3 Farm Bill Review | Are they Good or Bad for Farmers? 

City guys will never understand the sentiments of farmers. City guys are like birds. They move from pond to pond. But the farmers are like fish in the pond. Their life and world starts and ends in the pond.

UPSC civil services....I m writing mains this year. Your vedios are way better than any coaching institute.

This should be showed on TV

Good, unbaised and neutral analysis of whole subject, thank you.

I request you to Please restart weekly current affairs🙂... Thank you for this great efforts ☺️🙏

Just realised u have studied from the college I m studying in and it makes me feel proud I know some people who have lost lives in peaceful protest....sad for that

We def need such subjects covered in school level. I wasnt aware of so many things..thx u very much

This video is simply one of the best I have found breaking down the whole Farm Bills...thank you so much.

Government should not allow hoarding of crops/pulses as small farmers without quantity or storage would be vulnerable. Also make MSP legally binding in Contract Farming too.

I am requesting to all farmers plz. Plz. Read these three ordinances of farm bill. This farm bill will benefit the farmers. plz don't believe on political or farmers leaders rumors. Farm bill is providing you choices and Read it and then react. Specially punjab people plz read and don't take this protest on your ego.🇮🇳

More Unbiased Than Anyone Else Videos on Farm Bills. ❤️🙏 Thank You Mam

You are too good to explain it. The best part of your lecture is- "Your discussion was limited to law points only. It was unbiased legal discussion"... Keep it up and. Keep sharing. Thanks.

The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔 Chlo aap hi bta do Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level So lets begin point by point My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too 1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔... Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ... Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye 2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020 Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔 Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔 Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ... Sochne ki baat hae🤔 Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko Sochne ki baat hae 🤔 Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega Dhanyavad and do read comment by SK T....

Good Explanation. However you discussed only flaws of various APMC Acts and existing practices, not how new Bills will resolve these issues (except few). You didn't discussed about new bill for agreement between farmers and sponsors, how the disputes among them will be resolved, what will be the power of courts in this regard, what if SDM is unbiased or his decision otherwise prejudice to farmers, what if produce will not match quality,grade standards, criteria (inspection will be done by sponsor and they can reject). The price can be varied and corporates are smarter than innocent farmers, and they may take undue advantage of section 5. Bargaining power of big corporates may induce individual farmers to sell their produce at lower price, no other central law prohibits it. Corporates can now stock huge in their cold storage and sell later at higher price. I appreciate that now farmers can sell their produce directly to consumers if they wish to, there revenue will be increased by 8 to 10 percent with same inputs and efforts, it means there profit will increase by about 40%. Overall, new bills and their motives are good but lacks certain critical considerations.

'Minimum time maximum explanation' is your saving grace mam. i appreciate your efforts and great respect for the effort which u have made behind this informative video.

Gist of all farm bills, the concept of rich and poor state is new for me, Very well explained mam Thank you

Nothing Political, Only knowledge!🔥🙏

She had explained the things well but finally end up in a erroneous conclusion. Definitely there are lots of issues with current APMC systems. Bt the new acts are going to worsen the situation further. Now onwards the farmers needs to bargain with more powerful purchasers than earlier small traders. The small/medium farmers wouldn't have any bargaining power with big corporates. If the intention was to make MSP mandatory in every private transaction, why did the bills not contain a clause that the price paid to the farmer by the purchaser shall not be less than the notified MSP?. That's why lakhs of farmers are on the streets. I hope you will review your conclusion.

Ma'am I wouldn't say wether this bill is bad or not.. But if this bill fails & farmers suffer in the future our mainstream media will never discuss it as they are praising & discussing now

You are amazing. The way you teach, oh my god. You are an inspiration.

You seriously think the only problem with the bill is tax acquisition🤦‍♀️I’m from a farming family and I’m doing llb.These are death warrents for us.Born in a farming family and you’ll realise the differences

Question: Note: I had all these questions after I read about these bills from multiple news outlets, feel free to point out if I'm wrong about any of them 1. in case of dispute farmers cannot go to civil court, is that correct? and if yes then isn't that bad 2. farmers will have to pay a fee when they sell in mandi (just like it is right now) but if they choose to sell outside of mandi then they will not get charged anything, don't you think that in the long run then the purchasers will take adv. of this fact and force farmers to pay just a small hair above net profit that farmer will get if he/she decides to sell in mandi? and in most cases small farmers are not going to return without selling otherwise they'd have to cover the cost of two way trip from farm to outside seller 3. govt. is also not going to keep most info. about who farmers are selling, at what prices, etc. 4. there is also no limit on keeping the stock for processors and value chain members, how is that not going to get abused by some medium to big entity who will keep those produce in stock untill their prices get high enough?

Now farmers have two ways to sell their produce, one at APMCs and Another Outside Of APMCs. If the private traders won't give MSP to the farmers they have to choose APMC (only for 23 yields). And here education and awareness is necessary for farmers, because private traders have high knowledge of negotiation when compare to farmers, so farmers need to aware of market in their areas. And I think MSP to be made a legal right, so the small margin farmers won't get exploited by big traders.

I heard a very interesting analogy today, A 10 floor building did not have a lift, so people had problem climbing up and down. Specially the elderly and the kids, so the society started exploring options. Finally they got some donkeys, who could carry people up and down. The donkey owners would charge people for carrying them up and down for a fee and would also pay 10% to the society from the revenue they earned. It was a very happy situation for all involved. After sometime the society management changed, the new management decided to install a lift for carrying people up and down. All hell broke loose and everyone started protesting, this is not fair, society will loose revenue, the donkey owners will be jobless and no food for them (human rights issue), the donkeys will be worthless (animals rights issue), all were angry. Society management clarified, the lift is available to all but the gentlemen who wanted to use the donkeys could still do it. But no, the agitation continued and so finally the new management had to succumb to the pressure. The final arrangement was arrived and so anyone who wanted to climb the building could still use the donkey. The donkey would carry a person, go in the lift and carry people up & down. All were happy. Disclaimer: any resemblance of this with the farmers agitation is a coincidence.

Dear mam🙏🕊🌹 आप किसी भी topic पर बोहत अच्छा समझाती हो मैन आपके sirf 2 वीडियो ही देखे है। But I am very impress with you👌 And Your way of communication is spectacular. 👍 Your inossency and qtness is Also the good qualities of your Personality🕊🙏👍 God bless you mam🌠🌠🌠🌠 YOu are the proud of india🙏🇮🇳

Thankyou ma'am. The best thing about your Video is that you explained everything with respect to our constitutions law & order, statistics and also how our govt. operates & recieves tax which therefore leaves no scope of giving a biased review.

Modi is rejecting the earlier setup installed by earlier govt regimes. . 1) Playing of role in External Domain: Food Corporation of India was established with the same intention which Modi is now propagating with this new farm bill. . The problem of farmers is that they can not store their output. It is very difficult to do sorting, cleaning, packaging etc, transport to other markets where they can get more price. . Farmers can not do this extra job, they need helping-services. Farmers need warehouses for storing, materials and tools for processing & packaging, transportation help to bring their product to the warehouse and send it to the market for sale. . FCI has not built enough well developed storage houses, packaging, transportation setups where farmers can hire those services so that they can sell their products to prospective buyers when there is a right price for their end-products. . Modi is becoming an assistant to businessmen, not as an assistant to farmers.

I was against Modi about MSP, but when u said, only 6% farmers are getting benefitted through this, then farmer bill must come, and today is the day, Farmer bill has passed. Hope it will change the situations of farmers, their income and standard.

You didn't tell anything about new farm bill and started comparing it 🤔

There are few things that you could have explained as well like what impact these bills will have in future, an example of similar thing happened in past, why this approach failed in western countries, and how Bihar is doing now since they have implemented these laws in past. I am not a farmer and not biased either but see the long term impact of these bills on them clearly.

Priya ji, I have a few queries ma'am.. 1. Why can't farmers form a similar cartel (as traders) to control the prices at which to sell to the traders? At least this should be possible with the new farming bill... 2. Isn't the agricultural produce tax free item? If yes, then how does the Central government benefit for this bill? 3. You say that farmers won't benefit as much as consumers... but in free market economy an equilibrium is achieved by demand and supply. Thus why would a farmer go directly to a retailer if he is happy to get MSP.. he can go to the APMC for that...he will go to the retailer to get a good deal. A retailer too will also give him a better rate than MSP as they too have avoided the middle man and will still get a higher margin.. 4. Land acquisition act is not just necessary for farm sector but more importantly for establishing Industries... isn't it? Moreover, in a country like ours, poor farmers need jobs with steady incomes rather than farming outputs which are very much dependent on many variables such as monsoon, MSP, Politics etc... 5. I think, another point that needs mentioning wrt poverty in farming relates to the dimnishing size of land holdings with successive generations due to distribution of land within more & more siblings... this leads to smaller and smaller land holdings which further leads to poverty as the output reduces in proportion. Pls share your thoughts...

The best explanation I have ever heard! Brilliant! This should be tending. Guys get this trending. For the global public get this in English too.. even if there is closed captioning.

Recently, there have been strong protests from farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, against three farm bills that seek to replace ordinances issued in june 2020. These bills envisage to bring change in some of the key aspects of the farm economy - trade in agricultural commodities, price assurance, farm services including contracts, and stock limits for essential commodities. These bills sought to bring much needed reforms in the agricultural marketing system such as removing restrictions of private stock holding of agricultural produce or creating trading areas free of middlemen and take the market to the farmer. However, farmers are apprehensive that the free market philosophy supported by these bills could undermine the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and make farmers vulnerable to market forces. Note : Three Farm Bills that are bond of contention: The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020. Intended Benefits Associated with These Bills The Bills aim to do away with government interference in agricultural trade by creating trading areas free of middlemen and government taxes outside the structure of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs). It will allow farmers an option to sell their produce directly to these new zones, without going through the middlemen and paying levies such as mandi fees. It sought to remove stock holding limits as well as curbs on inter-State and intra-State trade, and create a framework for contract farming. Also, these bills promote the creation of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPO) on a large scale and will help in creating a farmer-friendly environment for contract farming where small players can benefit. These bills may enable private players to invest in warehousing, grading and other marketing infrastructure. A combined effect of these bills will help in creating a ‘One Nation, One Market’ for agricultural produce. Issues Raised by The Farmers & Opposition Federal Angle: The provisions in the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, provides for unfettered commerce in designated trade areas outside APMC jurisdictions. Apart from this, the bill empowers the Centre government to issue orders to States in furtherance of the law’s objectives. However, matters of trade and agriculture being the part of subjects on the State list, have caused resentment in States. Lack of Consultation: First the ordinance route and now the hastily attempt to pass the Bills without proper consultation adds to the mistrust among various stakeholders including farmers. Also, by allowing ‘trade zones’ to come up outside the APMC area, farmers have become apprehensive that the new system would lead to eventual exit from the minimum support price. Absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis: Another issue that is raised by the farmers is that the proposed bills give the preference for corporate interests at the cost of farmers’ interests. In absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis, the farmers may find it difficult to deal with Corporates, as they solely operate on the motive of profit seeking. Non-Favourable Market Conditions: While retail prices have remained high, data from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) suggest a deceleration in farm gate prices for most agricultural produce. With rising input costs, farmers do not see the free market based framework providing them remunerative prices. These fears gain strength with the experience of States such as Bihar which abolished APMCs in 2006. After the abolition of mandis, farmers in Bihar on average received lower prices compared to the MSP for most crops. Way Forward Improve Agricultural Infrastructure to Strengthen Competition: Government should massively fund the expansion of the APMC market system, make efforts to remove trade cartels, and provide farmers good roads, logistics of scale and real time information. Empowering State Farmers Commissions: Rather than opting for heavy centralisation, the emphasis should be on empowering farmers through State Farmers Commissions recommended by the National Commission for Farmers, to bring about a speedy government response to issues. Consensus Building: The Centre should reach out to those opposing the Bills, including farmers, explain to them the need for reform, and get them on board. Conclusion Without strong institutional arrangements, the free market may harm lakhs of unorganised small farmers, who have been remarkably productive and shored up the economy even during a pandemic

ma'am, your voice is too good ... and your way of explaining things are mind blowing... thanks a lot for your guidance

Ma'am you did a mistake... no farmer was bound to sell his product through APMC before the bills were passed !

How can anyone can be so good in explaining....with crystal clear facts....Explaining Skills you developed is amazing... Thanks for the video mam

Who buys maximum wheat from farmers? FCI Where does maximum wheat damage सड़ता है? FCI Who buys this damaged wheat? Alcohol makers, food processor How is Alcohol consumption in Punjab? BINDAS Which ministry does HarsimratBadal always take? Food processing Hmmmmmmmm

Hey mam!! Your lectures are so interesting. I suggest FL team, especially priya mam to start lecture series on Indian National movement and Indian constitution... Good luck

Thank you! Politics has a way of destroying clarity when a nation truly needs it.

I Feel that All School Students, All IIT Students, All AIIMS Students, All Engineering Students, All Agriculture Engineering Students, All IAS OFFICERS, ALL NRI'S and All Military officers and Soldiers must tell their stand on Farmers BILL and must explain why they took that stand.

So Ma'am according to you, would these act(bills) will benefit the farmers???

I agree that private participation in agriculture is need of the hour as it will bring infrastructure and technology . But farmers fears are also true bcoz in India 85% farmers own 2 or less than hectares, they don't have power to bargain. A proper mechanism to safeguard the interests of farmers must be set up by bringing a specific legislation. Elders farmers can be illiterate, but young and educated farmers have been spearheading this protests . So u can't dismiss their concerns by saying they are illiterate and unaware. No they are educated and know how to defend their rights.

I'm surprised how I missed u all these times .... Impressed

You did tell us how farmers were affected by the APMC act.. Very nice.. (Yeh to sabhko pata chal gaya hai) But when did you list out the benefits of the new farm bills..?? (Bills ke fayde kyu nahi bata rahi hai govt)

Anyways, your way of explanation is par excellence!😌❤️

And mam the way this bill was passed was really horrific for our democracy and mam what are ur views about PM cares fund.

Nothing about Contract farming(bill-2), seems only positive points of Bill are shown. Practicaly many things change on ground level.

Punjab farmers don't like Modi, so they don't like 3 bills as well. They have negative thinking, why not others states farmers protesting, because they have trust on Modi.

Ma'am.... I work in a Market Committee as a GOVT. employee. We implement APMC act. There is no any relation between APMC and MSP. If you go through the APMC act you will not find MSP. Since Independence MSP has no constitutional status.

I think you should also see Dr. Faizan Mustafa on this topic.

"Desh me farmer reform ke baare me baat honi chahiye" [sic.] I see it happening from Finology Legal:)

Easiest way ever to get explanation on this topic

Mam you should add the procedure of farmers to private sector. How they will decide price of crops and what will be the security of farmers. It is good that government is deciding msp but how if private will decide. Think about it..thank you

I watched many videos regarding farm bill but only your explanation is totally free of politics

Ma'am with all due respect! I think a farmer can sell his produce outside the mandi or in any other state. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Your way of teaching helps to learn the terminology and dates very easily just like a story

Excellent 👍 Skill to explain any topic...very easy to understand... Thanks a lot Ma'am...

This presentation should be put on tv

1. The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce Bill just says that all types of agri trade will be allowed (even outside state regulated) APMC mandis. So, now anyone can trade within the State or across the state all over India and it can be physical trade or online trade. And the most important thing is if Vivek opens a mandi/market for trade of agri commodities (ether i am procuring from farmers and selling it to retailers in my physical mandi or I opened an online portal just like amazon) anywhere in India then NO STATE CAN PUT ANY KIND OF TAX/CHARGES ON AGRI TRANSACTIONS. 2. But if trade happens through State APMC mandis then there are various charges. For example commission agents (arhatiyas) get 2.5%, State Govt imposes mandi charges and cess which gives them Revenue BUT all these charges get built in the price and ultimately the 135 crore consumers suffer in terms of higher prices. So, if the trade move out of these APMC Mandis (till 5th June no one was allowed to trade outside APMC), then who is at LOSS???. Answer: The commission agents (intermediaries) and the State Govt and its corrupt officials. And who will gain..........135 crore consumers of India. And there is no direct impact on farmers but in future they will gain because of several mandis and buyers. And direct procurement from farmers may end up giving more money to farmers for their produce. BUT THEY WHY FARMERS ARE PROTESTING???? Answer is they are being lured into protest. Big farmers of Punjab and Haryana who sell at MSP to FCI in these mandis are thinking (and are forced to think by politicians) that in future Govt. may stop procuring at MSP (but the amendment does not say this at all) of wheat and Rice and if prices fluctuates on lower side then they may loose because then they have to sell to private traders. BUT why not the other farmers of India are protesting. The Answer is....................MSP is announced for all over India for 25 crops but SINCE 1965........(when FCI got established).............FCI HAS PROCURED ONLY WHEAT AND RICE AND MAINLY FROM THESE TWO STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA (and to a certain level from MP, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh also). BUT mostly Punjab and Haryana farmers, traders, commission agents, govt has benefitted till now. And who has lost...........135 crore Indians, All other state's farmers. 3. Actually in the last 50 years of this REGULATED agri trade has benefitted the corrupt intermediaries and officials/politicians and they dont want this system to be reformed. Govt should stop procuring at MSP and it should stop giving PDS foodgrains. And just transfer the same benefit in to their account. Everyone will benefit except these agents/corrupt FCI officials/politicians.

No wonder the girl covered good information but she only narrated one side of coin. Her title is wrong firstly as it only sounded like she’s 100% supporting new bills and is only narrating flaws of previous APMC system. 1. Yes, the current APMC system needs reforms, but why she didn’t covered flaws/ negative side of new bills? 2. Why she did not mention the involvement and benefits of corporates? 3. Why she didn’t mention that even though the three bills are already executed in numerous states and on numerous crops, yet why states like Bihar’s Agricultural system got worsened? 4. Why Bihar farmers come to Punjab and Haryana to sell their crops? 5. Why it’s believed that all farmers are damn illiterate and needs education? This protest includes educators, teachers and every sector of Indian population. This is incomplete information.

Your way of explanation amazing & outstanding. you are an ideal & inspiration for students & youth.

Excellent explanation with so much of clarity. Looking forward to many more videos.

Bihar me ye system adopted hua isliye bihar me msp se kam amount me products bik rhe hai aur isliye he bihar ke farmers aaj sabse jyada poor hai Aur punjab haryana ke farmers iska virod isi vajah se kr rhe hai unka kehna hai ki ya to msp se related bill bnaya jaye ya in bills ko vapis liya jaye

Thank you for the explanation. By any chance have you made a video on new 3 bills?

Not properly explained on new farm act ,only explained previous farm act.

she explains it very easily and clearly

Every sector has it's own supply system but sadly, none are quite transparent. If the existing system is exploitative (which actually is) then Govt should bring in reforms rather than straight scrapping it. When big supply chain companies will become the players, what is the guarantee that they will sell at a reduced price? They will show there range of sophisticated supply chain in their audits and add the cost. Final consumers will suffer anyway.

If any private player(company) getting monopoly? Tab kya karenge hum......? 🤔

There is no question on the need for laws to get rid of unscrupulous middlemen between farmers and consumers. How does taking away Mandis going to help? Mandis were set up to prevent exploitation of farmers in the first place! How come it become breeding ground for middle man?? The truth is we have too many laws. The intend of these laws are often defeated as the people who violate these are much stronger and resourceful than the people for whom these laws are supposed to protect. We got quite a few laws from parliament in the recent past, all which have a "side effect " of undermining the federal system envisaged in our constitution.

Kal live session kafi informative tha Thank u priya di..

This video is for knowledge purpose. People in comment section "Don't spit your ignorant political venom here."

Mam ur teaching method is very simple......ap koi bhi topic bht detail s aur ache s padhati h

Please answer my following Questions ~ 1) How Blackmarketing can be controlled after the coming of Essential Commodities( Amendment) Act ? 2) How can you assure that both the systems (APMC & Private) can exist together if the loopholes in AMPC system( eg - taxes charged ) are not improved ? 3) How can the bill on Farmers Price Assurance be truly effective in the absence of a price regulatory body, so that farmers do not fall into the exploitation of big Industrialist groups ?

It's like magic and those hand gestures were really helpful ma'am such a nice lecture on recent topics 😍😍😍😍

Madam, you are very good at propagating the middlemen of framing business but your nautanki is how good is the bill. Comments on the level playing field of Farmers vis a vis the Corporate has not explained also on how the APMC law is letting traders cartel and making farmers to sell at below MSP. Cannot the Centre make a provision on purchasing anything produced by farmers and then asking the traders to purchase from Central Government in this way the BJP party will not have to face opposition in any state?

Really you have an ability to teach... very nice way of explaining....a good speaker. God bless you.

Excellent Presentation, very informative, Keep it up !!!

Subscribed. To the point. On target. Informative.

Mam aap itna acha samjhate ho ✔️ Itna deeply + ek lucid manner mein Thank You Mam Please keep making maximum videos

The 94% farmers you are talking about.. They suffers because of govt doesn't buy the producers at the accurate time. And they are cursed to sell to private

How do you make it so simple like butter to understand such crucial topics .....without this channel its now difficult to survive

The most unbiased and unpolitical explanation ever♥️♥️🇮🇳🇮🇳

Excellant! At last I have partly understood about the new farm bills

Policies should pe explained to common people..Most of them even don't know what Govt is doing . Thanks for this amazing video🙏

As allways, very informative n to the point Madam! I liked Ur note on understating these new Agri laws with unprejudiced mind!

That's called a true dedication when she held onion for better understanding!

hey everybody...... now a days this has become my fav line......😊😊😊🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👍👍👍 Thanks a lot... Priya Jiiiiii🙂🙂

This is a complete biased video. 1. Provision of Ordinances are for extraordinary situations and there was no such emergency here. completely there are some hidden motives. 2. Bills were made for farmers and they were not brought on the table to discuss before the bills were introduced. this is not tuglaq raj we are a democratic country. 3. Yes its true that whatsever happens in parliament cannot be challenged in the SC. But ther are some rules and procedures for the Parliament to work accordingly and Honorable Speaker should make sure about it. But Sad trouth is that Speaker comes form the ruling party. 4. whatever Taxes you have mentioned are not payed by the famers , they are for levied on procurer. Farmers only have to bear the labour cost. so please correct it. 5. Yes there are many flaws in the APMC but insted of correcting them Govt cant just scrap it. whole economy of states like punjab and harayana had evoveled around these mandis since independence. its not just farmers but ardhtias and kariana shops and many other labourers who will loose their jobs . Mandi boards are also empowered to construct roads and do other developments in local area. 6. Farmers demand is to amment bill to make sure that private procurer cant procure bellow MSP or Govt can pay the mismatch amount during low demand. 7. We all know the predatory nature of private companies. Two things to know-- agriculture product is perishable and should be sold within 21 days. second faemers are not very rich to have their own cold storage. Also they need money for next season. This thing can be exploited by private companies by forming cartels. We all l know very well the businedd model of JIO, first give some offers and then exploit them. we cant let the some happen with our farmers. Last thing is that the nature of govt, they cant bring bills without taking into confidence people for whom the bills are made for. The democracy is whole about walking together rather than making people follow. Govt had lost the confidence of people even before this bill had came into existance. Demonatisation, CAA, lockdown , economy and now this bill. And I request to you finologist to please talk to a farmer before coming to a decision. Dont consider farmers illiterate unless you are a bhakt. Thanks

I think there should be A middle way. Govt has to decide MSP for both apmc and private traders. So the farmers can get a Saficient deal for there hard work.

I tried to find out why people are protesting from so many videos and articles. Finally I found your video. Your video gave me great clarity. I am grateful. Can you help me find - what is the solution to revamp the age old system?

You didn't talk about new farm bills. Just talked about existing system.

First wrong information is being circulated that farmers are now free to sell their products anywhere.... . Even in the previous system farmers were able to sell their products anywhere.. for example few apple farmers from himachal use to sell their corps in delhi or chandigarh... Only this condition was applicable on commission agents that they have to buy products from a specific APMC..

Why government has removed agricultural produce from essential commodities list, what impact would it create

Congress ruled the country for more than 65 years and they did nothing to upgrade archaic laws! It has taken 55 years for the country to come-up with new laws for farm sector. When the relevance of a political party becomes low, resistance to any change is obvious. Now it is the role of state governments to ensure MSP for small growers as PM has repeatedly made clear that existing MSP is untouched and in fact there is delta increase. Since majority of states are under BJP, those states should take a leaf out the book and protect small / marginal farmers ! In fact economists have lauded governments' initiatives! If the Congress desires to consolidate itself as a political force, it should work with government as a constructive opposition but should stop opposing every law for the sake of being in opposition !!

in punjab 80%+ farmers get benefit from MSP .. which is more then any other state

I asked in yesterday's live video also, again asking; is there any change in the formula used by CACP for calculating MSP? is there any provision in act regarding this??

despite of unveiling real problems of farmers u looked more a mouthpiece of government

Now I understand why Punjab is leading in protests. This video should be played on news channels.

As always, so cute maam. And a perfect teaching. Thank you.

I never saw someone explaining like you..