Would be great if we never saw H&M again… 😐 … they could go & live in the woods somewhere & just annoy the wildlife rather than the rest of the world… 🤷♀️
Yeppers! But be warned you effing grifters that if you try to sell your innocent children for filthy lucre, then you fully deserve the outpouring of hate and vitriol that will be unleashed upon you. If you want to whore yourselves out to the highest bidder then fine - but don't do it to those poor kids who are already paying the price for your sheer effing hubris.
Those kids SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE LINE OF SUCCESSION NOW. I've never heard of such nonsense to have two kids that we will never see again. WHAT RUBBISH IS THIS?
I feel your anger annap6992 This is simply ludicrous. The RF needs to rip the band aid off the wound and let everyone get over this betrayal in time. 😡
You can’t remove kids from succession when there is no kids ,,I saw on TV when that bump fell to her knees ,she is playing games ,,what did you want the royals to do ,you can’t fix stupid ,,,tHere is no lily ,,,,thank god can you imagine ,those two as parents ,they would write a book mama dearest ,,,unless you have a narcissist in your family ,,you can not imagine the trouble 👿 they cause ,,but it’s never their fault ,,he is scared and brain washed ,my brother was the same ,,can’t rock the boat 🛶
They've been playing the "we won't share our kids with you" game since she was (allegedly) pregnant. And no one really cares. They're doing it to spite everyone, but in order to spite people, they have to actually care
Just fed up with them they are not off her body. We don’t want to see her kids because they are not with them. If they are shut in kids social services aren’t doing their job.
If the threat of "never seeing them again" is supposed to instill panic in the multitudes, sorry. Nobody cares! And we'd love to hear that we'll never see H and M again either!!
What the ENTIRE news media , utubers, royal experts!!, newspapers ,need to understand is NOBODY IN THIS ENTIRE COUNTRY GIVE A FIG IF WE NEVER SEE OR HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT EITHER OF THE KIDS OR THE HARKLES EVER AGAIN.WE DONT CARE.
We may never see the kids again because they don’t exist. How can you have two Heirs to the line of succession that are unknown?! And why did the Sussexes feel it necessary to put out this statement?!
ALLEGEDLY, Many rumours that markle had historically, tried to purchase a child, children from abroad to fit the requirements re hair colour etc. Nothing can shock me anymore about that creature.
What does he mean…we will never see the kids again… really we’ve never seen the kids in the first place. Maybe what he means is, the truth will come out and that’s why we won’t see them…nothing to do with privacy.
I think there could be kids but I don’t think they were born of her body and I have to wonder if there is a Lily as everyone that does tarot doesn’t see 2 kids . I thought it was just said that Zara and Mike said no one in the royal family have ever seen them .
The only grandparent and family member that is present(allegedly) in the life of these alleged children is Doria. A woman who abandoned her own daughter for 10 years when she was a child. That is quite revealing.
Given that we've never seen the alleged children, it's no loss. But at some point, they've got to prove that they exist. The longer this game goes on, the more people will demand that they be removed from los. No proof,then remove them.
They should be REMOVED from LoS until the 'parents' prove their existence and their LEGAL RIGHT to be on the LoS. Then Harry keep them hidden away for as long as you like. Not many of us give a c...
That’s what I think , maybe they are under the illusion that with time we will forget they actually had kids , I can see people in years to come saying “ were they not supposed to have two kids , I am sure I heard that somewhere “ 😂😂😂
This will not be forgotten. It is fraud allegedly and that I am sure will be their legacy in the history books allegedly.she can supply photos of anyone she pleases, it doesn’t provide the legalities of their birth and line of succession. This is a complete joke to even attempt allegedly.
“Unprecedented access”. Jack Royston is a fool if he doesn’t know that he is just another Scooby Doo who will be Markled very soon. Since they want total privacy, they should remove the whole family from the Royal Family website then they can have all the privacy that WE would like 💕🕯
Those children are now old enough to say I WANT MY MOMMY! YOU ARE NOT MY MOMMY! WHERE IS MY MOMMY? Etc……they can unmask them in a minute! Out of the mouth of babes!!!!!!!!
Those children are within the top seven places in line to the British throne. Therefore, Harry cannot have it both ways. Either show children that are provably eligible to be in the line, or remove them from Succession and keep their privacy. There is no other alternative.
They cannot afford rented kids anymore, and I mean not financially. When smalll, you can pass anyone for a kid, as they change rather quickly. When older, they need consistency and they can’t afford the same child actors over and over again
No one is invested in these invisible kids as we have never seen them. The problem is any kid in a few years can rock up and claim to be lilybucks or archbucks we are not interested but titles need to be removed from them in my opinion 🤬
Exactly. I’ve long wondered if the children (or at least Archie) was born to someone Harry had a relationship with and Meghan has helped him cover it up. The child is likely older than we’ve all been told but that won’t be do noticeable if the wait until college to reveal themselves.
Henry, when he came over for the Invictus service, visited the 'Scotty's Little Soldiers' charity told the children there (when asked "Where's Megan" "She can't come to Britain, it's too dangerous for her" This is to children who have lost a parent(s) in military conflict and who have been traumatised!!!!! PS All the time his wife was hiding in the luxurious Windsor Suite of Heathrow Airport waiting for him to join her for their faux royal tour of Nigeria. How I loath this pair
@@trishabens6357 And there is something equally vile and narcissistic about her aggressive, mean-spirited and duplicitous husband. H is no less vile, no less egregious and no less of a sociopath.
I wonder if the interest in Princess Catherine’s Mother’s Day photo was initiated by the royals? What a great way to end the nonsense with Hazelnut and Nutmeg playing games with their photos of pretend children. They can’t do it anymore.
@sundog I truly believe that the Mothers Day photo was released intentionally so that the Parkles would no longer be able to put out photoshopped pictures.
My thoughts exactly 😂 Princess Catherine took one for the team, she’d already been accused of the R word so, this would have been a pleasure to endure to stop the Meg from producing photoshop pictures 👍
Well, certainly, all my friends, colleagues, and family members here in Britain, are not interested in the children, but we are all interested in their provenance, and I'll leave it at that.
We couldn't be that lucky. I feel no compunction to ever see the kids. It's time Charles sorted this nonsense out. IMHO I can't help thinking that poor William will be left to resolve this issue.
@@QueenCathleen I think it's time Charles grew a spine. William has enough on his own plate play with his wife being ill. This is bound to worry him greatly because his mother died when he was very young.
@@sheilalumb5150 The main sticking point fact remains, that Henry's the *only* one who knows the truth about whether ANY kids exist or not. It's Henry's job to prove HE himself has kids that are *his,* -- which he CAN'T. Or they'd be visiting the RF in UK and H could take them there.
She has used our people's children to have photo ops of them and now they are no longer loaning them out 😂 she never gave birth to any children her family has said she had a hysterectomy in her 20's
I think it all relates to the fact that they will be exposed with more reality when they photoshop any pictures of the kids. They are trapped now with their endless lies.
Harry is forgetting, when he was a child his Father was the future King. Harry’s children are not the children of a future King. He needs to look at the lives of his cousins. Much less notice taken, only occasionally mentioned or photographs.
It’s obvious the invisible kids should not have titles or be in the line of succession. This situation is something the British Royal family has never dealt with before. Personally I have faith that they will deal with it in a way that is legally fitting, that will satisfy the public.
Never seen the children, and don't wish to. If those children exist what a miserable life they must have, two crazy parents, no family around them, that is so sad. The Jack Russell sounded like the cat, thought Fluffy was telling him off lol.
Plus Uk Public do not Ask for the Children to be seen it’s crazy, to even believe we want copious up dates on the Royal. Children. Snap Happy is not what we do to Children or Adults without (Consent) People are aware not to take Advantage.
The Wales family publish birthday photos and we see their children at some of the public functions. I see their children as happy, healthy with some bits of their personality-Louis dancing, Charlotte excited at Taylor Swift concert. I hope they don't feel over exposed. It's too late for Harkles. Not interested in their children. They have also shown us several versions of their children. The photos of the Wale's children are chronological and the children are acting age appropriate, and have age appropriate physical development.
Jack Royston is a comic. Have we seen those children anyway? This is because they can no longer produce children without major issues, passports needed for international travel, and the markle woman cannot photoshop anymore since the uproar around Catherine's mothers day photograph - well done to the Wales family for shutting down the markles. Also, international travel means passports.................. pressure, can't produce.
We won't see the kids 'again'??? We've NEVER seen them, in real time, at all. The only sightings have been a blanket, a couple of very oddly immobile babies being held/carried, then various arguably photoshopped stills, mostly blurry, and some pre-recorded documentary footage, mostly taken from behind, of assorted anonymous children who could, frankly, be absolutely anybody. But I can see how hiding them away permanently under the guise of ''extreme privacy' might seem like one way out of the problem of their provenance, and also, perhaps, their lack of actual presence. Perhaps M is hoping that we'll conveniently forget all about them and let her off the hook.
It's such a bummer when you have children for merching and leverage purposes when you have no interest in being a mother but you want to pretend to be maternal and you don't know what you're doing.
Two little too late 🤷🏼♀️Since they are in the line of succession, the public do have a right to see a glimpse into their lives. Even if it’s just legitimate Christmas cards with their photo. I’m not saying they should be danced in front of the public, but the public should at least be aware of what they actually look like and how they are being raised. If they are not willing to do that , then very simply, the public lose interest, and they have no stake in those two children. H&M have broughtthis on themselves. People have totally lost interest in my opinion.
With what is happening across the world public don't care - we don't believe she birthed any children but hope they are happy and with their birth mothers - they are irrelevant and their lies have been found out
😂wow. Dropping an announcement that nobody will ever see the kids again right before h&m start a PR campaign involving the children... SMH. That sounds about right.
Meghan will probably wheel them out next time the Princess of Wales announces she will be out in public again, she got too short of notice last time, so had to settle with jam and dog biscuits ...
What children? The only person who can prove *any children of his own* - even exist - is Henry himself. He's the only one in that unwavering spotlight _sweating_ & snarling ... and side pedalling. Prove it Henry. He can't.
This is really laughable! As we didn't actually see them to start with it really won't make any difference. When they divorce I would like to see all titles removed. They live in the USA that doesn't recognise royalty so there is no reason for them to retain their titles. End of.
Oh NO! Never see the invisi-kids again! What punishment for those of us who couldn’t give a good god-damn about the little tykes. Interest in them gets lower with every day of non-sighting. Personally, I’m looking forward to the day when the real Prince Archie and Princess Lily are old enough to break free from their toxic parents and approach the RF on their own.
If no one will ever see the kids again, then it makes sense to remove them from the line of succession. We wouldn't want them to have any pressure in having to perhaps step up as royalty. I myself think that the Parkles are on a desperate search for said kids.
What a load of horse shit! They don’t have the kids; if there are kids, they don’t have them in their possession! Time for the RF to fess up! Thanks Paula! Xx
Beleive me if there were kids ,she would prance them around and charge a fortune for their photos ,and she would open a store selling clothes ,they would wear ,ect,,,there are no kids ,baby bump fell on 📺 I saw it,,then she would write a book 📕 on how to be a good mother. Her brother said don’t leave her alone with kids and animals ,explained how her dog had two broken front legs ,,why was that animal returned to them ,if that was us we would be charged with animal abuses ,,,
Time for Henry to fess up, not the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker. Henry's the *only* one who knows the truth about whether these kids exist or not. It's Henry's job to PROVE he has kids that are *his,* which he CAN'T.
