Hai aiman, u got very fluent & excellent english slang with insightful yet pactical overall car review style, but u might need some wardrobe improvement just to make the whole package complete, nonetheless, really love ur reviews, keep it up! 👍
Still no android-auto or Apple-car play? Underpowered. Does Proton really have no other engine besides the tiny 1.5? So very sad. Nice review btw. Keep it up.
We all know P1 and P2 has the price point advantage due to gomen policy. Of coz P1 p2 sells, msian dont have that choice. There are many rm40k cars out there better and safer and more cost performance with better specs, just Malaysia restrictions makes them unavailable in M'sia. M'sia general population has to put up with subpar cars which are less safe. M'sia gomen really dont care about M'sia people's life. Prefer to keep msia gomen own pocket full. 50+ years since independence, 20+ years since p1 p2 and we still cannot withstand outside competition pressure when equal footing, our tax money used to sustain these failing p1 p2. Sad indeed. At least the Korean did something correct. But we Malaysian prefer to laugh at Korean car although they are made in korea and miles better quality and spec for the same money. But hey M'sia ppl ego is huge like iceberg. MITI only does not allow rm100k BEV cars. I apologise for this factual error. But I do stand by my point of P1 P2 having favourable stance due to gomen policy. Excise duties was introduced after our country decided to initiate P1. Any brand that is working with P1 using P1 P2 name will receive benefits indirectly as they will be considered 'national car'
1. Neither PROTON or Perodua utilise government funding beyond grants that are available to all OEMs with facilities in Malaysia. 2. Let us know what this MITI policy is as Chery's product pricing has proven conclusively that there is no preferential treatment afforded to local carmakers in terms of duties & taxes. 3. Malaysian-made vehicles undergo the same ASEAN-NCAP testing as all other vehicles in the region, and are evaluated on the same scale. 4. There are no restrictions on importation of vehicles under RM100,000, but with import duties it is nearly impossible to retail a vehicle at that price. That's economics, not policy. TL;DR - We do not tolerate delusional behaviour in our comments section.
@@MalaysianMotoring MITI has repeatedly and openly stated they do not allow vehicles with less than RM100k sale in Malaysia. I do not know if you ever checked this information online. The whole process of car pricing is opaque and the GOVERNMENT APPROVES CARS PRICES in Malaysia a.k.a government controls how low a car maker can price cars and everything is up to discretion of government. If government allows Cherry to price cars at rm40k that is the power of government and everything is Opaque. You can continue to call me delusional but that is the fact about Malaysian Automotive Industry since the beginning of P1 and P2. Tell me why no import cars priced below rm60k? Why no car manufacturers want to introduce cheap cars in Malaysia when it is a fact our earning power is generally less than rm100k annually?
@@MalaysianMotoringit is very interesting to see such unprofessional comment. You did not even answer why no import brands have cars below rm60k mark for so long in Malaysia. The excise duty is the reason but you prefer to ignore that P1 P2 is in fact protected by it, the whole point excise duties were introduced.
@@zeroxzero159bro, 100k limitations is for the BEV cars. Not gasoline car. If no 100k car can be sold in Malaysia, I then ask you what is Vios and City? They are not local cars.
