Тёмный

6G in the Upper Mid-Band: The Rise of Gigantic MIMO 

Wireless Future
Подписаться 27 тыс.
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.
50% 1

For the last five years, most of the research into wireless communications has been motivated by its potential role in 6G. After this exploratory phase, it is time to identify which new technology components will make it into the standard and eventually into practical networks. It has recently become clear that 6G networks will operate in the upper mid-band from 7 to 25 GHz, which has been called the "golden band" since it offers more spectrum than current 5G networks in the 3.5 GHz band and much better propagation conditions than at mmWave frequencies. The most interesting new frequency range is around 7.8 GHz, where 650-1275 MHz of spectrum might become available, depending on the country. This might seem like a lot, but it is far from enough to reach the ambitious 6G requirements defined by the International Telecommunications Union.
For 6G to deliver on its promises, we also need a leap in the antenna technology - from "Massive MIMO" in 5G to "Gigantic MIMO" in 6G. In this video, Professor Emil Björnson explains the anticipated development with a focus on how many antenna elements we need to overcome the pathloss challenge, how to reach the theoretical peak bit rates, how to achieve impressive typical rates using spatial multiplexing, and how to utilize radiative near-field propagation effects for more precise communication, localization, and sensing. He also identifies four open research areas where new contributions have good prospects to affect the actual 6G technology implementation.
This talk was first delivered at the NGMA-ETI 2nd QMUL ‘6G’ Workshop, Queen Mary University of London, July 11, 2024.
The slides are available here: github.com/emi...
If you want to learn more, we recommend the following article:
Emil Björnson, Ferdi Kara, Nikolaos Kolomvakis, Alva Kosasih, Parisa Ramezani, and Murat Babek Salman, “Enabling 6G Performance in the Upper Mid-Band Through Gigantic MIMO,” arXiv:2407.05630.
arxiv.org/pdf/...

Опубликовано:

 

8 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 36   
@James_Knott
@James_Knott Месяц назад
As one who studied Electrical Engineering, with a focus on telecommunications systems, along with a long career in telecom, it's nice to see proper technical videos such as this.
@SoapinTrucker
@SoapinTrucker Месяц назад
So, you like the video, yeah?
@pitmaler4439
@pitmaler4439 2 дня назад
In your new book on page 529-530, you write that the term beamforming gain is also called aperture gain. In the solution of exercise 9.2 c) you write "....The beamforming gain from the reflection is missing in a), but the aperture gain remains." That is contradicting. Thank you. Edit: now I got it, the aperture gain is the gain we get through larger A_eff. Nonerheless, this sentence gives the impression that all these terms are the same.(the sentence on the page change).
@isaunnununu
@isaunnununu Месяц назад
Great video! This is a very neat summary of 6G in the Upper Mid-Band. However, to my knowledge, the identified candidate bands for IMT are primarily for 4G/5G, as the ITU-R is still developing and evaluating RITs and SRITs for IMT-2030. By the time a decision is made regarding these bands at WRC-27, IMT-2030 will still be under study. Am I missing something?
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
WRC-27 is the last WRC before the product development and deployment of 6G will begin, so it is the last chance to assign new bands to IMT before that. In principle, any IMT band could be used for 4G, 5G, or 6G. But it is natural that a new generation uses a new band so it will not collide with legacy networks and will have access to substantially more bandwidth. When the ITU has finished the IMT-2030 requirements, there will be a submission period in 2027-2029 for RITs. We describe the timelines for 6G development in 3GPP and ITU in the following video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-70BOKA0PmdE.htmlsi=kqzkvrVkk9ZlbSBm
@TommyB-l3e
@TommyB-l3e 19 дней назад
I have a question to an exercise. It is about that capacity expression (OFDM MIMO - 7.10). The solution is C=2S*ld(1+2*q*beta/N0). It is just about the SNR expression. It is surely from the equation...(1+(q_opt*s^2)/N0). The s is 2 for both H (just one sing. value) So 2^2 is 4, but we have 2 in the nominator. I assume q_opt is q/2. But I don't know why? Because we have 2 transmit antennas? But we have just one sing. value, with (7.49), I don't get to q_opt=q/2 with that equation. Thanks a lot.
@jonnalagaddatharunkumar303
@jonnalagaddatharunkumar303 Месяц назад
very informative lecture; thank you so much.
@TheGmr140
@TheGmr140 Месяц назад
Nice overview 😊
@brunofelipecosta746
@brunofelipecosta746 Месяц назад
Thank you for the excellent video. The content was truly insightful. I have a question regarding the MUSIC algorithm example. With the increase of four separated subarrays, the Fraunhofer distance now becomes quite large. Will the same effect be observed in the near-field reactive zone? If so, will the users in that example be positioned within this zone? Thank you in advance for your clarification. Best regards,
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
The reactive near-field zone of an array of half-wavelength-spaced antennas is larger than the reactive near-field of an individual antenna. However, the considered subarrays are far outside each others’ reactive near-field zones so they will not affect each other or grow with the number of subarrays.
@danielaspin3840
@danielaspin3840 Месяц назад
Good video!
@Manidipa-v9v
@Manidipa-v9v Месяц назад
I want to know details about spatial layers and sub antenna array formation. how do these impact the capacity?
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
Spatial layers are data signals sent at the same time and frequency, but with different spatial directivity. It is like listening to two songs at same time - one with each ear. The capacity increases almost proportionally to the number of spatial layers. The word “almost” refers to that we need to divide the signal power between the layers and that there might be interference between the layers. With subarrays, we can reduce the latter losses since the spatial resolution of the transmission improves.
@jasminnadic2103
@jasminnadic2103 Месяц назад
I am about exercise 6.11 from your great book. Can you give me an approach how we get to that result in a) (P*beta_k/4.....), please? I am struggeling there. Thank you.
@user-xv7wy7od4k
@user-xv7wy7od4k Месяц назад
Thanks for the insightful video. One of the issue of catering demands is the bandwidth of arrays (operational). What if we have massive bandwidths to operate using the same array (saying a few tens of gigs) ? Theoretically we can get this by connected linear arrays but they are susceptible to high mutual coupling. Why can’t we use connected arrays in base stations?
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
To my understanding, base stations are unlikely to have contiguous bandwidths that are larger than the operational bandwidth of an array. The problem rather arises due to carrier aggregation of multiple bands that are too far apart to use the same array. The industry has started to make products with so-called "interleaved arrays" where arrays for low and mid bands are integrated into the same box. As you pointed out, their design is intricate due to mutual coupling and other non-ideal electromagnetic effects, but it can apparently be done. Ericsson mentions one of its products on this page: www.ericsson.com/en/portfolio/networks/ericsson-radio-system/antenna-system/antenna/passive-antenna
@jorgesanchez3244
@jorgesanchez3244 Месяц назад
@@WirelessFuture In the USA, the 6705 Ericsson radio is used for the 28 GHz band (considered mmWave), which can use up to 8 continuous 100 MHz carriers. Regarding interleaved arrays, a passive antenna with multiple ports is used, using the 4449 (new version 4490) low band radios and the 8843 (new version 4890 Ericsson) mid band radios. These configurations are widely used, using NR in 850 MHz and LTE in midband. For antennas, many brands are used, such as Commscope, JMA, etc. For C-band (NR), there are other antennas or radios from Ericsson considered, but they depend on which can be used, but there are like 3 options (2 antennas and 1 radio). I hope this helps.
@christerwiberg1
@christerwiberg1 Месяц назад
How will power consumption be affected in the carrier network between 5G and 6G, at least estimated? I guess it will increase roughly about the level of bandwidth, is that correct?
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
Yes, the transmit power at base stations is proportional to the bandwidth. The total power consumption also contains digital computations and losses in radio circuits. The latter things can also increase with the bandwidth and/or number of antennas, but are also improved by the gradual hardware improvements that happen all the time. I think the general goal of 6G will be to deliver much more data and better services with roughly the same total power consumption.
@hyiux
@hyiux Месяц назад
In the past each new generation used to bring more bandwidth, more antennas, and more base stations per unit geographical area. 6G seems to continue with the trend of more bandwidth and more antennas but what about network densification? Is their any juice left in that idea or have we pretty much squeezed out every single drop out of that?
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
When there is a need for more capacity, network operators have a choice between adding more base station sites or using a higher MIMO dimension at existing sites. The latter was not a real option until 4G LTE Advanced, and network densification has become less attractive since then. The fact that 5G mmWave networks have failed to become economically sustainable is an example of how further densification is unattractive. So yes, we have squeezed out the most we can from that. What remains is the battle between WiFi and 5G/6G in private networks, where the telecom industry hopes to make money from guaranteeing better performance than in WiFi.
@hyiux
@hyiux Месяц назад
@@WirelessFuture Thanks for taking time to answer this. Glad you clarified this aspect.
@iulisloizacarias9737
@iulisloizacarias9737 Месяц назад
Hi! Thanks for the nice explanation! (btw, there is a tiny typo on slide 9 2403 -> 2304 :)
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
Thanks for watching and for noticing the typo!
@James_Knott
@James_Knott Месяц назад
@@WirelessFuture Why is your reply 5 hours earlier than the post you're replying to? Proactive? 🙂
@rogerfroud300
@rogerfroud300 Месяц назад
Don't you just love the way they never bother rolling out one generation to everyone before leapfrogging it with another one we don't need yet. Governments should force service providers to guarantee a minimum rollout before they're allowed to even begin rolling out the next one.
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
A cellular generation is first developed under 10 years and then deployed a refined under another 10-15 years. That is why 6G is being developed now even if 5G has only been partially deployed. You are right that many of the new anticipated 5G services remain to be commercialized, particularly those that go beyond “faster speeds” and “capacity for more users”.
@James_Knott
@James_Knott Месяц назад
It takes many years to roll out a new G, with significantly more advanced tech. Also, you're not forced to drop an existing G and then jump to a new one. My carrier still has 2G and 3G available, in addition to 5G. So not a lot of people are forced to run out and get a new phone. Even when that happens, carriers around here will offer a free replacement, though it won't be the latest and greatest. The older tech will be gradually phased out, until it's time to pull the plug on it.
@Henni12-j4w
@Henni12-j4w Месяц назад
Thank you, when changing an equation, we calculate often with matrices and vectors. When I multilply with vector h2, I must then take h2^H because of the dimensions. Is that right h1=.../h2. |*h2 h2^H*h1=..... otherwise it would not fit the dimensions (h1*h2=...). Thank you
@WirelessFuture
@WirelessFuture Месяц назад
Yes, h2^H h1 is called the inner product or dot product between two vectors, and it is a measure of how similar they are. I don’t know what equations you are analyzing, but the basic matrix and vector equations for MIMO communications can be found in my open access book: www.nowpublishers.com/article/BookDetails/9781638283140
Далее
Will A Guitar Boat Hold My Weight?
00:20
Просмотров 68 млн
Я ЖЕ БЕРЕМЕННА#cat
00:13
Просмотров 422 тыс.
Fixing Plastic with Staples
00:18
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Three Misconceptions in Near-Field Communications
13:49
SpaceX Finally Gives Out The BIG Starship News!
21:27
Просмотров 742 тыс.
How To Start An ISP (like it's 1993)
16:54
Просмотров 187 тыс.
Will A Guitar Boat Hold My Weight?
00:20
Просмотров 68 млн