In the realm where tales take flight, GPT-4 wields its potent might, To write the books that captivate, Here are secrets to create and elevate. First, understand the art’s embrace, Let creativity set the pace, Blend human thoughts with AI's grace, A symphony of words in perfect space. Plot and character, an intricate dance, Craft personas with depth, give them a chance, Let GPT-4 weave their circumstance, Emotions and motives, in a storytelling trance. Language is the brush, the strokes refined, Choose words judiciously, the power entwined, Let the narrative, by design, unwinds, Each chapter, a melody, the reader’s mind bind. Balance novelty with what's known, Originality in a world of its own, Create intrigue, let curiosity be sown, In the garden of ideas, let creativity be grown. Edit and refine, an essential chore, GPT-4 as aid, its prowess to explore, Polish the prose, until it's more, A literary gem to adore and adore. Lastly, the human touch, an essential hue, GPT-4 augments, but the heart's true, In the symphony of creation, both in view, Crafting books that resonate, through and through. So, let GPT-4 and your spirit align, Creating worlds, stories divine, With these secrets, your books will shine, In the vast universe of literary design.
I think that AI art and literature cannot replicate the human element and the experience and emotion that we put into these works. They AI generated works may be beautiful and correct but they depict a more stilted beauty which lacks the depth of human art. I think that AI is a great tool to optimize workflow efficiency. In writing, to research, outline, and draft. The writer can then heavily edit the ai generated material to form his/her work. The AI would fill the role of a research assistant or ghost writer. Like a master sculptor would have his assistant sculpt a block of granite into the general shape and size of a human then the master can finish and perfect it.
I think you would end up being the research assistant, gathering what you want included in the book. The AI can then generate a draft, and you could then ask it to revise. Until we can input a large selection of a single author's text (unless the author has a large body of work already published), it won't necessarily be able to replicate your voice. It could, however, write in the voice of a best selling author for the genre. Most people wouldn't know. A lot of news reports are already computer generated (the weather can follow a formula and outline basically everyday and as long as it is accurate no one cares).
@@joelmacha2104 agree. The temptation would be too great. One of the main complaints I've seen is that AI assisted material hurtles through act two and doesn't always tie up loose ends at the (rushed) conclusion. I don't think we can blame sloppy editing or revision, because this would mean a total rewrite which of course defeats the whole point. I'd be interested to find out if a certain author I use to enjoy used AI for their most recent book, because in retrospect, it certainly read like one. If so, RIP
So a hardened writer that reads 500 novels and writes 10,000 hours and develops an interesting personality loses out to some teen that never reads, never writes, types a few sentences, and writes a bestseller? Ain't happening. A half hour interview would highlight the massive difference in wisdom and depth of personality between the two authors.
But you're not interviewing the author. If an AI/writer team can write a novel as good as a seasoned novelist, then the competition just went up. A seasoned writer will have to use AI to compete.
Published author here (nothing big), and the one thing about the new generative AI that's making me a little... sad?... is that I'll never be able to write *anything*, ever again, without someone at least wondering "How much of this was AI?" I get how artists feel about Midjourney, et al, in that way. Still, I want this tech to do even better and grow to do things just as well, if not better, than humans. Not to be overly humble, but I'm less important than, you know, the species. If an AI can write a better book than me, or someone else using it can, then that should be what's published.
You make a great point. It really intrudes into a vector of human authority that has never been challenged before and I can't say I love it. Many upsides here, but that uncertainty of someone potentially using AI is just a part of this world now. Thanks for the comment.
Im using it to help me write, if it writes for me, i sorta ignore it or put my own spin on it. I want more feed back on it than anything. I just wish that it wasn't so restricted.
I'm an editor and have been hired a few times to edit these kinds of GPT books, and let me tell you, it is not all sunshine and roses. LOL, it is terrible at writing fiction. Everything is stilted and lacks detail or literary prowess. Chatgpt is suitable for writing bottom-of-the-barrel cash grab books. Talented writers are not going anywhere. On the other hand, people that write "basic" prose ought to be careful as they're easily substituted by GPT.
The tipp to give GPT4 context in form of articles about the topic before letting it create an outline is golden! thnx, wouldnt have thought about that.
I will have to try out the update. I tried using 3.5 to help write a fiction book and it was a disaster, it was no help whatsoever. I spent hours trying different techniques even just to get a detailed summary and it kept forgetting what we were talking about (even as bad as the previous answer) and a lot of it's suggestions were generic garbage. Forget about even writing the actual story, it's outlines and summaries were terrible.
To write a book you need to be a writer, the process is important, it’s a journey to write a book. Chatgpt isn’t a tool to write books, if you want it to help you… fine. But to generate a book based on a prompt doesn’t make you an author, it isn’t your book, you aren’t a writer, you are a pretender
It started with newspaper ads, then there was catphishing, photo filters, fake photoshoots, plastic surgery, and these AI techs are only the next step in fake.
Here's a description of a zebra in the style of Joe Rogan: "Check out these magnificent creatures, man. The zebra, it's like nature's own psychedelic painting. They've got these black and white stripes that just pop out at you, and you can't help but wonder why they evolved that way. Some say it's for camouflage, some say it's for communication, but who knows, man? Maybe it's just mother nature showing off her artistic skills. And let me tell you, these guys are tough. They're built for speed, and they've got some serious kick. You don't want to mess with a zebra, man. But at the same time, they're just so damn beautiful, you can't help but feel a sense of wonder and amazement. It's like looking at a living work of art, man."
This is so incredibly stupid at so many levels. If you dream to write a book, then do it. What kind of a dream it is if you get most part of the book my a machine.
Americans like a cheap easy way to feel good without putting in the hard hours. But it will backfire in the long-term. You can only outsmart talent in the short-term.
The real trick? Prompt it to engineer the chapter structure, have it write the entire thing a couple paragraphs at a time, then go back and paraphrase it 100% so you don't get demonetized and/or reduced pay for using AI
@WholisticGuru it really depends on the subject matter, but honestly I'd start by giving GPT the general book idea, and ask it outright to develope a workflow for the chapter structure. And tell it that I want the book to have x number of twists or some other criteria to make it less predictable.
Oh man, rly like u`r vids) In about two months, I have developed and use almost the same strategy for writing near-science video scripts. Working grate till now)
Thanks, Great video. You say in the video that "all the prompts for this are down in the description". I can't seem to find them. Can you please show us all the "writing a novel prompts" ?
@@aiadvantage Many thanks. I wonder if the Italian government is trying to outlaw GPT because they don't want YOUR excellent prompts from making everyone productive and rich ! 😜
You are the best! Really thank you so much for your videos. The only thing I´m missing is Snoop Dogs "It´s a doozy" . Really hoped to see that in every video😂
This is a great tutorial! However, I placed the text directly in Originality, and shows me 100% AI, which is OK. Then I edit it through QuillBot "Rephrase" and showed me again 100% AI. Then I edited the text on my own, rephrase based on my knowledge, and again 100% AI!! But the most interesting part was when I copy and paste a post I made 8-9 months ago, written by me as conclusions of an article I've read, and... 100% AI!??!!! How's that even possible?? (I'm using paid services on both AI tools).
AI can give you a false feel that you know so much about a certain subject. This is bad. We don't want to live in the world that cannot distinguish between information and knowledge. Let us keep appreciating knowledge of human writers. Remember, we still need good original writers to create content that we will feed to AI machine learning to train AI. 👍🏻
How can I use Chat GPT to help me write a 6-8 minute Persuasive speech. I tried to use it to create a persuasive speech with chat gpt, but it was always short. I want to create a persuasive speech about issues with personal data and privacy and how more needs to be done to protect it . Or something similar to this. Can you help me with this? I need to create this speech asap! Thank you.
Here is a possible outline for your blog post: # Why Data Protection and Privacy Matter More Than Ever ## Introduction - Define data protection and data privacy, and explain the difference between them - Provide some examples of data breaches and leaks that have compromised personal data and harmed users - Explain the main purpose of the blog post: to persuade readers that data protection and privacy are important and that they should take action to safeguard their own data ## Data Protection and Privacy: The New Rules of the Game - Describe how consumer mistrust, government action, and market forces are changing the landscape of the data economy - Explain how countries are treating personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms - Cite some sources that support this trend, such as the Harvard Business Review article "The New Rules of Data Privacy" ## How to Protect Your Data and Privacy Online - Provide some practical tips and tools for users to secure their accounts, protect their web browsing, and manage their data sharing preferences - Recommend using password managers, two-step authentication, browser extensions, VPNs, and privacy settings - Cite some sources that offer guidance on how to protect digital privacy, such as the New York Times guide "How to Protect Your Digital Privacy" ## Conclusion - Summarize the main points of the blog post and restate the thesis statement - Emphasize the benefits of data protection and privacy for users, such as enhanced security, control, and trust - Call for action from readers to take charge of their data and privacy and to demand more transparency and accountability from firms Critique: The outline is clear, coherent, and informative. It covers the main aspects of data protection and privacy and provides relevant sources and examples. It follows the tone, length, and format specified by the user. It could be improved by adding some statistics or anecdotes to make it more engaging and persuasive. It could also address some potential counterarguments or challenges to data protection and privacy, such as convenience, cost, or compliance.
Why Data Protection and Privacy Matter More Than Ever Introduction Every day, we generate and share a vast amount of data online. Whether we are browsing websites, shopping online, using social media, or accessing online services, we leave behind a digital footprint that reveals our preferences, habits, opinions, and identities. But who owns this data? And how is it used? Data protection and data privacy are two concepts that are often confused or used interchangeably. However, they have distinct meanings and implications. Data protection refers to the technical and organizational measures that prevent unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction of data. Data privacy refers to the legal and ethical rights and obligations that govern how data can be collected, processed, shared, and deleted. Both data protection and data privacy are essential for safeguarding our personal data and ensuring our digital rights. However, they are also under constant threat from various sources. Data breaches and leaks are becoming more frequent and severe, exposing millions of users’ personal data to hackers, criminals, or malicious actors. For example, in 2021 alone, some of the major data breaches included Facebook1, LinkedIn2, T-Mobile3, and Twitch4. These incidents can have serious consequences for users, such as identity theft, fraud, blackmail, harassment, or discrimination. The purpose of this speech is to persuade you that data protection and privacy matter more than ever in today’s data-driven world. You will learn how consumer mistrust, government action, and market forces are changing the landscape of the data economy. You will also discover some practical tips and tools for protecting your data and privacy online. Finally, you will understand the benefits of data protection and privacy for yourself and society at large.
Ask it your exact question. Plug your comment here word for word into a new chat thread and it will tell you, and keep talking to it in the same thread, it will give you the best advice.
Are you not worried that your book would be fed to a llm ? like to mindsgrasp or something else. As is general knowledge copyright will not hold i think.
How make chatgpt write more like a human? How avoid his hallucination fairy tales style like: WElcome in today dog training world or in today fast paced marketing world, yep you can smell it miles away this fairy tales sentences. Hoa make chatgpt not write in that style ? Do you have a tip ?
Thats when you know chatgpt is lame when it can't even write a book because that's "offensive and sensitive to the audience ". They really nerfed it so hard that it's not fun anymore. The DAN and jailbreak stuff are awesome
Why did the writer start using language AI? Because they wanted to write like a champion, just like how bodybuilders use steroids to compete at the highest level!
@@aiadvantage no of course . What I’m asking is what tool/platform did you use to edit and make ebook. I’m tryin to find a tool but so far can only come up with Canva . Any help with recommendation would be appreciated
After experimenting for months with Chat AI i've regrettably come to the conclusion, that in its current state, besides being able to help tremendously with speedy research, it is otherwise useless. Its comprehension is impressive, but it fails miserably at any manner of subtlety, subtext or nuisance. Ironically it understands what subtext is, and its important role it plays in writing, but is NOT equipped to manage subtext whatsoever. Chat AI, is only able to write nursery rhyme level stories. It understand humour, and is able to identify jokes and what makes them funny, which in itself is a massive achievement, but when asked to be funny is only able to resort to the ridiculousness of a Rube Goldberg machine.
Are you writing this from the 1990's? Because I've just been on it for the first time, and it generated me a plot, subplot and some reasonable dialogue. It's how you phrase the prompts, I think. It's bloody depressing and I HATE IT
@@thehangingparsiple5692 I was REALLY impressed with it too my first few days, but with every passing day got more pessimistic, until i finally gave up. The dialogue it gives is so ordinary, expected, and very referential. And as I said absolutely devoid of any subtlety and subtext. It is often just okay, rarely that clever, and never good enough for a professional novel. A good novel is about what ISN'T being said, not what IS being said. And this is something AI struggles with. All it knows is how to be direct and to the point. Every time i ask it to dance around a subject without directly addressing the elephant in the room, it fails miserably. it immediately mentions the thing I told it not to mention. no number of prompts fixes that. It isn't programmed to understand how to use subterfuge. It sucks at writing mystery. If you needed it to write an opening crawl to Empire Strikes Back, it would start with by saying Vader is Luke's father. It has no restraint. But in matters where that isn't an issue it's shockingly helpful. I was doing a scene the other day set in British Parliament, and i needed all that fancy language they use. and i asked it to write me a scene, and used very few prompts and the options it gave me were gold. It would have taken me 2 days of research to write anything as good. It is also not terrible at writing atmosphere, provided you don't want anything poetic. If you just want lazy phone-it-in atmosphere, then it's great for that. It's proses are not great. It is terrible at using prose in any unexpected or interesting way. It is great at telling me cultural things i wouldn't know. slang in other cultures for example. If you find AI useful, I'm worried about the reading level you are writing for. It isn't better than a grade 6 level novel.
Actually many of these faults are on you, the prompter. The problem is overestimating a large language model AI to do the more nuanced stuff for you. You have to be more specific and precise in your prompting, and you can generate the same response but iterate on it with multiple prompts. Quality in, quality out.
Don't use it expecting to get quality by itself, the power of this tech is all in the potential, which is cultivated by your prompt quality and your own intelligent use of ChatGPT. You just have to experiment more, think outside the box, and push its limits. I once came to your same conclusion, but eventually I figured out how to generate better writing. You also shouldn't expect it to write everything for you, I use ChatGPT to fill in most of my stories, which I then use as reference for an actual draft. We're not yet at the point where you can give it a single command and it'll generate an entire bestseller. You still have to do the majority of the leg work to get the best results.
@@nogrammer giving it more prompts especially negative prompts does make a big difference. And it can occasionally produce some impressive paragraphs. Usually a bit on the nose, and filled with purple prose and melodrama, but better than anything i could write in 10 seconds. It still sucks at subtext, mystery, subterfuge, intrigue or anything subtle. It doesn't know how to imply things, or read between the lines, It doesn't know how to sit on a secret for any more than a sentence or two. Its imagination is limited to common subjects of which there is a great deal of material to sample from. It is very referiantial and always takes the expected route. Vampires, are a no brainer. Werewolves, no problem, but ask it to write about a rare mythological creature, and it flat lines. It's dialogue is on the nose. It isn't witty, clever, current, or fun. Everyone speaks their mind, and no one is ever misunderstood. It doesn't know how to describe atmosphere in any way but with purple prose. Everyone is melodramatic, their heart is pounding in their chest. It is intelligent enough to be able to identify humorous elements, and what makes them humorous but doesn't know how to apply them. Writing quality stories is something HUMANS struggle with. AI is years away from competing with humans on this front. What i AM WORRIED about is that the self publishing industry is about to become a shit storm of crap published by newbie writers who don't have enough critical skills to know their work sucks. It already has a bad reputation for this, but very soon it is going to be as reliable as an ad on Craigslist.