@@danielv1617 No, it should be narrated by somebody who isn’t a preaching, patronising, sanctimonious bore. Somebody who hasn’t spent the last sixty years standing on the shoulders of giants.
Let's just think about the fact that living beings started to use noises (in order to communicate) only after a certain period of time. Early animals weren't able to growl, scream or bark and they used scents, magnetism, touch and light instead. Earth in that period was a silent planet, water fire wind and earthquakes were the only things able to produce sound and I can only imagine how alone and lost a human would feel there.
I kinda wish they used this logic thought the films, like the first jp did, yea big music pieces are needed but you can create allot of tension with very little, also we don’t need corny characters. Ian malcom was eccentric but he was also sexist a bit of a dick, but then got serious when he saw what was going on.
This is not a realistic view of our world 65 million years ago, Giganotosaurus and T Rex did not exist in the same time period and T Rex did not have feathers
To save on special effects it was decided in studio that creating a working time machine was cheaper than getting the super computers for processing the special effects. Like Stanley Kubrick did with the moon landings. All filmed on location to save money.
Or during the time when Job 40 was written, and other historic accounts "the science" and "chosen history" works so hard to deny and reject. Read a literal translation of Job from Bible Gateway with the notes at the bottom, try English Standard Version.
Did they travel back in time for that opening scene?? That looked insane. Edit: The sheer volume of nerds and geeks on this comment second is simply hilarious. Thank you.
It was leak like a year ago. About the opening scene being back time, and it’s supposed to like reveal the meteor hitting the dinosaurs. The people who had the chance to see it, said it was extremely breath taking! So I can’t wait!! I can tell that most of the opening scene must’ve been cropped and edited. Obviously so they don’t give everything away! But can’t wait!
When I was a child, if I had seen this opening scene I would have believed it had to be REAL footage of Dinosaurs taken using a Time Machine. Movie Magic has entered the Platinum Age of special effects and I'm on board 100%.
I still felt that way as a 9 yr old seeing the first Jurassic Park. That movie still holds up because of it's many practical effects. 2000-2020 it was this CGI limbo where you could tell it was fake. Like CGI yoda etc.
Except the T-Rex never looked like that in real life (look of the head is all wrong, just find a picture of Sue the T Rex for a more accurate one). Also, the hands of the animal could only face inward (like if you were clapping), so the movie version of it with the hands facing downward is wrong.
I think the starting scene is a cool concept without any humans and just dinosaurs and you kind of imagine what the dinosaurs are thinking about and how the story goes in your head that would be pretty cool
I really like how Rexy doesn't just start attacking everyone in sight, just sort of wanders through the drive in like she's not quite sure what all these people are doing. She might be a predator, but she doesn't have it in for humans... she's just a wild animal doing what she needs to survive.
A croc or a lion or any other large predator would attack, kill and eat any feasible prey like this, animals have instinct, it's not about having it in for something.
Yeah I just watched it yesterday and couldn't find this scene. It was ridiculous we couldn't know that why were Giga and Rexy fighting. This should be the back story for why they were.
Love how the original t Rex has hair/feathers on its skin while the current one doesn’t, to show how despite filling in the genome the current dinosaurs are not truly accurate
That was the whole thing in the original novel in fact. Doctor Wu explained that they would hatch the animals without knowing and tweak the mix of the modern animal DNA with the incomplete DNA found. The clones were made to look as an approximation to what was known then or what people expected. They weren't really Dinosaurs, they were chimeras, hybrids of different species that would look like Dinosaurs in the image of what was discovered at the time. That was the whole point of having Allan Grant and Ellie Sattler at the Park, to approve on the look and partial behavior of the creatures to Hammond. Crap got really messed up when they started behaving outside of what was expected and Wu even suggested to Hammond to scrap the batch they had and hatch a few new batch that was more controllable. Many of the characteristics such as color and even poison or snake like attributes were part of the DNA mixing in the cloning process.
Jurassic park is all wrong with the fact that every dinosaur fighting with Trex doesn’t die from the 6 ton bite. And of course, this epilogue has a flashback to the time period of the dinosaurs with trex and acrocanthosaurus or giganotosaurus or whatever dinosaur that is living together and competing. Trex really never lived with any other large predators nor was in any competition with them
And bold move making the first hero shot of an Oviraptor with pronated wrists eating an egg, establishing right away that the movie is not going to even try to be accurate to the science
I don't want to be that you but I see here the same shitty problems of the last film: The people being so stupid and the dinosaurs being treated like a slasher guy who is nearly unbeatable. Come on we eradicated mamuts and another beasts with similar size of dinosaurs with only stones, bones, wood, torch and spears. How and why in the hell why can't kill a bunch of giant animals with all the technology?
@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 plot convenience, the writers can't be assed to come up with any real conflicts. just easier to make the humans absolute spanners. they've seen the audience eats it up anyway, so why bother
@@neito.m.6741 Right? We've got a 12-ton Carnivore running free but no worries! We'll wait til it gets tired to catch it. Even though we have a helicopter and thermal imaging technology.
As much as I love Jurassic Park, there's simply no way Giganotosaurus and T-Rex could've ever met (different part of the world, tens of millions of years apart).
That was incredibly well thought out. Beautiful imagination! When The T Rex drops, and the shot zooms in on the eye, and then the mosquito landing on it.... Wow. That's some serious attention to detail.
Conversely, this means that the existence of the fan favorite Rexy is based on a story that she was killed by a giga that was already extinct (died out arround 30mio years befor the t-rex) at the time. is that supposed to be the story for rexy?
The T-Rex's tail hitting the tranquillizer dart stuck in the windshield for a split second at 4:57. hoooooly crap the amount of detail these artists put into this is incredible
I disagree greatly sir but hey that’s my opinion And your opinion is that movie sucked which I think is wrong but stew it’s my opinion and your opinion it’s
Honestly, all I cared about when watching the movie was the more accurate dinosaurs and the Dimetrodon. Unfortunate that they still have the Dilophosaurus spit venom, though
@@TheChosenOne1098 but ronin the movie did suck and this scene was not in movie but it gives a hint that this gigantasaurus kicks the trex ass like it did in movie.
No, its not. They didnt lived at the same age and if they did, T-rex would stomp giga due the fact of be much more bulkier, stronger bite, heavier and build to fight directly, while Giga was build bite and run. That movie sucks.
@@FeroxX_Gosu Doesnt mean that It have to be a extremely dumb movie which leads the average person to misinformation. Unfortunately movies like that have a underrated responsibility.
@@triplocore JP's only responsibility is to make children pick up a Dino book or documentary after they watch a JP movie and they definietly live up to that! Hell, I even searched for dino stuff after the movie for days to get myself up to date with the recent scientific results and watched the Apple documentary "Prehistoric Planet".
@@FeroxX_Gosu If you really believe that more than 1% really do that, I have a bad news for you. The majority will just take it as reality, I lived it in my skin, I was the children who get to read the books about that after watch the movie, but my friends, all of them, assumed that JP3 was the truth and spino really could beat the T-rex. That new JW movie is just the same. Giganotosaurus was inferior to T-rex in absolute ALL ASPECTS, but who care? A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a truth. Kids who just see that movie will just believe that they lived together and T-rex was a prey, thats it. Just one or another will bother to search it, and half of them will just keep the same opinion even reading the truth and search by wrong source to enforce his beliefs because the average person dont like to believe that his visions was wrong.
I love the fact that instead of making the T-rex roar really loudly a whole heap, they made them mostly do a super low pitch growl/rumble like how they actually did.
@@mortenskands201 See above comment. We can make accurate speculations based on things like the shape of skull cavities and estimated biomass, along with the use of infrasound technology to get an idea of what it might've sounded like. Is it gonna be 100% accurate? Probably not, but we can get close.
This looks absolutely stunning, but as a lifelong paleontology junky the whole Tyrannosaurus vs Giganotosaurus absolutely killed me, especially after they sort of hyped up how "accurate" it was going to be, but then again this is Jurassic Park so I shouldn't really expect scientific accuracy because 1-that isn't the focus of the movie, and 2-Cool fight scene.
@@ozzywalker609 "stealing" the eggs refers to eating them. Which we have zero evidence for in oviraptor and again, is based on the misidentification of its own eggs.
Crazy how they even got the fauna right. Millions of years ago earth would've looked like a different planet compared too nowadays. I would LOVE too see these guys make dino documentaries like the ones I used too watch as a kid. The next genoration would LOVE it and personally I would too
I am absolutely BLOWN AWAY that they cut this from the final film. Not a SINGLE SHOT of any of this masterpiece made y the final cut and that’s hard to understand why. The REAL beginning was crap, just like the rest of film. It’s like there were two versions, the b movie made in the basement fan movie and the real billion dollar Hollywood version we expected and we got the B movie.
Man i loved those early 2000's dinosaur documentaries. The ones where it was all about the dinosaurs and not paleontologists. Cuz at one point dino documentaries pretty much became fossil record documentaries, some of the most boring shi--
Yeah man, that's what probably happened 65 million years ago, a deformed Giganotosaurus fighting against a Tyrannosaurus in a random Savannah somewhere because why not am I right? This probably happened for sure, I'm feeling it.
The fact that they finally, in-movie, nodded to the fact that the dinosaurs in the time of the movie were far from historically accurate through the appearances and behavior of many of the past ones is incredible. Still not perfect, but it's enough to get the point across that they were engineered and it makes me so excited for this movie! EDIT: Okay apparently I didn't make it clear enough that I was referring to the fact that we've never been given a physical comparison or direct reference to modern paleontology concepts such as presence of feathers, just a blurb in the speech about how other genes were spliced in without seeing what the dinosaurs would've looked like without them.
@Jon Hesson first of all he never said that, chill the fuck out, and second of all rex was thought to have some feathers when they were young but shed them as they turned into adults
@Jon Hesson That's not exactly true unless you count dinosaurs like Archaeopteryx, which have existed since over 150 million years ago in the Jurassic, as not resembling birds. The origins of complex feathers lie even further back, in the middle to early Jurassic, based on the fact that most major groups of feathered coelurosaur theropods seem to have diverged from each other there. Barring the pretty much non-existent possibility that different groups of theropod dinosaurs evolved feathers independently of each other, then at the very least the last common ancestor of pretty much any coelurosaur (including Tyrannosaurs AND birds) would have had at least protofeathers too, given there is concrete evidence that the earliest tyrannosaurs possessed protofeathers and lost them secondarily in later genera. I do agree that the fluffy rex portrayed here is now an outdated look, and that many dinosaurs would not have possessed feathers, but it's no good to exaggerate the other side of the argument.
Every therapod in the T rex family tree has been proven to have feathers, except T rex ofcourse. It is widely believed that t rex lost it's feathers the way elephants lost their hair.
@Jon Hesson The majority of *very large non-coelurosaurian* dinosaurs did not have feathers (and this isn't even getting into the possibility that theropod protofeathers may be homogenous, thus shared by a common ancestor, with the quills found in some ornithischians and even the pycnofiber hair of pterosaurs). Archaeopteryx isn't even the first feathered or bird-like dinosaur in the fossil record, and it definitely didn't sprout complex feathers overnight. Fossils of even older forms like Epidipteryx from 165 million years ago and Anchiornis from 167 million years ago also preserve complex feathers, and these indicate there was a massive radiation of feathered, gliding forms that can trace its origins to the Early Jurassic. These forms gave rise to the better known dromeosaurs, as well as the line that led to birds, and the likelihood that the ancestors of Tyrannosaurs would have split off from this lineage before it even developed complex, vaned feathers, as well as the presence of a full, fluffy integument in basal coelurosaurs such as Sinosauropteryx indicates there was a very large diversity of small to medium-sized feathered dinosaurs since at least the early Jurassic, as the earliest undisputed Tyrannosauroids are Middle Jurassic in age.
Let’s goo and I’m a big fan of dinosaurs and my mom always like I love dinosaurs like I had so many dinosaurs when I was little I had a T. rex shirt and I was a big fan of the Jurassic park and world movie and now there a new one I’m so hyped for next year
@@bxtman1 if youre a big fan of dinosaurs why do you like jurassic park an furthermore in what deranged state of mind do you need to be to believe this looked anything more than widely unrealistic and plain shoddy writing
Unbelievably real graphics.... I've always waited for jurassic park/world movies... every single movie in the series was extremely captivating and great!
@@southpakrules Rexy (the T-Rex) is female, as were most, if not all of the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park. (Of course there was the matter of the frog dna, and some species spontaneously changing sex and therefore were able to mate. Rexy was the only t-rex at Isla Nublar, so no reason for her to sex change)
@@southpakrules Bro, do not start with all this of assuming genres and that, it is a movie, it is made to enjoy, so do that, and science is not racist, science is the most exact thing there is, so do not say nonsense and enjoy the video.
@@southpakrules mmmkay so even though I'm pretty sure you're just looking for an argument, it was stated that all dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female but are able to reproduce asexually because if tree frog DNA that was put into their genome to help them acclimate to modern temperatures as was other modern animal DNA. (Which explains why most of the dinosaurs don't look accurate to scientific interpretation.) Reproducing asexually = a single creature, in this case a dinosaur, reproduces by cloning itself. It does not require a member of the opposite sex to breed, however in some cases if not all (I'm not too sure about this next part) things that reproduce asexually can also reproduce via opposite sex. So yes. Rexy is a female. However there are a few hints that males do exist occasionally throughout the Jurassic Park franchise. I.E. The rich dude in Fallen Kingdom specifying that the allosaurus being auctioned is a juvenile female.
Oh you just gotta listen to some VFX artists talk, what they have to do and research, behind the scenes or breakdowns . There's a tremendous amount of conscious detail put in the big expensive visual effects.
For a minute there I thought this is a trailer for a documentary film for National Geographic or the History Channel. WOW! That was one hell of a teaser trailer.
@@YusuffYT it was released that it’s not even going to be in the movie which makes it even more awesome. That’s countless dollars in CGI just to make a (fantastic!) RU-vid video. In fact, it looks like Universal is doing something unique here where instead of releasing the first trailer they release a full blown “prologue”. We already had the first trailer for Jurassic World and Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom by this point. Looks like we’ll get the actual trailer during the Super Bowl. I kinda like this plan!
I was 10 when Jurassic Park came out. I thought it was amazing then. If I was a kid and saw this video, I'm certain I'd just have put this on constant replay.
I for sure thought this was gonna be some fake mock up cgi trailer with clips mashed together from all the other movies, but I was pleasantly surprised! Can’t wait to see it!
I was totally bummed when it wasn’t in it. When the film started and the first scene came on, I was like “Did I miss something or did they not put it in??”
This entire trailer looked amazing, I still haven’t seen fallen kingdom but I can’t wait to watch these 2 movies. Also love the department of fish and wildlife showing up from the second evolution game
The opening was absolutely awesome. 65 million years ago was so awesome. The dinosaurs just roaming the world with no humans . And the rex vs giganotasaurus was so awesome. Crichton was right
In the first movie TREX walking caused those ground shakes, (remember the water cup ripples) but now he can ninja stealth (at a full run) straight into a crowded drive in theater with no one hearing or feeling a thing? They've reduced the sense of weight these creatures had... JP1 will always be the best movie for all the little details they used to really bring the dinos to life.
Also, no one looked in their rear view mirror to see the T-Rex coming and then read in horror the warning on that mirror: Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear! :-)
Not the Sharpest Tool in the Shed. African Elefant Weighs up to 6 Tons. T Rex is Estimated between 7- 8 Tons. An Elefant can Surprise charge you, you do not here them Walking. A Rex Has Predator Feet to make him Quite.
@@MaxVax-dh7rh Have you seen an Xray of an elephant's foot? The bottom is all fat pad. A TREX foot is built different. And it doesn't matter anyway because in JP1 they established the thumping and shaking when it walks... I only pointed out that they seem to have forgotten that detail.
@@mr.mediocregamer9653 I agree that it seemed Scarier and Better in JP 1. Not real but better for a Movie. I actually hate all after the first 2. They should Make the Books into a Movie. Way Better. It needs to be a PG 18 Movie. Have you seen the Books?
Firing a very low velocity, fin stabilized, unbalanced projectile, out a of a extremely short barrel, large caliber smoothbore. Its more of a guess then aiming. The projectile will have a ton of velocity change meaning excessive drop and wind effects, and its moving too slow to really stabilize as regular bullets rely on spin while fins rely on sufficient speed and being aerodynamic. It likely doesn't stabilize in the barrel meaning it might not exit "straight" and come out at a slight and different angle every time like a nerf gun. On top of that because it wont stabilize right, it might not fly straight either. Also shooting out of a moving helicopter is extremely weird and hard to do. They move a lot even when hovering. And when they are moving steady in a direction that really complicates lead and windage. And something like that giant ass slow moving non-aerodynamic syringe being shot will be affected by the rotors swirling downwash, where as a aerodynamic bullet will not. Also the liquid sloshing around inside of it in flight will alter the center of gravity and further unstabilize it. So no that's not that unrealistic. Having that gun on hand with the proper ammo to local police is.
@@johnlivingston9217 And how does a Trex 1) see a dart no bigger than a finger from that distance with a spotlight blinding him and 2) have the brain capacity to understand what the dart is and to duck away from it to avoid getting tranquilized. Buuuull shit!
omg i love the detail of the trex having feathers and the modern day trex having none is just so amazing' you wouldnt notice those in a theatre (probably) you could only notice those in your monitor
Imprints are what shows scales or feathers and TRex had scales. A very good Rex with several patches from different parts of the body was found in the early 2000s. Most dinosaurs have no evidence of scales it’s really just assumptions which has less to do about science and more to do about selling books and getting grants. To be a successful paleontologist you kinda have to grift money out of people to fund digs and research. That’s one thing Jurassic Park got absolutely correct nothing will get a paleontologist to move like funding.
@@GeraltofRivia22 Please stop going around the comments section and just blabbing to everyone that T-rex didn't have feathers. It's still up for debate because there's surprisingly a ton of evidence T-rex possessing feathers such as it's close relative Dilong and Yutyrannus having feathers.
Movie makers come up with all kinds of spins and stunts, this time it's the One and Only Archipelago of Socotra. Socotra..... Alien, wonderful a place like no other. Having been to incredible Soqotra a number of times - to have the Island in the opening scene of Jurassic World, is fascinating and surreal to watch. In this clip, I notice that almost all the scenes used - I have been in, one time or another: the Dragon Blood trees high up on the plate (two main sites on the Island have most of these extraordinary trees), the mountains with piled sand (which is actually near a beach), the stream with date palms (the birds in the distance are real because they are there now), the blue pond, the cave (I have been in) - I can easily recognise these.
since I was a kid until now, I still can't believe life evolved like that, it makes me wonder how aliens would have evolved, even on Earth the variety was just insane
I love how they added feathers to the T-rex: that makes him more realistic and get the approve of the science. And there are 10 different species of reptiles in a 5 mins video. I bet this movie is awesome.
Dinosaurs never had hair or feathers. Every claimed example is only a half decomposed specimen with streamers of rotting flesh. The only real reason they are shown with feathers is because of an a priori philosophical commitment to believing that they are related to birds, because of the reverse leggedness of theropods
@@horrificpleasantry9474 yeah, this is one of the differences between avians and non-avians, but there are actually lots of dinosaurs with feathers, like the ovoraptors. Or am I in the bad?
@@6666Imperator dinosaur enemy= ROAARRRR dinorsaur juvi trying to take some of the ded dinosaur ur pack killed= snap roar herbivore when carnivores coming= uhuhhuhuhuh raptor calling pack for attack= intense screaching
I know the prehistoric intro has a lot of anachrostic and spatially displaced stuff going on, but I like the real life power dynamic between the Carnosaurs (represented by the Giga), and the Tyrannosaurids (T-rex, obviously). The Giga is presented here as the king who rules over this land, being attended to by its subjects who flee the moment the newcomer T-rex shows up to challenge it. In real life, the Carnosaurs like Allosaurus, Giga, and Carcharodontosaurus were the dominant land predators from the late jurassic into the mid cretaceous, before they vanished and were replaced in the north by Tyrannosaurs and in the south by Abeilsaurs who took up their role as "The big scary apex predator". While the Rex loses this fight and the Giga continues its reign, it's a clear reminder of what will eventually happen to the current dominant predator, and who will replace it...
Computer animation and graphics at the highest level.Most of all I liked the beginning, where there are no people, but only dinosaurs, looking at them as they lived on the earth of that time.
people in the comments be like: "i love how they made X look accurate" while giganotosaurus and t-rex lived almost 30 millions years apart from each other. interestingly, if you want to know who'd win in a fight between them, google the skulls of both animals and look at the difference in bone mass.
Yeah and the part with ovi pisses me off as there’s actually no evidence for it eating eggs and the original fossil was probably a mother protecting her eggs.
This scene is stunning. Although 66 million years ago is more historically accurate. Great stuff! In a 2013 paper, Paul Renne of the Berkeley Geochronology Center dated the impact at 66.043±0.011 million years ago, based on argon-argon dating.
kind of annoying that they always try to do a bigger bad than t rex, considering that the two species that they have go toe to toe with it would be crushed. spinosaurus had a very specialized body plan (understandable that this wasn't necessarily known at the time) that would have been a hinderance in combat but allowed it to avoid competing with other large carnivores, and giganotosaurus/mapusaurus (whichever this one is supposed to be) had a much lighter build than tyrannosaurus rex. I feel like it's lazy to constantly try to one up the beast that terrorized the first two films, but I guess relying on nostalgia has made them millions so far, so why stop? at least they finally gave the damn things some feathers.
you don't even understand that all the dinosaurs in the present are genetically modified. that spinosaurus wasn't made to look like what a spinosaurus used to look like. also they don't have feathers because they filled the missing genome in with amphibian DNA not bird DNA
The thing the writers like too do is make the plotholes into part of the plot. Similarity to how we didn’t know dinosaurs had feathers they filled that plot hole up by just stating that it was cuz of the frog DNA. The Spino in Jurassic park 3 wasn’t completely known at the time, nowadays I’m assuming the plot device they’ll use to explain it is that the Spino is simply a modified super weapon dinosaur that’s built to be super strong. As for the Giga beating the Trex? It looked more like the Trex died from the fall, but judging by the pan in to the mosquito taking the Trexs blood, and then cutting to our Rexy, I’m willing to bet that there’s gonna be a different scene in the movie of Rexy fighting and beating a Giga
@@cupcakeeater3462 bud they had plenty of time to change that, starting with JP3 but continuing for two more moves, but they chose not to so that they could reuse assets. and i was giving them a pass for their incorrect spinosaurus, just calling it a lazy plot device. further more, those dinos were from 65 million years ago. not only did trex not share an environment with any of the giganotosaurus, the depiction was highly inaccurate.
@@cupcakeeater3462 and thats a huge assumption to boot. I've watched the first three a combined total of at least 20 times. there has a marked decline with each movie starting with the JP3.
@@_shenanigans_8337 the frog dna thing is not great, its the best they could do but not great, because feathers are ancestral to the most basal of dinosaurs, from even before they split with pterosaurs. and i gave them the pass on the appearance of the spino, but i still think the "it's a bigger threat you've never seen before" plot device is lazy writing, and not one that only applies to Jurassic park
This is the best scene any of these movies since the first Jurassic Park came out. Would pay to sit in a theater and just see their budget recreate 90 minutes of it.
I am going to be honest. I really just would like to watch the beginning part of the video and take that as movie. Imagine someone acting as a cave man during this time, would be neat.
It would be cool to see that movie done with Megafauna though, there were some crazy freaking animals in our time, done with this level of graphics would be awesome
I think it’s crazy at one point dinosaurs were alive. I think the saddest thing is so many species thru the lifetime of this planet we won’t discover cause there isn’t a specimen left.
It's crazy how the fly can just insert it's sucker into the T. rex scale so easily but in fallen kingdom, it's hard for Claire to insert the blood tester or whatever it's called to insert the blood testing thingy into the Rexy's scale.
Can we take a stroll back 29 years ago and find out how to make a good and exciting well written movie with amazing real looking effects?. 🤔 I miss those days.
I usually don't say "movies/music was better back in the days." But I really don't like the cgi in Jurassic World. Even if it's good it looks fake. The robots used in the old movies looked incredible (and still do)
