Hi, I have the 180 hybrid, no one can recommend what type of gasoline is best for this engine, 95 or 98 and in the previous one the screen could be turned off, in this one I can't find any option Could you help me, thanks
@@davidpickard9393 I’m not a big fan of the huge mpg figures they use for plug in hybrids, real world testing its usually much lower especially if the battery is left to run out. Was impressed to achieve the rated MPG in this FHEV though.
@@searchagent2801 goes to show it is achievable if you keep it regularly charged at home. Its just not an easy figure for the average person to understand
@@ItsDanLathamfrom my knowledge the life of a battery is measured by the number of charging cycles. To achieve that fuel consumption figure you have to fully charge the battery all the time, maybe even daily. I know that most of the buyers don't care about this because they lease the car and it's on to the next buyer
Did you have the chance to drive an Active (X) trim? ST (X) seems a little stiff for the kids in the back on bad roads. I'm thinking that Active it's more comfortable, not just 2 cm higher.
@@benny26 I’ve been a passenger in an active, definitely less firm. The suspension in this didn’t bother me personally but some have commented it’s a bit stiff on certain roads.
I have just yesterday had one of these cars for a 24 hour extended test drive - it was in ‘ST Line X’ trim. My impressions of the car was that it’s a decent car, with really good handling, and comfort, I also thought the stereo was pretty decent too. However, there were things I didn’t like. Although the screen is easy to use with regards to its layout, and I found it pretty responsive, I just hated the fact that things like the heating controls could only be accessed from the screen. Even though the controls are permanently visible, it’s impossible to change these without taking your eyes off the road. I took the car onto the motorway and trying to do this at 70mph is just down right dangerous. I didn’t think the build quality of the cabin was that great (apart from the seats), it’s certainly not as good as the cabins in some of its Korean, French, and German rivals which all come in at around the same price. Far too many scratchy cheap plastics, but even more concerning was that many of the surfaces had quite a bit of flex to them. I really don’t know how well the cabin would hold up with regard to its durability. However the thing that will probably be the deal breaker for me was the ride. Why Ford feels it is necessary to put sports suspension on a car like this is beyond me. Our roads here in the U.K. are not great, and every bump, pot hole, and bad road surface just sent shudders through the whole cabin, it drove me nuts. The Active trim which has softer suspension, or a model with smaller wheels might be better, but the ST Line X was just too harsh a ride for me. It’s a shame, because I really think this car has a lot going for it…..but that suspension, and the poor cabin quality make in a no for me. Will be test driving a Sportage next - which I know has a much better cabin, will be interesting to see how well it drives.
@@rufdymond your experience mirrors a lot of my thoughts. I have reviews of both the Tucson and the Sportage in the channel too. The hybrid system and steering feel of the Ford is definitely ahead, but the interior quality of the others is superior for sure!
St x with the 19s have been absolutely fine for me. Was worried about firmness coming from a galaxy with 17s but it's a perfect blend of comfort and handling in my opinion. Agree about the heating controls but has been easy enough to say alexa adjust temp, speed, etc. So no hands off steering needed.
@@searchagent2801- Just to add to this….the car I had for the test drive was the PHEV version. Someone has since mentioned that the suspension on that version is extra stiff to account for the extra weight of the larger battery. I done know how true that is but it may have something to do with the extra harsh ride. I would have been looking to buy the FHEV version but they didn’t have one for the test drive.
I’ve now finished my test drive of the Sportage HEV - had it for just over 1 hour. Have to say that I think the Kuga is much better to drive in every way, handles better, is more refined at lower speeds, and is quieter on the motorway too…..The Sportage seemed to have quite a bit of wind noise as I approached 70mph, it also seemed to rev quite a bit when accelerating from lower speeds, even with gentle acceleration……have some thinking to do.
@@jaymo2970 true! The voice system is better than some others I’ve tried, but a lot of people still prefer at least a couple of buttons for it. As I mentioned, its definitely better than the most recent VW system
314 miles per gallon dream on it would be breaking world records i drive a 1.5 ecoblue average 53mpg locally achieved 72mpg on a good run cant believe people think they will achieve that
@@lloydmillership9682 yeah exactly, the plug in hybrid figures for cars are based on ideal conditions and I don’t think are a fair representation. I was impressed to achieve the 53mpg rated for this full hybrid though
Well it is technically achievable by used ev now almost all the time. Over 180 miles I'm getting 298 mpg. However this is based on fuel mpg and not taking in to account the cost of electric. A little pop in to Tesco for some bread and chuck it on charge for the 15 mins free. All adds up.