For the US, we need to look at our economy in 1967, when the minimum wage was highest after adjustment for inflation, and the salary gap between workers and leaders was the smallest. Also, getting voters to see that corporations are buying the government candidates they want, both Democrats and Republicans, and lying about politicians not for sale like Sanders and AOC that they label extreme tax and spend liberals. Also, look at the policies over 50 percent of voters support such as negotiating lower prescription drug prices, that Democrats cannot pass even with their majority in the House, Senate, and with a Democrat as President.
Joe “nothing will fundamentally change” Biden never had any intention to pass anything. Manchin is his convenient excuse to serve corporate donors. The poison is the corporate media who have a stranglehold on older voters.
Democrats don't have a majority in the Senate. Manchin and Sinema are DINOs! Look back to all the things that were about to be passed and these facist degenerates BLOCKED them. We need to get at least 50 REAL democrats in order to start making change. Even then, we will still be at war with corporate shills like Pelosi The Putrid.
The Lennin's and Stalin's revolution was quite like that. They took asvantage of the political situation caused by the Russian workers revolution to instablish a regime of terror
They did not start out with a project of establishing a regime of terror. They seized power in a relatively bloodless coup, and then ran into violent opposition not only from within Russia, but from the British, the Americans and others who even sent troops to Russia to stop Communism. The choice the Bolsheviks had to make was: do we step aside because the people we have been fighting all these years don't want us to hold power and liberate the working class and the peasants? Or do we do what is necessary to hold on to power, including the use of massive violence? Do we surrender to the Whites and let them bring back the Tsar? Or do we defeat them and build socialism? Do we use violence only up to a point, and then hand over power to our enemies, or do we use all the violence that we believe is necessary to defeat our enemies? The Bolsheviks chose to do their best to hold on to power, believing that they could liberate the people and build a socialist Russia if they won. They did win. But their decision to use violence, even extreme violence, had a terrible effect on them and on Russia, and turned them into tyrants who were obsessed with the possibility that their enemies would try again to overthrow them and make it impossible to bring socialism to the Russian people. None of this excuses the atrocities the Bolsheviks committed, nor does it mean they were nice guys caught between a rock and hard place. They could have done things differently. But if they did, would they have won?
There was a great Marxist named Lenin Who did two or three million men in. That’s a lot to have done in But where he did one in That grand Marxist Stalin did ten in. - Robert Conquest 'You can't make an omelette without killing 40 000 people.' - Alexei Sayle, reflecting on his parents' communism
Also this man's solution to "regulate" social media is turning them into newspaper-like entities, owned / controlled by who if I dare ask? Who are the possible candidates, strongly interested in keeping strict control on what the population thinks to prevent any harm to their tribe while simultaneously spreading left-wing propaganda to increase their own power?
NGOs like the ADL already have quite a bit of say in what is allowable opinion and what goes against ToS on social media. The ADL were known as the "Brotherhood of the Cut" so I shall allow you to extrapolate from that what you will.
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
I’m definitely buying this book and telling everyone I know about this. I’ve been breaking my brain trying to understand what Trump supporters are “thinking “ if that’s the word, and here is the understanding we need.
Hmm ~ This generous ration of lickspittle is an insult to those of us that were around during WW2. How about we talk about the US SPACE FORCE and The Joker from Gotham City that initiated it.
2024….we are here once again. We need to stop it. Teach more history in schools…. Include comparisons to today’s world. Fight hard against banning books. Teach people to recognize propaganda….especially social media. Support a free press. Seek the truth. No one person has a solution to complex issues. Don’t fall for that line. Vote BLUE American!
Isn't social media censorship banning books? Which side is against the Jews? Which side works with big corporations? Trump took no money from corporations or big business yet the Dems took millions from big banks, big tech, big pharma Think man think
We could also say anomie also causes it. We see that people lose sense of direction (especially males) because society is changing too quickly for them to cope/adapt. We see that in the US today and just prior to Nazi rise pre-WWII.
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
Rather than take Mussolini at his word, it's a good idea to find out what his regime actually did, and find out whether it was anything like his many, many emissions of bullshit.
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
I'm not sure what you mean by this. I feel like a lot of democrats and progressives (with some exceptions) already recognize a lot of what this video expresses. Right?
Some people still don’t get it. The left and the centre are the solution - the populist right is the threat. Anyone who thinks that people like trump or Boris are the answer have been brainwashed. Not those opposing them!
@@jackmac2217 Thank you Jack! He said "fasci", but showed NAZI........... THE GERMAN SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY...................Ehem..........Mussolini was never a NAZI.
Paul you are the person who first introduced me to the concept of Neoliberalism, which started me off on a journey to become a socialist and later an anti-fascist. Thanks for that. However, I think you are mistaken to suggest that the UK left does not have a tangible, concrete alternative. I think you know this. Liberals put up barriers at every opportunity to prevent a Corbyn government. They're literally one of the greatest obstacles to progress.
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
The time for defining fascism and arguing over whether what we face is fascism is long past. Mason is talking about what we do to stop fascism, not spending a lot of time on defining it.
@@LeeZaslofsky : You cannot stop something you do not understand though. If people cannot define Fascism, they cannot stop is since they cannot even recognize it in the first place.
I don't understand why Fascism is described as "Far Right"? That's simply untrue. Who is the philosopher of fascism? That would be Giovanni Gentile. Born in 1875, he was one of the world’s most influential philosophers in the first half of the twentieth century. Gentile believed that there were two “diametrically opposed” types of democracy. One is liberal democracy, such as that of the United States, which Gentile dismisses as individualistic-too centered on liberty and personal rights-and therefore selfish. The other, the one Gentile recommends, is “true democracy,” in which individuals willingly subordinate themselves to the state. Like his philosophical mentor, Karl Marx, Gentile wanted to create a community that resembles the family, a community where we are “all in this together.” It’s easy to see the attraction of this idea. Indeed, it remains a common rhetorical theme of the left. Now, remember, Gentile was a man of the left. He was a committed socialist. For Gentile, fascism is a form of socialism-indeed, its most workable form. While the socialism of Marx mobilizes people on the basis of class, fascism mobilizes people by appealing to their national identity as well as their class. Fascists are socialists with a national identity. German Fascists in the 1930s were called Nazis- basically a contraction of the term “national socialist.” For Gentile, all private action should be oriented to serve society; there is no distinction between the private interest and the public interest. Correctly understood, the two are identical. And who is the administrative arm of the society? It’s none other than the state. Consequently, to submit to society is to submit to the state-not just in economic matters, but in all matters. Since everything is political, the state gets to tell everyone how to think and what to do. It was another Italian, Benito Mussolini, the fascist dictator of Italy from 1922 to 1943, who turned Gentile’s words into action. In his Dottrina del Fascismo, one of the doctrinal statements of early fascism, Mussolini wrote, “All is in the state and nothing human exists or has value outside the state.” He was merely paraphrasing Gentile. The Italian philosopher is now lost in obscurity, but his philosophy could not be more relevant because it closely parallels that of the modern left. Gentile’s work speaks directly to progressives who champion the centralized state. Here in America, the left has vastly expanded state control over the private sector, from healthcare to banking; from education to energy. This state-directed capitalism is precisely what German and Italian fascists implemented in the 1930s.
Probably because fascists are largely opposed to liberalism, socialism, Marxism, feminism (they believe in traditional gender roles), nontraditional sexuality, most forms of progressivism, and believe in hierarchy, might make right mentality, in group and out group mentality, and other right wing positions. Do you think it’s a coincidence that fascist groups like the KKK and Neo Nazis generally vote for republicans like trump? Also I haven’t met a leftist (being one myself) who believe that “all is in the state and nothing human exist or has value outside the state”.
There's no left in America. There are the liberals that are moderates or sit at the center and then you have the right, and then far right. There is no left. 🙄
@@isorokudono yes but relying on a divine philosopher king to free us from our chains is true freedumb lol, democracy is only mob rule if the decisions ppl are making collectively reap unbearable and unnecessary costs to a minority of ppl. Mob rule, depending on the situation, can be justified ie abolishing slavery or voting an authoritarian despot out of power
Fascism has a certain political meaning. Just because there are left-wing authoritarians does not mean they are "fascists". Fascism is specifically right wing and opposed to organized labour and any sort of issues pushed by the left.
I just stumbled upon this video, this is an excellent breakdown of the threat we are currently facing. We can’t underestimate fascism and its influence.
The problem is he’s out of touch and mostly fighting a straw man. The real threats of fascism come from intellectuals who are not Q believers or anti-science. If only it were that easy. The danger of his message, however well intentioned, is it leaves people totally unprepared to engage with the actual threat. Worse, the idea that we use BLM and lgbt activism is dangerously wrong. It’s precisely those movements that are causing a reaction: aka the right of the reactionary right. Alienating white men who disproportionately hold power is a guaranteed way to lose.
Hitler was a lifelong socialist. Who works with big tech, MSM and the intelligence agencies? Repub or Dem? Mason is a fascist yet probably doesn't even know. Look how the left hates Israel and the Jews. They have no self awareness
Okay, watching this in november 2023. The world is worse than before, I think it's one of the worst times humanity has ever gone through. Did you ever imagine there could be something worse than Second World War II? Watching it unfold on our phones while no onw does anything.
WWII was much worse than anything happening now. This is not one of the worst times humanity has gone through. Just the fact that China has raised hundreds of millions of people out of extreme poverty far overshadows the troubles we have today. There is no war between the great powers. Nothing in our time is remotely comparable to the Holocaust or the millions of people killed in WWII. There are no dictators as aggressive and murderous as Hitler, and none as murderous as Stalin.
@@joyvinci7338 : Nope. Fascists established a totalitarian government. They were against individualism and to them, liberal democracy was harmful because it was focused on the individual which led to selfishness. Now, what SCOTUS did was they took the issue of abortion from government's hands and gave it to the states i.e. to the people to vote for. Therefore effectively going against the ideology of fascism. Of course people may not like about the fact that in some red states it will be harder or impossible to do abortions but if majority of the people in those states agree, well, such is democracy.
He just sound left and communist, My first thought is WHY IS IT HAPPENING? What starts it? who? when? why so many contrys are going in the same directions? And by your rethoric you only say that your way is best, and all should be equal etc, but in real life those who rule in a left government are still the richest and get most benifits.. so this is kind of crap. It should be approched from another angel first..
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & Gentile . "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
oh im assuming yoyu mean because you've been herded into latching onto a series of uncontextualised illusions that make you instal blind belief into corrupt controller imposers that associate themselves with completely oposite and inappplicable metrics to what you percieved and in your lack of conscious experience / in lostness was herded into this broad blind belief vague format of thinking as only way as you know exists and you get termonology and definition mixed up ith what is completely opposite and without ever actually disecting actual metrics and thinking not that forward is back and back is forward and thinking that corrupt men that have been handed and who hand eachother everything through unmonitored regressive abuses to sustain there fragility and set us on a regressive self destructive and that your born ploped into and set to be immediately herded into this thin line of acceptable personality and expected developed not even beleifs but outlooks how distanced mislead and give you a series of uncontextualised illusions to get your latched onto and give you a mind frame make your opperative thought processes basis on blind belief fear out of your own incompetance and opperating by fear from your hindered unoncsicous incompetance
Fascism only serves itself not the nation or the people, it is a system of state and leader supremacy, think like a religious version of socialism, if socialism means the government control of the means of production then fascism means, that the rule of the state is the law or what the government says is the law, Keep in mind that at the end of the day capitalism, fascism, socialism, communism, are all just words by which a autocratic system is build on and in democracy were oligarchy rises one can unite them in their pursuit f power and dominacy,
Mason is an authoritarian who uses fears of fascism to enact his authoritarianism. He poses as a socialist, but in reality he's a treacherous liar who stabs friends in the back. He's a fake.
Hes right. But unfortunately, in the US, we are likely too late. But better late than never. How do we start? Its very real and becoming entrenched in leadership now. Anyone in Texas, Austin specifically?
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
Exactly. Neo liberalism depends upon the left vrs right illusion. They are co-dependendent. Watch out for imposters like him appearing with whippets and flat caps propping up the duopoly.
@@doom8082 "tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
"tuttu nello stato" was the slogan/definition of fascism by its founders, the socialists Mussolini & gentile. "Everything within the state; nothing outside the state". The social welfare - regulatory states of Europe are Mussolini's definition of fascism. Mussolini said said that he recognized US President Franklin Roosevelt as a fellow fascist
He's Jewish. They really do need to wear some sort of signifier, especially when talking on subjects that effect their host nations ( always negatively).
Great video with well made points. As you said, discussions need to be had about particulars, but Fascism needs to be stopped at every pathway. I'm proud to be completely against any fascist movements and views. I'm inspired to see that so many others are as well
He actually credits them as being the 1st form of modern Facism. Its not freedom and it is evil. It leads to mass murders , violence deemed acceptable for the state. It reminds me of " america first" and they call themselves "Patritots" as they incite sedition to overthrow democracy. No more public hate rallies and uniformed parades. And proud antifacism is required.
