Basicly every tank is alright if you know how to play it. Good player in tech tree T9 can do more dmg in the battle than noob in op T10 coz he dont know how to use it.
The cdc has crazy accuracy, dispersion, acceleration, capable of all terrain crossings, good penetration, almost the best dpm, good shell velocity and crazy reverse speed, if you meet a capable cdc player who is godly at peekabo, it is almost 100% chance that you will never hit him, back when it was free, i played this tank so much and had to compete with other cdc players and it was the most sweaty matchmaking at that point, my ass was sweating every game fighting other cdcs
To be honest T 44 100 is much worse than T 34-3. T 34-3 has alpha and good aiming time. And it has decent hull armor and good turret making it a good hulldown medium.
If T34-3 have any problems, its the fact we have to pay 5k gold for premium T34-2 with slightly less hp but slightly better 400dmg gun. But we cant change canon on 280alpha. But yes, T44-100 is far worse
@@hubertszymanski2272 at least you agree that T 34-3 is not the worst medium in tier 8. Also T 34-3's hull is actually more armored than T 34-2's hull. There are other tanks i consider worse than T 34-3. Such as Pz 58, T 44-100 and 59 patton
@@generalxanviar7304 59 Patton is actually a good tank, Very troll turret, Workable Type 59 hull you can angle with, excellent heat pen and great DPM. The "hatch" isn't as bad as people make it out to be.
@@hexagonstudios5601 i see. It's just i am pointing out that T 34 3 is not the worst. I don't own the 59 patton so i tend to scale it by reviews and performance in battle.
@@generalxanviar7304 it's brought down because it's cheap and often bought by new players but the tank generally performs pretty well, it takes a little getting used to.
I personally think t 34 3 is a very solid tank. It's a WZ 122 TM but with less armor but faster a bit. The guns are pretty similar. And the fact that it has the ram ability in mad games can make it pretty fun.
@@hubertszymanski2272it’s really not, the t343 has a way quicker aim time, better dispersion, earns twice the credits, has a better armor profile, and is overall a way more enjoyable tank to play. I got it for free from an event, but I can definitely say it’s a better 34-2. If you want to use the 280 alpha gun, then you shouldn’t even be playing the 34-2. You should be playing one of the MANY better Russian variants.
I just bought the M41 90 last week, and I can say the reason why it performs so poorly is because of its mobility. Not in the sense that it has none, more like new players will just yolo into the front lines with it and die right away. The mobility combined with the great gun also gives the driver a false sense of invincibility.
CDC ... Chasseur De Chars ... meaning, a tank specifically designed to snipe enemy tanks without exposing itself, its mobility hints away at how low its armor values are. Definitely not a premium tank for newbies
All of those hit me by surprise too! The M41 90 is fantastic, I love that tank, but its hella hard to play, what I've noticed is that most of the players that struggle on it dunno how to use the HE of the tank, and without the effective use of the HE it does have poor DPM compared to the other lights, in addition to the less camo values and kinda medicre view range (for a light), it also does not have spall linner, which makes it quite weak against HE (paradogially, lol) from tanks like the RU or the T49, only very good players can do really good on it. The T-34-3 is also a hard tank to play, it is decent, but kinda makes sense to me to see it so low as it lacks on plenty of things: The mobility is not very good, I would actually say it is quite mediocre for a med, the same with the view range, mediocre for a med, the DPM is terrible and even worse than a lot of heavies, the regular AP pen is bad (again, compared with the one of heavies with even more or similar DPM), and the gun dep is terrible, in my case it also misses more shots than it should, and to top it with a cherry, it has the chinese curse of having a terrible, I mean, totally atrocious and weak ammo rack. I would say the tank needs a buff or something because it has been totally power crept at this point, the tech tree version of it, the T-34-2, is very similar but it has way better mobility, it is tinier and with a better camo; the STG is also very similar but also smaller, faster, with better camo values, and somehow, a more troll armor; the WZ-122TM has a way stronger armor with similar DPM, gun and mobility; and even the Chimera eats it alive completely with more gun dep, more armor, more alpha, better pen, better accuracy, better view range, better ammo rack, with special consumables! Yeez! It might be just me, but just besides the T-44 equiped with the atrocious 122mm gun, I seriously think the T-34-3 is the the worst of the bunch. Also not surpresed to see the WZ-110 in the worst performing list, the thing has got power crept, it needs more DPM or sometbing because it is quite hard to do good on it.
This and the FCM50T both horrible experience, the BC Borrasque on the other hand and it's actually not that different as it has no armour, French and fast, is a dream, but they had to go thru the terrible two first lol
The CDC is powercrept, the good thing about it supossed to be the gun on a fast chasis. But WHY drive it when you have the Chimera for pen and alpha or the Panzer 58 which is a better CDC all around. I am surprised about the T34-3 though, it is a fairly easy tank to use.
I'd disagree with the CDC and m41. They're both solid tanks. People just don't understand how to play it. The T-34-3 on the other hand, doesn't really have too much going for it
I have that T-34-3 The gun never disappointing cause its aiming time,at castilla if you goes near the rock at side of the hill A site,and show your turret only,everything will bounce even the turret armor only 190 Its a good tank tho,only some "monkey play it by yolo or even camping,this new matchmaking sucks
U realize that just cuz they have bad WR doesn’t make them bad to buy. If you are skilled enough it doesn’t matter what tank it is. Tell me if I’m wrong.
Just saying these 4 aren’t bad tanks. Apart from T-44-100 which is a pointless tank to use. The rest aren’t bad, if you know how to use them. CDC is quite decent despite it is being compared to Dracula which it should being compared to. I think CDC is great in its own. You have mobility to get the job done. You are not as quick as Drac but you’re still pretty decent tank to operate in.
The tank must have some armor. A tank is an armored vehicle. A tank without armor is not a tank. You're playing a game about tanks, but you don't feel like you're playing a tank.
I have a weird question, it has nothing to do with this video. Where do you guys get different reacts? I mean, instead of the usual yellow thumbs up, there's bling version of it, instead of the usual Rubber Ducky there's fire spitting lava duckling??? There's also 💩??? Like, how do you get them?
Using this, "Worse performing vehicles" are bad? Look at Droodles is doing, his using them like a casual game, Sometimes, some tanks must be used correctly so they can be deadly or effective in battles. :3
Pretty sure there's a big discussion in regards to balancing games over pros and unicums who spent most of their time and dedication to the games they play in compared to the average joe.
Nah, it’s a decent tank still You can bait shots when on a hill (can give you just enough effective armor to bounce shots from meds) and punish misses with the accurate gun You can even get a few bounces on flat ground if you manage to turn at just the right time but it’s not always easy to pull off
T34-3 doesn't deserve to be second worst performing tank. I think it is on that place because it was sold often for a cheap price and also was in f2p events where those noobs unlocked this tank. In my opinion the amx cdc should be on the first place out of all bad tanks. The german tier8 bulldog is on the first place of all worst performing tanks, because wg loves to give away this tank for free and make many f2p event where everyone get multiple copies of it and also they(=wg) loves to sell it for a very cheap price frequently. This tank requires much more skill than the t34-3 and more people own this german bulldog tank. It's obvious why it has just low win rate.
I think the CDC is good to play it as light tank. Of course it's a medium tank , but with good mobility, good dpm and 0 armour, I should belong more to the light tanks than medium tanks. The t 34-3 it's an incredible tank in my opinion specially because of that gun and turret armour. It's like a t 44 with the 400dmg gun. That M41 90 it's really quite nice tank. I think these tanks can perform very good in battles only if you know how to play them. If you don't know where to position your tank , when to run and flank and especially where to aim, then of course you and the tank will have very bad performance specs. It's not about the tank, it's about the player and how to abuse the tank capabilities.
All three should be all fine, especially the black dog which should one of the best in right hands. CDC also is very capable, only need to be aware the large size. Don’t have the Chinese derp medium.
I used CDC, Lorraine and LTG, honestly i really like these tank, the reload is quite fast, the mobility is quite good, the accuracy is quite good too, more than enough for me who often plays at Tier 8 and below. In the end it all depends on who uses it, if you know how to use it.
I think they perform poorly due to being mediums/lights and it seems like lights and lightly armored meds are the hardest to play and master for most players. I really love the lekpz 41 for its damage potential and mobility though and i have gotten a few Masteries on it
