2021 Suzuki RM-Z250 Motorcycle Bike Introduction Test | Racer X Films 

Yes but we value our money. If we have a better option we will choose this option. Suzuki is positioning itself as a low cost brand and for me this is a shame. Suzuki has so much history and they are ruining it!

@@tonydamoto4877 If you really value your money, you'd buy used. I think Suzuki's biggest problem is that the new-bike buyer isn't all that price sensitive and simply want the best. It used to be that you could make the 4th-best new bike and it would still curb stomp anything from 3 years before. Today you can get 90% of the performance at half the cost, so Suzuki offering 90% of the performance for 90% of the cost is a tough sell.

@@JETZcorp where can you find 90% performance for half the cost?

@@caydenthompson126 2016 bike.

@@JETZcorp true

Huh? Spring rate is off, but that’s KYB. With some proper tuning they should turn out amazing.

@@nestserau I am sure with the proper spring rate they would be better. Its just a dumb thing to do by suzuki in my opinion. Why put a spring for a 200 pound rider in a beginner level 250? The air forks on the 17 and 18 kinda suck too. lol.

@@ossiboyz7566 I have the air forks. They are very good after a revalve. KYB stuff cannot be bad. But Suzuki cannot get the valving right year after year. Have no idea what their problem is exactly.

The fork valves are actually just fine, same valve stack as the yamaha. They're just sprung too firm.

Correct, but Amart is also a smaller rider which could help.

@@nestserau He's shorter but has weight to him.

Any bike can do it if you commit, just like how AMART wanted that podium

Any bike devolved by a nascar team, I think that bike might have a few more ponies than a stock one.

JGR Suzuki’s were the sickest bikes

Suzuki was the first dirtbike ever .. they created the market ... They are pro bikes ..

They just restructured 9 months ago and now the motorcycle co only does motorcycles. It looks like they are in a position that is way more focused

I DO NOT RECOMMEND PR2. There is one fairly sharp guy there, but he oversees nothing. I have 2 engineering degrees, and could not even communicate effectively with any of the other guys. I had my suspension lowered about 3/4". The front springs are way too stiff, and they put in a heavier weight oil than stock, and i have only gotten 8" inches of travel from them, (3" from bottoming), with zero compression on the clicker. I have to fix it myself. The rear shock, they could not follow my direction, and put in the wrong thickness spacer. They did not even know their own formula for the difference of the shaft travel to the rear axle,--I had to tell them what it is. I have to redo the shock also, and add a stiffer spring on that end. But they are not alone. The problem is a generation of poorly educated kids getting jobs now, and believe me,---every owner of a technical business is having problems right now. You might as well figure it out for yourself. You have a better chance of getting it right the first time.

@@EarthSurferUSA What engineering degress ya got? EE major myself

@@EarthSurferUSA Earthsurfer literally complains about everything on every video

So all I have to do to make it as fast as a Yamaha or a Kawi thats bone stock is dump 3 grand in motor work and suspension in to some piece of shit? Should've saved your money and bought a real dirtbike, makes no sense whatsoever. Should've gone blue and saved yourself the headache, time, and money bro.

@@nicholascampbell4600look its supremley obvious ....Orange

Wb rmz250?

It was several HP off for the last several years and there's little to no changes, so I expect that to not change

@@Awelsh216 so it's more about falling off early. You know by how many rpms it falls off early? What about torque as well? And is it several HP thru out most of the curve?

you see dyno on MCA 2021 250 shootout that came out the other day

check last month's issue of MXA

Here where I live almost everywhere i go i see dozens of Suzuki's.

Every manufacturer makes the exact same bike for four years. Do you even know what you’re talking about? They only make any noticeable change on the 5th year.

@@FunkyChicken251 3-4 years. This thing has been a bag of ass for all 4 years. Not even a minor change

@@FunkyChicken251 the issue is when they changed it years ago it was still sub par. My 2013 ktm is more advanced than a 2021 suzuki.

If there so heavy and so slow I don’t think A Mart would’ve won a moto at Loretta Lynn’s last year

If it’s heavy, take some weight off your body to start. I’ve rode plenty of Suzukis and doesn’t feel NEARLY as heavy as people make it seem

same price of retail apparently, couldnt pay me to ride this pos

old doesn't equal bad

the company is actually doing great.

@@caydenthompson126 Nah

@@mylesanderson5864 check their balance sheet

@@caydenthompson126 attach a link and i’ll check it out.

Suzuki is a massive company that makes cars, outboards, street bikes, and many other things. Suzuki is actually about twice the size of Yamaha. They’re not some obscure dirt bike company lol

those guys are pumping money in motogp.. this sport is niche they dont seem to care to much

@@bewimotos The GSX-Rs are all old too. Suzuki's whole lineup from stem to stern is nearly frozen in time. At least their bikes LOOK great.

They're lighter, simpler and just as cheap if not cheaper comparably after adjustment for inflation lol. I taught my 6 year old to do a top end on his crf110. You're stuck in the past Billy. Change is good sometimes.

hahaha you are awesome. Love the business plan! :D

Pretty funny. I have more videos than subscribers. My channel should be called zero subscribers