Don't make them shorter. Don't sacrifice quality. Don't dumb down things into the ground. Please. The quality of your viewers is far more important than their quantity. Unless you want money that is. But i'm sure you don't do this to get rich. Great video.
I'm glad all those virtual particles are out there in the foam of space crowding around electrons. I don't want any positrons following me around all day.
One of the most fascinating physics talk I have listened. Your enthusiasm keeps the audience alive regardless of how difficult the subject might be. Thank you sir!
I heard many times about the wish of the physicists to unify force but I didn't know in which way they want to unify them. Now I know and I'm disappointed. Instead of looking for answers on what's the source of that forces and how magic happens they just were looking to unify is a graph. Thanks Lawrence.
This is fantastic. Real time Physics so we don't have to wait for a documentary to come out in a years time. Please don't shorten these videos Lawrence. Don't dumb down this absolutely fascinating subject. I think you have a reached a perfect balance, short enough for you to explain the topic fully, but not too long for it to become an 'information overload' for lay people like myself. Thanks again. Take care and stay safe.
Michio and Stephen were always trying to put things in a very vey very simple form. Often that was getting too far from the real meaning of the things they were trying to present. I like the challenge that you give, this is really boosting my neurons! Please don't change that :)
As complicated as the universe appears, one day, once we understand it fully (and we will) we will most probably say, it is not complicated at all. Thanks professor.
Then you'd like Lawrence Krauss's lecture: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing. It's not 5 min physics it's 1 hr 16 min physics that you can listen to/watch it here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vwzbU0bGOdc.html I'm no physicist but have some science background & was able to grasp at least some of it. Krauss is very good at explaining complex things in simpler terms. As Einstein said "if you can't explain it to a 6 year old, you don't understand it yourself." Krauss understands Something from Nothing. Ha, here's something from Krauss that you won't like #5minutephysics the Principle of Least Action in the Classical and Quantum Worlds. I'll bet you'll like it as the first comment is "Let me be the first to say thank you for the best fivetenfifteen minutes of the day. Cheers, Lawrence!"😊
@@lkrauss1 Can you develop that point further, perhaps with a reference? The physical, measurable [virtual particle] effects are more than just mathematical artifacts - which makes physics seem like magic. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_forces_and_virtual-particle_exchange#Path-integral_formulation_of_virtual-particle_exchange
@@lkrauss1 Curious what you think of this: www.quora.com/Is-there-a-pattern-to-the-mass-of-subatomic-particles/answer/Thad-Roberts A purely mathematical derivation of the physical constants, specifically the fine structure constant ~ spacetime as a superfluid.
Professor The roughly plotted data of the LHC you have shown clearly shows that there might be a unification of the four fundamental forces at some point which ofcourse require some modifications. I want to ask you that how theoretical physicist behave when they found out such kind of experimental evidences, i mean in perticular how one should modify his theory for super symmetry, what kind of mathematical form it will have. I have the knowledge of QFT, you can be specific while giving answer. Thankyou for videos that spark thoughts in mind.
! Творец из лучшего эфира, соткал живые струны мира и кванты музыки из квант струн, мы мыслями через очи пропуская, свой умом фильтруя на уста и как через зеркальце, но отражаем мир, изобретателя слепца - Царство хаоса из юных квант бутонов, где с лепестками квант мембран, свет энергией делясь, как ключами бутоны раскрывая Вселенную ускоряя - Расцветом плоских квант мембран «из квантов музыки, собирая фракталы квант частиц и при каждом своём танце - квант частица, неопределённо увлекает и разбрасывает, хаоса цветы» ... . Ну как то так представьте, самое лучшие и худшие предсказания в науке да и работу квантовой гравитации.
Does this video has to do with something similar with the Geometric Unity proposed by Mr. Eric Weinstein? It's also about a unified theory of 'everything'
I thought super symmetry (SUSY) got the convergence between strong, weak, and electric coupling constants, not specifically MSSM. What was the important difference between SUSY and MSSM?
when I see a quantum physics video gravity is a force and they want to unite all forces. When I watch a relativity video they clearly state that gravity is NOT a force. it is curvature to space. now I am puzzled. force or not force?
Cool video, but one question: Is maths a fundamental part of nature and thereby discovered, or is maths invented by humans such that its a coincidene it sometimes applies accurately to nature?
What is your view of Matt Strassler's comments here : profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/virtual-particles-what-are-they/ where he explains why he thinks : "A virtual particle is not a particle at all. It refers precisely to a disturbance in a field that is *not* a particle."
so the positrons virtual particles surrounding the electron could be actually real particle from higher dimensions, as the quarks are to lower dimensions as we cannot interact with the higher ones, have the energy to interact from their realm of reality???
actually proton and neutron held together by higher bonding strength of the strong field(tauonic field), no different to the periodic tables or that of the range of photons wavelengths
