2023 Mazda6 2.0 Skyactiv-G (165 PS) TEST DRIVE 

Ja das stimmt, sonst neue cx60 mit 3.3 liter diesel wäre sehr interessant Hoffentlich kommt neue limousine oder kombi, da fast alle heutzutage SUV kaufe.

Agree

The paint on Mazda is very thin

it rust even if you paint@@Sha-Ayo

Not really. It's powerful and quite economical, yes, but turbocharger is small, after 5000 rpm there is no power.

😅😅😅😅😅

Except we in Europe don’t get this engine

They got the Mazda 6 four different times on this channel and every time they measured a different fuel consumption. Wet vs. dry road conditions alone can make about 10 - 20% difference in fuel consumption and there are also factors like wind and outside temperature. The only thing to take away from these kind of tests is, that you can't rely on real world measurements, if you want to compare different cars.

Winter tyres maybe

The problem is you, not the car. You don't understand the principle of horsepower and power to weight ratio. Of course a 300-400 hp car will have better fuel consumption at high speeds due to HIGH horsepower available to pull a mass. It's like having 4 horses 🐎 to pull a carriage versus having 4 donkey 🫏 to pull same carriage.

@@AlexVilla88 its not here 230+Kmh speeds then usual ones !!problem are you watermeloon head!! Go watch tests of audi a4 2.0 tfsi withn150hp and its consumption at same speeds or bmw 3 with 156hp and you will see they are in diesel territory and i think that still lowest consumption even at highest speeds are those Jetta test with 1.4tsi 140hp ,so dont talk horshits

@@Mr11ESSE111 learn English

@@AlexVilla88 you learn how to use brain

Automatisch is for idiots

So does your comment. Just write in there without any explanation...