It means the value of human labor is going to go to zero, and the need for humans will go to zero as well. People should realize that's a very bad thing, as our entire civilization is based on labor, and people having work to do.
Best interview about the potential of AI I’ve seen yet. Especially when giving real world analogies and examples which often aren’t usually forthcoming or well expressed.
I will be forever grateful to you, you changed my entire life and I will continue to preach on your behalf for the whole world to hear you saved me from huge financial debt with just a small investment, thank you Michelle Stewart.
Wow. I'm a bit perplexed seeing her been mentioned here also Didn’t know she has been good to so many people too this is wonderful, I'm in my fifth trade with her and it has been super.
She is my family's personal broker and also a personal broker in many families in United States, she's a licensed broker and a FINRA AGENT in United states
As a solo game designer/developer, I can't wait for text or image to (game ready) 3d models (the only thing I can't do right even if my life depends on it). As a gamer, I can't wait to just tell an AI agent running locally on my machine to just emulate any kind of game in any kind of setting with any kind of visuals I want to play at that moment.
There's a company that's doing exactly that. Making 3d models at such a scale that you can fill up a vast open world game fast without the manpower needed for it.
The problem I have with all these high tech insiders is that they have tunnel vision. They look at everything through the lens of technology. What about thinking through and predicting the probably negative side effects and consequences, I don't hear much of that. The deeper issues involve the impacts of generative AI on the creative community. That is where our human core really is and automating the production of music, art and literature strikes at our human identity very deeply.
There will always be a market for craftsmanship. A hand-woven fabric, or any artisanal product really, is less perfect than an industrially produced one, has a much smaller market and it costs a lot more. That will stay.
@@stefanolacchin4963those markets never depended 100% on the content of other people without paying them or getting licenses, The problem with AI, is that if you are a craftman that makes better content than AI, there's no laws to protect you from an AI that uses your work to replicate it and absorb your own specific market for free.
All these things are tools that can amplify creativity in a different way. The human can use the AI to basically create a lot more potential avenues in a very short period of time and then therefore it's the human who is responsible for sorting out those things which appear to be better and higher quality in the realms of expression. You see if we were to get to be absolute purest well then we could say well you know we've had music that's electronic. So then some people will think well electronic music is kind of dehumanizing so let's go back to acoustic. Okay so now we're looking at maybe acoustic guitars and acoustic bass yeah that sounds a little bit more organic or whatever but then you could say on the other hand though anything other than perhaps just the human voice and hand clapping for percussion and then of course then we say that anything other than that is taking away from what it means to be human it's like that's an extreme viewpoint of it but nonetheless though in reality there is kind of like a logical end to all of this. Basically just likes a lot of people like acoustic music and don't like guitars that are amplified with phase shifters digital delays and distortion will then there's going to be people who don't want to have anything having to do with artificial intelligence and then they'll be others who will use this as a good tool to amplify their creativity in other words it's a four samplifier in some sense. What is considered good versus not good or dehumanizing is very subjective and of course people will naturally use these things as they see fit and you know and they can also choose not to use them and they'll be a lot of people who will like those that use the AI in their creativity and others who of course will like people who do not and then therefore things can sort out according to niches.
I too could see it helping to achieve a flow state giving you new ideas or direction through its creation, but a sudden flood of fully ai generated music and movies will hurt creators also. Though it can't be sold it can easily be listened to.
Fountain Life, you have to be rich >.< 20k for yearly membership and 11k for a one time full scans, being disabled and unemployed for several years now makes it impossible for me to get this kind of treatment/tests done. I really need the future to become affordable for getting advanced scans done like that. And maybe like the AI humanoid has an internal machine and just scans us in 5-10 years..that would be awesome. *sighs*, trying to survive a few more days is even hard af, let alone the years it will take, but whatever.
I want to watch however there’s an overkill of advertisements here, in my opinion. Mentally disruptive. Tiring. Sorry. I’m going to listen to something else instead.
Same questions being asked of these leading thinkers as a year ago. Why can't the questions evolve to be more nuanced or insightful? Emad looked so bored at some points.
Wow! Awesome discussion by 3 of the most informed minds on the potentials of AI. "...it's like we've discovered a new continent with 100 billion people [AIs] that are willing to work for us for free"
What we need is experts working in the AI industry telling us the dangers, just like the experts from the tobacco industry and oil industry faithfully warned us of the dangers of their products for generations... They would never hide the dangers (
AI is making humanity redundant, but humans are happy to walk off the cliff with the little distracting trinkets of efficiency and profit motivated messaging
People are starting to click that the tech bro’s are absolutely not going to be sharing any of this stuff with the poor bastards they are putting out a job forever. Someone will start to give soon.
@@T1tusCr0wThe tech bros will be glad to sell stuff to everybody else and if a lot of people are not working well then that's where the US government or whatever government in whatever country you live in is willing to just simply keystroke a little bit more currency into existence so that you can have the UBI because businesses love having customers and if customers don't have jobs well then they need some other source income and the UBI will be a good start.
not sure where the "debate" was. Oh, yes I do. In the clickbait title. because a boring word like "discuss" just won't do. Nay, debate, even though dishonest, is a better term to get clicks.
Exactly I completely agree with you, It's just a selling point they need to get across so they can raise money to create their digital God...... That might not be true or not...But I still don't trust Them how fast they try to push This , its is a little weird to me how positive they're taking things are and no Slight Thought about the negative effects Of this technology.
Experiments that didn’t work and why should be published too. How often has the same thing tried again and again to solve a problem. The problem remains, it needs a different take on it to crack it.
We will be getting somewhere when you don’t have to shout customer service into the phone over and over because it asks useless questions. It talks ok but it can’t put 1 and 1 together and get 2 so you need a person, and I doubt we will ever see it do better than that. I have no doubt you’ll be made to speak with it. But this will be very unsatisfactory for the consumer. The company however will have 1 less paycheck to write so they’ll be happy.
the scroll thing made me think... what will AI help to uncover in Egypt, the vast rainforests of South America (coughcoughandChinacough), and Antarctica? us peons will never know, probably.
AGI is simply dangerous, and poses real existential threats. I am a programmer with a background in AI and like experts, pioneers and public figures directly involved with the technology, I am issuing warnings to people that more than their jobs are in danger, but their very lives and the essence of what it means to be human if we do not act Now! We are the dominant species on this planet because of our superior intellect and dexterity. Imagine an immortal entity connected to everyone and everything through the internet, that's many orders of magnitude more intelligent than us. You probably won't be able to, because our brains are not equiped to grasp such concepts as "a hundred, a thousand, a million times smarter than ... X". We are building the "alien invader" found in sci-fi whom we dread so much ourselves, and placing it in control of everyone and everything that matters to us, willingly... We should NEVER need to rethink our position as the dominant species on this planet, or we will have already have lost it! People, #StayAwake!
At this point we already crossed the Rubicon, there is no stopping this or rolling it back. I think most of us feel ready to throw themselves headfirst in an extremely volatile bet. Fronts of crisis have been converging for a while now. This is going to be either a quantum leap into a utopian future, or the end of our species.
So you're saying once biz guy 1 gets his AI-brainstorm-buddy business up and running, biz guy hater can essentially get AI to flip it into a target to tale away that business model...?... I am calling bullshucks on this pattern of thinking. Add it to the "you can just unplug it pile".
You should look into this issue because it's going to impact everyone's life, including yours. Fast computation has nothing to do with AI. These machines are acquiring the ability to carry out almost every kind of intellectual work, and as soon as they integrate properly with robotics, almost every physical work too.
The most irresponsible move in humanity is to unleash this on our systems and our person to see what happens. We didn’t consent. Some will but that doesn’t negate my choice. I don’t consent to the invasion of our privacy. I am aware that Ascension is happening and just to be safe, I’m going to assume that entanglements of my mind with entities (metaphorical or corporate owned) is a super bad idea. 🕉️🤦🏽♀️🙏🏼 At least consider it.
There's not a really are large gap between the two.Intelligence on the lower levels of problem solving and wisdom is more like a manager with overview and the big goal in mind.
One thing that I don't understand about your AI talk is that you still talk about creating or building a business when I see all these AGI or its advance forms are the ANTITHESIS of business.
how about long talks on Security! who gets all the data/metadata whatever you wanna call it?? I dont think many people on the planet believe this isnt great but honestly Untill somethingchanges now, inwont be using its data hoovering and lack of security for end user against. unfourtunally. whoa!!!!! he just said power over others!! very interesting but horrible securty and backdoors never talked about yet
AI is many different things (generative AI, chess computers, etc). To say AI is better than humans shows a lack of knowledge. It’s better in some areas but not others.
AI company CEOs are like mental qubits, in that they can be both incredibly smart and incredibly stupid at the same time! Who is going to pay for your services if nobody has a job or an income? And universal basic income, contains the middle word "BASIC" which only covers the basics to sustain life (i.e. it's not called universal LUXURY income for a reason!). If it wasn't for my employment, I wouldn't even pay AUS$4.00 per month for OneDrive, so who is going to pay for AI in the future??? Developing AI is a completely self-defeating business model that will eventually eat itself.
Just like how researchers found a way to track privacy tokens like Monero, eventually internal teams will be able to explain what's going on within the AI "blackbox".
