Wow I can't believe this is a 94, looks AMAZING especially for the year and mileage. I really like Mustangs and this is a good example of their quality. Never ever have I seen a car that looks as nice as this that has over 200,000 miles on it. Great Job Kyle, and your girlfriend!
This was my dream car as a kindergartener growing up in Mississauga, Ontario in the mid-to-late '90s. Everyday on the school bus, we would pass a parked one that was turquoise metallic (just like this one) with a tan top. And I always liked the horizontal taillights better than the vertical ones. More '90s and reminiscent of Hot Wheels, in my opinion. I haven't given up on that dream. Someday.
perfect platform for doing something interesting like adding forced induction; either supercharger or turbo. Although this year through 1996 were infamous for blowing head gaskets.
@@theviperkiller-io5ji you do realize the 94 to 98 sn95 v6 mustangs barely have any aftermarket support, they are very slow no one mods them, the GT they do mod and obviously the Cobras and Saleens of those years. Its the 99 to 04 mustang v6 mustangs that some people still modify
for it being as old as it is, that ol girl still looks GREAT. i had a 99 monte carlo z34 with 110k on it and it didnt look near as good as this. nice car man
My brother had a similar one. Back in 2009 he visited us in Prescott Valley, Arizona. He drove over 1,000 miles in it from Des Moines, Iowa and said that the trip was nice and gentle. It was just him alone in it. I recall helping him unload his suitcases when I was in 6th grade. I was talking about getting my permit (which I get next month, yay) and he told me that the car wasn't even worth it's own weight in dirt. He didn't really take care of it very well... gee, I wonder why he said that?
Kyle although this car may not be the cleanest car you reviewed, it definitely has one of the most CHARACTER. It probably has a lot of quirky history behind it.
That is a fine vehicle Kyle, which reflects well on your girlfriend. Let me explain: While there are always those, who wants the latest and the greatest, even if it's empties their bank account, or worse still indebting them for years to come, yet in all these consumers' madness, there are still those who are smart enough to live frugal. Beside the car is in good shape, hardly a dent or scratch, drives well and its a convertible in turquoise which is a rare combination.
Nice car though for a 94 dont see any rust or bad paint fade. Even the interior looks good yet wow! My brother has a 1993 Probe BY that he is restoring also a nice car, gotta say Ford had some nice cars, trucks, and vans in the 90s for sure
@luisinhoens90 that's true, the series 1 only pushed 165hp at time, the series 2 had about 225hp stock. Ya I know about the supercharged ones, I own one in my Olds LSS...it's a beast
@Jon3800 Yeah I know, my neighbor has a 2002 Grand Prix GTP, too bad its tranny wasn´t as bulletproof as the engine but now he has replaced it the beast has come back
That's barely enough hp for a 3.8, when the normal GM 3.8 pushes 225hp . I'm not a fan of those fords 3.8s because of the headgasket issues, but I'd put in a 3800 supercharged in there...what fun
@Jon3800 I think you´re not comparing similar year outputs of GM and Ford´s 3.8 engines. Actually most of the 3800 GM applications for 1994 had less than 200hp. Still more than Ford´s 3.8 but for mid 90s the output was upgraded to 200hp in some other cars and for 1999 the V6 Mustang was almost 200hp (at that time GM 3800 Series II V6 was 200hp) so actually not much of a difference. Supercharged models are another story. But yeah you´re correct about head gasket failures in Ford's 3.8
Nice car, my wife has one just like it, even the same radio. There is an easy fix for under $20 for the broken odometer. Just a quick gear replacement in the cluster. Do a Google search on it.
Btw Kyle, I notice in all ur videos with autos you move the shifter through ALL the gears. Be very careful doing this on older cars with shift cables as they are not used to being shifted in to that low gear. You can stretch the shift cable making it not want to stay in gear 100% correctly or worse, break the cable all together. Trust me, it's happened to me before. :\
Even then, they're not THAT slow. And it's not impossible to make them fast. For what it's worth, it's considerably more powerful than a lot of the V8s from the decade before it. But you're right, it wasn't supposed to be fast.
The song playing on the radio just before is a good song and is my favorite. If anyone wants to know what song that was, that was "if I could turn back time" by Cher. Year 1989. It's an old song. But still a good one especially for today being about 24 years old.
My friend has a red V6 coupe. Same year. He thinks its the shit. They are great cars if you leave them stock and just drive them. My friend, however, thinks with an intake, exhaust, 4.10 gears, and underdrive pulleys, he has THE fastest car at school. It does look bad ass though.
@marius883 it is a 94, you know. 6 cyl cars were made for economical reasons rather than performace at the time, especially on Mustangs and GM camaros and firebirds.
@Squalestang92 Yeah all the GTs came with 3.27 gears and the 8.8" rear end, but I was referring to the 94-98 V6 Base models they have the 7.5" rear with the 2.73 gears and that really slows the car down but better gas mileage haha.
@Leniwy1989 Here are the European brands sold in the US... Mercedes, BMW, Alpina, Porsche, VW, Audi, Volvo, Saab, Jaguar, Land Rover, Mini, Smart, Bentley, Rolls Royce, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Aston Martin, Maybach, Lotus. Everything else is not sold here LOL
