SUBSCRIBE HERE: ru-vid.com_c... It all comes back to drunken time traveling. Watch our new series WELCOME BACK, POTER here: goo.gl/W4UiA8 See more www.cracked.com LIKE us on: / cracked FOLLOW us on: / cracked FOLLOW us on: / cracked
This video came a full year before the first Jurassic world movie. If I was a lazy Hollywood writer I'd easily steal the good ideas from RU-vid channels like bioweapons for my movie
I absolutely love when they're talking about Hammond, and how Katie goes, "He's just a smiling, grandfatherly face to make the public feel better." And then they show the most absolutely terrifying photo of him in the entire movie.
He's actually a conniving dick in the original novel. Think "the dark side of Walt Disney", and you've got yourself the *original* John Hammond. d(^-^d)
@@TrollHunterTylei "The dark side of Walt Disney"? I'm thinking all the pedos running around the Disney World. And the drug dealings. And the human trafficking. And let's not forget the most scary villain of Disney -- Claude Frollo.
"Come play with the dinosaurs! Pet them! They want to play with you!" I always watch this video for that part. You can see Soren ready to laugh at that point.
The writers of that movie probably took the idea from this video. After all stealing is the ultimate solution for a writer too lazy to do any decent work and I think the fact that the movie's writers were horribly lazy is pretty obvious.
Now I know this is going to freak some folks out, but I'm about to talk about the book here for a second. You guys made a point that I thought was spot on, two acutaly about the food and the poop. Turns out that Michale C addressed both o those issues in the book. The fact that they took out the Compy's from the first movie is where they lost the issue of how the poop is dealt with. Compy's are created as dung eaters because the larger dino droppings weren't biodegradable due to the bacteria needed to break it down was dead along with the dinos. The Compys were "supposed" to be only there to eat the poop because their waste was biodegradable. However, the Compys were the first ones to start to breed without the teams knowledge, and they were a whole lot more of an integral part of the story than they were made out to be. As for the food for the dinos they stated in the book that they literally had to ship in a metric fuck ton of food every two weeks to keep them fed. It was one of the first times that Hammond said spared no expense in the book also.
They probably cut them out of the first movie because they didn't want to adapt the scene where they escape the island before Grant's beta test tour even starts, and ate a baby alive. Also, InGen thought it would be brilliant to use _cobra DNA_ to patch up their genetic code.
There's a fan theory that the reason the Jurassic Park 3 Velociraptors look different from the first and second film is that mabye there are different TRIBES of raptors based on their behavior and image.There's the Lost World raptors that are less intelligent and more savage like the Nublar raptors and there's the JP3 raptors that are more intelligent and more social. It is speculated that the JP3 raptors are the ORIGINALS;the very first Ingen recreated when the first started cloning Dinosaurs.But the scientists thought they were too smart for there own good.So,They decided to tamper with the DNA.Then,there was probably a jinx in the sequence which led to them becoming more brutal and murderous;in other words,becoming the Nublar and Lost World Raptors.Does anybody agree with this theory? If not,then why?
or you know, the reason they stated in the book and movies... They had to fill in gaps in the DNA with current living species causing the dinosaurs to be a bit altered from their original form. OR the fact that "raptors" is a whole family of dinosaurs, not one species.
Chickknight Greenleaf Well, probably everyone either ignored the little dinosaur eating people due to the giant dinosaur eating people, or everyone thought that they were the same dinosaur with different people talking about it and being confused. Then TWIST the raptor was pregnant, and long story short, hail satan.
Antonio Lempjahhjne just like the reall world, because when you invent new things there's always the 3 golden questions. "kan i eat it?" "kan I fuck it?" and "kan i fuck things up with it?".
I love this show. I love everything about it, everyone who is in it, everyone who wrote it and everyone who is responsible for it. I hope it never ends.
+Liberty Chapman-Viotto The baby T-Rex was already in Captivity and on the mainland, which is why Malcolm and Julianne Moore had to go find it in order to lure momma Rex. it's not like the baby T-rex was on the ship, the ship crashed, momma got loose, and someone said "well since mom's already running loose, I might as well go on the ship to get the baby. Life must go on."
Maui Randall They were also being transported on the ship, broke free because "raptors." They then killed the crew and were able to sneak away once the ship crashed because um..."raptors," I guess? I'm being sarcastic. It's all contrived as hell
did somebody already mention that they are incorrect about Hammond coming back in the second book? Doesn't happen. I have read both books 4 times (I am a Crichton fan). Malcolm does come back in the second book, but they give an explanation for that.
Cloning a person wouldn't give you an person with the same knowledge, being a biologist isn't in your DNA. There's really no reason to clone an scientist over just hiring a new one.
roottruthseeker Like what? You might have a genetic predisposition to be a better rational thinker (maaaaybe), but you can't seriously believe that knowledge of palaeontology and molecular biology can be passed along in your genes? Epigenetics would be the only thing that could potentially do that, but there is no way it would pass along such specific information.
Merry Machiavelli So you're suggesting they ALSO developed equipment that could map the human brain and upload it to awaiting bodies. The implications are endless!
This analysis is full of plot holes. When in Lost World did the Dinosaurs break out? They were free to roam the island? Storm in the second movie? That was just rain.
It's not in the movie, but in the books the Dinosaurs were hatched on this island. There were issues in the DNA that wouldn't allow most of them to reach full maturidy and they would die. So on lost worl island they were hatched and set loose to see if they would survive. If they did then they were taken to Jurrassic park. When all the shit went down in the 1st book and movie the japaneese stopped funding injen and they abanded the island thinking all te Dino's there would die. But obviously they didnt.
mary weaver You're completely right, but there was no 'breaking out' of Dinosaurs on this second island, they were released into the wild to form a 'factory floor' for the first island.
mary weaver im pretty sure in the first book the costa rican government began to bomb the island as soon as they rescued grant, lex, timmy, etc. so they didn't just let the animals roam free.
I'm saying the Dinos on Site B were there already. They were born free on that island. They were the factory floor and were intended to eventually be shipped to Nublar
what about the lycine deficiency that they made the dinosaurs to have?were those not designed to have it or did they eventually adapt to not need the lycine
The shadow corporation is Weyland Yutani. They're opening a hunting preserve for Predators. That's why the secretly added the cloaking ability to the Indominus Rex. They wanted something special. Something that would hunt them back.
In relation to the dead crew of the ship, wasn't it revealed in a deleted scene or something that a pack of velociraptors snuck onto the boat and ate the crew?
I think there's actually concept art for this scene that details a giant hole ripped open into the cabin area which explains how the Rex eats the folks holding on to remotes and wheels.
When in Jurassic Park 2 when all the people on the ship died I thought it was Raptors, like they snuck onboard and killed everyone then went below deck looking for more food or something and the T-Rex killed them.
Why the fuck would they cut that out? That would have made the boat scene more sense cuz a T. rex couldn't have killed the captain holding the helm. Thanks for the info
I will say out of all 3 movies, the biggest plot hole that haunts my brain to this day is the slaughterhouse that took place on that boat, especially in the helm. How does a dinosaur 3-4 times the size of that tiny room tear everyone to shreds but the room and control panels are perfectly fine.
Hammonds character was still dead in the second book, and Malcom was stated that his death in the first book was only rumours due to how bad his condition was etc
Thank you! i've been searching comments hopeing I'd find this comment. I was gonna add it myself if i couldn't find one. Thank you, you just made my day.
mary weaver I'm glad to know that someone knows the materiel as well as myself. As much as i like cracked, and after hours, they sadly get some things wrong, i felt it needed to be pointed out as they were going from books and films but got info wrong. But its all there to read and know. Now i feel i am coming across a bit know it all etc, so will leave it at that, and finish saying, thank god its not just me who realised this mistake!
Its toltaly o.k:) I don't think you sound like a know it all. I love the books very much and am glad you caught it. I agree, Cracked sometimes gets some stuff wrong and sadly the comments are usually full of people who dont understand or are just causing crap. Its nice to find a compitent commenter
If you cloned Ian Malcolm, you wouldn't get Ian Malcolm, you'd get the equivalent of his twin brother. Twins have identical DNA but they are far from identical and that even when they are raised through the same age and same family. Twins raised separately aren't just completely different in personality and politics and even mental ability but even in appearance.
I always assumed that the reason the boat had all those dead bodies on it wasn't because of the T-Rex, or the rival company, but because there were Raptors on the boat, Raptors that hid when the boat reached the dock & escaped into the world, to populate the world with intelligent Raptors that could breed.
You are referencing the books which the movies are based; Dan is referencing the books which are based off of the movies. Yes, there are two sets of books, yes one is the bases of the movies, yes there's one based off of the movies.
Really? That's weird, why would they write a second set of books based on the movie and then differ them enough to make the giant plot holes that they're pointing out?
Still doesn't explain why they would kill Malcolm and Hammond and then bring them back when they didn't die in the movie. Seems like really bad marketing. I'm glad I never knew about them before.
Funniest thing for me (which I wish they had brought up) was finding out that in real life, the velociraptor made famous by the film was actually about the size of a miniature poodle.
They never brought Hammond back in the books. He died in the first one and that was that, he didn't die in the first movie so there was no reason not to put him in the second. Ian never "officially" dies in the first book, it's heavily implied he did but not open stated. And in the second they explain that at first the doctors did pronounce him dead, but later realized he still alive.
Remember in the first JP, when the T-rex walked out of his cage, then Grant and the girl go up to the cage, and now there's a 100ft drop? What's up with that?
Maybe the movie is actually a montage of the different cloned test runthroughs. In one, there was a drop, in the other they changed that variable to see how it plays out..... :-P
I love this 'show' on this channel. It really makes me think about the movies I watch. Also makes me question all the absurdities of a film until I reach a conclusion that makes me so much happier about the 'error.' Just sayin'. I love you guys for doin' this.
Hey guys...hate to point this out, but it was actually Injen that took the dinosaurs off the island. Hammond lost control of the company to another guy, and he decided to go in and take the dinosaurs off the island to take to the zoo in San Diego. The rival company only showed up in the first book.
2 errors. 1) Dr. Malcom is only PRESUMED dead but is rescued as mentioned in the second book. Though he survives the first novel, he is left crippled with a cane. 2) Hammond dies in the first book and was never brought back in the Lost World novel. I expected a lil more research for this one guys.
+bigfatcarp93 Tyrannosaurus' growth profile involved a crazy teenage growth spurt between ages 12 and 18 (individuals like Jane)...and Sue is the oldest known individual, dying of trichomonosis at age 28. :) just saying...just adding it in...also a large Brachiosaurus could reach near-adult sizes in between ten to twenty years and keep growing slowly for many more...I think Troodon's growth profile is known. Grew up slower than most modern birds but faster than crocodilians, had mainly precocial or semi-precocial offspring so maybe the growth of a Deinonychus can be estimated using that I guess?...I...sorry for interrupting, even I dunno why I began this lol
john xiong*Very* educated, though. As in, with mountains of evidence. At this point, we know so much for pretty much sure that anyone who points out the whole "technically it's an educated guess" thing tends to look like more of a fool.
Joseph Ben-Obasa Yes. Because Jurassic Park is so well known for scientific accuracy. Besides, she could easily have been five in the first movie (animals that live such a short amount of time would also obviously grow to adulthood faster.). Not to mention many animals live longer in captivity.
5:57 John Hammond was killed by compys in the first book and did NOT return in The Lost World. He stayed dead. Ian Malcolm died in the first book but was brought back, having been revived or something. Been a while since I've read the books, but not long enough to forget them. Great reads that I'd recommend to everybody (especially the guys at Cracked, who must not've read them). :P Edit: I mixed up Malcolm and Grant for some reason, fixed that :P
Steven royally screws the book. Malcolm, Hammond and Muldoon all die in the book. Genarro does not. Speilberg ruins one of the best adult books ever by catering to kids, and sequels.
Joshua is 100 percent correct and actually i was glad malcolm made it. I had seen the movies way before reading the books and i must say the lost world was really good compared to the movie. Made more sense and had a better flow.
@Cracked would love to see you guys take another look at this considering the Jurassic World movie where ingen is shown to try to turn dinos into biological weapons.
I don't know if someone said this already but originally, in Jurassic Park 2, there were supposed to be a couple of raptors on board with the T rex that got lose and ate the crew but the filmmakers decided not to put them in at the last moment.
They brought back the original cast for Jurassic world, it wasn’t perfect but it was still cool. Jurassic park is one of the greatest cinematic masterpieces
I think Michael wins this one, due to his allusion towards that shadowy rival company that seems to have some influence on every Jurassic Park movie. Daniel: 15 Soren: 10 Katie: 10 Michael: 15
OK I have a theory that you're Dan O'Brian cause hear me out he keeps the shit that they say as a record and operates tallys about these conversations so you're just posting your results right?
Actually the crew disappearing isn't a plot hole, there was going to be a scene where a raptor was jumping off the boat and onto the docks, showing what killed them, but it was cut
I love this show, please make more. I know its probably hard and likely boring. But I would tune in weekly to watch this on network. Its that good! In any casethank you all for your obvious hard work, and I am subbed till youtube is taken down to you guys because of this show. I love Cracked.
As a 7 year old geek when this franchise started, I knew they hella fucked up on which dinos were around at the same time...or even in the Jurassic...or that a T-Rex was not a motion sensitive camera with massive jaws. Is that sad cuz I'm an ubernerd or cuz a small child poked holes in the damn plot 25 mins in then fell asleep in the theater? Possibly both?
In the book the corporation that created the park wasn't interested In the real Jurassic age or the time line they just wanted the most marketable dinosaurs.
I knind knew the ages were off too, but I figured "jurrasic park" was just a catchy name the marketing department came up with. Who really cares about the ages?
Joe Smith That's worse. I remember an article about the huge differences in the movies and book. I know that's not unusual cuz Hollywood thinks we're all idiots with short attention spans. Still 90 seconds of throw away dialogue could have explained that. And most of these plot holes come to think of it.
I think you missed that the shadow company from the first movie was different from the second movie, where it was InGen itself. Also the Malcolm retcon was because Spielberg pressured him into making a second book for him to disregard in the making of his own sequel. Hammond was not resurrected in the book in any way.
I never understood why didn't go the Suicide Squad rout in Jurassic Park. The dinos all got trackers in there neck, but why not place a bomb in there with it that, once the large carnivore leaves it's security perimeter blows its head off. Ok, the Indomunis Rex clawed it out but only once it was far removed from its original cage.
DebonairDinosaur Just saying this: And all the payments for the relatives/children/spouses of the families that died would be cheaper? Nah. If they have the ability to make hybrids of dinosaurs, they know how to make them in a smaller amount of time and cheaper than the people in the first two movies could.
I think there's a few (decent) reasons, 1)PETA-like people, there would be a few crazies trying to set them free after finding out they put bombs in their necks. 2)I'm sure they didn't want to put a bomb on their investment, not sure what a dinosaur costs to get/make but I imagine it's not lunch money. 3)Safety is probably something to think about, if somehow this thing got out of it's cage and blew up near or person or had it's head fly across the park and land on a kid or something that'd be a big lawsuit on the company. 4)If there were an incident followed by any kind of investigation they may scare the public or investors away after the headline, "InGen would rather invest in bombs than better fences". 5)A movie has to happen. P.S. Not saying logically it's a bad idea but I get why that decision wouldn't have been made.
first off love cracked seen all the videos and i hope there's still plenty more to come second, for the mutilated bodies on the ship scene, wasn't there also the baby T-rex on the ship? could it be possible that little sucker got loose attacking the crew? keep up the awesome work
That still doesn't answer the question of who killed the people on the boat. Even 10 year old me seeing that the first itme was like "Bwuh...? But how did the Trex do that?"
Hey remember when this channel was good? Remember when someone bought it out and said "we're gonna fire everyone and change everything." Great job guys.
Yeah the thing I was always confused about was how could have the T-Rex in Lost World eaten everyone on the boat because I'm sure it was locked up when they originally put it on the boat and the cargo door was clearly still strong enough to hold it in there because they had to push the button for it break free of the cargo hold later on. Let's say the T-Rex got out, how in the world would the people on the boat been able to 1) put in back in the cargo hold, 2) how could the boat not have subsized if the T-Rex got out, and 3) Why in the world would people open the cargo hold because they should have known the T-Rex was down there because that was only place it could be held on the boat! Thus, the only good point I can think of that the team brought up was that there could have been some corruption in the dino business world to where someone hired a team of assassins to kill everyone on the boat and make it seem like the T-Rex ate them, accidentally set the T-Rex free so that Ingen would get really bad press and be forced to shut down or go bankrupt.
artistwithouttalent Hellz naw, thing still wee babe, it aint unlocked it's full strength yet, plus it was brought separately remember? That whole part of them going to the unfinished park to get it
"invisibility" being on inGen's whiteboard is kinda painfully funny in retrospect. Or wait, had that part of Jurassic world been leaked at this point? If anyone would have known it would be Dan
+Tyranno Ganbat Dinosaurs are rubbish (read: incompatible). They'd fuck up the ecosystem on modern earth massively, they'd destroy the food chain (or get destroyed by it) and judging by modern cattle as a comparison they'd probably be the single biggest greenhouse gas contributor if they did survive. Priorty 1 would be killing most dinosaurs and just leaving a few alive in geographically isolated reserves like the original islands.
I totally enjoy your videos. Just an FYI to solve the question about what happened to the crew of the ship... in the original version Raptors also stowed away on the ship and ate the unsuspecting crew, leading to the boat crashing and body parts being left everywhere. But the Raptors were later removed from the scene for whatever reason made sense to the movie editors. Leaving no reason at all for the missing crew, but all the attention given fully to the T-rex.
