with a TDP of 125W it is faster in every category. Desktop and laptop hardware is not the same.

I know hardware wise theyre different, but thats the sacrifice people do for some portability. And with the cryptocraze currently happening its easier to find laptops with good gpus. Dunno, I bought mine because I didn't want to work on my desk all day, specially during lockdown, so I was pretty disappointed to find I have to be near a plug every time I wanted to take my laptop out of my desk. Not to mention its charger is enormous haha.

@@MakiNoAtorie I do the same tbf, I plug my laptop into kdm and have a decent desktop setup with it. Or go work on the couch. The new MacBooks do look pretty magical

Hi just out of interest what games fo you play on the m1? I wanna play rust, f1 manager etc would this be able to handle it?

I was wondering the same since the h264 scrubbing was so choppy. He specifically said he used Resolve Studio to unlock hardware acceleration. I assume he checked the box since he mentioned it. But he did not explicitly state that he turned on HW acceleration.

@@MoChuang343 yeah, I wanted to make sure bc I suppose even if you enable it in the editing process/ settings, Nvidia as rendered won't be the default still on the deliver page. So yeah, if you can answer it bro, would be nice.

It would smash the macbook if it used the gpu rendering. The mac probably uses the gpu and cpu since its both in the same chip.

​@@LtUpgradesPh Did you consider testing 4:2:0 material? Currently only M1 Macs support hardware decoding for 4:2:2 h264 and h265 whereas Nvidia, Intel and AMD only support 4:2:0 and 4:4:4. So dropped frames and slower speeds overall aren't really surprising.

Isn’t that not the same chip though?

man that sucks, live with no plug with the macbook

@@shzammpatapon9865 and no fps to

@@shzammpatapon9865 and no games, broken py libraries, few linux options, many missing productivity apps, etc

The 3070 is really nice on the razer it's what I'm using now. Only thing is fans can get little loud while gaming but not a bad thing cools it down if you use right settings and most the time you don't notice especially when using headphones.

@@bluedogviking are fans turning if you are watching series or just working ? Is the computer noisy

@@kevinalgur2738 Don't really hear ot qhole watching RU-vid and doing other low performance tasks.

Pure performance per doller, intel plus Nvidia wins right now. If you care about battery, low fan noise, and overall build quality, macbook pros are the best atm.

@@ricosrealm for gaming* For me the os is priceless. Working on a Mac makes me much productive and happy because clutter and bad design stresses me. I understand many don’t like the os though and it’s fine

@@ricosrealm only when plugged in, I need more mobility and performance while mobile. I have very high performance Intel/Nvidia laptops and off power they are junk. There are some exceptions as always but you would need to do a lot of research to get close while off of plug and the cost would be similar to the new Macs at that point. XPS 17 and high end Razers are a few that come to mind and the one exceptions for power at a great price is MSI but their laptops usually have major quality issues.

Not sure why they keep doing tomB raider when baldurs gate 3 is a true atm native app.

But aren't the rest of the windows market shifting to ARM? Which means that game devs would be probably support ARM but not MacOS entirely. idunoo :3

@@kentoyawazaki2625 The fact that Apple is switching to ARM doesn’t mean that the rest of the industry will start a switch. Until 2019, Intel thought ARM is low power and performance. Moreover Apple is almost 10 years ahead with RISC V architecture, so I think we won’t find a decent competitor for years. It would be quite easy to write optimized games for Apple Silicon, but I don’t think developers want for now.

Benchmarks are not useless because they're what we HAVE at the moment. Don't get me wrong, I'm as impressed with the M1 series of SoCs as anyone. But their specs are just like smartphone specs at this point. All that power and nothing to do with them. These new Mac machines are powerful and efficient, sure. But how many games are optimized for them? If you want to game NOW or even in the next 3 or 4 years, you'd have to be in denial if you think that any of Apple's machines are a better deal than the Windows machines in their price range. That games will be optimized for M1 series chips is not a foregone conclusion. It's still a huge if. Believe me, I would be incredibly happy to have a gaming Mac, but clearly Apple isn't interested in it at the moment. The truth is that the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of PC gamers have low budget Windows machines. They're not part of Apple's target audience. The reason why Razer and other luxury brands and PC components exists for Windows gamers is that games are highly scalable. You have a good machine? Game runs good. You have a great machine? Game runs great. But at the end of the day, you still need that massive consumer base to prop up the gaming industry.

@@iatwiatw True

The Mac. If you’re a gamer, go Razer.

@@CreatedTech Thank you!

You're correct, I didn't clarify this further in the video. The main point I tried to make was that the MacBook screen is twice as bright!

Full brightness is 1600 nits

@@Anonymous-vh9tc no bro thats peak brightness [which is a fancy term for how bright whites can go in hdr which realistically never happends], their highest brightness is 1000 nits in hdr and 500 sdr, which is still really high

@@omsingh4478 Does it matter? It's still waaay brighter than an windows based HDR screen with blacks that are essentially OLED equivalent (without all the drawbacks of OLED).

@@77dris the hp elitebook dragonfly max can too reach 1000nits which is a windows device, so your statement is wrong

Interesting, I might make a video on this topic!

The biggest issue with the MacBook is the software, there are so many professional tools that simply don’t have a macOS port especially with the new SOC, if this MacBook could run all the auto desk apps and if unreal was optimised etc unfortunately that’s the biggest deal breaker for me

@@jeezy9406 Funny thing that I have dropped my PC in favour of Mac, because I have got so much additional tools for software development(both unique to Mac, and Linux). And SCREEN so much better. Oh, and touchpad gestures with several screens! And now I am not able to return to PC. Had to buy console for gaming.

@@jeezy9406 How abt using parallels (to use windows) on mac? Works Iike a charm.

@@pnkpune it works but it’s not optimal, also the software just isn’t optimised for Apple silicon so you could could get the same performance from something a lot cheaper on the windows side

That's a great point. What's crazy is the 14" MacBook has 2,010 dimming zones, the huge XDR display only has 576. So it has almost 4x the dimming zones while being much smaller making blooming a LOT less than the XDR. Technology is improving rather quickly lately. Also from what I've seen the 12.9" has more blooming, which is why the 14" would look better especially in darker scenes. Honestly I like Windows more than Mac, but I primarily use a Mac now because of the hardware. Imagine if the 14" MacBook Pro was actually a windows machine with the same performance/efficiency/specs. But that's just wishful thinking, I doubt even in the next 5 years that a windows machine will come out that check's all the right boxes (Speaker quality, Screen, Performance, Battery, Fan Noise, Instant sleep/on, etc).

no

it actually scores one of the best results for 14 and 15 inch gaming laptops.

@@earnistse4899 but could it complete all the bench test on battery only without recharge.

The Razer performance will be crippled by 20-30% in CPU/GPU testing once on battery power. It will also last about 2-3hrs on battery vs the MacBook pro 14 10-12hrs time. They will perform nearly the identical once both are on battery power power.

cant stand a little bit of room noise like a easy triggered beta soi boi ? XD no seriously i have laptop that makes more sound than that razer and i cant hear it, whatever i do my focus is on a task and the sound is more silent than a tv or someone speaking in room... damn if i open windoes there more sound coming from street

Liar

@@asdbef3667 Shh don't tell him 😶

Having used both laptops extensively, for me the biggest cons of the RTX 3060 Blade 14 is needing to have it attached to the charger for full performance, and the screen. The screen is just so dim at only around 300 nits full brightness, that it's almost unpleasant to use in all but the most favourable of lighting conditions.

@@sorafhorn Trust me dude, brightness is not the only factor in how good a display looks. I have seen the 14 inch MB and it is just no comparison, period. Black levels, colors...

@@LIFEOFSTUFFEDANIMALS I'm a little biased, I'm red-green colorblind so I don't really give two shots about color or black levels, because when I'm using my machine I'm working as an engineer and as a PhD, so I'm not consuming content on it or editing content. I think a ton is down to use case and preferences. But if you're going to buy something based on a screen for content consumption the iPad pro I'd imagine would be a better choice. If someone really does in fact need extreme color accuracy and deep contrast then yeah this machine might make sense, but I really think the majority of people who use their machine for work would be better with the blade in the long run.

@@sorafhorn but I don’t understand, the Mac clearly performed better, yet you would recommend the blade?

@@canonicator for most people, especially most professionals aside from creative production specialists that are heavily immersed in the mac ecosystem, the shift over from windows to macOS is massive, and the availability of dedicated optimized software is way behind. If I'm going to be using a device every single day for everything I have to do for work and leisure I want it to be as flexible as possible, and macOS just isn't there yet especially with the m1 architecture. With the next couple of iterations of these devices that may change, but we just don't know yet. We also have to consider the chance of hardware failure, almost any windows device will have some level of repairability that Apple has been shying away from historically, regardless of their press releases. For the average person, wanting to spend 2 grand, the blade just is a safer choice overall.

Bruh

MacBook performs the same regardless of if it's attached to power or not :) Apple silicon is so efficient that the internal battery is able to provide all the wattage required to drive the chip at 100% performance.

@@CreatedTech thanks for the reply! So it tells the story that MacBook really suits for those travel a lot!

I think the way to go with M1 Macs will be to buy the base models and upgrade every two years or so.

Either base model or M1 max with 32 gb. M1 pro with 32gb makes literally 0 sense. Watch one of the videos of „max tech“. Pretty eye opening

Max tech showed that 16Gb works just fine (with less swaps than 32Gb). For apple computers, upgrading parts hurts resell value a lot as you can recoup almost nothing from the upgrades, if you run a business, getting the base model then upgrade every 2 years while claiming taxes is the best way to spend very little on updated hardware

You did mention you do unity so I think you should pick up a 16Gb one and give it a try, with apple you can return without a question within 14 days.

Same position. I think its too diminishing returns, even more so on these models. I have decided to get the basemodel but with 1tb. Apparently the incedible speed of the ssds almost works as fast as ram cache. Its just too much money to upgrade - if u really need that much power honestly i would rather/be forced to a pro workstation build. Or i would wait for the new imac pro or mac pro. For this kind of money on a m1 max u will probably be able ti buy a base midel mac pro. Its just not worth it. I would buy a basemodel 14 and a 10 bit 32 4k monitor instead. Im going for the 16 though, as i will be on that screen alot next year, going back to uni. For more homeuse i would rather either wait for imac or mac pro and rather invest 3-4k in of those - use a 14 base model until then and then resell it and save up money.

boot camp doesn't work on apple silicone :(

The razer will get smoked. Gpu and cpu will be throttled

@@ricosrealm not really

exactly the only true laptop in this comparison is the macbook, may aswell get a desktop gaming pc than the razer

It doesn’t make sense to unplug it, if you want a fair comparison the MacBook should also be plugged in….

I have 15"razer blade 3070 and 16" m1 max and have been working with heavy 3d scans in blender on both- mbp can do things as well on just battery that razer needs to be plugged in to do- also razer lliterally burns my lap- gets hot enough to put burn brown marks in some bed sheets. Mbp stays cool and runs most of a workday off the battery for these 3d tasks and for the first time in my life I have been reaching for macbook over the pc every day since ive been using it

Well. We can’t tell you what you like, that’s up for you to decide

@@TechnoLadz cause some people say that you cannot run linux on the latest m1 chip, also you cannot use dual boot

@@kraken3477 yes you cannot but my freind is a coder he said that you should only get apple macbook if you have money then its worth it and you cannot use linus on macbook thats true but ios is good itself and remember linus is also good and for a beginner, it is not necessary to purchase expensive laptop you can go for linus too.

Geekbench has known flaws on m1s

Geekbench favors ARM uArchs. Even now, geekbench scores shouldn’t be directly compared between x86 and ARM, becuase it’s not an overly reliable cross architecture benchmark.

I'm guessing because the M1 Pro isn't Apples chip with the best graphics performance. It would make more sense to compare the Ryzyn 9 5900X with the un-binned M1 Max chip.

I’m looking at getting the MBP 14, how has your swap usage been?

@@2392youngmoney it's been okay. I only use mines for video editing work. Just get 32GB of memory of you don't want much swapping at all.

@@dawgcanjumphigh thanks for coming back to me. I’ve found a good deal on the 16gb, that’s why I asked. I’ve looked for the 32gb but can only find it in the max chip with a bigger SSD (both of which I don’t want) and it’s much much more expensive.

Actually TG Pro displays that information for all models of the M1 Pro MacBooks, regardless of exact CPU/GPU core configuration. I can guarantee you the MacBook in this video was the base model 14". It says so in system report and also on the barcode on the packaging. Don't rely on what TG Pro displays there, it's not fully updated for the new Apple silicon MacBooks.

@@CreatedTech Ah my apologies then. If that's the case then it's good to know these are accurate.

Yeah it’s a weird reporting error! Even I had to double check when I first saw it. Hopefully the developers fix it up soon.

This is definitely the Base MacBook pro 14 for sure! My MacBook pro 14 with 10CPU/16GPU core got much higher scores. In similar CPU benchmarking my MacBook pro 14 10cpu/16gpu got 20% higher scores and in the GPU benchmarks I got about 10% higher scores than this base MacBook pro 14. I ran all these benchmark on battery power like he did in the video at full brightness. I went from 100% to 68% battery life after about 2hrs of non-stop testing. The MacBook fan was barely noticeable during the test haha compared to the jet engine of the razor.

Once the Razer is unplugged, the performance will be identical in GPU benchmarks. In CPU benchmarking it will be 10-15% slower than the MacBook pro 14 base model.

Can you use Xbox companion on the MacBook ??

lemme have the razer

Which device do you prefer?

@@quantaviousdingleton Gaming : Razer Blade Anything other than that : Mac

@@quantaviousdingleton I traded in my razer for a MacBook honestly the MacBook is better

Because many people don’t need access to 100% of the performance 100% of the time. A gaming laptop is a better option that a gaming desktop and a moderately spec’d laptop combo