I was keen on this car, then they priced it as it is. As you mentioned the new Ranger/Everest with that whole dash reset plus it’s new looks will just make the D MAX/mux look frumpy all over again. If Ford doesn’t naff up the pricing like this they will get my money.
@@mightygood1 No it's not, RRP is $65,900 (excluding on-road costs). We can't quote drive-away prices because they vary per state. More details: www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/2022-isuzu-mu-x-price-and-specs
The button blanks are used by owners who install compressors, lights and additional switches for auxiliaries. It is much easier to drill and replace a button blank than a dash fascia. It also makes the install cleaner.
Exactly, especially with base model for mining and plantation purposes. Needs aux buttons for the accessories: strobe lights, winch, sirens, etc. Surprised this guy doesn't know it, i guess he's city lad, used to city cars
It looks terrible though, if they sold buttons I would take that back; but using a standardish button it smart Rather than 6 different buttons because the shape of every button is different 🤮
that's not the reason. it'll be feature shrink-flation - either legitimately because of covid parts supply, or or choices made by the parent company/isuzu aus, for the aussie market. the non-standard/consistent blank sizes arent something the mainstream aftermarket are ready for, or have pre-designed. they may if the demand is there.
Just brought one soon to be delivered As far as incandescent globes I see no issue indicator units (LED) can fail due to the use and tech involved not saying that would be the issue however replacing a globe compared to an led unit is significantly cheaper
A big leap forward but for growing families why wouldn’t they consider a sliding second row, I’m 6’4” and I can comfortably fit behind myself as though I was sitting in all 3 rows (in a Prado). I also wonder how durable those interior materials will be, time will tell.
Drove this, a Pajero Sport Exceed and an Everest Trend the other day. I've got to say, the MUX reminded me a lot of my 2007 Diesel Santa Fe. I was easily the most tractor like. The ride was good, however its easily the noisiest and I found it underpowered. That resulted in me accelerating harder and forcing it to do lurching gear changes. Honestly from all the reviews I was expecting to put a deposit on this pre test drive, now I'm leaning towards the Pajero. This has nothing The Pajero doesn't, but the 10yr warranty and ability to drive in 4wd on road in the Pajero is sensational.
I really like the tractor like noise of my MU-X. It gives me a feel of strength. And it is not just a feeling. Many buy the MU-X to tow a caravan. If I ever need a silent car I borrow my wife´s Honda.
Great review. I find it amusing in the comments that people are calling it dated already, looks pretty stylish to me, test drove one the other day and it's a nice drive. I agree on the price but I think the increased tow and features can justify.....maybe just! I buy for reliability, I've known many people that purchased the last model MUX and they love it, never had an issue. Isuzu specialize in diesel and are damn good at their trade. I have no issues against the ford but that screen look ridiculous and most people I talk to tell me to stay away from them. It's Isuzu or Toyota for me.
I love the outside styling, but I kinda think he is right about the shelf life of the interior design. Compare it to even cheaper cars like the Chinese MG HS, with big stand-up touch screen, and the even bigger Tesla-like design mooted for the new Ford Everest, and its already looking like last years designs. Another disappointment is the imitation leather seats (hailed as Coolmax - here in Thailand, not sure about Oz). A backward step from my 2017 MU-X with genuine leather.
It does not have a true 3.5t towing, so thats negated. Do the maths and if you towed 3.5, you're left with almost no additional carrying capacity for the wife and kids plus the dog. No 360 camera. No sliding seats. No QI charging. Clunky infotainment. At 66k, you'd have to be touched in the head to buy one over its competitors
That can be said for any car claiming a tow weight. Same maths applies to a Prado claiming 3 tonne so I don’t understand your point. Last model MUX had 3 tonne, I’m simply saying it’s upped its towing capacity to most utes on the market. I took one for a test drive, the leather is nice, there is plenty of leg room in the back without the slides ( look at the video again and see how far back that guys seat is LOL) and the entertainment system is superior to most new Toyota’s I test drove at $20-$30K more than the MUX. I’m just saying it’s my opinion based on actually seeing one in the flesh, not from a monitor 😂😂😂. If I was to buy one it would be based on the engine and reliability, these guys know how to make a diesel. Ford has a history of issues and that screen looks fucking ridiculous
@@Portyhouse comparing it to a Toyota is laughable. Pretty sure they think it's still 2003 in terms of spec. And there are actually a few that can tow heavy without compromise to the GVM, like the Land rover discovery (admit build quality is a bit questionable). Although towing anything over 3 with a vehicle this small and light is a recipe for disaster. If you truly need a tow tug, look for a vehicle designed for it like the Ram, knowing you give up other things
Great car, but far too expensive for the middle spec range. Considering the top of the range DMAX was drive away for $59990 up until the release a week ago. Cant get it for that price now. Pajero sports wagon Mid spec with deluxe pack is a much cheaper option and very competitive with features.
@@CarExpertAus Two wrongs don't make a right. I think the Everest is already too expensive along with many of the awd SUVs. That said, people continue to lap them up. No wonder the price for many used models (all brands) is holding strong. The only thing likely to shake up price is a couple of low priced good quality new model competitors. Future government legislation is likely to increase costs further and the move to EVs would see prices more likely to rise unless low cost (Chinese?) competitors change the dynamics.
Apparently they don't ever sell at the full price though? (not sure, not from the country, we will have ours released by the end of the year in South Africa)
Hi Paul - Its 2021 and climate change is 'code red' according to the latest IPCC report, so all car reviewers I think have a responsibility to mention pollution levels, especially for diesel cars/trucks like this. Europe haven't allowed any cars to be sold since Sept 2015, yes 6 years ago, that are not Euro6 compliant. The Euro 6 standard imposes a further, significant reduction in NOx emissions from Euro 5 diesels - 67% reduction. These Isuzu engines are Euro 5 - so they are 'dirty' diesels. Ssangyong Rexton/Mussos are Euro 6 - so they are at least 67% cleaner than Isuzu - which I suggest is a big deal. Its a disgrace that Australia don't align with European standards and we continue to allow dirty diesels to be sold. And shame on Isuzu for not working hard enough on this engine and the DPF to bring it up to Euro6 standards - you should mention this in future as these dirty brands should be brought to account. As an influencer I encourage you to show your support for more environmentally aware and caring car companies and highlight those that have not reached Euro6 compliance. And shame on Isuzu for brining a car into Aust in 2021 that is 7 years out of date.
Great review Paul. Like in Australia in India too, only these two are sold by Isuzu. The fact is that many features are missing in Indian variants! Our government hardly pins the auto companies to come up with same features like their other global variants.
I actually prefer physical buttons / knobs for climate control. For audio its okay to not have physical button, I can still adjust volume or tracks using steering switch buttons. But to control AC while driving, physical buttons beat any huge modern screen.
@@CarExpertAus Yeah. It looks quite fine now, but it won't match with the rivals that are currently one gen older. Reminds me of how subarus always seems outdated on the inside. When the 2017 one came out, while it looked much better than the previous, when matched up with other new rivals, they seem one step behind all of the sudden (in my opinion, still like the imprezas interior). Still like the mux interior though!
I can see where Mazda have contributed to the development. That is on the front and rear of the MUX. It looks Mazda-isque. The back resembles a bit of Mazda 3.
I think you’ll find that the spare switch locations are just that, spare. They allow for the installation of various accessories such as driving lights, roof lights, diff locks etc. etc..
In the overseas model those centre switches are for heated and air conditioning seats and also surround camera view. These features didn’t make it to Australian models
Price hike for these is definitely disappointing. I bought a new 2018 LSU MUX 2x4 for 37k in Australia and love it, the 4JJ1 engine and Aisin gearbox was the selling point for me. Solid drivetrain and engine was what I was after for a family tarmac warrior. 90% of people who will buy the 4x4 will never engage 4H or 4L but hey the marketing experts have that all wrapped up! As for the Ford Everest, anyone who forks out 70k for the highly strung 2 litre twin turbo mated to a dismal 10 speed gearbox, needs to realign their priorities...
Those blank buttons around the gear selector are the perfect spot to engage or disengage the safety features. I don't know why going through so many sub menus is necessary. But overall, I'm liking this new MU-X! Could replace my Fortuner with one really soon.
Agree ! Although I have one on order this was "almost a deal breaker." Let's hope Isuzu listen and do a firmware update re once you plug in trailer wiring harness (tow) their recommendations re switching off some of the setting happens automatically. Pain in the arse to have to go through the settings every time i.e. ridiculous imho !
I own (since new) a 2017 4x4 Dmax. It’s done 120,000km. The window buttons on the drivers side collapsed and the dealer just re glued them. The infotainment failed and they replaced it. The front inner guards have cracked on both sides twice in the last year. ($10k fix) Isuzu have knocked back the warranty claim. It is a well known manufacturing defect. Check out the owners forums. Isuzu are not speaking to us but my insurer is helping us out and they say Isuzu and Hyundai are the worst to deal with in terms of cooperation and transparency. People I’ve spoken to who have been through the same thing have gone to court but Isuzu settle out of court and get them to sign a non disclosure agreement so there’s no precedence. I highly recommend anyone to do their research before getting sucked into Isuzu’s current marketing hype. The company is awful to deal with and it has been quite traumatic for my family to deal with. We are still in the warranty period.
Also for the money and compared to its competitors having brand new models hitting the market soon like the new Ranger/Everest Isuzu are a joke trying to charge what they are. They’re not reliable, just the engine and drivetrain. They cannot handle corrugated roads without cracking inner guards due to manufacturing defect.
That’s disappointing to hear. Feel free to shoot me an email through our website and I’m happy to follow this up with Isuzu to see what the story is. Just head to www.carexpert.com.au and click Contact.
a bunch of unnecessary bullshit, like "keyless access" all sorts of headlights there.. LEDs are curious, but what to do when the headlight dies? buy a new one on credit? the most important and interesting thing is the frame ( preferably galvanized) long-lasting diesel engine and automatic transmission that will run at least 500,000 (with proper care in dealerships ) that's what is important and necessary, the rest should be at a minimum, the less the bettwhich is much cheaperer, in order to ensure the most attractive price. and if it's a one-time crap like most modern cars, it's not interesting at all, there are all sorts of Renault duster and other garbage there. now I have a 9-year-old Hylux diesel 3L automatic, rust spots have already gone on the frame of the car, and it's time to think about a new one, here in Russia it has now become difficult for us to buy a new Toyota because of the high price, we are looking for alternatives.. mitsubishi began to make an aluminum cylinder bolt that was not maintainable - they immediately go to hell. and here it seems to be an interesting offer, but everything will depend on the price and service life
This might sound weird but my wife will not even consider this car because of the name. She doesn't want a Mux, lol. I don't care about the name but women do.
مشكلته الفل كامل تنقصه مواصفات كثيرة جدا وغالي: المواصفات الناقصة المهمة: ١. عدم وجود ايرباقات كامله (بما انها سيارة عائلية). ٢. عدم وجود تبريد للمقاعد (بما انها جلد). ٣. عدم وجود تشغيل عن بعد (بما ان الديزل يبغاله تحميه اكثر). ٤. مافيه نقاط عمياء. ٥. مافيها رادار. ٦. الشاشة جودتها اقل من جيد. ٧. مافيه فتحة سقف. وسلامتكم
Would not be my first choice, the engine is under powered for a three liter, in fact it is only slightly more powerful than the Pajero and has a bigger motor. The V6 3 liter in the Volkswagen has much more power and torque. The six speed transmission is old fashioned, the Pajero with only a 2.4 liter engine and a eight speed transmission would out perform this vehicle especially as the Pajero can be driven in four wheel drive on the bitumen. The Pajero is a better vehicle, for much less money. I believe some of the Fords will be coming out with a high performing V6 3 liter engine which will increase sales significantly.
65k that's a lot of coin for wired AA no charging pad bulb indicators no led interior lighting no digital display no pana sunroof all those blank buttons a tiny useless glove box. Ticks very few boxes and at 45k would still be easy pass. That new everest will obliterate this MUX it looks like a cement mixer vs the Ford.
Saw your Review on the previous MUX..... noticed you were critical on the lack of Techo......this new version sure has heaps of techo......but I'm old school.....I'd rather drive the vehicle than allow it to drive me....especially unnecessary LANE DEPT WARNING...and I'm not sure if slamming on the brakes in an intersection would be a great idea either.....too many drivers relying on high tech instead of actually driving the car and avoiding a terrible situation in the first place...anyway....great review.....
The safety features are a big problem in the Izuzu range. Hundreds of reports of cars slamming the brakes on when detecting a car at its side through double lane round abouts large sweeping bends, amongst other issues. Izuzu have been made aware of the issue and have Said there is no problem. No point having a full safely suite if it doesn't work properly.
I haven't had any issues with the AEB when testing the D-Max and MU-X. There are settings to reduce the sensitivity. Mind you - if we drove the car full-time it could potentially pop up.
The attractions to the isuzu was the price. Mist flag ship killers provide value in areas where others are lacking. For me no thanks id rather spend the extra 20k and get a toyota land cruiser
Really solid review - thanks. But again, it just seems to be impossible to find one car that ticks all the boxes. Just about every SUV seems to have some short falls these days. Just comes down to a balance now. Some significant, some just minor "why couldn't they just do that" annoyances.
That towing 3.5t is utter crap you claim two adults and tow the 3.5t what about fuel there is only 10 liters when they have the kurb weight so add 70kg you are literally down to 1 person and fuel. What a joke. How many people will be tricked by this, totally misleading! Also $9000 increase for what?
Looks like an Everest/Mazda hatechild. They didn't fix the gearbox weakness. . . Still can't tow my caravan in 4wd on damp or greasy roads. So its not a 4wd on bitumen where you drive 95% of the time. Glass area tiny so will feel claustraphobic like Mazda.
@Bill Brown research paid off. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. 4x4 on any surface, 10 year warranty and to my amazement its $3k cheaper than the Isuzu that still doesn't have 4x4 on bitumen even on dearest model. Mitsubishi has it on all Pajero Sport. No brainer now. 2H for dry towing, 4H for damp, wet or dusty towing. 4x4 lc for ice mud or snow and 4Llc for beach sand. $62k driveaway 10 year warranty but 3 months of back orders, no wonder.
@@oldmancycling7440 Pajero Sport may not look same as Everest and MUX virtual twins but its a proper 4x4 on all surfaces making it safer than an MUX. Pajero Sport is 6 month waiting period due to high demand and proven Mitsubishi reliability. MUX had known turbo issues. Only the rear end of the Sport is subjectively ugly but its mechanically weigh superior and has the best 4x4 system on the market bar none.
@@waynehobbs5175 .. yet I hear plenty of people complaining about the Pajero Sport overheating, especially if towing. As for Isuzu they have long waiting list like all brands at the moment. Lack of parts supply has done that to all brands
Informative review as always Paul. Can you do one improvement? On the hoist and do a suspension and under body look and review like Savage Geese. That would be the icing on the cake. Don't use a Turbowski though.
i really dont understant car reviewers 'wiggle test' for the interior durability, like has anyone centre console ever like snapped in half cos it was too wibbly or something, seems rather pointless.
In the early 00s, Isuzu had a model in North America called the Axiom, based on the US Rodeo/International MU. That infotainment console is very reminiscent of the Axiom's, though the Axiom is primitive by today's standards.
The back looks like Pajero Sport- inside still resembles the Trailblazer. Isuzu expected Ford competition hence the RRP is cheaper than the D Max in its drive away configuration. Ford will be at least $5k more expensive knowing their current sales plan.
Hey Paul! I believe since the new Everest and Ranger does have that big ole’ touch screen. It may have the Enhanced Park Assist 2.0 it’s similar to the 6th gen Explorer
I currently have a 2017 MUX, manual 4X4. We have taken it down some rugged country with no problems. However, three months into owning the car, the turbo went and then 6 months later a DPF sensor malfunctioned. All fixed under warranty. No major issues since.. I really love the new MUX, however, I'm so disappointed that Isuzu stop making the MUX in manual transmission. This car will look dated compared to the new Ford, Isuzu is always behind with the technology though. BTW, I love these car reviews videos, keep up the awesome work!!
Hello im from the philippines and i own a 2010 isuzu dmax 4x4 boondock and it is a 11 year old car its pretty realiable with no major issues and no hassle to be found. The engine is still good with no issues and the interior is in very good condition with minor decoloration but over all pretty realiable and bulletproof.
Love the new exterior, made it more suburban in the new front and back end but thankfully can still do the off road business. Definitely a much needed upgraded on previous model.
Better to look at as it looks like an Everest now but its a 4x2 on bitumen even if you buy the so called 4x4. Its primitive transfer case system and no centre diff make it an inferior wagon for safe towing. Everest or Pajero Sport can tow caravans on wet or dry bitumen in 4 wheel drive. Dopey Isuzu repeated the last models Massey Ferguson antique part time 4 wd only usable on loose surfaces. Borderline dangerously outdated technology. We were expecting that to be fixed.
Looks too generic, like the boring Everest. Used to look distinctive. No 4x4 onroad means its not a good towcar choice. AWD is a huge safety feature of its rivals. Why they didn't fix that blaring omission eludes me.
Good looking ride. No doubt it will conquer the outback. The reliability of the ISUZU Diesel cannot be questioned. As far as price is concerned Auto manufacturers have been hit with a global shortage of Micro electronics so it's probably a temporary hike and it may stay like this, who knows. As usual great review mate.
It will age quickly. The grill surround is very Mazda, and that style had been around for awhile. People are moving away from it. IMO it's not muscular enough. Needs wider/pumped guards. The rear end... reminds me of a Ford Kuga for some reason. I'd wait for the new Everest.
IMO the trouble with many (most?) of the 4x4 utes and SUVs with "muscular" styling and "wider/pumped guards" etc is that they don't look authentic or utilitarian but rather look like they are compensating for the drivers small wedding tackle.
Enjoyed your review I in the market to buy a vehicle to tow a pop top caravan 1500 tare budget up to 50 k what would you recommend looking at new or second hand. , thanks
@@CarExpertAus thanks for replying I’ve been thinking along those lines too the two vehicles I’ve been looking at secondhand Landcruiser Prado or new Isuzu mux I can stretch my budget i I work for a little longer Thanks again appreciate your help
Thank you for bringing the best car reviews to Aus. One suggestion - perhaps briefly mentioned your thoughts on the soft touch areas (rather than just the durometer) within the video; then if people want to know more, they can refer to the link? Keep up the great work! Always look forward to your reviews!
@@harmansaroa8055 nah i was expecting a review to be informed about the car and not putting the 2m row up and telling its not flat lmao... if you just put the seats fown they will be all the way flat
Finally 🙌🏾, now just the landcruiser 300 left. In regards to the new ranger v6, I heard that toyota will integrate the same v6 engine (F33A) that powers the new landcruiser into the Hilux
We are hearing the same rumours about Toyota - they’ll have to, to keep up with a V6 in the Ford range. Will have a 300 review as soon as it lands in Australia.
do you guys in australia get nissan terra which is a sort of baby patrol based on the frontier/navarra except it has a solid rear axle and competes with MU-X, Pajero Sport, Everest etc?
Love your reviews, however it would be good to see a towing review for these SUV’s, is that possible? Most people buy them to tow caravans etc. also for the rexton if possible.
A big step up from the previous Imux but I don’t see the $10k in value - I wonder if it uses the same aluminium drive shaft as the new DMAX/BT 50 which may snap or bend under load - as for GVM I would never never tow something heavier than my vehicle - an under three ton SUV or ute towing an over three ton caravan or boat is asking for trouble - I saw with amusement a caravan overtaking a 200 series Landcruiser towing it down Pike’s Reservoir hill 100 metres in front of me with an obvious outcome - $210,000 written off due to ignorance - John in SA
Hi Paul; the blank buttons will be for aftermarket accessories - led bars, etc. A bit pricey as it stands I reckon. Put aside the new flash interior, and some new styling, it's concept already done to death and would cost nothing for Isuzu to manufacture. Additionally, as a previous MU-X owner, I recognise several interior panels that are taken from the previous model on this new one 🥴
Those are normally fitted to the buttons near the driver’s knee. In some shots you can see the trailer brake controller. The buttons alongside the gear lever are likely features missing for the Australian market. And yep, diff lock is now standard. We demonstrate how it works in the off-road section.
7.14… a UTE?…🤔 Yeah the price gouge is wrong! As an aside I went onto a well known car sales site to see what prices were/are for the superseded models…OUCH! 😣 Looks like the dealers are gouging the heck out of the old models too! Maybe though they may discount HEAVILY to move that stock. Then again, can anyone see the new ones flying off the lot at this price?… I’d be shopping Pajero against this MUX.
Nearly every car brand is raising their prices massively these days, so it is not a surprise here either. Unfortunately that's how the cookie crumbles these days...
Yep, the new 300s will be $10k dearer than the outgoing base model, and the hike on the higher specs even more. Sadly this will force people to buy CCP cars, the West will lose out due to it's own greed.
@@tobybrowne7906 The Landcruiser surprisingly cheap? Depends on your income level, I'd say. But at $70k for a MU-X means I won't be buying one - it was at the top of my list for next year. Maybe if the tech wasn't only 80% functional and the engine output poor I might have remained interested.
I think the looks of This MUX going to stay for really long(depends on various market),it has charm of beauty with a sence of practicality, decent off road capabilities, functional will not break the bank in case something goes wrong, Ample power, Ya could go with V6 around with 250-300hp( Diesel) engine. Plus I loved the Instrument cluster which gives me a sense a feeling of driving a Automobile not working on a laptop or playing a video game. It's Like beauty is a beast . Love You Isuzu. But I guess it's not landing on Indian shore anytime soon. Till then we have to deal with Fortuner ,Endeavor or Older generation Mux. Nice review though , Is it a ladder frame or Monocoque construction. With Monocoque layout the body can flex a bit may trouble to shut doordoor, Whereas even ladder frame flexes but just little, it's not semi.
Definitely! Just keep in mind it has a diesel particulate filter so you’ll need to ensure you allow it to do a burn run if the light comes on. This involves driving at about 50km/h for an extended period (normally 15-20 minutes).
@@CarExpertAus I believe you will find this is the "ONLY (Fortuner, Everest, Mux) one that that TRULY has a flat floor" when the 2nd and 3rd rows are folded (not tumbled). This is the reason why I have one on order re I'm 6'2" and I can sleep in it i.e. I occasionally currently do this with my Holden Trail Blazer re when doing a single overnight camp.
