To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/JustinSung/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
Am new to using mind-map for studying. I had done some level 1 mind-maps. I was in Level 1 courses in H.S. so a lot was really about remembering the information first, and then analysing or arguing a point of view second.
I wanna highlight few important things. I feel like these techniques are pretty common for high functioning people who have higher mental fluidity. The reason being that whoever came up with mind map was because high functioning allows you to observe and absorb greater structure of things. Also here's something that's more important. Forget about shortcuts and silly techniques. At the end of the day lesson is engage in critical thinking lol! Critical thinking is what allows you to create abstract thoughts leading to discovering things like mind maps. But merely 'following' the video won't neccessarily make you a better thinking signigicantly atleast. One word for all your problems: "Just buy some wild inward curiosity"
Biggest shock today was seeing my MM featured at level 3. This made my day. On behalf of everyone in ICS, thank you justin for changing the way we learn!!
I'm currently using mind maps to map out the main points of scientific papers (for postgraduate studies) I'm currently reading through. I was surprised at how uncomfortable it was in the beginning, but now I'm getting into it quite nicely. Definitely helps with finding relationships etc. I wish I knew of this channel much earlier, but grateful I get to learn from it now. 🙌
I love that you've come up with your own levels for mind-mapping. In grad school (Education), I upped my mind-mapping game to the highest level that I've found so far: Mind-mapping towards an instructional model of whatever I was studying. If you can create a diagrammatic representation that acts as the "ultimate model" of the topic, you can start INNOVATING, advancing and enhancing the topic towards a "new" theory. Another tip for getting there is efficient minimalism: What is REQUIRED for this diagram to act as a framework or taxonomy for this topic? Why? Because efficiency is a distillation process that sets up the best neural pathways for learning. If you think about it your mind map is a visual representation of how you are trying to encode the neurological network of the specific topic. In short-term memory the brain is limited to 7 (plus or minus 2) chunks of information at a time, so a diagram with the least number of branches or clusters "engages this limitation" and will actually help you remember things more easily in the long-term because your reference or "anchor point" in remembering the topic will have been simplified to a point where it takes advantage of this short-term memory limitation. This is how mnemonic devices are created. I only really discovered this when I was studying education and neuroscience at the same time. Keep up the good work!
1) i think one key point you didn't reveal to viewers or maybe you just forgot about because its so subtle is: you cannot jump to level 2/3 right off the bat with new info when you're learning. When you learn something new, you don't gave any concept of what it is or have misconceptions or just biases and no structure at all. This is why you start off at lvl 0/1 just to understand the material first. First is memorization. You need to sleep on the data. 2) second once you have a good enough volume of info, it's no longer new to you, but just unstructured, then you begin to make the connections, create your own structure, your own flow, etc. this is where lvl 2/3 comes in. But you don't get here right away and without first going through lvl 0/1.
@@waterfoker8558 He actually disagrees with you. He builds the mind maps before memorizing. You don't need to completely know a subject before you can summarize It into one concept and link It to others.
@@luccagiovani the disagreement seems to be around memory, memorization, etc. this gets technical and one can make the point that if everything you read just gets forgotten, having no retention of data, then all of learning is impossible. So obviously you need to have a working memory and whether you call that memorization is irrelevant. The skill to actively think about and categorize where a new piece of data goes/is structured/connects to existing data you already know, is trainable and the point of this video. But all this work requires memory/memorization, and time to let your subconscious "protein fold" all the data into something cohesive and beautifully mapped
@@luccagiovanimind maps are for memorizing not for understanding. They are for expressing your understanding and helping you retain them. If you are making mind maps before understanding a subject then you have to adjust it down the line when you have new information/better understanding. Worst scenario you have to re-learn some parts and that's just a waste of time
@@pramitpratimdas8198 Well, as you just said "mind maps are for memorizing". You make them before you have memorized the information. You express your understanding of a subject through the mind map. If you already know everything, if the info is memorized, then the mindmap is useless. Learning tools are for learning. There is no use for a hammer to nail an already hammered nail. If you already know, there is no learning to be done. Adjusting or making mistakes is part of learning, failure is part of learning. The fact that you are able to see and correct your mistakes shows that you are using the corrrect tools for the job, which is to learn. He shows in this very video how he makes mind maps at the same time he reads the info, he demonstrates that mind maps are a way to classify information in your head, and subsequently written down for your studies. The catch is that we don't have to do lvl 3 mindmaps right out the gate, you can do lvl 1 or 2 and then polish (which is part of what "Waterfoker", the original poster, was talking about). I only disagree with him on the memorization part. Anyways, maybe you don't see this the same way I do, and that's fine. We probably have diffferent needs at the time of studying.
Arrows and lines can mean many different things and I find it useful to come up with a way to differentiate them and mark them: time, process, dependencies, relations (one to one, many to one, etc) and they can be conditional (even negating) or depend on a formula or expression, it is useful to learn symbols for logic gates and processes to incorporate in your MM. Also, marking areas across different groups to give additional dimensions to your MM. In any type of note taking I also like to reserve one color for what I am seeing and hearing and another color for what I am thinking or how I assume or think things relate; makes it easier to fix later my wrong thoughts on the matter.
I feel like 75% of the benefit comes from to *active engagement*. Level 0 and level 1 are completely mindless. They are basically passive actions, they simply delay the effort that is *engaging* with the content. I remember having to take notes because otherwise the professors would get pissed. It was a monstruous waste of time, when I write I can't focus on the lecture, that leads to bad quality notes because they weren't thought through, which then moves the work to after the lecture. I very much preferred when I was to take minimal notes and focus on building the cognitive framework.
One thing I like to differentiate is explorative thinking and the more kind of „declarative“ writing down what’s in your head. I feel like for explorative it’s way more important what happens inside of your brain than what happens on the paper. Actually putting a keyword into a „wrong“ category can be so mentally stimulating in this case because your mind is desperately trying to make it work and see connections. This works especially well if you already kinda know what the groups are, to get that final hidden layer of connection, to make all those lines that would’ve otherwise been too weak to be worth it to draw them onto the „everything is correct and thought out“ mindmap.
I studied for one month and passed diploma in pharmacy because of justin....thank you Justin ..ur ways are super..practical...working..fromthen...on...I keep...seeing his videos..thank you so much again
So you ran a business went to med school and went and got a masters degree????? I fear some people are just built differently. What kinda business?? What kinda masters? What kinda doctorrrr?? My jaw is on the floor. I have a hard enough time just getting through the day… maybe i need to get off of youtube 🤨
This would be more helpful if you actually gave a definition. This is way too vague to be useful for me. For example, level 1 is a graph (maybe directed), level 2 has clusters as nodes, and level 3 is just more “intuitive” or has higher “quality”. How can you justify a hierarchy on a methodology based on the specific content? Without knowing anything about the subject, it’s impossible to tell the difference between level 2 and level 3 (if these are indeed real categories). There isn’t even a mention about the type of relationship identified by the arrow!
@@mwtichenor for any subject you cannot directly go to level 3 without going though the previous levels as level 3 requires a complete understanding of the subject matter (as well as correlation and association with other subjects) Mind maps are there to retain that understanding, not to make you understand. You still have to understand yourself hence the whole rambling about "higher thinking"
@@pramitpratimdas8198If I used your explanation then: 1) how would I know I completely understood something?, 2) why couldn’t I just wait until I completely understood something then skipped levels 1 and 2? 3) Without completely understanding something, I am left unable to categorize a mind map. Wouldn’t it be nice to look at someone else’s notes and use that as an aid, and surely since level 3 is so much better than other levels, wouldn’t it be good if I could distinguish levels 3 from 2 or 1 while still learning the subject? Hence, I don’t think these are objective categories.
@@mwtichenor 1) There are different ways to check your understanding of a subject- the most popular ones are quizzes, model question papers from the institution you are affiliated with, discussions with your friends etc. 2) You can skip the early levels once you are proficient with them, however it's still beneficial to use them to expedite the learning process - data gathering, finding connections and associations, locating the core concepts etc. 3) You can definitely look at other people's notes to see what level 3 looks like but it's still way better to make them by yourself because it helps with retention a lot more. Personalised notes are the way to go. These levels aren't objective per se but are well accepted and practiced. I think the misunderstanding you are having is looking at these levels individually rather than parts of a process. OP's video didn't help in that regard. The difference is once you get proficient you can skip to level 3, however the other processes still happen in your brain (maybe more disorganised since you didn't put them onto paper)
My beef is that these levels aren’t clearly defined. If this guy had said this was his mind map tier list, I wouldn’t be commenting. I’m not knocking mind maps. I’m knocking the lack of clarity here. So keeping this abstract, can you define levels 1, 2 or 3? If not, just like this reply. And yes, there needs to be a definition if this is to be applied correctly.
I've had a process for study that is as follows: observation>planning>executing :|| that acts as a baseline structure by which I actively engage in multiple subjects. On of the issues I've had in this approach is knowing how to make connections. You mentioned similarities and differences which act as a good starting point for context, but what other dynamics can groups and ideas have with each other? Scale, causal changes, variables? Anything else?
I was a programmer for 20-ish years: academic and professionally, so even my non-programming mind maps look like object/relationship diagrams combined with data-flow diagrams. But as well as this, I add in what I call data islands - these are essentially the screens of information that I would display to the user if I were writing a program based on the diagram. Using these techniques (and a hierarchy of colours that I keep constant for all my work) allows me to structure most things.
This video feels like a long winded way to describe how to build a mental model of a certain topic. The benefit isn't in the mindmap/notes, but in the effort to organizing the information in said strucutres. It's similar to a normalized database, you minimize redundancy decreasing the memory burden, but you remember relationships decreasing the cognitive burden of rebuilding the relationships. By doing that you also allow your brain to relate the mental models to eachother, every model makes the next one take less effort because you can rely on the previous ones.
Why'd you quit being a programmer? How'd you escape!? These days sequence diagrams are recognised as the clearest way to explain what a program's doing. That and C4 diagrams, though I don't see those in the wild.
I love the content but it is really hard to understand your comparative examples since much of the handwriting is indecipherable. Is there anyway that you can modify your writing so others can better see the comparisons?
I feel like I’m at level 1 but trying to move to level 2. Constantly training my brain to think about relationships and connections to the big picture, and your videos have been helping a lot!
Wow, I feel like I grew up with you (not literally, cause I'm older than you). But I remember doing level 1, when I've just started watching your videos 4 years ago, and it didn't work, so I've stopped, but I still watched your videos about higher order thinking, and ways to study, and this year I've decided to try again, it worked so much better, and now after watching this video I know why, I unconsciously reached level 3 just by understanding how it should look like thanks to all your work through these years :D Thank you!!!
Im currently on mind map lvl 2. Making the MM itself is definitely a lil bit time consuming considering how much trial and error i have to go through (i use pencil, paper), but its definitely worth it. I can still recall and recap a particular MM of mine i made 1-2 months ago with BARELY ANY REVISION. Its definitely worth practicing your skills on MMping due to how effective it is.
Thanks. I’ve been MM since Buzan days and I agree with your levels 0, 1 & 2. However my level 3 differs somewhat. I agree that level 3 should be elegant as you do. However, to be more precise, level 3 must include 1) more graphical and tabular results (MM is a form of condensed inform preferably viewable as one page, and 2) should have 3 ⇔ 10 main stems, each of which is as conceptually independent of each other as possible (too many links make for complexity which must be minimised) and 3) these main stems should be as close to equal in complexity as possible. When doing a literature analysis using MM the level of maturity of the piece of literature soon becomes obvious as level 3 rules are broken. Literature MMs are normally level 0 going to level 1 with proper keyword selection. Keyword selection is essential for useful MM. Then copying MM literature into you dissertation/publication goes to level 2 grouping. The final sweep through level 3 produces the elegant MM but there is still level 4 - the expansion of the MM back into a normal dissertation/book.
Remember you can prototype a quick LV1 first then, with the information gained from your first iteration, refactor it into a LV3. I find this almost always produces a better result & usually a bit faster than trying to go for LVL3 structure & coding on the first shot.
lvl1 is like listing all they keywords its time comsuming if u do it like a map without real engagement . its better to start the grinde method right away .
I just watched your video on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy yesterday, and I'm surprised at how well I can relate the two concepts together! From what I've understood, level 0 "mind maps" fall into Bloom's level 1: Remember. It's literally just repetition of the content, and doesn't work that well. The brain is barely, if at all, active, and the notes are just the same text, but sometimes a bit shortened. Level 1 mind maps are a small step above that: by trying to connect thoughts spatially, the brain has to work just a little bit harder in order to place the ideas. It leads to Bloom 2, Understand. (Bloom level 3, Apply, is not really applicable for making mind maps.) Level 2 mind maps jump to Bloom level 4, Analyse. By forcing yourself to group the content more logically, your brain is activated and you need to consider similarities in order to organise the content. Again, your brain is more active, which leads to a better understanding. Level 3 (and pseudo-3) mind maps go another step above, to level 5: Evaluate. You directly mentioned needing *judgement* in order to *prioritise* the groups -- both of those bolded words were emphasised in your video about Bloom's Taxonomy! (Again, Bloom's level 6, Create, doesn't really apply here. Sure, a level 3 mind map can be used to learn at level 6, but it's 1. not needed and 2. doesn't require a new level of mind map.)
Can you do a video on self learning Mathematics? I want to get to University level of maths by myself but i really dont know how to go about it. The problem with mindmapping and also scanning the entire chapter before i start to get some perspective on what the topic is about, is that i dont understand anything. I have to learn the entire topic wich takes weeks until i am able to make sense of the basic structure of it.. but at that point i dont need it anymore because i already understand the topic. It takes way too long to learn sentence by sentence as you said yourself, but i dont see another way... advice would be much appreciated because you are honestly the best learning coach i've ever found.
Would you suggest making a MM for each Lecture or Week of content in a class, or go more big scale and have one for the entire semester? Maybe both or is that too much and my energy would be better spent elsewhere in my studying?
Listening to this entire talk has convinced me that there is still no better way to learn than good, old-fashioned OUTLINES and FLASH CARDS. Mind mapping is good for brainstorming.
while i was watching this video i remembered something about in past from my childhood that i wanted to make server or something i wrote like that using arrow and thinking about it and somehow i remember i dont know how but that gave me little motivation. that was like 6-9 years ago
As you master Mind mapping level 3, you dont actually need much of Active recall or spaced repetition. Actually, those techniques can still be used for information that doesn't fit in mind map at all. For the content in mind map, it's much more effective to active recall the whole mind map. For example, explaining it
You didnt understand the concept . There is NO need of Active Recall and Spaced repetition, once you master Mind mapping . Mind mapping covers all and saves your time .
These are intersting philosophies, but I think it would be most effective to implement these strategies with the ‘Obsidian’ not taking software. It acts as a sort of Wikipedia for all of your individual nots along with a plethora of community and creator created plugins. It’s been a game changer for me personally.
i love love LOVE this video. it took me a year to go from 0 to 1 because initially i experienced severe overwhelm and panic, and couldn't do it at all (thanks to my crazy parents..) once i got to 1, 2 came naturally to me. i have to first create 1 though, and then reduce that into 2. i'm not at level 3 yet. i'm grateful that you just gave me a map of where i need to go.
Hey Justin, thanks a ton for the content you put up! I've seen a significant improvement in how I digest information I'm studying by following the methods you've suggested. However I find it pretty hard to make complete mindmaps and I end up having to reduce their scope (say from a chapter to a single topic within the chapter) as I'm constrained to pen and paper. It'd be awesome if you could make a video on how to effectively make mindmaps when we're constrained to the size of an A4 sheet...
As someone who has used mind maps to run a complex financial company, incentive plans and products. Clarity of plans and efficient management resulted in a quick acquisition. I’m still surprised most people aren’t using these.
@@ishrakmujibift4269 I think I made a level 3 mind map today for my history lesson. But I'm not that sure.It is because my mind map was looking cleaner and the flow really helps me navigate. I also was able to memorize the entire topic through only 1 mindmap
came here from your other mind-mapping video. Really interesting subject! I’m stuck on level 1 and would love to see more video on how to get to the level 2
BEST DAY EVER... Honestly coming home from work on a weekend and you find out Justin sung finally posted again!!! 🎉 (Even better considering, the video quality is only getting better and better, so good work on your team aswell!) 🌟🌟 Oh also im level 1 and have been for a year, because I don't reflect enough (however i found them veey helpful to recall information by thinking about related things. (Or maybe 1.5 because i think alot about it first while doing synotpical reading)
normally study technique videos are lame and uniniformative, but this one really stand out with very rare and good information. I'm a 2e student so the ADHD was the main reason i dropped out of college for 5 years, and because i refused medication, i had to find mental tricks to study. Speed reading + Mind-mapping, active recall + repetition. Deadly combo. That's it. Went from dropout to a 3.7 GPA in CS + Math double major, with pretty severe neurodivergent issues. And this video is really funny to me because i kinda saw my mind-mapping process through another person's perspective and saw that i instintively went for "level 3". Not because i researched anything about mind mapping, simply because it's the only one that works for me. I have a very "quality over quantity" brain so the simpler and more linear i could get my mind maps, the better. Also, i use them as "index menus" and every node on the tree also has it's own data inside or another mind map inside. If you build it a little bit every day and always do active recall exercises, it's extremely powerful.
This is one of the best videos you've created on RU-vid! I've seen a bunch of your videos and they are all really great and yet this one has topped all of the ones I've seen so far! Great work Justin and I appreciate your guidance. More videos like this would be awesome!
I'd say i'm in level 2, but I have been trying to bump things to level 3, which takes a loooot of time! Edit : Nah, I'd say I'm at level 3, I just don't spend that much time studying one topic, so...
Here’s a suggestion for you. Decide what the purpose of the mind map will be. Most of mine are about why? Sometimes though, I have made mind maps about how? Or who? Or where? Or when? You get the idea. When I am listening to the information “why?” Is what I am listening for. Most lectures, including those by college professors, are incomplete, so it is then up to me to do the research that is actually required. All I am really looking for is the prompts for my initial whys. I follow Peter Senge and ask the 5 Whys? (Using the initial prompt from the lecture, You ask why? And after you answer you repeat for 5 whys. Usually, 5 why’s is sufficient to get to the meat of an issue. Often I find, and so will you, that, after asking and answering the 5 whys for each of these first order why prompts, many of the initial why prompts have common causes and themes and are therefore related. And you now known why they are related. These can then be clustered and labeled with a meaningful name. By making your diagrams in this way, you see the deep pattern of things. I also make systems diagrams of things. With causal loops and stocks and flows. Mind maps constructed in this manner are also quite useful for gaining understanding of complex systems. I hope that you find this useful.
After I get this mind map, I use it to construct a new mind map in the form of an argument explaining my understanding of the why. I have assumptions, premises, conclusions, qualifiers, etc., factual evidence, refuted counter arguments, etc. So if anyone asks me why this lecture was important, I can tell them where the lecturer’s argument was correct and where it was incorrect and why? Constructed an argument helps you remember the significance of what was said in the lecture and doing the same for several related lectures by different people helps you to construct the argument for your next paper.
This may sound crazy... but for Math you just have to practice 😲 Okay but in all seriousness practice is all it takes for Maths because in the end, you're trying to see patterns in the question, and using various techniques that doesn't seem to make sense at first. It's only by using them more does it feel more logical, and make you understand just what you're doing. When you're starting off though, DON'T PRACTISE QUESTIONS STRAIGHTAWAY. Instead, look at a few questions and its answers immediately. And then make sure you understand it before trying to solve questions.
I recommend watching Archer Newton's recent video on MM I believe he teaches How to do level 3 mind map because he talks about building a backbone for your organizational structure He also shows how it was applied for music theory,MATH,physics,etc He works for Justin sung👍👍
@@Azure-Aura Maths is a combination of Declarative knowledge and Procedural knowledge The method you're teaching is the latter which is quite ineffective if you do not know the 'WHY?' which is achieved only when you focus on the Declarative part at level 5 of Blooms taxonomy If u do it correctly then it will give you a nuanced understanding such as "Why is this concept important?", "How does this formula fit in with the concept?","If both formulas are giving the same result,which is more important and Why is it important?",etc Hope it helps
@@Tstep45_qr Well, honestly I understand what you're talking about but that's achievable by just reading through the textbook. Every math concept is interlinked in some way or another so the concept itself and the 'why this works' aren't that difficult to understand. What I myself (and a lot of people I know) struggle with often is to understand how I can use concepts I know in new problems, which is why I said to practice. Afaik, Math is straightforward when it comes to how concepts are important or how formulas are derived. It's hard to solve problems, thats pretty much the only difficult part. And every time you do solve a problem, you soon start seeing ways to make the process more easier and apply in newer situations. You don't really need Bloom's taxonomy to understand Math, you just need to find ways to apply Math.
Very interesting. I've spent around 1.5 hour trying to understand how the mindmaps in the example are made. Could someone please type down all the words which are written on the level 3 example? Level 2 I can guess since there are the same words as in level 0, but the new words in level 3 map are not guessable for me :(
In the higher levels, you have devised a legend of symbols (as per maps), wherein, for example, a boxed item is different than a circled item. Can you share your legend, please?
It looks like a really nice method to study with, but does it let you learn and remember little details? because I normally end up in a test having a question about that detail that the teacher told us 5 weeks ago.
I will admit, that I am level 0. I have BS in ME. a minor in Nuclear Engineering, and work for a research institute. I will be using this when I return to school for my PhD.
Thanks for another insightful video! How should we balance between taking linear notes and making mind maps? Linear notes are better for lectures and reading in my opinion as sometimes you would like to capture as much info as possible. My take is that mind maps are for the synthesis stage when we consolidate all the notes from lectures and books. What do you guys think?
I took a college cell biology course once which required 4 mind maps: one per each of the 3 major tests. Then a final unifying one before the final exam that didn’t contain the smallest levels of discrete details from the other 3; only levels 1-3 were connected to the overall picture. Mind you, this was before the days of infinite canvas apps. Rules were: 1) Zero crossed lines-each line crossed was 5% off. 2) The biggest idea must be in the top center and everything must flow away from it. 3) Each bubble had only one concept (noun, 3 words or less). 4) Along each arrow line we had to write a single action verb, indicating the precise relationship between the concepts (e.g. creates, modifies, destroys, determines, completes, initiates, etc). I have use this model with great success in my personal and professional life to create clean and detailed maps.
Even the ad was well delivered and engaging! 😂 Amazingly useful and well explained video. One can appreciate that you think in an orderly way by how you explain 😊
I'm not an expert, but I'm guessing just start to implement in one of the ideas at a time and then slowly work your way up to level 3. emphasizing 1 concept at a time in your MM until you feel comfortable with it. otherwise it can be a little bit overbearing. kinda like trying to skip using training wheels when learning to ride a bike and trying to go straight to ride it hands free while in traffic and turning also hands free. sure you could get there eventually and it's not that unrealistic, but you'd hurt yourself a lot while you do it. better to learn it slowly and experiment with one thing at a time while you master that and then move onto the next thing. Here with this video you at least have the path you have to take laid out for you, so just keep trying 1 thing at time in this video until you get to level 3. good luck :)
I find your videos so interesting! …I don‘t really know how to apply it yet, specially for language learning (is that possible??). I‘m super interested in tge mindmapping/ drawing tool you use. I haven‘t found the right one for me yet…
for a lvl 3 mindmap, is it normal to start over from scratch 3-4-5 times for a single topic? i find myself discovering new overall structures that are more intuitive and simpler, as i go along and learn more about the topic - so my previous hypothesized structure constantly needs to be totally "updated" throughout the topic. this is energyconsuming. am i doing something wrong?
I'm somewhere in level 2 and 3 mindmapping, I'm able to emphasise and structure my mind maps pretty effectively, but my grouping skills need a bit of work :>
Your videos are great. What hardware/software are you using in your videos? I'm a high school math teacher and would love to try them for making virtual lessons this year.
I think I'm shifting between the three levels of mind maps , it depends on my mental condition, mood , how much time i can spend thinking about the information that I'm learning. It's hard for me to keep my consistency with level 2 and 3
As a level one, I can guarantee it doesn't work at the beginning but eventually, you get better at level one and when it takes around a year to upgrade to level two but by the time you have reached there you will not be able to recognise yourself then vs now
Insights By "YouSum Live" 00:00:00 Mind mapping levels: Level 1 to Level 3 00:00:16 Level 3 mind map benefits: Memory, speed, comprehension 00:00:47 Identifying mind map levels: Recognize characteristics, processes 00:02:07 Level 1 mind map characteristics: Nonlinearity, connections 00:04:02 Transition from Level 0 to Level 1: Arrows, concise, spatial 00:05:22 Importance of Level 1: Foundation for higher levels 00:05:37 Level 2 mind map features: Grouping, flow, structure 00:07:19 Advancing to Level 2: Similarities, flow, structure 00:14:42 Level 3 mind map qualities: Clear structure, emphasis, intuition 00:16:03 Transition to Level 3: Quality connections, intuitive groups 00:20:36 Mind map vs. essay: Different structures for organizing thoughts 00:20:51 Essay limitations: Not as comprehensive as mind map 00:21:04 Mind map advantages: Simplicity, speed, and organization 00:21:12 Mind map for revision: Effective technique for studying 00:21:23 Free Weekly Newsletter: Distilled coaching concepts for learning Insights By "YouSum Live"
so In India we have boards for school so we have ICSE CBSE STATE STATE syllabus so in ICSE which I'm in in the 10th grade I guess the head people of the board read the bloom's taxonomy I guess and implemented the higher order learning in the syllabus and now they ask us questions which we NEED to process .Before english was boring and stupid and now its a perfect challenge for me the only thing I miss are the eassyyy questions they used to ask us before,Im very happy because I'm just discovering this(I discovered it
Are line notes useful for enjoyable learning process daily ? How many levels of learn ing are needed to become an successful student ? What many months does it take to complete each level ? Thank you for listening.
What recommend to get from 2 to 3 especifically, i know he said we need to increase the quality of connections and grouping, using 4 and 5 levels of bloom taxonomy but especifically, how we can increase the quality of connections and grouping and flow?
Consider alternative ways to connect and group concepts. Then decide, which one feels more intuitive and simple without sacrificing depth. It is a skill and it will take time to develop, so push yourself just enough but not too much and many things will come to you naturally.
Hello Sir, I am a student, preparing for competitive examinations but I am facing lot of issues because of so much distractions around me 😭 .. Can u pls make a video on that topic!
@@NewDarkKnight what i meant was that he made one of his best videos ever, and i have seen a lot for people asking for a live tutorial of him applying it while studying in real time so i was waiting eagerly for a follow up but it did not happen.
I wonder if others feel this way. Level 2/3 come very naturally to me, but trying to input raw information, rote memorizing, and recall without recognizable marks, all take considerable effort, intention, and practice. Pulling information from a non sequential space -- traversing a particular path through my reflexively created mind map -- to convey to another information that I have in my head -- as in speaking or writing this here -- is truly exhausting. But at the same time, building a graph, writing code for, or conjuring the feelings of these concepts through art is intuitive.
Quiz By "YouSum Live" 00:00:11 What are the three levels of mind mapping discussed in the video? 00:02:00 How does level three mind mapping differ from level one and level two? 00:04:00 What are the key processes involved in transitioning from level zero to level one mind mapping? 00:08:00 Why is engaging in higher-order thinking crucial for effective mind mapping? 00:17:56 How does level three mind mapping significantly impact learning performance? 00:20:36 How does the structure of a mind map compare to an essay? 00:20:57 What advantage does a mind map offer over an essay in terms of comprehensiveness? 00:21:01 How is the level three mind map described in the video? 00:21:12 How can the synthesized essay writing technique be used as a revision technique? Quiz By "YouSum Live"
I'm probably level -1. I forget to write and try to memorize everything. Now I'm working towards breaking that habit by having pencil and paper with me at all times.
Quiz By "YouSum Live" 00:00:11 What are the three levels of mind mapping discussed in the video? 00:02:00 How does level three mind mapping differ from level one and level two? 00:04:00 What are the key processes involved in transitioning from level zero to level one mind mapping? 00:08:00 Why is engaging in higher-order thinking crucial for effective mind mapping? 00:17:56 How does level three mind mapping significantly impact learning performance? 00:20:36 How does the structure of a mind map compare to an essay? 00:20:57 What advantage does a mind map offer over an essay in terms of comprehensiveness? 00:21:01 How is the level three mind map described in the video? 00:21:12 How can the synthesized essay writing technique be used as a revision technique? Quiz By "YouSum Live"
Thank you, Justin! This really is helpful!💯💯💯 I did try mind mapping, and I really understand concepts better than before, but after a few weeks, I can't figure out what I'm trying to explain in my mind map in some places. Is it a problem with my mind map, or is it normal?🤔🤔🤔
It also happens to me! I think the problem could be that it’s logically correct, but not intuitive enough. When something is intuitive, you naturally grasp it. That might be the problem correct me if I’m not
never realized that i am in the 2.5 region. But watching this video made me realize that the subjects that i enjoyed were because I was able to think of them non-linearly.
I really appreciate the way you tried to convey this information but unfortunately it boiled down to "you'll notice I'm doing a lot of high level thinking in my head and that's how you do a level 3 mind map". You have to show us what those high level thinking processes actually look like when they transform one kind of information into another kind of information. Very useful as a reference video for people who have a solid grasp of what these concepts are, but otherwise more of a dictionary than an instructional guide. Thumbs up!
I’ve spent the past week creating my first mind maps, stumbling a little but finding that I have difficulty representing relationships visually. I keep wanting to construct 3D models.
I try to do things at level 2 but i get stuck almost immediately after creating main groups, thinking of what alternatives there are. From there i dont really know where to go. But overall level 1
