1A Postal Training 

Exactly. Couple their policy about THEM not recording with the myth that most people believe that you need consent and there you have the problem.

EXCELLENT COMMENT!

In a few states, he would have needed permission to film. But in most states, there's no reasonable expectation of privacy while in public (...duh). I don't remember if SC is one of those states, but I don't think it was.

@@godividarr No, there are no state where permission is required to record openly in a public place. Some states require two-party consent to record in a PRIVATE setting, if the act of recording is surreptitious or not disclosed.

When was this?

@@LiveBD.50 I’d hafta say like fifteen years ago. Maybe more.

@@johnnyryall1400 Wow, their sensitivity goes way back! LOL

@@LiveBD.50 😂 yep.

What a lovely bullshit story

Tyranny has no morality

I know someone that is a management in the post office, and so many of these postal workers have no clue of the rules and regulations governing themselves along with the law enforcement showing her. Some of these videos has really enlightened her and educated her on her own job that she’s been doing for 18 years and most postal workers believe that the post office is a self-sufficient entity and get snow Taxpayer funds

That kid was on my side, everytime I said something he said YEAH!

I noticed no one asked you what woman. We all know who you mean.

Yeah I saw that! It's about time the Postal Inspectors start educating clerks and managers on the 1st Amendment instead of them calling the police and wasting recourses.

I love watching Amagansett Press, he's one of the greats for sure!

Beta male! Lol

postal meltdown 🤣🤣🤣

Your postal follow up in Sumter was awesome!

Yeah man! Come on

@@LiveBD.50 For sure man! I'll let you know when I'm around

everyone is under mind controlled!

its really sad right

And the slow lines just make it worse.

No sam we don't want nor do we need to be a part of a frauditor you-r-a-fool video. This idiot was lost. He was looking for a movie sound stage and in a mental health crisis wandered into a post office. Get help bd. Then harassed a patron who was doing what is SUPPOSED to be done in a post office, mailing a package. I hope next time someone slaps a stamp on the grauditor and ships them to North Korea so they can figure out what a tyrant really is. Friggin idiots. Then for the court part you buffon, for a very short term you would jam it up, then 1 of 2 things happen. Either taxes increase enormously to cover many new courthouses and judges so all the cases can be heard this way or the laws change from a fine TO JAIL TIME. Want a jury trial, ok, then jail time is the punishment instead of a fine. See how big and brave you are then genius. End of the day sovcit guru, drive like a sane person with license registration and insurance and you won't need 5o worry about it. Newsflash cops hate ticket writing. It's tedious boring crap. But sovcits know everything just ask them they n will happily tell you they do.

Oh ps and there is no bad situation a sovtard WONTNOT CANT BUT WONT MAKE HORRIBLE, EXPENSIVE, NOISY, DRAWN OUT AND INTOLERABLE.

Officer Jeffcoat knew the constitution!

They have a new chief there now

I love your comments thank you!

@@LiveBD.50 and thank you. I enjoy your videos.❤️🌹

Post office is not funded by taxpayers.

I'm uncomfortable paying taxes to bail out an agency that spies on us.

She's already on youtube from last year LOL!

Poster 7 explained - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ° IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *(un edited)* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm10s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm00s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tZIZblghujg.htmlm00s ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U-PkfKgZlYA.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

@@mainid2490 nice copy & paste job, but no it didn't, since no help was needed in the 1st place. The words of poster 7 are that clear & understandable, not requiring a lawyer, any time you enter a PostOffice. "..... *except where PROHIBITED by.......other AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL (aka any Postal Employee)* ......" Hope that helped

You videoed a Vietnamese/American FAPD officer (the only one they have) at a wreck he is the 48th Police Officer they hired. His Radio #48 not sure if the new Chief has changed that but FAPD history has been that the Radio Call # is in the order the Officer was hired. 48 has Officially Retired from FAPD and has gone back to work for them and still has 48 as his radio call #..... Again, he was the 48th Police Officer hired by the Department. Now they are in the 170's.... To give you an idea how long 48 has been there... He was 100% and always has been 100% a really good Peace Officer and a personal friend of mine....

LOL! Advertising and commercial photography are considered other photographs, and do require permission, but I'm filming for news purposes.

@@LiveBD.50 no difference Cupcake Look how many MSM broadcasters film in public, and you see loads of people with their faces blurred out So Dumb Dumb there's no difference as you're making money from filming, as we know FRAUDITORS don't do anything for free, Plus you're not press or doing anything for news purposes, no FRAUDITOR has ever published a story, Just an embarrassing man child who is UNEMPLOYABLE and 100% has a CRIMINAL RECORD and is butt hurt he was arrested a few times and can't take responsibility for his actions

@@LiveBD.50 yeah you do it for kicks. You POS.

Poster 7 explained - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ° IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *(un edited)* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm10s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm00s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tZIZblghujg.htmlm00s ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U-PkfKgZlYA.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

I see you are ignorant of the law as well.

You are defining racist sexist trying to provoke people just going on about their day

Yes! He's Awesome!

Other photographs require permission

Unless prohibited by signs or authorized personnel

Poster 7 explained - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ° IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *(un edited)* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm10s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm00s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tZIZblghujg.htmlm00s ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U-PkfKgZlYA.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

Wrong!!!

@@Meanandre nope.

2003 version

My story was on the post office, so I tried to keep the camera off the customers, but when someone inserts themselves into my video, they become part of the story. I love that kid, he was on my side, every time I said something he said YEAH! Yes you should read all of poster 7 especially the last paragraph that says local police need an agreement to enforce postal regulations.

@@LiveBD.50 I was referring to the baby being held by its father starting @ 15:53

Why does one need to read the part where it's unlawful to bring a "pet or animal" on postal property, when they have no pet...

Poster 7 explained - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in Poster 7 concerning "Photography for News", it covers three "Subject Areas" (SA#) and two "Conditions" (C#) ;* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *Photographs for News (SA1), Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)* *(SA1)* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *(C1)* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *(C2 & SA2, SA3)* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _(The last sentence deals "Only" with _*_"(C2) Other photographs"_* _IE: _*_"Advertising (SA2), or Commercial Purposes (SA3)"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* _The _*_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited" or is "being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ● An _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ° IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *(un edited)* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm10s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tTpT7T77DTU.htmlm00s ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tZIZblghujg.htmlm00s ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-U-PkfKgZlYA.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

I’m glad the deputy told her to read up on the constitution after she insulted him.

Seem to always find the uneducated there.

You would think, in the 10 months I’ve been watching these videos that the Post Offices would have received a memo about the Auditors. I’ve heard that they did. Still, they raise a fuss almost every time!! They’ve forgotten that they are public employees. That includes many Post Masters!! It’s amazing! I like Public Library Audits, also. They have forgotten that they are Public employees, also! They think that patrons are private and can’t be filmed. Children are NOT EXCLUDED in the Right to film in public! That’s usually a huge argument in Libraries.

Another boot licker comment rogeeferrari, don't you care for your rights either? I guarantee you WILL after you lose them, if you have at least average intelligence.

@@pinktights747 Red (Like Mao's little red book?) I don't care what you say about me, what I care about is all Americans regaining our Constitutional RIGHTS! That begins with education, which some accept, and others are too indoctrinated by marxism to comprehend.

@@pinktights747 your the troll lol