I also find it helpful to keep reminding myself that what we see on the picture plane is only a projection of the 3D world behind it, and the normal laws of 3D geometry do not all apply in the 2D picture plane. On the picture plane, parallel lines meet at a point, equal lengths do not always look equal, and equal angles do not always look equal!!😂
Finally understood why vp to mp equals vp to sp after carefully following video 38. I am also finding it useful to use one colour for all lines linked to the SP, as these are in reality in a horizontal plane, and another colour for all lines and points in the picture plane, which is in reality a vertical plane. So any line from the SP must end at a point on the horizon/eye line, which is the intersection of the two planes.
Sir, thank you very much. I suffered for a long time, not understanding how to determine the depth of the lines in a two-point perspective. Your videos helped me a lot)
Hi, I love this series and I followed your last 26 videos. But I start getting confused here, Here are my questions, I try to make them concise. 1: I do not understand why (LMP to LVP) == (LVP to SP). does it have some physical meaning? I dont understand why I should put that point on horizon line. 2: followed Q1, in one point perspective, for my understanding, the 45 degree MP means the vanishing point of 45 degree lines. But I do not understand in 2 point perspective, if I connect one point to LMP, where is the 45 degree angle. 3, in one point perspective, one VP has 2 45 degree MP, does that also applied in 2 point perspective? If I draw LMP, and then put the same length on the other side of horizon line, does it have physical meaning? If no, then why? I am looking forward for your reply, I am very interested in this series.
1. I have other videos about this, but it concerns drawing isosceles triangles. 2. The 1-point MPs draw 45° angles because they are 45° from the SP. So when you use the 1-point MPs as vanishing points they will also be drawing lines that are 45°. MPs for 2-point are not at 45° 3. Yes, you can put another MP on the other side but it will be far away. I also have other videos about this.
@@trustyourperspective Thanks for the reply, I think I got it, Here is my understanding, can you please take a look? I create a google photo link, I am not sure does youtube allow the link, I will put the link in another reply, If you cannot see it, let me know pls.
I had the same question as your question1. The appropriate follow-up video mentioned by trustyourperspective is video 38. I found it needed to be followed slowly and carefully, step by step, but it finally made sense.🙂
I like measuring points personally, because this way I can more easily maintain consistency if, for example, I want to draw the same room from multiple points of view.
I agree with your explanations. So let me ask you. Do you need to learn the 30/60 method if you are already familiar with the measuring points? Or is this method used entirely different?
When you say "30/60 method" you are referring to the object being at a angle that is 30/60 to the picture plane? I'm not sure if this answers your question: but as long as the distance from the vanishing point to station point is the same as the vanishing point to the measuring point, then you are good. Is this what you are asking?
