240fps vs 1000fps drop fps test  

For the ppl saying there is no difference fps means frames per second and he slowed 1000 fps on purpose so that we can preview all frames Edit : Ok, so due to me not using punctuations the comment feels incomplete or has some grammatical mistake, lemme fix that and add up some things to clear confusions in the replies For the ppl saying there is no difference, fps means frames per second. He showed us 3 clips, in which we can see the amount of brown particles emerge out at same time but in different frames per second, showing the difference that having more fps helps us achieve more detail and information and ultra slow motion. And for the people saying that all 3 clips should've been in the same speed as original for comparison , I agree. But according to me the main purpose of the uploaded for this video was to show, having higher fps can help us achieve "ultra slow motion and more information", thus he extended the duration of the lower fps clips till the duration of the clip with the highest fps (in the 1000fps clip the ball falls the earliest whereas in the 240fps clip, the ball starts to fall later than that of others) , hope this comment helps understand people better Also another small note when the cameras were done recording the original 3 clips might have been of only 1 or 0.5 seconds, the uploader later on slowed the clips in his editing software. (basically people generally record in high fps so that they can slow it down later on, and also, so that it doesn't look choppy while they are at it)

250- something cool to see 480- something you could use in a commercial 1000- something used for a emotional scene for a emotional movie

For the people that don't understand the more the fps the more you can slow it down more with out looking choppy that's the simplest way to explain it

The video caught in 1000 fps but we see this in 30 fps💀💀💀

More FPS gives us the feeling of that moment. It feels like we are there in the frame 🥺

All those fps made me hungry

A more complete explanation: All of these videos take the course of just a few seconds, and with higher frames per second it doesn’t necessarily mean that the video is inherently slower. When you raise the fps you’re still capturing the same few seconds, however to view every single frame you will have to slow the video down. The reason the lower FPS videos look faster is because there is less frames to go in between. Yes you can slow the lower FPS videos down to match the speed of the 1,000fps, however it will jitter/stutter as the frames are interpolated (there’s like 3 techniques for slowing down footage that I know) between each other. If you were to play a game with 20,000FPS the game would not look slow at all, you are not able to see all 20,000 frames in 1 second, but it will look very smooth and fluid in your eyes because there is more data to fill in the gaps. And before a smart Alec says “But, monitors can’t even display 20,000FPS”, You’re absolutely right, which is why the video is slowed down in the first place.

ads on hd tv at electronic shops be like:

I edited this comment. You will never know this is why have so much likes 😈

Rip hard drive lol, either way rest of this comment section is cracking me up ngl

Me watching in my 60hz screen: I see 🍷🗿

I can Still watch clearly in my smartphone screen with 60 fps

240fps : Im fast as fuk boiiii

480 Fps Is Very Clear And Nice❤

uhhh, now I totally get what a frame it's. Thank you so much! the details are everything

Video: Frames per second Rendering the scene: Flames per second

Yall misunderstood something. This clip is at respective fps but for comparison. They all calibrate to play at the same frame rate to compare. That being said higher fps has more frames in it so when it is set to play back at lower fps. It becomes slower . Let say you want to compare between 60 and 120 fps. Both this video then being compared and being set play at 30 fps. Now because the amount of frames in a second it has. 60 fps would take 2 seconds to play all rendered 60 frames while 120 fps would take double the amount of that time just to play all 120 of the rendered frames when you play back the video at 30 fps by displaying all the 120 rendered frames without skipping. Hence why higher fps seems slower and lower fps has faster playback. This video is about previewing all the rendered frames at fixed fps for all videos being rendered at different fps.

480 is the prettiest in my opinion

so basically fps means frames per second, when you have more of it, it allows it to be slower and get more frames in one second so 800000 frames per second would be very very slow compared to 60 fps because it’s allowing 800000 frames into 1 second of footage vs 60

You ought to make each of them last equally long so you can see the step difference between the FPS amounts. Unless it wasn’t your point to show the difference between amount of detailed snapshots.

Our brain can only show 200 pictures per second also i think its called pps

Where's the thirty FPS? Damn it!!!!!

Well nothing beats the good ol' 24 fps.

This is the actual time i see a chocolate ball dropped into a powder so dramatically

1000fps 2000w

Everytime the increase of fps slows the video more..

240 fps lets you see slowed falling of the ball, 1000 fps lets you see the sand bits.

I got confused too for a moment but them mean camera fps for slow motion footage.

Amazing lvl I might beat this someday

Just slow :p

Fun fact our eyes can only see 30 to 60 fps so you would have the same experience playing on 60 fps

"Me happy Getting 1 FPS in Cod"💀

240fps - screen updated every 0.0041666666666s 480fps - screen updated every 0.0020833333333s 1000fps - screen updated every 0.001s

Frames per second . Humans see at 60 fps . It's how many pics flash per second . The more the smoother it will look . Try changing from 120 fps to 90 to 60 to 30 on your camera to see difference

The ending is never true, solos is always a loss 😢

Fun fact: the framerate of your vision is generally around 60-90 fps, but can sometimes get up to 500 fps. So if somebody says that a 1,000 frame 1 second animations looks better than a 500 frame one second animation, they are probly lying.

I dont see a diffrence after 60 fps

Jerks asking animators to make a 120 fps animation:

I never saw a difference of fps above 60.. but the slowmotion is amazing.. I remeber back when the Warp program about that super slow motion camera was a thing, and we where able for the first time to watch scenes hundreds of times slower. Maybe in a few years it will be accessible to most to have a 500 to 1000fps camera like we can have smartphones now that allow most to use something only the rich could before.

Bruh my iPhone says it records in 240 fps in slow motion but the 1000 fps video looks exactly like my iPhone recording in 240 fps

Lol y’all don’t get what FPS means

my mobile is 30fps

I Used to be a dumbass in videography because younger me think a 2tb hardrive will be enough for all my client's need

Now all i want is chocolate.

Now I need a 1000hz monitor so I can watch it at normal speeds

You are viewing all the videos at 60fps. Its nor about smoothness, it's about the diference in "the time resolution". If you capture a second ina 120fps camera and playback at the natural 60. You will get a footage twice as slow as real life. More FPS means you can get even finer details in that time dimension. And as such, can slow down by a bigger factor. This is about capture speed. Not playback speed

My phone: best i can do is 7 fps

For a good example if the top one was a animation you would have to draw 1000 pictures to make a second

People don't know the pain we go through with low fos

240 fps got smoother

POV you're watching it a common 60 fps screen😂😂 and try to finding out difference

High frames = potential to slow down to greater levels without degradation in flow Low frames = cannot be slowed down without degradation in flow Those scenes are depicting what limits those footages captured at different frame rates can be slowed down to without degradation in viewing quality

240 is for surprise, 480 fps is a mix of both worlds and 1000fps is just an elegant spray

It's Amazing The Lower The Fps The Slower The Image/Footage/recording

Our eyes can't catch much difference 😅.If a game is played in 1000 fps playing in 60 fps makes you feel lag 😅😅

So what your saying is in assassin movies is the rewind of the crazy kill shots are gonna look amazing and replays of nfl plays

Oh 60fps vs 60 fps vs 60fps i’ts so Amazing 🤩🤩

Wouldn't it make more sense to show them at the same slow speed to admire the difference?

oddly relaxing

yt is capped at 60fps so u cant really see but this video give u an idea of what its looks like and also the human eyes are limited to see around maximum 300fps

Can't wait for gaming to hit 1000 FPS

i thought this was a whole vid turns out i watched this loop like 5 times

who else thought it was a cricket ball getting pitched on the surface of pitch?

For all the idiots who are complaining about refresh rate: the following scene is either rendered or captured in 1000 frames/ second, now it’s up to you how you want to play these 1000 frames at which rate ie 60 frames/ second which appears smooth but abit faster or 25 frames/ second which appears slower but a bit stuttering. So in the end it really doesn’t matter.

you should've had the videos synced, showing videos at different starting point might mislead what you're trying to show

Good marketing they make you watch it three times

You know I'm not going to lie 240fps is just crazy in itself but a thousand I think it's just Overkill

Bro turned particals up

Zack Synder is edging to this

me casually playing minecraft at 1000

Who else watched this video on repeat multiple times 😅

Me who sees no difference between 240 and 1000: 💀

I was confused y the bigger is slow, until some1 said the vid is slowed on it

We can jump to the moon but our eyeballs just on 0.000001fps

Bro anyone remember back in the day when people were stoked about 60fps and were like “your eyes can see 60fps so this is the BEST way to game - you can never go back to 30fps” 🙄

I wish I could afford 1,000 fps lol

So smooth

you can see infinity fps in real life

Think of this as white lines on the road at slower speeds you can see the line at fast speeds it comes one line

I have a 60hz screen, I just won't be able to unfold these fps

1000 fps is dramatic in a funny way

Which one weighs less, 1000 pounds of feathers or 1000 pounds of bricks

you see whatever your screen refresh rate is

what if the more fps the more memory fills our brain 😳

Now do all of the vids at same speed

When that happens in a game i lag

1000-fps CSGO 🙏🙏🙏

Excellent example

they should’ve added 144 and 60 just to give a better example anything 144 and up just looks great in general

and that's how kids i'm still stuck in this loop

I think 1000 fps is good food commercials.

The 1000 was slower and my phone cant do 1000 fps anyway

When you delay the 240fps video to show it's slower but in reality it will stutter but not delay. And 3 videos are running with different speed, the 1000fps one is the slowest and 240fps one is the fastest.

Wow i never knew that 1000 fps was so detailed

Bro waited 3 months for it to render.

400$ vs 800$ vs 15000$ approx

So the higher the fps the slower and smoother a video can get

240 FPS So real✅👽

This is satisfaing my nervs

It is like:- 240fps- 1x @60fps 480fps- 0.5x @60fps 1000fps- 0.3x @60fps I wrote 60fps as RU-vid can show 60fps at max😂