A look at the '20 and odd Africans' who landed in what is now Hampton, Va. and their lasting impact on what would become the United States. (Part 1) ww.wusa9.com/1619
Anthony Johnson was the first slave owner in what was the British colony of Virginia. He was black. Look it up. You want a REAL education forget just about everything you were taught and find the truth yourself.
The real history is that we were ALREADY HERE BEFORE COLUMBUS and the savages arrived. We copper-skinned people were living our best lives before we were attacked and enslaved. We even had a black president named Hanson. There's a street named after him in Brooklyn, New York. Yes, there were black presidents BEFORE George Washington and Lincoln. These devils have been hiding the truth for YEARS!
Brazil imported ten times as many kidnapped West Africans as did the United States. Latin America as a whole, imported twenty times as many. By any chance are you going to teach that too?
Could William have been named after the master because he was his child? The Tucker family appears to have strong European genes. My family flows in a different direction. My family from Britain, part of it moved from Virginia to Mississippi where one or two of the sons had children with one of their slaves. The story was kept secret and within the community but we always knew something happened because of the strong European features. We eventually met the European family members and everything started to make sense. Secrets can lie dormant for centuries. Very beautiful story.
I'm from that area in Virginia. They look at lot like my family on my Dad side. In my research many of them were Mulatto's. Also my Grandfather work or was his father that name was Tucker.
A story on the Mozingo family would be a great addition to this one. We are one of two families that actually kept our Angolan name. Congrats to the Tucker family for maintain their history.
@@tamelajones6002 thats nice, I read his book, but have come to a different conclusion based on my Y-DNA and we have a Middle Eastern Origin by way of Spain & Portugal.
My research says, indentured servants. And my 7th great grandfather was on this ship. He served his agreement and was granted freedom, even gaining his son’s freedom in court. Gowan
@@HippieDelicia Excellent research. Just out of curiosity, do you feel like color if skin has any relevance whatsoever? One color today, could have been another color then. We seemed to have quit identifying our land of birth when introducing ourselves. I was only wondering, because I know there were dark skinned people on the Mayflower, as well as lighter. Just don't hear of it when this historical event is regurgitated. Seems to be a homogenous mixture until after Bacons Rebellion. Just curious.
the term servant was used instead of slave caught my attention. the fact that they honor the slave masters name and feel endowed by that name sake caught me. a bit of delusion in the perspective of slavery caught me. it hurts to see and hear how far gone my people really are.
@@SandfordSmythe no my brother, both terms are used in the Bible, indentured servants was ok among the israelites. Slavery was also ok for the israelites to do to their enemies aka Gentile nations. The Bible is against israelites enslaving other israelites. Hope that explains it for you.
@@morrisstewart7586 So why did the Southern Protestant churches officially accept slavery? There was a sense that the slaves were servants like mentioned in the bible.
@@SandfordSmythe dude I'm trying to enlighten you to the Bible, and you bringing up the protestant church. The Bible was written long before the protestant church.
Okay - in 1619 Africans arrived in Virginia ... They were from a privateer ship (pc for pirate ship) that took them from a slave ship that had bought them from Africans (Angola), who raided a village and took them captive in order to sell them .... got it.
@@spiritunbound9414 ...You people *ALWAYS FIND* a way to absolve the BLACK SLAVERS of their genocide. Entire villages were destroyed, too old, too young - slaughtered. Because of Your People's action Africa was pushed back into the stone age. Learn YOUR history numbnuts.
What a beautiful family. People don’t know how luck they are to have this. I would’ve absolutely love to have this but I guess it’ll have to start with me and my wife. Many Blessings to this family.
@muffdiver8884 facts. also in the middle east. Jordan, Iraq, Syria, where alot of the women were sold to as well. thats how they got their lighter skin complexions. white christian women were prized in the harems from north africa all throughout the islamic world.
@@AngryNegativeHistoryProjectindentured slaves. As in people who were made “slaves” or servants bc of crime or debt. Not the devilish form of slavery that the white man did in America and across the world through colonization
These videos are vital records for history. I don't have any children, but it's important to educate your own children, and not leave everything up to the system.
1619 project is marxist revisionist history to tell a certain narrative about America through a marxist lens. You will never get the full context from these type of people.
I just uploaded a video on Africa before America and another video called the 1607 project, and none of the stuff I mention in my videos is considered by these people, and all history is relevant and should be learned.
The Spanish had brought Africans to the South Eastern Coast as well as other regions prior to 1619.. but yes 1619 appears to be the first recorded in British America..
I could not help but notice, as I first laid eyes on this beautiful family, the deep American-Indian bloodline jumping out of their copper-colored skin-tone! Somebody need to sit down with Queen Mother CARROLL TUCKER and try to jog her memory concerning her great grandparents! Or get on with some serious genealogy research!
@@Myacckt U can't B for sure theirs native ancestry there until a DNA test is taken. People always lie that they have N.A. ancestry & DNA tells the truth Bcuz DNA don't lie, ppl lie.
Very grateful that these stories, this history, is now on tap for many, many people to absorb. As a plain ole White person, I was somehow "lucky" to have understood this horrendous travesty from a young age. It's what drove me to prefer reading American history--but the obvious omissions were gaping. By my teens I realized we're ALL mixed race. Love it. I think many Americans--all kinds--have craved this information also. Thank you again.
I am a descendent from one of Antony. My father is Anthony Jackson. Mississippi raised. Mary Booth Tucker was my great great great great grandmother 🙏🏼
MY grandfather was a slave in Jamestown who came from England and was in Bacons rebellion his punishment was being sent off to Jamaica into slavery for so long ,returning he died and left a widow and children.
That's amazing to be a direct descendant to a person that participated in 'Bacons Rebellion'. What an honor. Do you have any details that you would like to share, like where he was from? I have to remind myself that the trans Atlantic slave trade started in the Carribean, so many of the slaves around the time prior to Jamestown could have also been from the Carribean ( ex: Sidney Poitier ancestry), as well as people that initially were indentured servants that came over on the mayflower from England. Its difficult for some to realize how slavery started in the colonies. Simply to lessen chances of Rebellion, and to increase of profits, while separating, and turning families against each other in the name of greed, and self preservation at the expense of the unfortunate souls made to work for free, or die. What depth of moral corruption. Thank you for your time.
#EyeAmNOTBlack #PleaseReadThis Through compulsory American educational institutions, vulnerable children were taught as young students about the topic of U.S. History, a mandatory learning curriculum. These young students were forced to study and comprehend all information provided by their teachers, concerning this topic, to pass multiple tests and possibly graduate toward the next grading level. Without strict supervision at home from their parents concerning what their children learned in school, these students eventually became adults that were indoctrinated with detailed information about U.S. History, which they now believe is the absolute truth without any doubts or room for questioning its accuracy or validity. This type of social engineering experiment systematically manipulated millions of American’s mindsets into a one-directional belief system, to the point where the offspring of the indigenous Niiji, who are misclassified today as African Americans or Black Americans, will believe that their direct ancestors were somehow captured by anonymous European caucasian sailors, from random parts of West Africa, and then forcefully migrated to North America to work as slaves for foreigners from another continent. This folklore is commonly known today as the Transatlantic slave trade story, however, essential details of this story did not happen the way that we were all told by strangers in school. Not only was this deceitful story drastically manipulated and even exaggerated by design, but it was also told to us in reverse. www.amazon.com/dp/1737655896/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_ZPF4MN2AK3F56D74JVBY
You saying alot but you not saying nothing. Where did life first begin don't say life begin in America. Are you saying the slave trade never happen. Am glad you not Black why are you even here. if you not Black it's not about you.
Yes, their strength and endurance is much respected. I think it's pretty amazing that much of the fruits of their struggles, along with those who helped them, the civil war, signing of the civil rights bill, etc, has given the recent past, and current generations much opportunity..
@@serpentines6356 the Civil War WAS NOT fought because of slavery! Some more little white lies to make some so called blacks feel special! Because if it was fought over slavery then why we DID NOT receive the 40 acres, and that phucking mule? That's when that promise was made for certain participations! Also why was it so many so called blacks, and Indians fighting for the Confederate! Let me guess they were slaves, and made to fight! Sure giving a gun to a slave, and that slave in return didn't shoot the slave master! Whole groupings of slaves with rifles! How about because they weren't SLAVES as bias whites wrote! Louisiana's history details a lot of this history!
@Muff Diver I swear the more people try an tell the TRUTH the more the lie is exposed! LMAO! 1619 disconnecters luv mentioning about so called blacks coming from so called Africa! LMAO 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣! Post Slavery Stolen Legacy is the theft of so called blacks birthrights! While US school indoctrination have ALL believing ALL so called blacks ancestors comes from so called Africa! We didn't land on Plymouth Rokk! Plymouth Rokk landed on US!
I lived in Hampton as a child. This is a beautiful reminder that the past reveals itself little by little and makes our History so much more colorful and makes us understand ourselves better as a nation. Thank you 🙏
What you are saying is ridiculous. Those people who were taken in slaves were from pirates capturing ships and enslaving the passengers. The Trans Atlantic slave was the largest forced migration in the history of the world
I think Grandma should Purge my grandmother's four of them all Purge before they die but they didn't get to say everything if you are not about to die I think now would be a good time to purge it takes a while and there are a lot of questions grandmother has to sit down her pride and respect in order to let the full truth bring out so that there are no blank spots left at the last moment the grandmas would never shut up and I love that
To clarify, this is in reference to the first (British) documented Africans brought to N. America. Some things are speculation, while a lot is documented. This is part of my family history, one I can trace and document well over 400+ years just in this country alone . DNA wise, I am of African, Native American, and European descent.
This video was confusing to me because if there were only very few Africans that came to Virginia and most people there were native and the white people and those slaves came from Angola then why am I Nigerian with dna from England Scotland Norway and Italy im mixed but my main admixture is Nigerian
@@iyannasmith350 Before slavery was law, Africans were considered to be along the same lines as Indentured Servants from Europe. In early Virginia Africans, Europeans, and N.A’s coexisted peacefully, having relationships and children. This wasn’t seen as productive on several levels, and white landowners/free people, along with Va. House of Burgesses passed a law making slavery legal in 1661. Look up the case of Elizabeth Key, who in 1662 sued for her freedom. Her case is the reason why any child born to a female slave, would remain a slave for life (not always the case). Due the racial caste system and the fact that certain people could only be considered property, slave owners bred them like cattle. Slaves having come from different parts of Africa, the Colonies, Europe, N.A. are responsible for many of today’s A.A.. This would explain why your admixture has several different ethnicities.
@@iyannasmith350 Nigeria is a European creation. I don't think it even existed in the 1600s. The Africans had their own nations that existed based on ethnicity beforehand.
So you learned some actual history that spoiled the sugar-coated version they gave you in 4th grade and now you're upset. Man up, people! You're not children any longer. This stuff is all in the historical record, if you'd just bother to read a book instead of watching TV or playing video games.
@Common Sense American Problems cannot be solved if you ignore them and sweep them under the rug. Rather than wring your hands about "perpetuating hate", we need to address the CURRENT problem. That normally requires finding out how we got into the current mess in the first place.
@Common Sense American I'm trying to figure out what is fiction. Black people were not slaves in America? Slavery didn't exist in America? Slaves didn't come over in 1619?
I found out from a cousin that had DNA done that our maternal ancestors came from a tribe in Angola; in fact, the same tribe as Chris Tucker. I also heard somewhere that James Brown's ancestry was Angolan.
@@4562deedee1not Chris tucker has ancestors came from Angola and a lot of black Americans came from Angola and Congo but people think they are from Nigeria and Ghana is a lie unless u Jamaican or from the Caribbean
The first African slave that came to the continental United States was in 1526 during a Spanish expedition in what was to become North Carolina where the African slaves they had rebeled and excaped.
that was a good story but it doesn't show Providence at all furthermore if we're done and get real and we need to talk about the Mayan genocide they made it all the way up to the land bridge through Canada! we still hide artifacts found as far east as Georgia Tennessee and so on Africans are behind has anyone would be but that's arriving at land against their means
NOT TRUE! THE PORTUGUESE DOMINATED THE TRANSTLANTIC SLAVE TRADE FOR ITS FIRST HUNDRED YEARS AND THEIR MAIN PORTS OF EXPORT WERE AT THE COAST KINGDOM OF NDONGO, MODERN DAY ANGOLA! THE PORTUGUESE AND DUTCH EXPLORERS EXPORTED THOUSANDS PF ANGOLAN SLAVES FROM LUANDA AND BENGUELA. ANGOLAN SLAVES BUILT NEW AMSTERDAM (LATER NEW YORK), LOUSIANA, VIRGINIA AND MORE! Yes, there were slaves from the Congo and other African nations, but Angolan slaves played a significant role in the building of the new world! USA.
Saying "First Africans in English North America" is incorrect. The British had already established a trading post in Bermuda, and there were Africans there since 1616
@S Tonnelier Regardless of whether that's true, I just said that them saying "First Africans in North America" would be incorrect, which is the same thing you're saying
@S Tonnelier I am not disputing your claim, I'm clarifying that I never declaratively stated that the slaves on Bermuda in 1616 were the first, just that they were earlier than the enslaved Africans taken to Virginia in 1619. I had not been aware of any documents concerning slaves in St. Augustine until today, so I can't attest to their validity until I've researched them more. Nonetheless, the point of my initial comment is that the 1619 Africans were not the first in North America.
Interesting fact. Tnere were always more freed slaves in the south then in the north. In 1790 there were 28000 in the north to 32000 in the south. In 1860 its 225000 in the north to 256000 in the south. These are numbers from a census and probably undercounted ?
It's sound interesting because the average America just have basic narrative. The fact is free blacks lived right through that period, but their life experiences are complex. Good bad and ugly..
More slaves there to be freed? Maybe a comparison of freed slaves vs the current number of slaves would be more appropriate, but I'm not sure of your point.
@@SandfordSmythe Really just what the facts . Based on what I usually hear I didn't believe many freed slaves would be in the south.or that nearly 15 % would be free.
They were never. ever slaves; They worked as indentured servants, working under a seven-year signed contract: That contract ends after seven years. White historians keep writing that black Americans came from Africa, instead, they came from Wales, Ireland, Scotland, and England since the 1400s. Whites came out of Barbary slavery, and out of Europe, prison houses: Barbary were black wealthy Moslem men in Europe. Whites were brought to America 1790s by black captains and sailors. Look for yourself. www.loc.gov/resource/rbpe.02201500/?st=gallery
The first Angolan immigrants weren’t “stolen”. They were sold. Sold by the people on their own lands. Most of them were considered indentured or freed people in the 1700’s.
Well none were immigrants... None willing decided to come here... We are also talking earlier than the 1700s... If you Google The White Lion slave ship it's pretty well know that these men were slaves stolen in a slave raid and bought to Virginia
I mean, if someone takes your child out of their bedroom, and "sells" them to China, I'd definitely call them stolen. And it's not their own people if it's a warring nation.
The first Angolans were stolen, abducted chained forced to walk over 30 days to the coast, placed in chained on ships , yes their lives were stolen when they were abducted
Ever wonder how 75 Portuguese sailors could trek 100 miles into Africa, bind up 350 healthy adults, then trek them back to shore, and transport them in groups of 15 back to a ship while thousands of locals watched? Me too.
Don’t mean no harm. I’m of aborigines . It looks like y’all had racial affairs. Y’all look Indian and white! Just like most of us. Africa maybe the mother of civilization allegedly. However, we were here wayyyyy before Africans came to the Land. No disrespect! Dane collaway Taught us that!
Has Dan Calaway ever showed you an archaeological site has Dan Callaway ever showed you any DNA?. Why don't you tell him to take a DNA test? Every ancient skeleton found in the Americas has had DNA extracted from them and none of it comes back to you. You read their except getting educated by a random RU-vidr then by real doctors real archaeologist real science
Truthfully, I’d prefer this conversation laid out in the context of 1619 laid the foundation for the formation of the 13 colonies. The framers laid the foundation for the formation of the United States of America...
I'm sure you would prefer that conversation as it is more positive than one which involves slavery within "the land of the free". However, there are over 40 million real individuals who are descendants of this inconvenient truth, without whose existence the United States would not have been created. Point blank PERIOD.
The complexion of the Carolina Indians is black, not much different from that of the Ethiopians. Their hair is black and thick, and not very long, tied back behind the head like a small tail.” Giovanni da Verrazzan 1524
Humans have always kept slaves, as far back as recorded history goes there have been slaves. South American and North American tribes kept slaves long before Europeans arrived. I think it's something that we as a species had to out grow, or still have to out grow in some parts of the world.
@@jamesreck8476 yes we know but that’s not argument. USA was the longest and worst and transatlantic slavery was the only one based on race making the affects generational.
This is why I always said most of black Americans came from Angola 🇦🇴 and Congo DRC 🇨🇩 even the first blacks in USA Virginia 1619 were taken from Angola 🇦🇴 brought them to USA even there is a lot of name is USA like Louisiana Angola prison the bloodiest prison in USA 🇺🇸 it’s name Angola cuz of the majority slave were taken from Angola and even Congo square 🇨🇩 also knows as the place of jazzy, Congo Square is the epitome of resilience and Black identity in New Orleans. Going back to the 19th century, the area was known as a gathering space where enslaved and free people of color came together to drum, dance, trade, pray and honor the spirits of their ancestors.
That's because you didn't continue learning after you became an adult. You can't rely on the sugar-coated history they give to 4th graders to carry you through your entire adult life.
"Captured by the Portuguese in Angola during a time of war?" ..."depending on who tells the story" is right. I'd heard that the Portuguese captured these Africans in Portugal and sent them to Angola.
Antoni and isabela, the tribe of Judah. They knew exactly who they were. They're the one's that had previously built Spain and Portugal. They were from 1 of the lost tribes of Judah.
While we navigated the seas, 100,000s years ago, we built and left Artifacts and statues all around the globe, building new civilization as we traveled. That's why you see Buddha with African naps of hair and pyramids in Egypt and in North America and the Grand Canyon, Olmecs in Mexico, Ethiopia, middle east and statues and art works through out Europe. When the European came to America, we were living in apartments with running water and toilets. The Europeans were astounded to see we dressed in fine clothing, deodorant, toothpaste and a city and clean life style never seen before. All the while the white man stink as if he never had bath before. We built these cities everywhere we went, thousands of years ago, we gave civilization, knowledge, science, medicine, taught them how to read and write, music, street lights, Universities and how to put their animals in Corals, hygiene, cure diseases. But his-story won't tell you the truth. Because without Black history, there is no history, we are the beginning of civilization.
The British West Indies having significant use of slaves on plantations totally passed on the opportunity to break with the Crown when the 13 Colony's were breaking away.
@@rustyyb8450 "Eventual"??? There was not the slightest hint in 1776 that the British Empire would outlaw slavery almost 60 years later. It wasn't even on the table in 1776. That's like trying to predict whether interstate travel will be outlawed in 2075 (something that's not even under discussion now).
@@alansmiley3870 yep, but that's not what the 1619 "history" lesson says. So a reasonable challenge is to know the British West Indies, at the time of the Colonies, had a far larger & malignant slave system to primarily power its economy. And yet, the British West Indies didn't choose to join in parting ways with the Crown. The 1619 Project's degree of acceptance reveals that a well told story is able to make moot all the easily obtained evidence to the contrary. The "information age" is not yet powerful enough thwart such efforts.
@@rustyyb8450 the Caribbean colonies didn't have the manpower to even challenge Britain. Also they depended more on Britain. Most sugar colonies only produced sugar. They depended on foodstuffs from other places.
I thought the first Africans, in europe, were actually descendants of the laddino converso Moors that converted to Catholicism end of 'Battle of Grenada'-1491. Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't there people of African descent in Europe during King Henry v11, and prior to? Jacques Francis. John Blanke, Catalina, Mary Fillis, and of the many Conquistadors that were also considered blackamoor, Juan Gurrido, who brought wheat to the American continent. I thoroughly enjoyed your presentation. I just need clarification, if possible, at the assumption that Europeans brought 'black' people from Africa in 1619. I know they brought some, but werent the principle source of dark skinned europeans. King James grandson nicknamed the 'black' boy( king Charles 11of England). Thank you. ("Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind." -Benjamin Franklin ,' Observations Concernig the Increase of Mankind' sect 24. founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-04-02-0080#:~:text=Which%20leads%20me,natural%20to%20Mankind.)
💯 if the Anthony or Antonio they speaking of was an indentured servant and was a slave owner himself once he completed his indenture. Correct me if wrong but he was one of the first one to actually start chattel slavery.
@@rparks580 Anthony Johnson awarded with castor as perpetual slave.. Didnt start chattel slavery, but definately supported it (by skin color). Was set in stone by 1740 negro Act, as result of 'Stono Rebellion'1737. British police sent in yo enforce, and back up each newly defined 'white'- (1681) males rights as superior. 'An Act concerning servants and Slaves ' 1704 encyclopedia Virginia is also very interesting read. Supports Moorish exclusion from slavery if could proove European ancestry, or amnity with the queen. Peace.
@@mellowrage4892 That maybe so but it was the first known case of any person having servitude for life right. I'm not his servitude was the start. He actually held a person for life after freeing him another contract.
I love this video. The truth is not hate, when hate is not telling the story. We must read the Book of laws and see 👀 we are not african (hamites) but we are Israelites (Shemites). Exodus 5:1 and 11:7 We must teach our people, we are not africans. And correct any and every one that call us that. Shalom 😎
The Atlantic slave trade actually began in the 16th century not the 15th century. Also it was in the early 1500s not 1619 when the first Black slaves were brought to what is now the United States.
Trans Asia slave trade started Even earlier, with Persians and Arabs trafficking Africans across multiple continents, and what's really funny is it continues today 🤣🤣
Scorpio Africanus was a Roman general who fought against the Carthaginian’s in the 2nd Punic wars. Any indentured captives that were brought in chains across the Atlantic Ocean were not his captives and were of a different bloodline than that Iberian, and should therefore be labeled appropriately. Appalachia already had aboriginal negroes of a different bloodline and probably intermingled with these new arrivals. Therefore to refer to them using the Iberian label of Scipio is completely incorrect
To paint a complete picture there needs to be more discussion about the Atlantic Slave Trade as a whole. It wasn’t just Brits and colonists bringing slaves over to the US coasts. The Portuguese and Spanish brought over many many times as many to South America. Brazil in particular. France too. I know we’re talking about the US here, but there’s an awful lot to this story that isn’t being told.
Burn for eternity to the moral degenerates and lazy psychopaths that perpetuated and those descendants that directly benefit from the enslavement of Black People in america.
The year that the first African slaves landed in North America is as insignificant to U.S. history as the year the first African slaves landed in Brazil. It would be almost 150 more years before the idea of an independent American nation became widely accepted by the colonists.
The americans that eventually participated and the beneficiaries of that demographic are moral degenerates and genetically void of empathy for other humans. Burn for eternity and doomed is americas future unless atoned for. The Civil War was not atonement. That was greed in the form of War fought by pawns of the greedy.
You seem like a very nice family and it just so happens that this period of American history is something I have studied for some time. I would recommend reading a book called "White Cargo." It is full of historical notes and references from the time, from the English side of the Atlantic. I hear mention in this video of the Virginia Company of London. That is accurate as that company was responsible for transporting Irish and English slaves to Virginia starting in 1607. There was a lot of Irish and African intermingling in Virginia in the years that followed. Hope this helps.
A book missing a few pages (Track 1:00-1:1:16) is an opening exposition of a film, about the Middle Atlantic Slave Trade, where it’s actually another book missing.
@Terrill Elliott yup. Them Dinah's daughters. Stephen saw 75 souls. Moses said 70 souls. Them five that Stephen saw came from whom? I sa Dinah. They murdered her husband after he enter covenant of circumcised. Joseph also buried with those betrayed in covenant. Jesus sa lost sheep. Jesus knew he from Juda, Paul knew he from Benjamin. Who lost. Now ? why? Next ? why king James sent women to supposedly be laborers to untamed world? Imagination biggest nation in the world 😂😂😂
@Terrill Elliott got to add to that imagination by looking at how Zelophadad's daughters pushed up on Moses bout their right and bout their father's inheritance Moses was overlooking
Doesn't anyone realize how lucky the 20 and some odd were. They were headed for somewhere in the Caribbean to work on a sugar cane plantation. In Virginia, they were not slaves, but indentured servants. In 5 to 7 years, they were given land.
The complexion of the Carolina Indians is black, not much different from that of the Ethiopians. Their hair is black and thick, and not very long, tied back behind the head like a small tail.” Giovanni da Verrazzan 1524
Meanwhile, thousands of white Irish prisoners were sent to work the fields years before all this. Everyone has been oppressed at one point or another. Grow up.
That’s not the point. African Americans are a central part of our history and their perspective deserves to be told. It’s not about who’s the most “oppressed.”
It’s countercondisive to talk about oppression and be a Christian family. Christianity is not what you come from. It what was forced on your ancestors and it’s honestly sad.
These indentured servants/ slaves, were not from Africa. They were European and the colonizers, or slave masters, that were bringing them from Europe to America in 1619 happen to be of SWARTHY European Descent.
That was not their names. It was the name the slavers gave them. If you're gonna tell the story, be kind enough to tell the truth. They wasn't born with European names. They had Hebrew names!
You missed the part where the Africans had been selling other captured African tribes to the Ottoman Turks for almost 1000 years before the Europeans got involved in the slave trade.The African slave trade is still to this day a thriving business after the British banned it back in the mid 19th century.
Stop, your real history is not consistent with their anti-western anti-white political narrative. You're not supposed to talk about how many slaves in the Americas actually had it better than millions of Africans right now, today in Africa.
I have realized a flawed narrative always coming from non-black Africans always tries to shift blame on black Africans for slavery. No y’all perpetrated this evil alone. Imagine chattel slavery wasn’t enacted until 1600’s however, blacks were being brought to the America’s for a whole century before chattel slavery was enacted. Clearly, for 100 years, black Africans were under the impression they were not being sold into bondage. But after chattel slavery was introduced in 1600’s, do u think any non-black African went to tell black Africans “we r now taking u across the ocean to become property with no human rights?”
When we divided to travel, we took a boat and went down the Nike River around the horn of Africa. Where the Lord calm the seas for 18 months, and guilded us to this land called Assuria, the hidden land. The Lord would not allow any ships to come near this land that he had blessed for us. Ships that would try to follow the current toward this land would be ship wreaked into the sea, this was 60,000 years before any other races existed. 18,500 years ago, Columbus learned we were here through the 14 Books of the Apocrypha that was removed from the Bible along with the book of Enoch by the Catholic Church. But Columbus being Catholic gain access and found we were here. The white man only learn to sail the seas from our old maps left behinded, or like Columbus had a Moor aboard ship to guild them.
Could've turned out different if France won. Napoleon had a plan to use Toussaint L'Ouverture and his battle hardened army plus 12,000 American Indians he had armed and waiting, to carve out an American empire by expanding Louisiana westward to the Pacific
I did my ancestry DNA and it says I am linked to the early virginian Africans, a lot of Nigerian DNA. But I'm also part white, on my father's side his Irish ancestors were abused and mistreated by the English as well. They were starved to death on their own soil by English occupiers, why many migrated here. Point being, history all over the world is tragic and I mourn for my ancestors, but how lucky am I to be here in the united States versus living in mostly war torn and impoverished Africa present day? Something to think about..thank you for this presentation.
Nigeria has one of the largest economies in Africa. There parts of Ireland that are "war torn and impoverished". It's ignorant of you to imply that slavery was some sort of gift that saved you for African. It's because of European colonialism and imperialism that many African countries are in the state that they are in. Nigeria and Ghana are two of the more prosperous countries in Africa. Who's to say you wouldn't have been better off if your ancestors hadn't been left in Africa and never enslaved?
Not just Nigeria and Ghana the most prosperous. Angola, Ethiopia, Kenya, Botswana, Namibia, Senegal, Rwanda and South Africa all night these countries are prosperous too.
My ancestors were those first Angolans as well. My family the Walston’s (who were listed under the last name Jay in 1790’s NY) of Northampton Va were indentured servants who never were enslaved.
@@michaelmarion7380 I'm not denying facts, I am acknowledging your dates and events, they are very special to you. White people like to identify July 4, 1776, the issuing of the Declaration of Independence, which severed their political connections to Great Britain, as the when the country was founded. I am not saying that didn't happen, but that it is very important, for proud White Nationalism to survive, that citizens adopt the mythology of the country's beginning being rooted firmly in 1776. In reality, the country was founded on native genocide, and centuries of oppression of African people. For over 300 hundred years, European settlers used systemic violence, terror, false promises, and a foreign legal system to claim Native homeland. For three centuries, British colonizers created wealth through stolen land and stolen labor. Do not celebrate July 4; it's just White people wanting to celebrate freedom from British rule, but there is much more to a country than what a particular National ideology will make you believe in your heart.
So, at the time of the Revolution, we kicked the old people out and created new social institutions and values? Many states like Virginia just continued to run their own affairs.
@@SandfordSmythe that is a good thing. I hope you agree. This country was founded on a few beliefs that wanted to delegate all the other responsibilities to the states
Airplay i agree we need to look back on slavery and see it was the biggest evil in the history of the world, but at the same time we need to stop letting something that happened 140 years ago continue to define our nations political ideals
Yes, slaves were only a small part of the founding of the US. My ancestors braved the path 50,000 years ago; we don't like be shoved aside by Afro-Centric types!
Hurrah for the Union! Hurrah, boys, hurrah! Down with the traitor, And up with the star! Oh we'll rally 'round the flag, boys, We'll rally once again, Come sing the Battle Cry of Freedom!
I must've missed something. I'm 50, and I didn't notice anything I didn't already know about slavery, or America. I didn't notice any controversy. Or anything contradictory to what I learned in middle school.
