It's quite disappointing to find out that the whole discussion missed one major point: As most of the international conflicts, the conflict is caused by a power struggle between two powers. However, the major aggressive power in this struggle is the American/Anglo axis, the Russians in fact are on the defensive side. It should not be called the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In fact, it's the American vassalization of the whole Eastern Europe after 1991. The Taiwanese should also recognize that in the US-Taiwan-China triangle, the major aggressive power is China. If the lecturer and audiences cannot fully grasp the contrast between these two, then, they will definitely make a precarious situation more dangerous.
@@damianchang4812 所謂的台北和約(中日和約)跟台灣主權歸屬根本無關, 中日和約是舊金山和約子約只是重複母約舊金山和約對於台灣所規範的, 1952負責台北和約簽訂的﹝中華民國﹞外交部長葉公超向「立法院」解釋這個條款時表示,《舊金山和約》「並未規定把這些島嶼歸還給中國」。當時是「立法院」就中日和約進行質詢,有立法委員說:「台灣和澎湖群島的地位是什麼?」 葉公超回答說:「事實上,這兩個地方正由我們控制……然而微妙的國際形勢使得它們不屬於我們.在現行情況下,日本沒有權利把台灣和澎湖群島轉移給我們,即使日本有意如此,我們也不能接受……。」(Despatch No.31 from the American Embassy in Taipei to the Department of State, July 23, 1952, Enclosure 2, at p.2.) 1952年5月13日,中華民國外交部對日和約案卷第54冊載明:「舊金山和約僅規定日本放棄台灣澎湖,而未明定其誰屬,此點自非中日和約所能補救。」 要知道1949年中華民國早就不統治中國領土,數億人口行使中國主權, 也就是說蔣介石1949在台灣所建立的只是中華民國流亡政權.. 按照國際法也不可能把領土主權轉讓給一個流亡政權..