1900 Buganda agreement 

Great clever young man thanks.

Thank you so much

Thanks so much Counsel for the grt work

Thanks so much I'm learning a lot

Thanks 🎉

Appreciate magis sed upload aliis gratias tibi

Thank u sir

Thanks for the program

I appreciate your work sir

Very informative. Thank you very much

Big thanks sir

Thank counsel

So counsel am I supposed to refer to the 1995 constitution

Gd work done sir👍

Great job

Good 😊

thanks

Is there a video befor this regarding margna carta

Thanks

I would like private tutorial but I see no contacts

Thank you counsel am a lawyer in kigali Rwanda I like your lecturer thank you I need to connect u for more engagements in terms legal proofing .Thank u Regards Daniel

Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri

Tweyanziza nnyo sebo Can u teach about the 1894 agreement as well

How does someone give away themselves like this?

Good work 👍

We had to memorize all this in high school history.

What about the features 44:55

We've been getting bits of history here and there. This is like drinking from the well itself other than drinking from akadomola big up on you👍

What about Zakaria kizingiri

Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri

Well said, Mr. Mutyaba. You are right that the Kingdom of Buganda has never been "equal" to any of the 14 major tribes that had joined the kingdom in the early 1900s to form what the British Administration called the "Uganda Protectorate." Hence, saying so does not make it so. Moreover, it is not a matter of the Baganda "feeling" that they are not equal to the rest. Actually, we the Baganda are not and never have been since the 1800s when the Kingdom gained the upper hand over the rest of her neighbours, establishing herself as a power to be reckoned with in the lake region of East Africa. That is what has spawned the bitter resentment since then against the kingdom by the rest of the country up until today. The Kingdom has no peer in everything in Uganda today, even though the rest of the country will never admit it. You may also be aware that the agreement had never been signed by any Kabaka of Buganda, the reigning Ssekabaka Mwanga II having been exiled in the Seychelles, as punishment for the persecution of the Christian converts in his kingdom. The kingdom was then in the hands of the chiefs you have mentioned, who had endorsed and signed it and not the Kabaka. This would come back to haunt the Governor Sir Andrew Cohen in 1953, when he withdrew his recognition of Ssekabaka Muteesa II sending him into exile. They had apparently disagreed reportedly over the thorny issue of the proposed federation of the east African British administered territories. The Kabaka refused to append his signature to documents the Governor had presented to him at Entebbe, according to Paulo Kavuma, the Katikkiro. The Kabaka would later be vindicated returning in triumph to his kingdom in 1955. It had been determined by law, that no Kabaka was bound by the agreement since none of them had signed it since then, and so, the governor had no authority to do what he had done. Furthermore, the court had asserted that the governor had the prerogative of withdrawing from the agreement but had failed to do so. Hence, the saying in Luganda after the verdit: (teyalina buyinza) - meaning that the governor had acted arbitrarily and without authority. Therefore, in reality the kingdom had never relinquished her autonomy up until then, and throughout 68 years of the British Administration of Uganda (1894-1962); the agreement notwithstanding. For example, you may recall the Mulira incident in the 1950s. The Kabaka had been accused of seducing his wife. The new Governor Sir Frederick Crawford was careful not to intervene for fear of overstepping his authority. The matter was then settled without interference from the British Administration at all, yet the governor had known about the alleged affair for some time but was powerless to act. Hence, the governor could do everything else that the agreement had stipulated, but he could never assail the Kabaka even if he had wanted to. Finally, that our country was called the "Uganda Protectorate" under the British Administration and not a "colony," is enough to show you the special status secured on behalf of the rest of the country by the auspices of the Kingdom of Buganda; regardless of the 1900 Agreement.

Those of Noah and stanslus mugwanya were bribed

For sure be more audible

GREAT WORK BUT I WISH YOU WHERE MORE AUDIDLE YOU ARE LOW

There was nothing positive in this bogus and very disrespectful document to our land and it's people

Bt are we still following that nonsense to date?

Thank you so much

Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri

Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri

Thank you so much

Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri

Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri