Тёмный

#172 

w2aew
Подписаться 209 тыс.
Просмотров 92 тыс.
50% 1

Op amp gain-BW product and slew rate limiting are defined, discussed and demonstrated on the bench. This discussion applies to the majority of general purpose op amps on the market - as most op amps are internally compensated with a single dominant pole. High speed op amps, unconditionally stable op amps, non-unity gain stable op amps, high power opamps, etc. may not follow these characteristics because they are often compensated differently in their design. An LM358N is used for the example circuit. Other popular op amps like the LM741, etc. will behave in a similar way. Sometimes the slew rate limit of a device will be the dominant factor in determining the bandwidth, and other times the gain-bandwidth product will determine the resulting frequency response. The video demonstrates why this happens. Notes from the video are here:
www.qsl.net/w/w...

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 223   
@AppliedScience
@AppliedScience 10 лет назад
Really great explanation! I hadn't looked at slew-rate limited signals on the scope like that -- very good way of showing the problem.
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
Applied Science Thanks Ben - much appreciated!
@babybearkill1
@babybearkill1 10 лет назад
I'm finding your channel the best of all of the EE blogs. Dave and signal path are ok but the waffle on to much about smeg, you are straight to the point in an entertaining way
@Robert-hr6sh
@Robert-hr6sh 2 года назад
Good way in skewing the problem 👍 nice video and good information!
@onesupremelife
@onesupremelife 5 лет назад
The way you explained slew rate was the best I've ever heard or read anywhere. Great job!
@RonanCantwell
@RonanCantwell 10 лет назад
Excellent descriptions as always. Thanks for taking the time to put this together.
@Aemilindore
@Aemilindore 5 лет назад
Thank you so much for working on publishing this video. You have marvelously explained the difference between operational amplifiers gain BW limit and slew rate. Hats off.
@leonardomoro228
@leonardomoro228 Год назад
Wow that is such a great class! Thank you for sharing such knowledge!
@popovlist
@popovlist 4 года назад
Just watched like 10 of your videos, great stuff!
@ellyvatedaf
@ellyvatedaf 3 года назад
Best explanation of slew rate and GBP
@jstro-hobbytech
@jstro-hobbytech 9 месяцев назад
That is my dream oscilloscope. I regret not buying it when i bought an expensive one. I have the tds2002c which i use more haha. That scope is how old now and still holds its value and has a floppy drive. Tektronix are the best. Im restoring one for a friend. Hes had it in storage for a few decades so im not even sure what the model is. If i knew i could get that scope id sell almost all my gear. I tend to donate my gear when i get new gear. The tek diff probes are so expensive. Id trade my rigol mso5354 and every other piece of gear for that scope and a nice selection of probes. There's a reason you work for them but havent replaced the 3104. Great video, thanks. Ive found that i had to buy caps that are above my budget to get most opamp circuits to look as perfect as yours. Sorry for rambling i have severe ptsd. I shall get my ham license in the new year.
@rishabbagani9514
@rishabbagani9514 9 лет назад
Exceptional explanation. Precise and compact, thank you very much!!
@PercentageSign
@PercentageSign 8 лет назад
Excellent information and demonstration thank you! I've been having refresh/learn things about op-amps lately for our senior project and this video helped very much!
@matthew798
@matthew798 10 лет назад
This is absolutely brilliant. Very well explained. Now I can sleep on class and learn at home!
@ZeedijkMike
@ZeedijkMike 10 лет назад
Brilliant video. Suddenly I understand why my home brew function generator acts wired at higher frequencies. Thanks a lot.
@gregsuarez5205
@gregsuarez5205 2 года назад
Super clear . Thank you for doing this video. Liked and subscribed
@FreddyBNL
@FreddyBNL 2 года назад
A very, very well done, easy to understand explanation. Link to video instantly forwarded to my hobby network.
@WaltherGrube
@WaltherGrube 10 лет назад
Nice explanation about slew rate!!! Very helpful!
@valiza123
@valiza123 10 лет назад
This is great stuff, I just came across phase reversal on a LF353 working as a voltage follower when reaching Gnd. Luckily I also bought TLC272 that did that job perfectly single supply. I know it was a rookie mistake but what better way to learn.
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
Yes, some op amps have that unexpected phase reversal when you violate the input voltage range. Very nasty, and lock up a system. And, often not specified in a data sheet!
@yoramstein
@yoramstein 5 лет назад
Fantastic video and all in 15:30 minuts !
@JordanLui
@JordanLui 7 лет назад
Stellar video. Thank you so much for the great lesson & demo.
@chawkzero
@chawkzero 10 лет назад
This was extremely concise and well paced and informative. Thanks so much for your videos! I had a few questions about the caps in your test circuit. I'm assuming the 0.1uF cap going from your divider reference to ground is a bypass cap to limit noise from the op amp, right? As for the 220uF coupling cap, was there any reasoning in picking that value or is it what you had on hand? Additionally, would this cap and the input impedance of the op amp form a high-pass filter? It seems like the 3db point would be nearly 0? I'm still learning the fundamentals and trying to piece together all these EE ideas in an intuitive way. Your videos have helped immensely in that quest. Thanks again
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
Yes, cap values aren't critical. The 0.1uF is to keep the noise down at the non-inverting input. The 220uF is what I had laying on the bench, and was large enough to be "invisible" at the lowest frequency I intended to test with (~1kHz).
@hugocoolens
@hugocoolens 7 лет назад
Dear w2aew, I really am a big fan of your videos, this time however I was surprised to notice you made a common mistake at around 2:23. You are saying that for a single pole response the product of the DC-gain and the bandwidth is constant, however this is _not_ true for the inverting amplifier you are demonstrating: it should be: (1+R2/R1)*BW=unity gain frequency. As long as R2/R1 is much larger (10 times or more) than one, the difference in bandwidth will not be that large, but for small values of R2/R1the difference between your prediction and the correct formula can be a factor 2! If the unity gain frequency of your op amp is 1MHz you should expect for a single pole response a bandwidth of 500kHz and not 1MHz. This also means that the -20dB/dec slopes of the closed loop configurations will not touch the -20dB/dec slope of the open loop system, but will be shifted to the left of it. Unfortunately you did not measure the small signal bandwidth for R2/R1=1, you should apply an input voltage whose amplitude is small enough not to have slew rate distortion. I wrote an article concerning this matter "A closer look at the slew rate criterion" in 2004. Maybe you could check it out and remeasure the bandwidth for R2/R1=1. In reality you probably will find a somewhat higher bandwidth due to the fact that a real op amp always is a higher order system, which especially can be seen in the case where R2/R1=1, sometimes noticeable as peaking in the amplitude characteristic, the asymptotic slope of the amplifier being steeper than -20dB/dec and the phase characteristic shifting over more than 90° relative to the phase at low frequencies. kind regards, Hugo
@w2aew
@w2aew 7 лет назад
Thanks Hugo. I chose not to get into this level of detail in the "Basics" type of video, but I greatly appreciate your reply. Other viewers will benefit from reading your reply here, as well as your article: lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/240890/1/artikelextended.pdf
@Fabio_Barone_Au
@Fabio_Barone_Au 5 лет назад
Hello w2aew, may I encourage you to add a follow-up video to re-measure the unity-gain BW at a sufficiently low amplitude to stay under the slew-rate limit. It would be very beneficial to test the theory as expressed by Hugo Coolens regarding deviation from constant gain-BW product for closed-loop gains that are under 10. Cheers.
@MaxilViaggiatore
@MaxilViaggiatore 10 лет назад
As usual, so clear to make me understand at first time! Are IC switching power regulators in your "to do" list?
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
Max Petrus That's another that's been on my list for a long time. Just haven't had the hours it takes to put something together on that yet.
@EmbSysDev
@EmbSysDev 10 лет назад
I wish i could vote it up a few more times so that Mr.Alan Wolke does it sooner :).
@RupjyotiNathAEC
@RupjyotiNathAEC 8 лет назад
Very good explanation....Learned the concept practically..just amazing
@bumelant
@bumelant 10 лет назад
Thanks for such quality tutorial!
@W1RMD
@W1RMD 2 года назад
Great as always! Thank you!
@martinkuliza
@martinkuliza Год назад
Holy shit mate, i just noticed the scope you have, That's a serious instrument, around $40,000 if i'm not mistaken.......VERY COOL 1GHz on the front end
@w2aew
@w2aew Год назад
It helps when you work for the company...
@martinkuliza
@martinkuliza Год назад
@@w2aew LOL....... Indeed hey... Still Seriously fucking cool see... if, when you leave the company it can "somehow" get misplaced LOL Me.. i can afford that, thats' not the problem JUSTIFYING THE COST is the problem and when i look at my MSO5000 Rigol Honestly, when i look at Bandwidth vs sampling rate if all 4 channels are enabled i can't really see how i justify the additional $40,000 with merely the 1GHz front end i do lots of scope work, but i can't justify $40,000 if it's just extra bandwidth, but yeah, still cool
@tonybell1597
@tonybell1597 10 лет назад
Thank you Alan. Superb....
@jebsaekam
@jebsaekam 10 лет назад
Fantastic as always, thanks.
@afterthought138
@afterthought138 10 лет назад
Thanks again, Alan. Great vid.
@stevenbliss989
@stevenbliss989 Год назад
As always a great video! :)
@mdkalimullah4207
@mdkalimullah4207 7 лет назад
thanks a lot from the depth of my heart
@JasonOlshefsky
@JasonOlshefsky 10 лет назад
Excellent explanation!
@ashfaqueahammedk
@ashfaqueahammedk 10 лет назад
Really as always. Great teacher
@marshsmello
@marshsmello 8 лет назад
I was thinking, if you put two common emmiter transistor amps on the output of the opamp and take feedback from the collector resistor of the second transistor back to the opamp feedback resistor network, would that somehow enhance slew rate or/and the gBW product?
@gregsuarez5205
@gregsuarez5205 2 года назад
I’ve been trying to find a single step attenuator like wavetek you have in the video but unable to find anywhere. Can you recommend any alternative to the wavetek ? . I’d love to run these tests as well
@w2aew
@w2aew 2 года назад
Lots of manufacturers make them, but aren't cheap! www.jfwindustries.com/product-category/manually-variable-attenuators/50-ohm-dual-rotor-attenuators/ www.apitech.com/products/rf-solutions/passive-coaxial-products/manual-step/9000-series-manual-step-attenuators/ www.pasternack.com/50db-step-sma-female-sma-female-2-watts-attenuator-pe7398-p.aspx
@nickkinnan7485
@nickkinnan7485 10 лет назад
Very informative, thanks!
@GOWTHAMKRISHGowthamShanmugaraj
@GOWTHAMKRISHGowthamShanmugaraj 4 года назад
Hi, I'm using TLV3501 comparator (it hash push-pull outputs) (SOT23 6 Pin) for zero cross detection. I'm powering it from single supply (5v).comparator output goes high to ~5v no issue with that, but the comparator output when outputing low doesn't go near 0v, instead it stays at vdd/2. Can you give your insights on why this might be happening?.
@w2aew
@w2aew 4 года назад
It is difficult to say without knowing your circuit or measurement method. It is possible that the comparator is oscillating between hi and low output and that's why you're reading vdd/2.
@GOWTHAMKRISHGowthamShanmugaraj
@GOWTHAMKRISHGowthamShanmugaraj 4 года назад
@@w2aew hi, thanks for the reply, I checked with oscilloscope there were no oscillations. After I replaced the IC with another fresh one I was getting proper results... though I'm not sure what went wrong...
@moaazroushdy4099
@moaazroushdy4099 9 лет назад
Great work man,keep up
@zynthos9
@zynthos9 9 лет назад
Why are you specifically looking for the 3 db point?
@w2aew
@w2aew 9 лет назад
***** Because that is the traditional definition of "bandwidth" - between the points where the response is 3dB down from the in-band response.
@zynthos9
@zynthos9 9 лет назад
***** thanks
@nickpelov
@nickpelov 10 лет назад
thumbs up before I watched it - for the topic
@aborabie1572
@aborabie1572 10 лет назад
thank you very much
@fernandohood5542
@fernandohood5542 4 года назад
Brilliant video. What opamp should I use to amplify a 1mhz audio signal by 20db?
@w2aew
@w2aew 4 года назад
Can you clarify? 1mHz is 1 millihertz, or 1MHz is 1 megaherts - neither of these are audio signals.
@fernandohood5542
@fernandohood5542 4 года назад
@@w2aew Mega. Your right. It is for ultrasound. I am having trouble moving from all these theoretical videos to moving to a practical two stage amplifier at 20db per stage.
@w2aew
@w2aew 4 года назад
@@fernandohood5542 20dB gain at 1MHz means that the op amp would have to have more than 100MHz unity gain BW - that is a tall order! You may have to use several cascaded stages with lower gain in each stage, in order to get the gain you want at 1MHz.
@grzesiek1x
@grzesiek1x Год назад
So if I want to have an useful gain for for example 27 MHz so I need like an ultra fast Op Amp right? Like 1 Ghz at least ?
@w2aew
@w2aew Год назад
Yes - which is one reason why you don't often see op amps being used at RF
@aes9217
@aes9217 9 лет назад
Thanks for this awesome video
@srscricket
@srscricket 10 лет назад
hey, i was wondering if you have a vector network analyzer in your lab?
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
Unfortunately, no, I don't.
@rodwall2335
@rodwall2335 10 лет назад
***** Hi, A great home built VNA is the N2PK VNA. The VNWA is also good. N2PK: n2pk.com/ Up to 60MHz, I built it for around $350.00. VNWA: groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/VNWA/info Up to 1.3GHz + I wouldn't be without my N2PK VNA. They are a great learning tool.
@ItistDe
@ItistDe 10 лет назад
Thank you.
@Andrey289162
@Andrey289162 9 лет назад
can anyone please tell me what is the purpose of the 2.2k ohm resistor at the output,or how this configuration called so i can learn about it. thank you
@w2aew
@w2aew 9 лет назад
The 2.2k resistor is simply a pull-down or load resistor. It is used in this case to keep the op amp output in the "current sourcing" mode of operation. The LM358 output stage can source a fair amount of current, but has a very weak ability to sink current. If the output is forced to transition between the source and sink modes, then crossover distortion will often occur. Thus, the load resistor is included to prevent the crossover from occurring by ensuring the output is always sourcing current.
@w2aew
@w2aew 9 лет назад
+Andrey Andrey This video will explain the purpose of the 2.2k resistor: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VgodYtiD_F0.html
@JimGriffOne
@JimGriffOne 10 лет назад
Slew rates are awesome.
@Sjampster
@Sjampster 10 лет назад
Brilliant!!
@marwan_nafea
@marwan_nafea 10 лет назад
***** Thanks for the video. Is it possible to build an amplifier using LM741 to generate an output voltage of 50 V?
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
No, not directly. However, the output of the 741 can drive a transformer which can step up the voltage.
@marwan_nafea
@marwan_nafea 10 лет назад
Thank you so much :)
@markhall3323
@markhall3323 2 года назад
👍
@engmdgolamazom7137
@engmdgolamazom7137 7 лет назад
hi
@ethanjames4189
@ethanjames4189 2 года назад
bruh
@pyrokinetikrlz
@pyrokinetikrlz 5 лет назад
the demonstration of the slew rate limiting the frequency response of the opamp was so sweet!!!! I have not done the connection between slew rate and freq response.
@bain5872
@bain5872 10 лет назад
Excellent! You laid out in 15 minuets what it took for me; three months of college study to understand back in 1986, with some help from Walter Jung, of course. Alan, you did an outstanding job! Thanks for your hard work.You make it look so easy however, I'm well aware that it takes a lot of hard work, not only for the concept and math, circuit design and build but the mere production of these videos. Thank you so very much for your hard work to make electronics so easy for saps like me...!
@gwav1a
@gwav1a 19 дней назад
Thank you very much for sharing. Very insightful explanation.
@adityaramachandran5223
@adityaramachandran5223 Год назад
awesome job explaining. Super helpful, thanks
@RameshKumar-nn7ds
@RameshKumar-nn7ds 7 месяцев назад
Really great explaination and to the point ,you are inspiration to many
@tradegrabber4854
@tradegrabber4854 4 месяца назад
Awesome tutorial. Thank you!
@robjordan63
@robjordan63 Месяц назад
Fantastic teaching.
@simonyoungglostog
@simonyoungglostog Год назад
That all makes a lot of sense. You can tell a great teacher, it seems obvious as they explain things.
@heinzkreutziger2218
@heinzkreutziger2218 4 месяца назад
Very good demonstration. I have read slew rate in datasheet often but understood it really with this demonstration and explanation. I like the attenuation box you use.
@gerhardgroenewald6560
@gerhardgroenewald6560 5 лет назад
Platinum!!
@ZeedijkMike
@ZeedijkMike 10 лет назад
Brilliant video. Suddenly I understand why my home brew function generator acts wired at higher frequencies. Thanks a lot.
@CH_Pechiar
@CH_Pechiar 10 лет назад
Brilliant explanation as usual. Thank you. A tear fell when you pulled out the datasheet "book". Excellent.
@david_6063
@david_6063 Год назад
It seems to me, that in most applications we wouldn't want to be slew rate limited. That is, we would want to hit the 3dB corner (f_3dB), or the full power BW, before we hit the slew rate frequency (f_SR). We can check if this is the case from the op-amp's data sheet, which gives us its GBP (gain-bw-product) and its SR (slew-rate). We have: GBP = (A_CL)(f_3dB) or f_3dB = GBP/A_CL. We also have SR = 2(pi)(Vout_pk)(f_SR) , or f_SR = SR/((2pi)(Vo_pk)). Using Vo_pk = (Vin_pk)(A_CL) this last equation can be written as f_SR = SR/((2pi)(Vin_pk)(A_CL)). So we need f_SR > f_3dB, or SR/((2pi)(Vin_pk)(A_CL)) > GBP/A_CL, or SR/((2pi)(Vin_pk)) > GBP. If this isn't true then our application needs an op-amp with a larger SR and or a smaller GBP (or we need a redesign where we start with a smaller input signal Vin_pk). Am I thinking about this correctly? Thanks!! And beautiful job on teaching about closed loop f_3dB and SR !!.
@mixguru9669
@mixguru9669 3 года назад
An Exceptional Narration!
@Электроника123-ы4н
@Электроника123-ы4н 2 года назад
Interesting info. Will be fun to repeat this experiment
@BASANTABHATTARAI
@BASANTABHATTARAI 6 лет назад
your videos are helpful as they are more practical and hands on..thanks for it
@mortenrolsing7137
@mortenrolsing7137 10 лет назад
Thanks a lot, exelent video, keep up the good work :-)
@kadirozdinc6065
@kadirozdinc6065 4 года назад
Is there any difference in gain bandwidth product between inverting amp and non-inverting amp while calculating V out ? I mean I watched a video regarding GBP and teller said Fu = Acl x Fcl in Non-invering amp Fu= ( |Acl |+ 1 ) x Fcl in inverting opamp Does it make sense ?
@andreymarinov4410
@andreymarinov4410 6 лет назад
Thank you for the nice video. Great stuff
@uiticus
@uiticus 5 лет назад
Excellent!!! It is interesting how the slew rate of the op amp is not affected by the frequency of the signal but basically by the amplitude of the signal.
@aryanviolett4606
@aryanviolett4606 4 года назад
Very nice! thanks :)
@SJayanth
@SJayanth 3 года назад
Thanks very much.
@Karya.Layeut
@Karya.Layeut 5 лет назад
Thank for share, very usefull for me, for make good preamp Regards,
@mixolydian2010
@mixolydian2010 8 лет назад
Thank you for the video and clear explanation i have learned soemthing new today.
@k1mgy
@k1mgy 10 лет назад
A fascinating demonstration. Regarding the phase delay introduced when the slew rate limit is reached: is this a constant? You pointed out that the falling edge has a slightly different slope than the leading edge and this was clearly seen. Two thoughts on this. (1) is this predictable enough that it has utility in a design? and (2) as a phase delay appears to be present (although you didn't show the waveform just out of the signal generator), is this useful in certain applications - and perhaps undesirable in others?
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
k1mgy I didn't show the phase delay, but there certainly is a delay encountered as you near the GBP limit, and a further delay as you hit the slew rate limit. It would be unwise to use this in a design because the performance, particularly slew rate, may not be well controlled between devices, and will vary depending on operating conditions. Not shown was that the asymmetry of the rising and falling slew rate limit is also dependent on the input common mode voltage.
@RafaH1906
@RafaH1906 3 года назад
Why did you stop increasing the frequency when the voltage dropped to 700mV?
@w2aew
@w2aew 3 года назад
Because that is the -3dB point, which is where the bandwidth is traditionally defined.
@gearstil
@gearstil 4 года назад
At minute 3:38 the formula for BW is very similar to the formula for calculating the scope BW based on the signal rise time. The diff is in the 0.35 constant. Are they really related?
@w2aew
@w2aew 4 года назад
Yes - it's the same single-pole rolloff relationship.
@ElektronikUygulamalar
@ElektronikUygulamalar 4 года назад
This is briliant explanation. Thank you.
@MissionFitnessCTC
@MissionFitnessCTC 11 месяцев назад
Good video!
@MaciekDrozd
@MaciekDrozd 3 года назад
Please keep doing. You have found the optimal way to merge theory and practice. I have studied these "boring " things over 20 years ago. Now they are exiting thanks your videos.
@FrozenArchLich
@FrozenArchLich 8 лет назад
Many many thanks to you, I'm designing a 2-switch forward converter, and need to do with op-amp feedback compensation. This video make me recall things on my electronics class. :) :)
@9a1cool
@9a1cool 4 года назад
beautiful demo of knowledge...you really understand electronic! as ham radio op. i'm proud about you..9A3RU
@matrud_bass
@matrud_bass 10 лет назад
Very helpful video, everything is described in a very calm and demystifying manner.
@matrud_bass
@matrud_bass 10 лет назад
Btw: whats the purpose of the 2.2k resistor at the Output?
@w2aew
@w2aew 10 лет назад
John Matrix The output stage of the LM358 uses a push-pull output stage that has some crossover distortion. Using a 2.2k resistor to ground keeps the stage in the "push" mode (sourcing current) so that I don't incur the crossover issue. Also, the spec sheet for the part specifies the output characteristics with a 2k load, so I figured I'd come close to matching that.
@matrud_bass
@matrud_bass 10 лет назад
***** thanks for the quick response, now i get it. since i´m a electronics newbie i`m not yet into checking datasheets before asking questions :-)
@SatyajitRoy2048
@SatyajitRoy2048 7 лет назад
Very well composed video. You are the best in explaining the basic things.
@smartdesignengineering
@smartdesignengineering 5 лет назад
Why have you used 470uf and 0.1uf capacitor in this circuit.
@w2aew
@w2aew 5 лет назад
Just basic power supply filtering and virtual ground bypassing. Nothing critical with the values, just some parts found on the bench.
@ronaksakaria875
@ronaksakaria875 2 года назад
Really helpful explanation. Can you make a video on opamp stability and capacitive loading ? It really helps the way you explain it with actual demo. thanks again.
@UpcycleElectronics
@UpcycleElectronics 6 лет назад
Thanks for the heads up in the other comment section. I have watched this video a few times before. My op amp tester is based on a similar type of circuit with a dual polarity supply instead of the bias. I guess my challenge is to learn how to replicate what your doing with the function generator. ..Without a function generator...yet 🤔 ...but with predictable, repeatable results.. 🙄 My snipe hunting list for eBay is getting ridiculous... I'm starting to think hotrodding cars was the cheaper hobby. Thanks again, -Jake
@w2aew
@w2aew 6 лет назад
You don't really need the complicated waveform when doing op amp slew rate testing. A simple square wave will do.
@robertcalkjr.8325
@robertcalkjr.8325 10 лет назад
Thanks Alan. It's always a pleasure learning from your videos.
@sammin5764
@sammin5764 2 года назад
🌹🌟🌹
@eshwar1085
@eshwar1085 3 года назад
How didi u select the value of resistors and capacitors
@w2aew
@w2aew 3 года назад
Nothing special. I wanted two equal values to setup a 50:50 voltage divider for the non-inverting input. I have a big pile of 3.9k resistors, so I used two of them. For the gain setting resistors, I chose values that are simple "in your head" calculations.
@bluegrassengineer
@bluegrassengineer 10 лет назад
Thank you for your efforts. This is an excellent video.
@samsam1602
@samsam1602 7 лет назад
what is purpose to use 470uf cap on non inverting line.
@w2aew
@w2aew 7 лет назад
Filter for the +5V power supply. Really has nothing to do with the function the non-inverting line.
@mip2442
@mip2442 3 года назад
Thank you so much for the explanation of the slew rate, helped me a lot!
@EmilianoCaballeroFraccaroli
@EmilianoCaballeroFraccaroli 9 лет назад
Great video, thanks a lot.
@haimt
@haimt 10 лет назад
great explanation thank you :-) u r very good!!
@conamx5728
@conamx5728 3 года назад
can u tell me plz how u calculate 707mv....
@w2aew
@w2aew 3 года назад
Bandwidth is defined as the half-power point. Remember that power is equal to voltage_squared divided by the resistance. Thus, dividing power by 2 is equal to dividing the voltage by sqrt(2). 1/sqrt(2) = 0.7071
@thijsdebont
@thijsdebont 10 лет назад
Awesome practical demo! I really appreciate the balance between theory and real-life measurements.
@RyanJensenEE
@RyanJensenEE 9 лет назад
Hey Alan, Thanks for uploading another great video! I hate to be picky, but I noticed something in your diagram of slew-rate-limiting at 10:20. You drew the slew-rate limited waveform being in-phase with the the input signal (or a non-slew-rate-limited output signal). However, shouldn't the slew-rate-limited signal lag the input signal by some phase?
@w2aew
@w2aew 9 лет назад
The drawing wasn't intended to show input vs output, but rather just comparing normal vs. slew rate limited output waveform shapes. If it was showing input vs. output, then yes there would be a phase shift.
Далее
Inside Out 2: BABY JOY VS SHIN SONIC 4
00:16
Просмотров 3,7 млн
Op-Amps  - Using Operational Amplifiers
44:21
Просмотров 286 тыс.
#1189 Dual Op-amp Test board
12:22
Просмотров 11 тыс.
Op Amp Open Loop vs Closed Loop Gain Response
10:46
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Op Amp Frequency Response & Gain Bandwidth Product
5:43
#1677 Op-amp Slew Rate
12:21
Просмотров 5 тыс.
#281: Bipolar Transistor Switching Time Measurement
23:18