240Hz vs 144Hz: Can a NOOB tell the difference? 

So do I yeah...

only 10 years old? 16 years old 17" ....

Same but a monitor lol

Zenith TV

14-year-old Hitachi tv over here

360hz is already out

@@bartsiebelink2694 So, can you show me where to buy one then?

@@iwiffitthitotonacc4673 I think nVidia has 1 for sale

@@bartsiebelink2694 Haha!! Yeah maybe one day. 😁

@@bartsiebelink2694 Yeah can't find anything. I'm just an average consumer, not a popular reviewer, I can only buy things that are to sale for the public.

Oh for sure! Honestly, the 60Hz gaming experience on this monitor is crazy good. I guess that 1ms is putting in work.

Dam straight!

😅

Anna Muller UNACCEPTABLE! You aren’t subbed to David Does Tech Stuff?!

@@moonlacer Umm.. she is?

@@moonlacer uhhh

Makes sense

SOOOO TRUE !!! Cant tell the dif, if the fps dont cap the 240 hz NOOB

Or geometry dash

Oh for sure! Stuttering is the biggest enemy.

60fps is literally unplayable. 120fps is minimum needed, anything lower gives me a headache

@@Blox117 I upgraded from a 60hz to a 144hz one because of screen tearing.

@@Blox117 For fast fps games it is but for game like tw3 or AC 60 is fine

@@Blox117 are you sure its not just a Placebo effect?

LEV1ATAN and the human eye can only see 24fps... duhhh

MattTheMightyMeme that’s untrue, 24 is used for movies as it gives it a more cinematic view. 30fps is smooth, but you can easily tell the difference between 30 and 60hz as it’s a night and day difference. Anything higher is unnecessary unless you get headaches under prolonged viewing. The law of diminishing return applies to refresh rate. The difference between 30 & 60 is massive while the difference between 60 & 120/144 are minute. Same goes for 120/144 to 240. You’re just using up more electricity and what you get in return.

@@AznTony360 my bruh I was being sarcastic...

Tony Nguyen dude I had a 60hz went to 240hz night and day. You have no idea what your saying. Linus tech tips did a test with Shroud and other pros and for the most part the difference was very noticeable to everyone. And they’re reaction times clocked in faster on the higher refresh rates. It makes a difference ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OX31kZbAXsA.html

The human ears can only smell 3GB of RAM

He prolly would've cut it out if she wasn't the type to later say "so I guess the video should be titled 'can a LOSER tell the difference' lolmfao!"

Not really, the difference between 144 and 360 is less than 4 ms gap between each frame, while 60 and 144hz is 12 ms

@@tendatonda1634 maybe but u can't speak on it unless uve tried 360hz. Hw unboxed said u never notice how slow 144hz is until u try 360hz

@@Frozoken and Linus did a video with shroud and there wasn't much difference between 144 and 360. 60hz on my 144hz display gives me a headache.

Haha! This video exposes my true mathematical ability lol 😂

Maybe if youre comparing 60 to 120/144 but you don't really need to go much higher than 144 hz

@@PenguinNoodleSoup The games that benefit most from frames are played at low settings and even the nicest gpu's are not going to push triple digit frames with rtx turned on. By the time any gpu can max out these monitors, they'll be 5 years old. Console game developers set the pce for the whole industry. This will be a 4k60fps gaming generation max. The new systems are already struggling with that.

so there's no need to go past 240, nevermind alot of pros have been backtracking from 360 to 240

@@CHRISCAMPO-wq8bi this just mean 240hz is the bang for the buck. go past dat u ll ve huge diminishing return. if u ve 240hz, 360hz is not worth it, but if u go 540hz hell yeah its worth it! its a 2.3ms reduction! but its a $1000, and its very demanding on the CPU. we can barely maintain a consistent 540fps even in esport games like overwatch. also nowaday the panel type like OLED make a huge diff in motion clarity vs ips even when they ve same hz. final the motion reduction technology make absolutely ground breaking of a diff. the ULMB2 tech really make ur 240hz mon looks like its 500hz.

@@jake9854 yeah its like you said, 240 is the sweet spot. 360 has no benefits, plus anything higher will also barely be noticeable, and many even noted less than that going from 360 to 480. On top of that, its like you said: even the lowest requirement esports games that can actually reach 500 fps, like CSGO, Valorant, and Overwatch, so you know games that you can tone down and not make it an unoptimized mess, can't handle all the smoothness at that level. Not without blurriness and visual artifacts atleast.

@@CHRISCAMPO-wq8bi look thats not what i said, im saying 240hz to 540hz is a noticeable upgrade. for the reason that it a 2.3ms reduction. thats like 144 upgrade to 240hz, its 2.8ms reduction. plus ROG Swift Pro PG248QP has a new motion reduction technology, ULMB2. this tech makes night n day of a difference, it makes fast moving object, crystal clear, u ll know their exact position, u can even spot the details of their clothes while moving fast! but the price u ve to pay is huge! $1000 for that monitor. and u need to greatest n lastest CPU, 7800X3D to maintain stable 540fps.

We need more clips of Anna and those deep Vs... Mmmmmm

At the absolute least begin with that and then ask slightly more targeted but still vague about questions such as “smoothness” etc.

While there are ways to improve his experiment, your suggestion is absolutely horrible. Better or worse experience can mean a lot of things. Research questions must be VERY specific and not open to interpretation.

@@vivacious7276 my suggestion was as specific as was necessary. I did not say 'experience', I said 'visual experience'. That is the crux of the hypothesis being tested: does a higher framerate lead to a distinguishable improvement to the visual experience?

there will almost always be bias. people tend to think they can notice more then they can. and by telling them what is changing won't matter it will make them focus even harder to see if they can spot the difference. with clear out from all the videos I have seen people can't. People like to think that, oh I paid this amount to get this screen that has a bigger number so it must be better then my friends screen so therefor I have to say I can spot the difference or else I'm incorrect in it being better. I have seen so many of these kind of videos to the point where it is guesswork. people can't really see it. maybe a very few people with extremely good eye's can. but most won't be able to. And trust me people will be saying it again when you go from a 240hzx to a 360hz, or from a 360hz to a 500hz and so on. people will always claim they can spot the difference. it's so stupid.

I should do a "beast" T shirt.

Yea, I hate KEKW, VERY annoying. I should be a dead meme but I refuses to die.

I went from 20fps on ps4 pro to 60fps on pc, and then my old monitor broke and I see 30-60-90-120/144 but I don't see the difference between 144-240, but maybe need for speed hot pursuit doesn't support 240 but even it's ets 2 I can't tell the difference from 144-240. But honestly 60 is perfectly fine even a stable 30 is okay, although on low power pc's I try to get 40-45 fps. And thanks to the really bad fps on the ps4 pro I managed to play pay day2 on a potato at literally a consistent 3 fps. (But could be neither games can actually run at 240, I've only tested those 2 so far).

@@tilburg8683 i got a 240hz monitor, upgraded from a 165hz rog... i feel no difference at all :D

Xenox just cancelled my order lol.... I'll stay with my 165fps

@@Xeniix I mean thats upto you guys stable 30 fps and higher is technically good enough( thats better than the ps4 pro can do and a fair amount of ganes) IMO, but the higher fps just looks smoother. I went from 19 inch 1080P 60fps to 27 inch 2k 240fps so definitely a difference for me. The 19inch one was good but it kinda died so I had to buy a new one, else I would have used it for longer probably ( or well I wasn't planning on throwing it away, still haven't actually, but I would have used it for a couple more years and then used it as back up or for console, since my current one only has hdmi and display port.

@@Xeniix you need to overclock your eyes.

I won't actually miss CRT, but yeah those were better days for different things. Still hoping there'll be actual improvements made to future monitors though.

@@ArtisChronicles yeah, it is a bit frustrating thata new tech tookover so fast and it stil is worse in some aspects. For example shaky handcams never bothered me on CRT.

not with backlight strobing to hide the pixel refreshes

I must agree. When I had a gaming laptop, I was using a GTX 1050, when the highest around was the RTX 2080Ti. It worked fine, and suited my needs with both gaming and RAW photo editing from my Rebel T6 camera, as well as video processing. One thing is for sure, it worked a lot better than a standard laptop running a Radeon A10 processor, and definitely a lot better than an Intel Pentium, which was better than an ATI Radeon processor (that's way back!)

Thats why i have a 1440p 240Hz Monitor.....

Yea games do look nicer if u run ultra settings in game. You can't have both resolution, fps and ultra, no graphics card can handle that atm.

Yeah I very much agree. I want to do a follow up video talking about that. Perfect gaming is a triangle and at the moment you can only have two corners. 😋 I hope the notation was a bit more clear, I was not sure how to set it up to be the most legible

I just want larger screens than a miniscule 27 inch.

Maybe you're color blind...

@@dawidalt9532 Im losing my mind over this, how is that magenta? Isn't the one under it magenta?

@@Karrppu I was just joking about the color blind thing. The one on top is cyan and beneath it is magenta from what I see.

@@Karrppu Here's a the actual color I got from the droplet tool in photoshop. The one the arrow is pointing at is #067D9B and the one beneath it is #B74B86. Hope it helps

me too!

don't we all?

marry her then lol

i wonder if she is single

does she have a steam account? i would love to play with her

You don't need high speed screen capping devices to notice a difference in refresh rate. Both of them were right most of the time, so there's some truth to their results. I instantly notice the difference between 60 and 144. No need for science cuz i get it right 100% of the time hehe.

That is because this video is recorded and rendered in 30 fps, so what you see is definitely not the experience you get on a high refresh monitor and feels way more smoother than what you're seeing in this video

Bloodyfist222 won’t see much of a difference until you go back to 60 😂

Yeah there is no going back. 😁

@@DawidDoesTechStuff I did 😅

You should only get benefits when playing something that is a running at an fps that reaches the monitors refresh rate

Agreed 😸 Anna and Neko all the way!

who is neko?

Haha!! Yeah that is the big problem with 240Hz. 😁

@@clemenszink3823 Didn't you get it from my emojis, Neko is Dawid & Anna's Cat 😻

I'd say 144Hz is the sweet spot for a competitive gamer

That's the thing, CSGO has a dramatic difference in mobile CPUs for some reason. Your CPU is bottlenecking it by a pretty substantial amount, even with a 3070 Max Q. I have a 10875H, it's pretty good, but the 11th gen counterpart gets about 100 more FPS on average on CSGO.

Depends on the games you play and high much you value refresh rate vs higher resolution

Thank you, saved me $699

@@taegire wtf u talking about? 240hz now cost $240!! 1 dollar per hz!

@@taegire go for 240! cauz after 240 u ll experience extreme diminishing return... u have to wait till 1000hz to see a difference

Bro that's stupid almost anyone can tell

@@balake1879 is it really more noticeable than 144hz?

Thank you very much! I appreciate you watching. 👍

You made my day better, my motherboard died. Now I have to RMA it. Tried everything I could think of. :(

Dawid Does Tech Stuff it stopped recognizing my graphics card

These monitors are made for esports. Esports games are easy to run above 240fps. For anything else than playing competetiv 240 is not a whise choice

If you just play casual game or something that you can play laid back and enjoy the game. 144hz is the best for your case. But if you playing competitive game, or fast pace action like e-Sport game in general. It make difference as less latency, and faster response. Which is really important.

wrong!!! 240hz has become so cheap it s like water to be honest! get it now!

same! except anything less than 100hz

you play games at 30fps????

@@Blox117 A whole lot of console games play at 30 fps, what can you do

@@Blox117 I play games at 30 fps I have done for years especially 3rd person games

it looks good on 1080p bro whats ur problem

The ONLY difference would be E-sports titles and a few MMOs that are designed to be super easy to play for your computer. So some of these players will benefit on a competitive stage. But plain old me, nuuupe

That’s an interesting fact!

_Yeah but my face has RGB so 300% boost_

i love facts with [CITATION NEEDED], don't you?

I can you see RG

The time has come.

so can u tell the difference?

if u play competitive games like overwatch it makes a huge difference! so much more comfortable to the eyes! its like paradise!

I am a casual gamer, so 60 Hz is good enough for me. 120 Hz sure does look nicer, but puts more strain on the PC.

@@megabojan1993 144 Hz looks really smooth on the desktop though too, even if you can't get 144 FPS in games.

​@@megabojan1993paesant

@@luigi95- I don't care :)