4K HDR 60FPS ● Bike Chase Scene (Gemini Man) ● Dolby Vision ● Dolby Atmos 

I hear Hisense is using that clip from your channel to sell they tv in shop in the Uk against LG and Samsung and a lawsuit is on way so I suggest you remove the Gemini man chasing scene ASAP from your channel if you don’t want to loose your channel and be involved of this million lawsuit. A friend who works in the industry told me about this. Regards. @4KCLipsAndTrailers

Will you Please put more new clips of transformers and fast and furious please?🥺

It looks like a cheap low budget movie lol. But the picture looks awesome.

seems like a documentary than a movie

@@pinokio3785 Because we're not used to seeing Hollywood action movies in 60frames per second (well, more like 48fps but you get the idea). The standard had always been 24 frames per second with action moments rendered in 22fps.

@@DuhBla so we should get used to it and not complain

@@senioralfredo2080 I wasn't complaining though, was trying to be informative.

Yeah, for Action sequences like this one, 60fps provides a new sense of immersion!

Wtf? It's filmed in 120fps and here and on disc it's at 59 fps? Lolololol.

I actually thought this was pretty good, I can see myself watching 60/120 FPS movies. It leaves less room for error so the acting and special effects must be better, but it can totally work, we're just used to 24FPS that's all.

@@rogeriodias9770 I honestly dislike this. When they make any kind of fast movement, it looks like it came from a video game. Doesn't look real.

@@MarManHollow That is because RU-vid does not support 120 fps. lolol

What on earth are you talking about 🤣😂

@@nimajneb6650 LOL the movie smooth af I have experience that in premier. they use 4k 120 frame 3d format to shoot the movie and 24 frame feel better than 60 frame or higher

I also don't remember this mission in uncharted

Yea that's def not it

It doesn’t seem too bad for me 60fps on movies 😅

It really does look like a video game to me. It looks like E3 footage of next gen "gameplay".

@@dafunk74747 I honestly think that’s the point and why it works for me. The whole film feels like it’s invoking classic PS2 era shooter games like Metal Gear Solid, from the designs of weapons and armor, to the FPS shots, to the frame rate. It plays into a theme of artificiality and how we treat humans as commodities both in the military industrial complex and in VFX, with using CGI to fully recreate people especially dead people.

i know, i can’t find the game gemini man on steam though, where can i get the game?

Bro, it's not any game

@@vengeance9047 no way

True, but the 60 fps looks odd in the first few shootout minutes. The running away etc. somehow looks odd and kind of goofey when it's this fluid or something. I did enjoy the 60fps look in the motor chase, and I might enjoy it in a martial arts movie of the level of the raid or ip man. Beyond that...I don't know.

@@theeternalnow6506 I feel very similarly. I however think HFR film has it's place and could be used more often. I think part of the goofiness comes from the blandness of the camera and with the combination of 60fps, it looks like a camcorder. This movie looks cheap to me even at 24fps. If it looked higher budget, I'm sure it would feel much better.

@@theeternalnow6506 I think the raid might be borderline unwatchable in 60FPS. It is already such a grueling watching in 24fps(very bloody). A lot of movie stunt work will also become very obvious when you can see every detail(fake punches and stuff like that). I know in this movie they had to hand edit all the stunt work to make it actually look decent in 120fps. When you unblur the details it will make the film much more visceral. I think that's the difference between motion smoothing that TV's produce and this movie. The camera is there to capture ALL the detail and it's not just being interpolated.

No it isn’t. You can tell that in 24fps it’s not real. For CGI, 60fps is real

@@theeternalnow6506 FALSE. And no it doesn’t 24fps looks very odd

Prefer 24fps.

It's interesting to see the different tastes people have with frame rates. Personally I prefer the standard 24fps. But Peter Jackson was on to something when he filmed The Hobbit in 48fps. People are starting to like the 60fps look in films which is weird ha ha.

It looks stupid. Smooth yes but it looks like a live movie

@@InclementFilms the Hobbit looked like crap. There's something about the lightning and motion that looks artificial. 24fps is superior for a cinematic feel. Motion also doesn't translate well, because we get to see too many nuances of the camera. 24fps all the way.

@@rbaz9454 exactly i was thinking of that too, way too real and live...

I'm OK with 4K HDR, but there's something about 60fps that doesn't look good. I'm beginning to believe that 24fps is best for movies. Just like The Hobbit, which was 48fps, it looks artificial and not cinematic. I know it might be an acclimatization issue. The Hobbit looked terrible. I'm sure this looked better in the cinema, but I don't think I'll ever get used to this.

@@theuniversewithin74 i agree , 60fps in movies looks weird.

@@krithik4673 60fps is suited for gaming, because we control the camera and we're always at the center of the action. Unless they figure out how to light it properly and film it in a way that doesn't accentuate that they're filming in 60fps, 24fps is superior. The only legitimate reason to film in 48 or 60 is to have smoother motion in 3D. But then again all the VFX needs to be beefed up to match the framerate, otherwise everything will look even more fake than it already is. I'm sure it'll improve, but as of now they have a long way to go.

I just watched the movie today but not like this 😭 its look like a 3D movie

Tarek Issa is this better quality even on phone

Time stamp?

I was looking for this comment, I thought the same thing lol

Same, I was actually very immersed in what would have otherwise been a pretty standard and forgettable action sequence, because of how real the scenes look in 60fps. I was scared that the actors were going to die in some of those stunts.

it was actually shot in 120fps

@@dcv2009 Yeah it looked like real people doing real things.

😂

thats not how it works dumbass

right it you can really see and feel everything a lot more

Like 45 percent of the shots in this movie are film school level bad framing

Nice STUTTTERER jou got there Kkken!

Stuntten?

@@AceDeclan wow 5 months and no one corrected me. Thanks 👍

I don’t really see it, but if you could, could you timestamp them?

@@misterj_j Yeah same. I went through a handful of the action scenes with my brother (basically spamming the space bar) just now, couldn't make out anything for sure.

I agree. This picture quality with 24fps would make it a lot better

i mean that's how fast they would actually go down those streets, it's very realistic

That’s the lack of correct motion blur

I don't think those types of bike's are fast

That makes no sense, what about the people in the background? At 24fps it would also make them look like they are moving super fast. At least at 60FPS you can see the action as opposed to everything being a blurry mess.

And this is artificially made. Real movie is in 120fps...quite an interesting trip to watch it on the big screen

@@yoshimitsu1977 I ended up watching it on Ultra Blu-ray at 60fps, it looked great.

@@yoshimitsu1977 what do you mean ‘artificial’

@@yoshimitsu1977 increasing frame rstes and upscaling is artificial... When the movie is already shot in 120 fps, how can 60 fps be artifical they just have to reduce frames

@@yoshimitsu1977 It is 60fps per eye. Which gives the motion of 60, not 120.

Video can only capture 60 fps, even when u have 120 fps gameplay.

Trueeeee

@@fynkozari9271 not entirely true, there are cameras capable of 120+ fps that can play anything captured in that framerate in real time. it's incredibly rare but it does exist, it's just mostly used for slow motion. some smartphones can capture in 120 and even 240fps.

@@SoulStealerJay But when u play the video, its 60 fps. The video cant go higher than 60 fps no matter if slow motion, or 120fps gameplay.

@@fynkozari9271 on youtube, no it cannot but in general it can. it depends on the display and viewing method. it can be viewed under specific circumstances as long as it’s supported. an iPhone 13 Pro Max or a Galaxy S21 can view 120FPS content easily because they support it

Biggest Upgrade .... My Cables to the Newer HBMI 2.1 Standard for the 8K.... Was just about to buy a new TV until my cables came in and I plugged her in.

This film is 4k 120 hdr. Since youtube does not support 120 fps, this clip has been compressed to 60 fps

@@DKSorgdo you… think that changing your cables made your tv display 8k…?

@@musicenjoyer4203 #NO..... My cables were an OLDER STANDARD.... My TV is NOT 8K.... WHY would I think that makes my TV 8K? The upgraded standard from a 2007 HDMI vs 2023..... NEWER STANDARD was an INSTANT upgrade for a NEWER TV.

How can something that looks SO clear take AWAY from realism..... that would do the OPPOSITE.

​@@AceDeclan I'm mainly convinced that people just aren't used to the framerate, as there are so many conflicting statements being made about HOW it effects a scene (this comment section, case in point). Some say it makes it look too realistic, others complain that it makes everything look to unrealistic/gamey. Personally, besides it being insanely nice actually being able to follow the action (in an ACTION! movie), I think it mainly just exposes how fucking dumb a lot of the scenes really are. Also, people really need to check out a low framerate version of this clip, even with a trash tier framerate it is easy to see how 'unrealistic' these scenes are. Would be interested to see something more "grounded" like a James Bond or John Wick fight scene in high refresh rate.

It looked way more intense and real than the original.

@@AceDeclan because you can see they aren't really fighting. Like when young will smith kicks some people and steal their bike, you can see he doesn't really kick them.

My first impression was that it seemed like watching a soap opera recorded on a well-lit (over-lit?) soundstage. It looked fake and game some uncanny valley type revulsion.

Yes I would love to see Hardcore Henry in 60fps. I think it would actually work in that movie.

@Imafraid Jumitebeeinnagang кек. Теперь здоровые люди со зрением лучше камер столетней давности = "дерьмовые вкусы"? Вы, инвалиды, можете оставить своё мнение при себе. 24 фпс годятся только для пыток зрителей.)

Because 60fps is not for films. It's for games.

@Imafraid Jumitebeeinnagang ладно, сударь инвалид. Все уже поняли, что вы тормознуты.)

@@VARJAGAMINGENTERTAINMENT I dunno man, ever played zelda at 17fps?

Ahahahahaaa good one! :)

Where actually?

@@thespicyspicey pause at 131 exactly look at the silver parts in the bumper. You can see the camera lens and some other shit

@d R they were sarcastic i think

Lol

It does. I saw it in 120fps. In 3d. That was... an experience. Not sold on the look though. I think Ang fucked up here.

Yeah, I see a lot of potential in this. People are saying it's jarring cause they're not used to it but once you get used to this it's amazing.

@@realanimegirl777 No it’s jarring cause 24 looks like what we see in real like. 60 doesn’t

@@malikkelly I like to believe it's jarring because film techniques and stabilzation have yet to be refined for 60fps cinematic shots... a lot of the panning shots in this film felt blurry/too fast, which is a valid complaint.

@@malikkelly we see much higher than 24fps.

@@bot_matrix I didn't say we don't

You're saying this after watching in 60fps (just). The people in the theatre watched it in 120.

Looks fake.

My personal belief is a lower framerate means less processing for the brain which makes people into more a zombie like state. Ideal for "television programming"

problem is the FX haven't caught up to that level, after all film itself is about an illusion, and it becomes too obvious at times that what is happening is not real.

It's people who have nothing better to do, if they don't like 60 fps they can easily watch the 24 fps version.

@@jerchongkong5387 disgusting 60 fps. every director knows 24 is the best

Dose this show up like 4K watching from phone

@@DanielMazz I don't know but it should play in 4k on a 4k phone.

Yh like a Spanish soap opera

@DirectorHMAN Wtf what are you all up to with this soap opera thing!? That's the biggest cap I've ever heard. The scene looks so much better and natural when the motion is more realistic. The 24 frames would give me a headache over time!

@@John.bww03 yh you are right, the last 100 years of films, everyone has chronic headaches

It's because you're feeling that soap opera effect from the 60hz instead of the usual 24hz

For different reason: 1. the bad HDR to SDR youtube conversion makes the colors looks weird, in a good hdr panel this video looks stunning. 2. The frame rate, Going from 24 to 60 fps can be uncomfortable at first, but when you get used to it things change for good. I think it takes a few years to get a good technique to make movies at 60 fps or more correctly, I don't think this is the future in a short time but it is a nice alternative.

It kinda feels like a home movie

@@BaltaBueno Bro come on. Stuff like this is why we don't have nice things(high frame rate film)

@@helloguy8934 Don't get me wrong, that's exactly what I want too lol Just helping explain stuff

The comment I was looking for...

its not "HDR" mode that you see here. its just that the Arri Alexa SXT-M camera has a crazy high dynamic range in general. even on none HDR mode screens you can see that. The highlight and shadow recovery is insane.

MikedieONE but that is what it’s so confusing, you just don’t know which content is HDR and which is not, like in Netflix it’s easily shown

Sagar Kalasa would this show on a phone in hd

Daniel Mazz do you mean HDR? It would show on XS and 11 pro models as they support HDR

I think 90 would be better suited for movies

@@nitroxylictv nah fam 144fps or 240fps all the way

@@somedankboi6093 This isn’t games

Dude most people can't even see past 60. It literally doesn't matter.

@@Error0101 Wtf? We don't see in FPS... And yes, there is noticable difference between 60 and 120 fps...

Yes, but it's damn expensive!

Just say NO to drugs!

Me to🤣🤣. The thumbnail right

agreed man... totally :)

To me it gives it a realistic feel like you are right there.

@Eddie 5 yes when it becomes more common people will be more comfortable with it. Look at old post when Blu-ray came out or how people feel about watching old movies on 4k before they actually watch it.

nothing is off it's just that you're not used to it HDR is much better

It highlights the CGI fsfs. It looks so quirky and unfinished tbh

What kind of novelas u be watching

We thought the same 🤣

it was in 120fps in the cinema?

@@l21n18 yup they had special 120 fps showings.

@Grime Fork Is that why Hollywood have rushed to adopt it?

Agree. It just looks wrong. Like a soap opera.

Thankyou.