I think this championships was very slow time wise. I dont remember anybody running anything amazing in 2003 timewise. But id say the fact that these heats where so loaded with names think the pressure got to everybody. Watched all this live as a teen
@@berbanedash7935ahahah where ? In USA only probably. All you talked is trash, 10.1 is a supreme chrono and is the national record in so many countries. Also it is still a time that could bring you into a world championship final so take your conclusions.
@@lerebele1 Facts. Not a single sprinter ran even 10 seconds in that WC which proves how hard running 10.00 flat is. Now think about all the guys who run sub 9.8 these days...lol
@@Andrembramwell which proves that running 10.00 is very hard. Not a single sprinter was close to run 10 sec flat then, despite guys like Greene, Montgomery, Boldon and Chambers, all men who had ran sub 9.9 and 9.8 in the past
He was pretty much. Around 2004-2006 he did so at will, seemingly in a jog. Just couldn't find that relaxation when it really mattered. He should have had 1 Olympic gold and at least 1 or 2 world titles coz he was clearly the fastest man alive then before Bolt came along a couple years later
Not exactly. The next year he ran 9.78 in the 100m (his career best) with a tailwind and had a good season in 2004. He was unlucky to become Olympic champion again in Athens 2004, but he was capable. The beginning of his end became the USATF 100m final in 2005, in that race he pulled the hamstring again…
