Тёмный

2020's Biggest Breakthroughs in Math and Computer Science 

Quanta Magazine
Подписаться 959 тыс.
Просмотров 2,2 млн
50% 1

For mathematicians and computer scientists, 2020 was full of discipline-spanning discoveries and celebrations of creativity. We'd like to take a moment to recognize some of these achievements.
1. A landmark proof simply titled “MIP* = RE" establishes that quantum computers calculating with entangled qubits can theoretically verify the answers to an enormous set of problems. Along the way, the five computer scientists who authored the proof also answered two other major questions: Tsirelson’s problem in physics, about models of particle entanglement, and a problem in pure mathematics called the Connes embedding conjecture.
2. In February, graduate student Lisa Piccirillo dusted off some long-known but little-utilized mathematical tools to answer a decades-old question about knots. A particular knot named after the legendary mathematician John Conway had long evaded mathematical classification in terms of a higher-dimensional property known as “sliceness.” But by developing a version of the knot that yielded to traditional knot analysis, Piccirillo finally determined that the Conway knot is not “slice.”
3. For decades, mathematicians have used computer programs known as proof assistants to help them write proofs - but the humans have always guided the process, choosing the proof’s overall strategy and approach. That may soon change. Many mathematicians are excited about a proof assistant called Lean, an efficient and addictive proof assistant that could one day help tackle major problems. First, though, mathematicians must digitize thousands of years of mathematical knowledge, much of it unwritten, into a form Lean can process. Researchers have already encoded some of the most complicated mathematical ideas, proving in theory that the software can handle the hard stuff. Now it’s just a question of filling in the rest.
Learn more: www.quantamagazine.org/quanta...

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

22 дек 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,6 тыс.   
@ilovecomputers
@ilovecomputers 3 года назад
Cracks me up that a mathematician found it ridiculous that a knot problem was unsolved for a decade, so she just solves it in a weekend. What a flex
@kelpdock8913
@kelpdock8913 3 года назад
@@ginxxxxx what are you talking about
@aaronthelord9409
@aaronthelord9409 3 года назад
You'd be surprised how normal this is. Sometimes it's about perspective and new ways of thinking. I work in Combinatorics and have worked on problems faster than my professor did back in his day. Young and upcoming mathematicians are increasingly more knowledgeable every year
@aaronthelord9409
@aaronthelord9409 3 года назад
@@ginxxxxx they tricked me into starting a PhD real good
@aaronthelord9409
@aaronthelord9409 3 года назад
@@ginxxxxx wut we talking about now?
@realglutenfree
@realglutenfree 3 года назад
@@aaronthelord9409 Leave that troll alone. Probably took the wrong kind of drugs, and who can blame him. Its 2020 after all.
@DavidMcCoul
@DavidMcCoul 3 года назад
Experts thought it was a hard problem, but in fact it was knot.
@soutrikdas8403
@soutrikdas8403 3 года назад
Help yourself to the door Damn that was good
@briandbeaudin9166
@briandbeaudin9166 3 года назад
Knot funny!
@divyaalokverma
@divyaalokverma 3 года назад
Lit
@bythebooksgaming2721
@bythebooksgaming2721 3 года назад
Worthy of a lil chuckle and a congrats note nice one bro
@randy4443
@randy4443 3 года назад
@Jake Braiding-Watson he will knot
@HenryYuen
@HenryYuen 3 года назад
Just wanted to provide a clarification on the first segment (I'm one of the authors of the result). Contrary to a popular misconception about MIP* = RE: quantum computers CANNOT solve the Halting problem (and it's known that they cannot). Our result is not about SOLVING the Halting problem: instead it says that it's possible for quantum provers who already know the solution to use entanglement to CONVINCE a classical verifier (personified by the policeman in the video clip) that they know the solution. In other words: without entanglement, the provers are unable to convince the verifier they know the answer, but with entanglement, they can. --- In more detail ---- The Halting problem is to determine whether a Turing machine (given as input) halts. We know there is no algorithm to determine this. But for any specific Turing machine A, if it does halt, then there is a proof of this fact: namely, it will be the transcript of the program A's execution until it halts (in programming terminology it's the execution trace of the program). So in principle you could convince someone that A halts by showing them this transcript. However this transcript can be astronomically long, because the A can run for an extremely long time. Is there a way to short-cut this? MIP* = RE shows that if A does halt, it's possible for quantum provers to convince a verifier that there exists a transcript demonstrating this fact... without showing the entire transcript to the verifier. Instead, the time it takes for the provers to convince the verifier will be independent of the run-time of A. In a nutshell, it's like this: verifier wants to know if program A halts. These almighty provers, who we assume know the answer, claim "Yes, it does. However it halts after the life of the universe." The verifier says, "well, I don't believe you. Prove it to me right here and now." And the provers, using entanglement, can actually do this (without having to wait until the end of the universe). Hope this clarifies a bit!
@dannygjk
@dannygjk 3 года назад
You mean for a given program? A program for which it is known whether it halts?
@HenryYuen
@HenryYuen 3 года назад
@@dannygjk Yes. The verifier wants to know whether program A halts or not, and if A does halt, it is possible for the provers to convince the verifier of this fact.
@dannygjk
@dannygjk 3 года назад
@@HenryYuen Isn't that the crux of the Halting problem ie. to be able to determine whether it halts? I have a programming background so I get the idea of the Halting problem. If a program is complex 'enough' there is no known way to determine *in a reasonable period of time* whether it halts. Similar to chess theoretically it is possible to exhaustively determine whether chess is a win, draw, or loss but it can't be done in a reasonable period of time.
@Futti72
@Futti72 3 года назад
@@dannygjk The Halting Problem means that it is impossible (even in theory) to create *one* algorithm that can decide for *all* programs whether they will hold eventually or run forever. It doesn't matter how your algorithm works. There will always be at least 1 program for which the algorithm makes a wrong prediction.
@HenryYuen
@HenryYuen 3 года назад
​@@dannygjk Yes, the Halting problem is to determine whether a Turing machine (given as input) halts. We know there is no algorithm to determine this; as you mention programs can get too complex. But for any specific Turing machine A, if it *does* halt, then there is a proof of this fact: namely, it will be the transcript of the program A's execution until it halts (in programming terminology it's the execution trace of the program). So in principle you could convince someone that A halts by showing them this transcript. However this transcript can be astronomically long, because the A can run for an extremely long time. Is there a way to short-cut this? MIP* = RE shows that if A does halt, it's possible for quantum provers to convince a verifier that there exists a transcript demonstrating this fact... without showing the entire transcript to the verifier. Instead, the time it takes for the provers to convince the verifier will be independent of the run-time of A. In a nutshell, it's like this: verifier wants to know if program A halts. These almighty provers, who we assume know the answer, claim "Yes, it does. However it halts after the life of the universe." The verifier says, "well, I don't believe you. Prove it to me right here and now." And the provers, using entanglement, can actually do this (without having to wait until the end of the universe).
@aazdu03
@aazdu03 3 года назад
Lisa is the absolute Chad : she just flexes on decades of mathematical uncertainty " it's just one knot who cares " then solves it like it's some dumb exercise and is like "yeah here you go look , now can we please move on?"
@aazdu03
@aazdu03 3 года назад
@Anime Sucks well you're making an assumption that is not true at all : she is not some random person. She is a professional researcher and a professor in mathematics wha has worked for more than a decade in her field. She basically has worked her entire life to build the tools that made her able to solve these kind of problems so no she is no random person
@nowheremap
@nowheremap 3 года назад
@Questa Semplice Animazione nobody cares about knots, not even her 😭😭😭😭
@pubgplayer1720
@pubgplayer1720 3 года назад
@@nowheremap Lmao that's 'cause knots are literally one of the most boring and useless parts of mathematics
@mryodak
@mryodak 3 года назад
@@pubgplayer1720 100 years later: 4-dimensional proteins are discovered. No one knows what to do with em.
@heisenmountainb6854
@heisenmountainb6854 3 года назад
@@mryodak Or the solution to "the theory of EvERyTHinG" involves knots in some way.
@mashanaslidnyk422
@mashanaslidnyk422 3 года назад
I loved the "I don't care about knots" comment 🤣
@Tymeshifter
@Tymeshifter 3 года назад
She will definitely care to tie the knot with someone in the near future.
@mashanaslidnyk422
@mashanaslidnyk422 3 года назад
@@Tymeshifter that's a really inappropriate comment. I know you didn't mean it, but it is. If we wouldn't say the same about Stephen Hawking, no need to say it about another mathematician who just so happens to be a young woman.
@PanConQueso001
@PanConQueso001 3 года назад
I kind of get it, Modern math is a lot more "imaginative" than we are taught in school, in a literal way, I didn’t knew until a couple of months that maths are *literal representations with symbols* of things that most often, you can draw, and as an artist, that’s a whole lot of new info I wasn’t aware and I wish I knew before.
@Caellyan
@Caellyan 3 года назад
​@@mashanaslidnyk422 It has nothing to do with the fact that she's a woman. Also, people made ACTUALLY inappropriate jokes about Hawkings all the time and I don't think he minded it. It's a dumb pun about knot theory. I found that comment really funny too. Subtle shade thrown towards knot theory people was 👌.
@Cyberdactyl
@Cyberdactyl 3 года назад
@@mashanaslidnyk422 Hawking tied the knot early, so no, it would not have been said about Hawking.
@mehg8407
@mehg8407 3 года назад
I hope Lisa never writes math text books. "Proof: Obvious. Left as an exercise."
@soutrikdas8403
@soutrikdas8403 3 года назад
More like the book would be empty
@dmr11235
@dmr11235 3 года назад
Lmao just 300 blank pages and the single line “the writing of this book is left as an exercise to the reader”
@apefu
@apefu 3 года назад
I fell like that is EVERY math professor I've ever had. Not all of the time obviously, but every class. Even some of the textbooks.
@luke_fabis
@luke_fabis 3 года назад
That’s like every other Dover book on math.
@Agrover112
@Agrover112 3 года назад
@@dmr11235 * Left to the imagination of the reader
@jimkennedy4509
@jimkennedy4509 3 года назад
I love it that the woman thought "This can't be that hard.." and then she solved it! awesome!
@mergen9802
@mergen9802 3 года назад
and she doesn't even care about knots...
@originalsugarcake
@originalsugarcake 3 года назад
Badass! It's also a great attitude towards theoretical research. Even if you don't solve these problems, you usually learn something by being arrogant and trying. Deference is poison to science.
@virgiliustancu9293
@virgiliustancu9293 3 года назад
Why is so important that she is a woman or not?!?
@emielverbeeren8181
@emielverbeeren8181 3 года назад
@@virgiliustancu9293 Nobody even slightly implied that.
@chrisray1567
@chrisray1567 3 года назад
Her story reminds me of George Dantzig, who mistakenly thought two open problems in statistics were homework problems and solved them.
@Lieu10antDan
@Lieu10antDan 3 года назад
"You find yourself studying knots anyway." Most underrated comment of Dimensional Physics 2020.
@u.v.s.5583
@u.v.s.5583 3 года назад
This is phonetically true. I do indeed find myself studying not anyway.
@aluisious
@aluisious 3 года назад
@@u.v.s.5583 I have been not studying this whole time.
@nurph2594
@nurph2594 3 года назад
she scripted that, don't be fooled
@anothervanwinkle
@anothervanwinkle 3 года назад
If you really look into it, it's pretty knots.
@ameliablamey9049
@ameliablamey9049 3 года назад
you sure do hahaha, know from experiance
@BassHero55
@BassHero55 3 года назад
That first one was misleading, if you actually read about the paper (or even the title!) You would realize that the proof actually proved that the set of problems that can be solved by entangled quantum provers is exactly the same as the set of problems that can be solved by turing machines (i.e. that are recursively enumerable)
@ShreshtJain
@ShreshtJain 3 года назад
Yep this makes it sound like the Halting Problem is solvable with Quantum Computing but the Halting Problem is provably unsolvable.
@benjaminanderson1014
@benjaminanderson1014 3 года назад
Thank you for clarifying. I had a hard time believing the video, I'm glad to know it was wrong
@hariw834
@hariw834 3 года назад
Thanks for clarification. I was searching for the abstract of the paper and couldnt find it
@ShreshtJain
@ShreshtJain 3 года назад
yeah like dont get me wrong ofc the paper is huuge and its impact is gonna be big in complexity and even physics but halting problem being solvable would imply there may be a way to have a sufficently expressive, complete and consistent mathematics which would violate Godels incompleteness. Not an expert tho, just a curious physcist
@juan84518
@juan84518 3 года назад
Thanks
@blas_de_lezo7375
@blas_de_lezo7375 3 года назад
The whole idea of an artificial inteligente solving math is incredible promising. As math advances, the number of people expert at the highest level in multiple fields decreases. I believe that if you could somehow posses the current total math knowledge in your brain, some new answers would come up immediatly.
@cbot9302
@cbot9302 3 года назад
Well there's also the fact that math is sort of like evolution, and it kinda has a massive tree, where some branches end, and others just keep on splitting and expanding. This means there are more and more fields that may need some very simple things done to progress them, but no one is working on them, so they just sit there looking like an extinct line(if that makes any sense)
@blas_de_lezo7375
@blas_de_lezo7375 3 года назад
@@cbot9302 It does and it happens, until somebody somehow reconnects that forgotten field with some new stuff and suddenly magic happens.
@user-rm3wf7ch3d
@user-rm3wf7ch3d 3 года назад
@@blas_de_lezo7375 I am holding a different opinion... There are many math facts which are not written out, because they are not as "pretty" as others. For example, we have "rings" which does not have identity, non-commutative etc. There are indeed some theories on it, but not very much unless they are used in some particular problems, since many mathematicians found that it is "not beautiful". I would say "beauty" is one of the reason for some of the "ugly" lines extinct. However, I surely agree that Lean can give so many proofs once one can input the current math knowledge inside.
@MusixPro4u
@MusixPro4u 3 года назад
The problem generally lies in knowing which deductions to make to derive meaningful results, as the possibilities to combine theorems grow exponentially. In theory, one could derive all the math we know of based on ZFC (except Gödel sentences ofc.), by just letting a theorem prover run for infinity, since ZFC is recursively enumerable. But in practice, for automated theorem proving, we need to have some form of meta-inference learning, which learns which kinds of theorems tend to produce meaningful results, when combined.
@bunnyben5607
@bunnyben5607 3 года назад
Computerized proof results mainly in just lines of spat out truth sequences anyways, some of which are actually impossible to translate into meaningful human-readable mathematics. Truths tables aren't what mathematics is about anyways, it's about understanding mathematical structures on a certain level. Furthermore, mathematical proofs are something called "NP hard" and sometimes NP-complete. This means that even if a program were developed which could derive every mathematical statement, calculating statements would require exponentially increasing periods of time, this reduces the feasibility of any such program massively due to combinatorial explosion. We're also pretty sure (but can't yet prove) that there is no way to reduce theorem proving to polynomial time either, meaning the time barrier is fundamental.
@sayantanguha1934
@sayantanguha1934 3 года назад
"I don't care about knots. haha. I do care about 3-4 dimensional spaces." - spoken like a true Mathematician.
@AbiduddinAhmed
@AbiduddinAhmed 3 года назад
This video called me dumb in 8 different languages
@MrSpock-sm3dd
@MrSpock-sm3dd 3 года назад
And I was already feeling dumb before the video
@killerbait8240
@killerbait8240 3 года назад
Just nod and hmmm boys....nod and hmmm
@holysmokes4493
@holysmokes4493 3 года назад
I hear the Feynman lectures are helpful. I myself wouldn't know since i haven't seen them but I've heard people like them for their approachable learning curve. I'm not sure if it has anything to do with this video though.
@killerbait8240
@killerbait8240 3 года назад
@@ginxxxxx its seems that you are far dukber for not realizeling that we did call ourselves dumb
@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587
@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587 3 года назад
same lol
@dirtrockground4543
@dirtrockground4543 3 года назад
It's so funny that there was a whole issue with the Conway knot and then Lisa comes along saying "I don't understand what is so difficult about this knot," and then solves the problem.
@FrappuccinoAlfredo
@FrappuccinoAlfredo 3 года назад
Lisa: “it’s knot that hard guys”
@IamBHM
@IamBHM 3 года назад
(That's what she said.)
@sebastianjost
@sebastianjost 3 года назад
Just because some people say a problem is hard, doesn't necessarily mean it is. Maybe you happen to have just the right idea that leads to a relatively simple answer/proof. Always give it a try.
@WWLinkMasterX
@WWLinkMasterX 3 года назад
@@christophermarini5738 why are comments sections always full of you weirdos? And why do people upvote you?
@nathanthanatos3743
@nathanthanatos3743 3 года назад
quantum computer: *attempts to solve halting problem* quantum computer: *experiences halting problem*
@gerardoflorescalderon1038
@gerardoflorescalderon1038 3 года назад
Buy in the year 2525 regains momentum or speed without bumps or halts!? Q C feel she lacks decision power. She might decide become Idling C for some 424 years more? STOP. Got tired of fighting this damnd editor which chances every Word i write!?#$@&*%?
@emberchord
@emberchord 3 года назад
How is it that everytime a mathematician is interviewed, it is happening in a room that is in utter disarray
@RADZIO895
@RADZIO895 3 года назад
It's the law
@johndallis9901
@johndallis9901 3 года назад
@@RADZIO895 what
@maclegaming4553
@maclegaming4553 3 года назад
@@johndallis9901 it’s the law
@johndallis9901
@johndallis9901 3 года назад
@@maclegaming4553 what?
@goji_crafter
@goji_crafter 3 года назад
@@johndallis9901 it's the law
@brodykrusemark5444
@brodykrusemark5444 3 года назад
The fact that these incredibly smart people exist in the same universe as flatearthers is even more complicated then these math problems
@Ethan-ix4oe
@Ethan-ix4oe 3 года назад
bell curve go brrr
@WitnessedOne
@WitnessedOne 3 года назад
And yet I wonder how many of these "incredibly smart people" would be able to answer the simplest of biology questions.
@sthamansinha243
@sthamansinha243 3 года назад
@@WitnessedOne Found the flat earther
@PeterJavi
@PeterJavi 3 года назад
@@WitnessedOne "biggest breakthroughs in mathematics and computer science." Does this sound like a video that has biologists featured?
@m101ist
@m101ist 3 года назад
And what are the odds of that !😲
@heathispieces
@heathispieces 3 года назад
Lisa is so cool! She was my ta in calculus at ut!
@stevehan3498
@stevehan3498 3 года назад
Wait really? I’m at UT rn
@heathispieces
@heathispieces 3 года назад
@@stevehan3498 she's at mit now I think
@ericnyamu9981
@ericnyamu9981 3 года назад
Are you having a scarcity of letters at your end 😂😂
@tacitozetticci9308
@tacitozetticci9308 3 года назад
@@ericnyamu9981 Teaching Assistant. University of Texas at Austin.
@btm1
@btm1 3 года назад
she's pretty arrogant
@HealthInspectorz
@HealthInspectorz 3 года назад
I'm a comp sci major, minor in math. I appreciate math since I realized how math and computer science closely tie to each other. The seemingly abstract realm of mathematics somehow finds a way through the machinery of computer science. It's poetic.
@Magnasium038
@Magnasium038 3 года назад
I love this byte sized summary format. You quickly convey the gist of the mathematical problems without it becoming overwhelming for those not familiar with the field. I hope you continue this as a regular series
@HominisLupis
@HominisLupis 3 года назад
Lisa Piccirilo might be one of the coolest humans alive
@mistahcruz1211
@mistahcruz1211 3 года назад
1:08 - 1:12 there's a pink 'v' floating on the screen and it's not letting me sleep at night
@ImChief
@ImChief 3 года назад
I came looking for this comment immediately after seeing it
@kcaz94
@kcaz94 3 года назад
I work in graphic design and video. V is the shortcut to the selection tool. Seems the editor hit it while still in the text tool. Sometimes floating v's appear in my work too lol.
@hadi174
@hadi174 3 года назад
I thought you were talking about the guy's face...
@volp02
@volp02 3 года назад
@@kcaz94 happens to me alot xD
@wyndter_4951
@wyndter_4951 3 года назад
@David Cruz You monster, I was having a good day
@yimingqu2403
@yimingqu2403 3 года назад
All these are really exciting stories, especially the Lean. I've have similar idea and I'm glad to see that someone is working on it and that it might work.
@ultraviolet.catastrophe
@ultraviolet.catastrophe 3 года назад
The last one on digitizing math was my favorite. There's actually a lot of potential in using computers to prove and/or discover mathematical theorems.
@Deady4u
@Deady4u 3 года назад
I've always wondered why something like the math library hasn't been invented yet. Like its quite impossible for any one person to know every kind of math/recall on the spot but a computer can recall,categorise,compare,compute that data in just moments without any error.
@mastershooter64
@mastershooter64 2 года назад
that's why people collaborate, multiple researchers from different fields work together
@delirious323
@delirious323 3 года назад
really crazy that this one mass of code holds the pathway to solving virtually unsolvable mathematical problems which act as roadblocks to developing a more advanced civilization. This code is literally advancing humanity forwards, and the more people focus on creating things like these the faster we as a people will develop :)
@bonob0123
@bonob0123 3 года назад
The last segment guy's argument about how putting your proof or argument into programming terms helps you yourself to clarify the argument in a precise manner to possibly improve it is absolutely true. I remember being baffled by the Monty Hall problem (game show with 3 doors: 1 with prize, 1 undesirable item, 1 neutral; you choose a door; they reveal 1 door leaving two closed doors; do you switch your choice or stick with it?) as a kid in school so decided to simulate it on my TI-89 calculator with the intent of running the simulation hundreds of times to check the probabilities. Except the process of writing the code to set up the simulation made the Monty Hall "trick" become so plainly visible that the correct understanding of the problem became intuitively crystal clear before ever even running the simulation (the first revealed door is NOT RANDOM so the final probabilities of the each of the last 2 doors having the prize, per the good Reverend Bayes, is not 50-50) .
@Doppe1ganger
@Doppe1ganger 3 года назад
What are you talking about. Whether the first door is random is irrelevant, you still have a 50-50 regarding what's behind the last two door. What is even the problem? If they reveal the bad item you switch, if they reveal the good item you don't switch, if they reveal the neutral item you decide whether you value the neutral item.
@tim40gabby25
@tim40gabby25 3 года назад
@@Doppe1ganger hi. They never reveal the good item, so they choose one of the doors behind which is a bad item. The "risk" then concentrated on the unopened doors. Time to switch. I prefer the 1m boxes with just one loaded gun. You choose, they open every other box bar one.. you stick - or you are betting on that 1m:1 shot. Does this help? Old uk duffer here :)
@Doppe1ganger
@Doppe1ganger 3 года назад
@@tim40gabby25 I still don't understand. Say they reveal the bad item, this is an obvious switch. Say they reveal the neutral item, then it's a 50-50 on whether you'll get the bad or good item if you switch and it's up to the player to value the neutral item. (extreme scenario, if the neutral item is worth 100 bucks, and the good item worth 101 bucks, and the bad item worthless, it would be best to just stick to the neutral item). Dunno what that other game is. My game is poker, so i'm constantly assessing the pot, my contribution to it, the maximum i could get out of it, the cards i have, the cards on the table, and how the other players assess these things.
@bonob0123
@bonob0123 3 года назад
@@Doppe1ganger why don't you take a deep breath and google "monty hall problem" for yourself and read a little bit to learn something instead of arguing with strangers in RU-vid comments for a video meant to be a beautiful celebration of humanity's progress in the sciences.
@Doppe1ganger
@Doppe1ganger 3 года назад
@@bonob0123 I'm sorry but, i read the Monty Hall problem now (hadn't seen it yet), which is completely different from the problem you posed. In the Monty Hall problem you have only 1 prize out of 3, not 1 good, 1 neutral, 1 bad. In the Monty Hall problem it is obvious that switching will net you a 2/3'th win since 2/3'th of the time you will not pick the prize and Monty has to open the door which also doesn't contain the prize thus, the door you haven't picked and isn't opened has 2/3'th of a chance to contain the prize. In your problem the player has to make a value judgement, risk the neutral item that is shown to possibly win bigger, which would be a 50/50, or if the host shows the bad item, it's a 50/50 on whether you'll get the good or neutral prize.
@DukePaprikar
@DukePaprikar 3 года назад
3:55 "Senior topologist" - what an ultimate job title.
@marcello9476
@marcello9476 3 года назад
What do you mean by that?
@wegner7036
@wegner7036 3 года назад
@@marcello9476 I'm assuming a lenny face.
@DukePaprikar
@DukePaprikar 3 года назад
@@marcello9476 It just sounds so unusual/unexpected (because it's so specific), thus cool.
@sklizzy3125
@sklizzy3125 3 года назад
@@DukePaprikar it’s not that unusual of a job title lol
@dsp4392
@dsp4392 3 года назад
Saddens me that those positions don't earn even close to what the typical hedge fund manager does.
@slickko8455
@slickko8455 3 года назад
I wish they would have explained the solutions more that’s so interesting
@AdrienBurg
@AdrienBurg 3 года назад
Get into the papers ! :)
@benjaminw.1471
@benjaminw.1471 3 года назад
@@AdrienBurg Or read the articles on their websites, they're all high quality
@Madhu-uy4dj
@Madhu-uy4dj 2 года назад
Can you please tell me where I can read those papers..or which website it is
@S.G.Wallner
@S.G.Wallner 3 года назад
"I just didn't understand why for some 11 crossing knot this should be so difficult." ... I just fell in love with you Lisa.
@value8035
@value8035 3 года назад
Nope. Move on dude, she was specific. She don't care about "knots".
@S.G.Wallner
@S.G.Wallner 3 года назад
@@value8035 Haha, I know, but I won't even tell you how I feel when she mentioned 3 and 4 dimensional spaces. Don't tell me who I can and can't love mom and dad! *storms off to bedroom and slams the door.
@TheJeremyKentBGross
@TheJeremyKentBGross 3 года назад
@@S.G.Wallner She's only into dudes who understand 5 and 6 dimensional spaces. 😂
@S.G.Wallner
@S.G.Wallner 3 года назад
@@TheJeremyKentBGross Well maybe my hyperdimensional travelling self has a chance in another part of the multiverse. sigh.
@TheJeremyKentBGross
@TheJeremyKentBGross 3 года назад
@@S.G.Wallner Relax, you just have to find a chick who understands fewer dimensional spaces than you, and also hope she's not on Only Fans or Twitch. 😆 ...or go to the gym. Do you even lift bro? 🤣
@arnavrawat9864
@arnavrawat9864 3 года назад
TOO SHORT. THIS WAS TOO SHORT
@finn9000
@finn9000 3 года назад
Hits home too hard
@delirious323
@delirious323 3 года назад
@@finn9000 small meat gang 👊😕👎
@justamanofculture12
@justamanofculture12 3 года назад
@@delirious323 small pp. But i see you are a man of culture as well 😌.
@hynjus001
@hynjus001 3 года назад
That's what she said.
@arnavrawat9864
@arnavrawat9864 3 года назад
@@hynjus001 ayyyy
@blob7800
@blob7800 3 года назад
Lisa is someone who just walks into a room full of hard thinking people and solves the problem in five seconds then walks away
@pjshaw4797
@pjshaw4797 3 года назад
Very good video! I like how these very complicated topics are depicted in such a way that their complexity is obvious, but they're still very easily understandable in concept
@delatroy
@delatroy 3 года назад
I’m still clueless about the knots 😑
@dewaard3301
@dewaard3301 3 года назад
It's great to know that it's still possible to tackle and solve long-standing mathematical issues with a new and fresh set of brains in relatively short time.
@sadjadasadi4575
@sadjadasadi4575 3 года назад
It's impressive when I see the people working on the edge of technology and improving it.
@rk593415
@rk593415 3 года назад
Where were you these many days.. the content you provide is next level.. hats off to the editing person. 🧠
@KaiHenningsen
@KaiHenningsen 3 года назад
Nice quote I found googling this stuff: _"Currently the computer proof systems we have are not good enough to mathematical researchers anything new about the p-adic Langlands program or other trendy Fields Medally things"_
@MakingTomorrowBetter
@MakingTomorrowBetter 3 года назад
Second video I have watched and so glad this channel was suggested.. just my kind of content
@D0NTREPLY
@D0NTREPLY 3 года назад
my math grades were such a breakthrough this year, my teacher broke through the window by jumping out because they were so bad.
@SineEyed
@SineEyed 3 года назад
"To be, or knot to be?" That was her question..
@jaegercrown964
@jaegercrown964 3 года назад
You cracked me up mate :)
@SamiJumppanen
@SamiJumppanen 3 года назад
Knot be it.
@lover5012
@lover5012 3 года назад
I wish i understood Math, physics, computer science and chemistry the same i understand and continue to learn about the way the human body works as a physiotherapist. So many interesting things in the world. So much mystery, and secrets to be learned in this world. Get's me excited just by thinking
@georgiosdoumas2446
@georgiosdoumas2446 3 года назад
At least you can go to sleep every day knowing that you made an impact to the live-health of a person. While all the people in the video are just hoping that what they do will possible , in a few decades , affect in some indirect way the humanity. And we cannot be sure if this affect will be for better or for worse. Imagine that the practical applications of some of those ideas may be used to control and suppress even more the people. Since you are a physiotherapist, you can certainly look at some 1st University year mechanics (to understand even better and at a theoretical and practical level ideas like speed, Force, , Momentum, Kinetic energy, Torque , stress and strain) , and also some organic chemistry.
@gigachad1983
@gigachad1983 3 года назад
yes i wanna be highly conciouss by learning these...
@lover5012
@lover5012 3 года назад
@@georgiosdoumas2446 Why thank you for your honest opinion. It's weird quoting uncle Ben, but indeed with great power comes great responsibility. Same can be applied to my occupation as well, we wouldn't wanna cripple someone for life. Just like you said, new applications could also be used to hurt people rather than help. What else can you do but hope? If we deny making progress, the lack of progress maybe or maybe not, end up also hurting many people. Each side has it's risk maybe. There is no certainty.
@lover5012
@lover5012 3 года назад
@@gigachad1983 After you get yourself on the wheel running like a hamster, it may be difficult to stop. Of course you may fall outside the wheel, like saying you may be get tired of studying at one point, but as I keep experiencing, I noticed that as I started learning (something intriguing maybe, something I liked), after a while the mood I had expanded to many other areas of "knowledge"? And now I have the feeling that I want more I want more. It's funny when you live it
@gigachad1983
@gigachad1983 3 года назад
@@lover5012 thanks i apreciate that
@derdreckigeDan20
@derdreckigeDan20 3 года назад
This is a quality masterpiece. The other biggest discoveries in biology /physics are amazing, too.
@rickytrisnaagusta6770
@rickytrisnaagusta6770 3 года назад
wonderful please make again like this!
@AnkitKumar-dh1jd
@AnkitKumar-dh1jd 3 года назад
This is the first video I saw from this channel and it earned my subscription 🙌🙌
@firstnamelastname-li5ru
@firstnamelastname-li5ru 3 года назад
6:33 looks insanely like some ancient art, it reminded me of the entrance stone and the stone at the back (k52) of Newgrange, Ireland, an ancient passage tomb
@aronhegedus
@aronhegedus 3 года назад
That knot story is like in Good Will Hunting movie
@zumar--7306
@zumar--7306 3 года назад
Yeah it's "I do it for fun" part..it seems like innovation and unintentional new discoveries comes from people who are innately just do it for fun lol.. it's a hint for those who are like this 😉
@chuckdowning5222
@chuckdowning5222 3 года назад
Lean is really cool. My proofs professor this past semester made us use it as part of the class, and at first I was apprehensive, but seeing it appear in this video reaffirmed that it really is going to be relevant for the future!
@miketurner3461
@miketurner3461 3 года назад
I've been recently writing differential programs (programs that be differentiated and therefore can learn). I stumbled across some of Kevin's work on the way. Programs will definitely be writing themselves at some point.
@hamzahimran3447
@hamzahimran3447 2 года назад
how do i be this smart
@darkdivisionderek938
@darkdivisionderek938 3 года назад
This is exactly how that police officer analogy went: "imagine you have a police officer and two suspects.. and the suspects share quantum entanglement. Your goal is to get the police officer to ask them the right questions to figure out the truth to any mathematical statement"
@hammadusmani7950
@hammadusmani7950 3 года назад
This is an amazing video! I read the first proof in it's pre print version and didn't know that they published the full proof this year.
@jaikumar848
@jaikumar848 3 года назад
Wow ! Today I found your channel. ..great work. Merry Christmas!
@cookerkids
@cookerkids 3 года назад
This is awesome as an undergrad it’s great to see where the discipline is going
@arthmendhe999
@arthmendhe999 3 года назад
All 3 breakthroughs were beautiful
@7795jonatan
@7795jonatan 3 года назад
“Watching this video to get smarter, and not understanding a single thing” 🙃
@TheOrigamiGenius
@TheOrigamiGenius 2 года назад
"Today we recognise the halting problem the spinning wheel of death." Very true
@MrThatguy333
@MrThatguy333 3 года назад
this is a great RU-vid channel, thank you!
@archangecamilien1879
@archangecamilien1879 3 года назад
4:20 I like how they start "Beautiful Mind"-type of music right there, haha...
@DevinBigSeven
@DevinBigSeven 3 года назад
Did Lisa and Conway ever get to meet? I would imagine that he would have wanted to congratulate her. Reading more about her proof, it sounds like he was still with us when she solved the problem he created some 50 years ago.
@silphonym
@silphonym 3 года назад
Didn't he die from the virus in spring?
@bravomike4734
@bravomike4734 3 года назад
@@silphonym oh frick
@user-rm3wf7ch3d
@user-rm3wf7ch3d 3 года назад
Conway is chill. I can imagine him congratulating her XD
@hwyterrorist
@hwyterrorist 3 года назад
I think knot.
@tuan2352
@tuan2352 3 года назад
*The paper was published in March 2020. Conway passed away in April 2020.* I hope the solution was delivered to him before he passed away.
@JuanMorales-rl1wr
@JuanMorales-rl1wr 3 года назад
love this channel thanks for creating it 😊
@BlueSoulTiger
@BlueSoulTiger 3 года назад
Inspirational. Summary appreciated.
@minh5044
@minh5044 3 года назад
I took a combinatorics class with the guy at 1:03. Go Henry!
@BOBMAN1980
@BOBMAN1980 3 года назад
My favorite part is when the math undergrad says she couldn't understand what was so difficult about the knot--and why so many were vexed by it--then goes on to solve it for fun.
@grapy83
@grapy83 3 года назад
I must give it to youtube for recommending this video. Great content BTW.
@debasishraychawdhuri
@debasishraychawdhuri 3 года назад
I had some experience with Coq, now just learned about Lean. Seems fascinating.
@fridadesigley2014
@fridadesigley2014 3 года назад
such an inspiring little film!!
@LimitedWard
@LimitedWard 3 года назад
Feed that program P=NP and see what happens!
@Andre-gn4sj
@Andre-gn4sj 3 года назад
c++ P *= N; //P = P * N is this what you mean?
@tear728
@tear728 3 года назад
@@Andre-gn4sj Polynomial Time = Nondeterministic Polynomial Time
@value8035
@value8035 3 года назад
@@Andre-gn4sj Ahem.,,,,
@Andre-gn4sj
@Andre-gn4sj 3 года назад
@@tear728 ah my bad; misunderstood the question.
@DrunkenUFOPilot
@DrunkenUFOPilot 3 года назад
First, give it Riemann's Hypothesis for a warm-up
@straef1042
@straef1042 3 года назад
I love Piccirillo's comments. Though some in the comments seem to think she comes across arrogant, I get the impression she's just being sincere about not really seeing what the big deal is.
@sharktac
@sharktac 2 года назад
Pretty much got this vid shoved in my face every refresh
@user-tk2jy8xr8b
@user-tk2jy8xr8b 3 года назад
Wow, uploading the whole math into Lean libraries could be tremendous! I wonder if there's a way to (semi-)automatically translate those into Agda, Nuprl, Coq etc. so that their users would have instant access to those knowledge as well
@winstonsabellona2204
@winstonsabellona2204 3 года назад
"and, it turns out that when you wanna study 3 and 4dimensional spaces, you'll find yourself studying knots anyway :) " - Piccirillo
@yashmakwana8019
@yashmakwana8019 3 года назад
Honestly speaking, I had the same mathematical Library Idea. Did some work too on this. But I thought I need a big team for same. Congrats to mathematicians for working on this.
@2Oldcoots
@2Oldcoots 3 года назад
Imagine Lisa teaching your math class. I won't miss a single lesson!
@Grimeaper
@Grimeaper 3 года назад
I think deductive reasoning is already a thing. Having a computer to do a vast unworldly size puzzle has always been a valid idea. Turning it into a mathematical formula seems like it would have been a thing for a while.
@0Kaliber0
@0Kaliber0 3 года назад
Great Video! It would be awesome, if you would refer the paper or source additionally in the description 😊
@Adhil_parammel
@Adhil_parammel 3 года назад
True
@Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez
@Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez 2 года назад
this is so awesome! Because once "full", we can build an AI to search for repeated inputs or such, and eventuallyt put events like "whoever can input something successfully into the library, gains scientific attention and a review". And this is a bridge for society and maths as a possibility for anyone to add to the field :O
@richardmendel5027
@richardmendel5027 Год назад
She is great-very humble and laughs at herself!
@samhanndean
@samhanndean 3 года назад
I feel so dumb. Want to throw away my degrees and start everything again..
@jasonmachula1472
@jasonmachula1472 3 года назад
or just build on what you have
@ElyTFain
@ElyTFain 3 года назад
bruh i thought this was the onion so i was laughing at random things
@alganpokemon905
@alganpokemon905 3 года назад
LMAO
@behrad9712
@behrad9712 3 года назад
Thank you for the real gift for Christmas!🌹🙏👌💖
@adrianthegreat8190
@adrianthegreat8190 3 года назад
brilliant video. Came here from the physics one and will be coming back next year. also subbed
@boredgrass
@boredgrass 3 года назад
As a "*none mathematician" I can't help noticing, that all these stories seem to be moved ahead, by strong elements of aesthetics and intuition. I wonder, if both of them constitute the main engine of mathematics. Indeed, if we approach Art as aesthetics of the visual, music as aesthetics of sound, perhaps we could add mathematics as the aesthetics of causality? It could be taught as the intuitive endeavor of reflective reasoning about the **"beauty" of structure. **Whereas art had to dismiss beauty as overarching principle, mathematics could build a kind of grammar from it. * Based on such an approach, one could raise the question if "None-mathematicians" exist. Given the importance of mathematics as accounting- and engineering "machinery" we could create a subject ***"applied causal structures." ***Only with a better name...;-)
@StCreed
@StCreed 3 года назад
You're on to something I think. Proofs that are "elegant" or even "beautiful", usually cut right to the heart of the matter without runarounds, showing a deep understanding of the issue and its solution.
@viridian9673
@viridian9673 3 года назад
I just remembered she made about it called "lost in math"
@Psychx_
@Psychx_ 2 года назад
In physics there is a debate about pursuing "mathematical beauty" going on for decades now. Many discoveries have been made due to that mindset, but since the mid-late 20th century, it became kind of a dead end. We're living in a world full of asymmetries (there's more matter than antimatter, charge and parity symmertry are violated, our universe is not only expanding, but that process is also accelerating, the forces of nature were once unified and now are split, etc.) and current theories based on mathematical beauty do not lead to new discoveries i.e. no supersymmetric particles have been found and neither string theory nor the holographic principle yield a mathematical description of gravity that matches our universe. On the other hand, antimatter was predicted by Paul Dirac at the beginning of the last century on the basis of mathematical symmetry/beauty… When trying to describe the physical world as we understand it atm we'd need to combine a lot of pretty, symmetric, mathematical theories and then mangle the shit out of them by adding all kinds of exceptions to match experimental observations. This does automatically lead to a convoluted mess which of formulas which can't be called pretty, beautiful, elegant or aesthetically pleasing anymore. As for describing an idealized system or a hypothetical structure in theoretical mathematics, beauty can still lead to new concepts/ideas but the real world seems to be "flawed" in that regard.
@igotmoney3095
@igotmoney3095 3 года назад
gist: all problems can be solved. But a lot of talented people either don't care about it or don't know about it.
@nk-qy2xp
@nk-qy2xp 3 года назад
Gödel would like to have a word with you.
@davidliverman4742
@davidliverman4742 2 года назад
Thanks for adding to my brain cells. Fascinating!
@konstantindimitrov2019
@konstantindimitrov2019 3 года назад
The "I-proved-that-one-knot-has-a-thing.-I-don't-care-about-knots" moment made me instalike this video. That's adorably honest & bossy lol.
@neithanm
@neithanm 3 года назад
She didn't know it was hard to solve, so she solved it
@marflage
@marflage 3 года назад
A new perspective is all it takes.
@faith2756
@faith2756 3 года назад
She did, as she said, but she didn't think it should be really = ).
@average-osrs-enjoyer
@average-osrs-enjoyer 3 года назад
Shouldnt the big step regarding protein folding be in this too? Its a bit of a multidisc field but still its a computational problem at heart
@aaronmontgomery2055
@aaronmontgomery2055 3 года назад
wasn't the real big step in 2018?
@ashutoshdas865
@ashutoshdas865 3 года назад
I wish this video would go on forever..........................................
@lucascorazza9792
@lucascorazza9792 3 года назад
Quanta magazine, what a wonderful video!
@jenaf372
@jenaf372 3 года назад
In relativity the concept of "instantaneous" breaks down. Its a spooky correlation of events with spacelike 'distance'.
@rabbitpiet7182
@rabbitpiet7182 3 года назад
Why have you said this?
@jenaf372
@jenaf372 3 года назад
@@rabbitpiet7182 because I fail to understand how entanglement stufd can be 'instant' when that concept fails in relativity, and I desire a deeper explanation.
@ericy1817
@ericy1817 3 года назад
@@jenaf372 Entanglement can be instant because what it affects instantaneously is the correlation between measurements, not the actual transmission of information between the measurements. For example, imagine two coins a lightyear apart entangled in such a way that if one coin is measured to be heads, the other is guaranteed to be tails. If you measure one coin and it turns out heads, you know for a fact that the measurement of the other coin is guaranteed to be tails. If a separate observer measures the other coin before your information could've reached them (i.e. outside the future light cone of your measurement), they will still be guaranteed to have tails. However, the information that you got heads will not reach them until a year after their measurement. Similarly, though you know the other coin is guaranteed to be measured as tails, you will not know that it has been measured to be tails until a year after it is measured.
@jenaf372
@jenaf372 3 года назад
@@ericy1817 you completely missed my question and just repeated the version wich fails to consider the fact that there is no absolute present in relativity abd thus "instantaneous" is non-unique. Also if you reead my initial comment you would already see me replacing the term "action" with correlation. But again: I do not need my current best understanding reiterated, but I want to go deeper. Please read my question before simply repeating a sramingly memorized stuff about entanglement and relativity wich wasnt even the question here.
@SamuelPearlman
@SamuelPearlman 3 года назад
She was knot interested in knots
@futurehistory2110
@futurehistory2110 3 года назад
I'd love to see more movies about math and science. It's so interesting.
@muthuk
@muthuk 3 года назад
Thank you so much for the awesome shares
@MadlipzMarathi
@MadlipzMarathi 3 года назад
RIP John Conway ❤️
@KangJangkrik
@KangJangkrik 3 года назад
Bright side of COVID era: Scientists have better time figuring out nature
@benheideveld4617
@benheideveld4617 3 года назад
Second best RU-vid post this year across all RU-vid video’s...
@user-or7ji5hv8y
@user-or7ji5hv8y 3 года назад
Great channel!
@yash1152
@yash1152 3 года назад
6:52 yeah, thanks a lot for saying it
@mr.peavey603
@mr.peavey603 3 года назад
Someone explain the knot thing to me ? Not even this specific example of the "hard" knot. Just why are people examining knots so intensely?
@kylecollins1045
@kylecollins1045 3 года назад
Last one is amazing. That will actually change the future
@diegomata1062
@diegomata1062 3 года назад
OMG I JUST LOVE THIS CONTENT!!!!!!!!
Далее
P vs. NP: The Biggest Puzzle in Computer Science
19:44
Просмотров 686 тыс.
Заметили?
00:11
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics: 2023
13:21
Просмотров 915 тыс.
How To Code A Quantum Computer
20:42
Просмотров 471 тыс.
Biggest Breakthroughs in Math: 2023
19:12
Просмотров 1,6 млн
Millennium Problems: Math’s Million Dollar Bounties
15:05
2021's Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics
10:31
Просмотров 1,4 млн
10 Math Concepts for Programmers
9:32
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Крохотный и быстрый SSD на 2 ТБ
0:59