7 Moments When Spirit Of The Game Dies In Cricket 

You have described English mentality, perfectly

Exactly. they even won the World Cup in 2019 that way. They used DLS when there was no weather situation just to avoid playing another extra over to decide the real winner legitimately because the rate was in their favour. To me, the answer to the question, the country that invented a sport and never won the World Cup is still England for Cricket.

@@abhishekmajumdar5437 new Zealand are 2019 champion 🏆

They are biggest hypocrites they troll Australia India even though both countries have won more trophies than pengland

​@@kushajkumar6313Comparing Australia with India is hilarious. Australia's achievements are one of a kind. England and India have similar no of ICC trophies

Now the rules have changed. He will not get out like that in modern era of cricket

Please can someone explain me about the last case?? What actually happened is underarm ball allowed in cricket

Correct

​@devanshmaheshwari5108 Underarm bowling wasn't illegal at that time, but it was still considered unethical. They made it illegal after that incident.

@@AJWRAJWR thank you

That's the spirit of Indian cricket

@@sridivyaarun yes absolutely..

Don't call it mankad. It's runout.

​@@RajRaju-oh2of Rightly said. When W G Grace from an impoverished island called Britain did it, they didn't call it " Grac-ing ", did they ??

Bell shayad already 137 pe khel rha tha

Yes.. There is nothing wrong done by McCullum

@@soutrikmukherjee5421 This just shows mccullam is a genteman.

​@@soutrikmukherjee5421That is McCullum's opinion. However, batters must know that that are not entitled to wander when the ball is alive even if they are not attempting a run. It's that simple. There is no question of spirit of the game here. Stop writing this same stupid comment everywhere.

Agreed, exactly like that fool Bairstow.

@@doge_69 Mccallum did same thing aganst Zimbabwe but never said nothing about it

C'mon he had easily made ground... It wasn't like he didn't touch the crease with his bat

So what? The ball is still in play and he should have waited till the ball is dead. It's utter carelessness.

If it was direct hit then what will you say.

​@@user-jn7bq8wh1eand so are all the other dismissals, all within the rules of the game. Spirit of the game is highly subjective. It's a futile exercise to argue over such dismissals.

that why its call spiritof game fucker. Anybody who has a good non toxic mind wouldnt mind that? anyways fuck that right?

And bangla legend our mushfiq🎉 and sabbir rahman

Abd

And ashwin too

Adam Gilchrist

Shakib too

Remove the rule then

Good, that Chinese colony got back just desserts, for denying Sehwag century

Thoo 💦

@@zulficarfarook3951 for what?

​@@swayamshreepradhan6742you are absolutely right!!

Despite being the first nation to play the game, England also comes first to hit the spirit the game as well.

Stokes asked for what you said but umpires was not ready to reverse the decision

​@@shashankmishra8138who are you 😅😅 where did you came from. He never did this

@@aryangupta7624 go and watch that super over again and commentary too than you will better know who I'm and from where I'm

@@shashankmishra8138 you think stokes said that if you could not give 4 runs because I was one who push the ball.

It just shows your hatred. Nothing else..

@@tashrifmahmudraiyan4119 no brother For me Cricket is a gentleman's game to be fought fiercely with proper spirit. Its my way of seeing, you may have yours. Nothing right or wrong in this.

​@@tashrifmahmudraiyan4119how is it hatred?? All these are there in the video showing their worst show of sportsmanship. Come out of the virtuality. TBH Shakib is the worst of all.

Yes... Shakib is the worst here... Shakib said after match in press meet, we played according to rules.. I'm playing for our country.. And I try to win for my country with wat ever rules as said. This is out by rules made by ICC.. Worst explanation also by shakib.. Surely Mathews came to crease in time.. Helmet some problem.. So he want to exchange.. Yes out by rules. But not out by spirit of cricket.. Shakib should show some spirit of cricket here

​​@@vigneshsrinivasan8712 is sakib umpire ? Why didn't umpire consider that matter instead of giving out

There were a lot of people in England very unhappy with Collingwood as well. He did apologize afterwards, but resigned the captaincy the same year, in a "Did he jump or was he pushed" sort of way.

Watch the first clip again.

Mother choor please there's a difference between letting hit century and making a batsmen out without facing ball UNLAWFULLY

😂😂😂 teri gaali “mooti choor” kae laddu jaisi lagi, Bhadwaeee😂😂😂😂!!

@@minukawickramasinghe6454 how is it UNLAWFUL when its in the rule book and he was given out according to the cricketing rules ??? Yes in the cricketing spirit they should not have appealed ... but then again why is that rule in the book if one should not appeal. This is like saying there is a rule to appeal LBW but in the spirit of the game dont appeal.

​@@preetkumar9270its in the rules if its 2 minutes, it wasnt 2 minutes? Whats so hard to understand

@@mr.lunatic3157 definitely he had 5 more seconds when his helmet broke This isnt international cricket world cup,its indias world cup Messed up hawkeye and messed up umpire decision s

Exactly SL, NZ, England are at both ends of the play here.

lol indians

If that's true, how come Australia has 6 WCs in spite of the most shameful underarm bowling incident.

Yes and many other incidents. I think karma exists but sometimes it's too late, haha!@@musicfreak040884

​@@musicfreak040884becoz they have worked hard for them😒

Yes. 100% agreed. Keeping the incident aside, the two deliveries are a treat to watch. What great action and what great bouncers by Legendary Akram

which match was that

Do you even know that Chatfield was once almost killed by a bouncer? Only the quick action of a physio saved him. On top of that, he had been bowling short-pitched deliveries at Wasim who was a World class all-rounder. Nothing like the same in comparison.

​@@grimupnorthSounds like Chatfield should've tried to train harder with the bat???

Sounds like you weren't around in the 70's. There were many, many tail-enders then who could not hold a bat and often got hit. Quite different than today. @@akshitkukreti3745

Not really... He was not going for a run... He was going to congratulate his teammate who completed a century... Even McCullum apologized later for this incident to Sangakkara..

​@@yaduvarma9854👍💯

First thing you learn as a batsman is not to wonder out of your crease. Was and should always be out in that situation

​@yaduvarma9854 but he did it when the ball was active,(by mistake or just plain stupidity idk)he should have congratulated him when the ball was dead

lol why murali will run when ball was in keeper hand 🤣🤣

Ok i had heard of 12😂 but 14 no way

Let it go, India lost

I think the other two guys were umpires😂 😂

@@Santu-straight_forward 3 umpires third also member of team

​@@blesskavalalame excuses

bro still 10 sec was left

Moral of the story is both Srilanka and Bangladesh have no gentlemen in their team. Sangakkara was supposed to be a lawyer and educated abroad but even that didnt change his street level morality.

Naam hi randiv hai toh kaam wesa hi krega na 🫠

@@atulshukla8473 the umpire already warned mathews 30 seconds before the time out, yet he didn't listen to him, he should've consulted with the umpire first before asking for a helmet from the dugout.

@@skylark5249 An action of a single player doesn't determine the morality of a whole team.

Mathews didn't inform the umpires for taking more than usual time so shakib appeal and the umpire gives timed out so basically its Mathews fault

The umpire was walking to the otherside

Agree.. McCullum hadn't collected the ball yet so it was very much in play ..

That is a clear out.Ball was still on play and he left the crease.It' s his fault .

@@acorn4208 umpire always walks to the other side to avoid collision.

It is hence called the spirit of the game - legally it is out, but common sense says otherwise.

What will you say about Lankan cheaters.. did you forget Suraj Randiv's no ball to Sehwag and Mankiding dismissal of Jos buttler by Mathews? 😅😅😅

@Switch_off24X7 who says mankanding is illegal

Yes shamefull behavior of shakib and all Bangladesh team... It will be always remember by world cricket as a most shameful cheating by Bangladeshi team

@@AjitFarate-ip2km You must be a Sri Lankan cheater 🤣🤣🤣

@Switch_off24X7 what cheating.what are you talking about.

Very well said. These guys talk about the Spirit of the game and doesn't follow it one bit.

England and Aussies both are super cheater since I am watching since 1989...they used to win old time because no technology. Now see they start loosing frequently. Englishman lost by new afgan team...

Their world cup win was against the spirit of the game, but sure, they stayed quiet then

@@prithvirajmukhopadhyay515 Karma worked instantly in this edition of World Cup. England deserves to get out from the tournament.

@@maheshposwal2428 instantly???

Tab daal sakte the. Iss incident ke baad hi overarm bowling mandatory ho gayi.

It wasn't. He should be ashamed of this incident. Being a senior cricketer and in a major tournament, you are being reckless. It's not like he was the opener or suddenly a flurry of wickets fell off, he should be ready with his gear. He has his allotted time.

Yes, indeed. It's better to exclude Bangladesh when it's comes to gentlemens matters.

​@@ravineranga1663it is better to rendians . Gay hind

​@@AmitSingh-lh7ymhis helmet got broken after he came to the crease, and he came to the crease within the time. What you expect him to do? Bat with a broken helmet?

@@vishaloshada8236 Did you even read what I write? He should be ready with his gear. Meaning checking whether they are in correct order or not. You can't just go out there with broken or semi broken equipment, that's being reckless.

Dhoni called Bell back when he was 139.

Then why did McCullum apologised to Sanga and Murali later?

​​@@dinukagamage Sanga missed out on a century because Murali had a brain fade moment - McCullum reacted instinctively to seeing Murali outside his crease, exactly as a keeper is meant to, batsman outside his crease, ball into gloves, bails off, appeal (like muscle memory). McCullum was sympathising with them both, it's gutting to miss out on a milestone score by one run, and it's equally gutting to be the reason your batting partner misses a milestone score. I guarantee Murali never did anything like this again

Australia haven’t done much that’s against the spirit of the game

​@@jackthechristian2820 no, they be straight up cheating.

​@@jackthechristian2820 Come on now Jack - they're top when it comes to sledging (it's like they're professional & everyone else is kindergartners) and that includes targeting the umpires if they have to. There's been a fair few ball tampering claims made against various Aussie players & teams down the years too (but that's true of many other teams & players as well tbf).

lol you're not NZer, try harder

​@@ray.shoesmith Don't think they were claiming to be kiwi, they were just stating the facts of the situation

Indians and aussies dont have to cheat, they got umpires that do that for them 😂

@@mr.lunatic3157 Indians don't do that.

Indians burn their stadiums and cause riots

Mankading was invented by South Africa 😂😂😂😂

How is it ironic then? I dont think the word "ironic" means what you think it means.

No, he didn't.

Jeez, I understand we love our players a lot. However, don't be blinded by bias. It was a collision, and there was nothing untoward or intentional by anybody there.

Sorry bro, I too play cricket n am a bowler for my local team, I too ocassionally implement this tactics to run out the batter who is trying to reach the non Stricker end during a run....but that's the common tactic used in local games which sometimes are seriously confronted .... but in international games such tactics should be considered as cheating...please see the replay again and again..., I am proud of my Indian players that they have not involved themselves in such low level cheating.

@@Indianness4545 I too play cricket regularly for a club. That doesn't change anything.

It was not purposely blocked but they should have not asked for out because Tendulkar once already had grounded the bat in crease.

Had India required more than the one run to win, it definitely would've been scored as six extras (a no ball that was hit for six). The obvious issue here, is the deliberate no ball denied the batsman from his well earned century

Bhai tum to complete tha

Probably was tired, so he needed the innings to end to go and have a breather.

Pi$$ off ... the umpire was looking out for the batsman's safety ... remember this is an older number eleven batsman (aka a bowler that's forced to bat because that's the rules) vs a younger fast bowler. Javid was trying to equate this to the short pitched medium pace treatment Hadlee (and maybe Chatfield himself) had given to Wasim during the PAK innings - no one ever accused Javid of being the smartest of people 😂 If you're a fast bowler & you have to resort to this level of tactic against a number eleven batsman, then you're either childish or malicious - neither quality has any place in international cricket

Yes shakib is currently world's fastest bowler 😂😂

The rule is the batsman has to arrive at the crease in 2 minutes and get ready to bat If there was such an issue with a broken helmet after that, the umpire would have allowed him to call someone from the dressing room for a new helmet even before the first ball is bowled. This whole controversy is just a case of not having knowledge of such a rule as it has not happened before which at the same time has no further constraints like in the case of a broken helmet. Hence, such a vaguely written rule was just used by the opponent which I don't think is unfair or against morals. Rules of cricket are always above any morals. If not, then first criticize every batsman who didn't walk back by himself when he got an edge but the umpire didn't give him out or the team didn't appeal.

First of all, Mathews entered the pitch when around 10 secs were remaining for timeout which itself says how active he was. He had all the time since the SL batting started to cross check his equipments. He paid for his mistake. Lack of awareness from Angelo was the cause. It is no where near to be considered in the context of spirit of the game.

​@@zealous623blah blah.just stop and think for a second.he was at the crease before two minutes.if his helmet didnt break everything wouldve been fine.how is it his fault?.if this happened to one of your players will you react exactly like this? I think not

It was a spin over not a pace one. How do you get your lethal bouncer here?

Number One is absolutely deserved. That was the last ball of the match, the Aussies were scared our guys as going to easily get the winning runs, so the captain ordered his brother to deliver the underarm to prevent that from happening. Murali took advantage of a supposed physical defect to unfairly become a prolific wicket taker - and now we have all manner of other slow bowlers with decidedly dodgy bowling actions. I would bring up Malinga's dodgy side arm action, but he wasn't around for as long, and fast bowler's actions from all nations have always been called into question

@rickybobby38 I am sorry but you dont even know what you are talking about. Please check the ICC ruling. It is very clear. They did not give him pass due to a physical defect. They clearly stated that his arm bending was withing prescribed guidelines and there was nothing wrong and it had nothing to do with the defect. The defect only makes it seem he is bending it more than what is allowed. So the aussies cheated and even after ICC cleared this. And it is damn shameful of them to have done it.

​@kdsh2434 Sorry, I'm not reading some BS document/ruling from the ICC on this issue - they'd already bent the knee to the subcontinent long before this, and this situation only further cemented that fact. I was actually alive & clearly remember watching the exact match & incident that lead to Captain Arjuna having his fatboy dummy spit & marching his entire team from the field in protest - can you say the same thing (if not, then you can sit down). It has always been, and will continue to be, a chucking action - I guess they felt sorry for the lad or the Sri Lanka team as a whole, as they were still kind of fringe at that time. Sadly this unleashed a monster, and next thing we have a whole slew of suspect bowling action spinners showing up (I won't start in on Malinga as fast bowlers from all over have been called into question for their bowling actions at one time or another)

@@rickybobby38 Well you can call everything bs as much as you want. It's been cleared legally and you can complain all you want but it's there for all to see what's really happening. And just because they made and changed the rules as they want and then complain about the subcontinent don't make it right. Btw so called gentleman's game and you have had the Aussies sledging forever. By that fact itself they should have been thrown out lol. This is complete bs.

Look, he is also the number 11 player. And you might have played cricket on the street only with tennis ball.

With that gear if ball hits in his head he will dead and also he is 11th number player

You see their are things beyond the game. He was a no 11 player, he could have been killed man. So vo sab bhi dekhna padta tha us zamaane mai when gear was not good. Now it's not a prblm

All incidents were by the book. You can’t cherry pick.

Safety is only for non-aaian players 😅

The number 11 player is not a batsman, he only trains for bowling. And at that time even helmets were not that strong. And Akram is throwing a bouncer to the number 11 player at a speed of 140 Kph. Shame on Akram And those who are defending it.

Pakistan are violent wasim try to kill the batsmen thank god in cricket dont allow the guns

But did you hear your own video. They were also bowling bouncers to no 11 batsman when they were bowling

​@@suvrat6 NZ didn't have anyone in their bowling attack anywhere close to Akram's pace - Hadley was always medium pace, just accurate as a dart, and Chatfield himself was only medium pace.

Not no. 1 because appeal was taken back/ withdrawn by Indian team.

Mankading Is Well Within The Rules

⁠​⁠@@CCDif Well yer…. Every thing in this video is well within the rules of the game. The point of this video is The spirit of the game, so not sure what your point is

@@craiglo1181 There Were Some Moments That Were Morally Wrong , And I Agree On That , But Mankading Should Be Acceptable For Everyone , Imagine The Last Ball Of A Game Where A Team Requires 1 Run and The Non Striker Runs Before The Ball Is Bowled , Why Bother Having Such Situations

Mankading is not against the spirit of the game. It's the batsman who is taking undue advantage by starting the run before the ball is bowled which is against the spirit of the game. First the people who oppose mankading should have knowledge of the game rather than bragging in the comment column

This channel is made by Indians, they will never show their negatives lol only other teams and indias positives.😂

Lol, RIP English Grammar@@xm2268

@@xm2268 Ashwin's appeal was then taken back u stupid .

Those who don't know cricket brag about mankading. Let the batsman be inside the crease till the ball is bowled. Why is he taking undue advantage. It's the batsman who doesn't have the spirit of the game. One fine morning all the supporters of spirit of the game will tell stumping is against the spirit of the game 😂. Grow up

Well it's absolutely disgusting to see how mankading the batsman is considered as going against the spirit of the game. Whenever the batsman steps out of the crease before the bowler bowls at that time nobody talks about the spirit of the game. When the bowler oversteps then it is immediately given a no ball without any warning. At that time no one talks about the spirit of the game. It is clearly written in the rules that Mankading is completely legal and it is completely fair since otherwise it'd give the batsman an unfair advantage to step out of the crease and take a run. But unfortunately our country is full up of illiterate and uncivilized creatures who are not mature enough to understand this.

Most match fixer are from pakistan

@@roniplshorts9909 😂 😂 😂 I feel sorry for you boy

I’m with you …. Ashwin loves to cheat

Because Ashwin's appeal was taken back by Indian captain@@hasnatnoor1845

​@@roniplshorts9909 You misspelled India

How dare you say our country India is a cheater, this means you are not an Indian citizen and don't know to respect your own country, India team are not cheaters and they will never ever be cheaters

Love the Indian Cricket team but they are as guilty as any team when it comes to the spirit of the game.

Exactly, the OG act of breaking the spirit of the game. But that's only Poms n Aussies back before televised sports & it doesn't affect whatever country this channel supports 😉

Yep, Lotto here in NZ used the footage in one of their TV ads, but instead of defensively blocking it & walking off on disgust, the batsman removes his protective cup, places it on the pitch & smashes the ball away for the winning runs after it bumps the ball into the air (I forget the advertising slogan, but it was definitely hilarious)

What about others who advised him

Yeah, that one damaged the Trans-Tasman relationship for a number of years. I do remember a Lotto TV ad here in NZ many years later, where they used this footage, but as the underarm was bowled the kiwi batsman quickly took out his protective cup, placed on the pitch, the ball bumped into it & became airborne & was smashed away for the winning runs (it might even be here as a video on YT)