6. How did the guard know the house had been robbed? He just regained consciousness. Yet he said the robber, "Emptied the house." He could not have know the house was robbed if he was stabbed and unconscious the whole time. I think my answer is just as good as the real one.
Also, I know for experience that it is certainly possible to move over the dead leaves in the fall without making a sound, your answer should be the real one
I'm confused on the first one. How do we know that the youngest is the girl? With that info, everything else makes sense but i didn't see that she was the youngest.
Fact #3 means the victim not the youngest. Fact #4 means the accomplice not the youngest. Fact #6 means the murderer not the youngest. So, the youngest was the witness. Now, see fact #2. The oldest person in family was a male & the witness was a female. Youngest = Witness = Female.
the picture showed footprints that looked like they came from a foot without shoes on so i guessed it was a homeless person who was pushing a cart with their belongings on it
1. first riddle, I got this one right, but how does rule #2 in the first riddle let us know the daughter is the youngest? It says nothing about her age. 2. second riddle, ok I'm lost... how exactly does a man *in a wheelchair* leave footprints?? 3. Third riddle, I guessed the newspaper delivery guy, as the mailman doesn't normally deliver the paper. the rest were too hard for me to figure out lol
Hermes The Loser For number 2, just in case you're still wondering about it, it is common for people who are not paraplegic yet wheelchair-bound to use their feet and legs to help push/pull themselves along--especially when confronted with difficult terrain. Although, _L_ _L_ did point out another possibility that I didn't even consider which led me to think of one other, someone who was pushing a sled killed the guy in the snow. (The ladder thing is--while possible--seems highly unlikely. Unless there was a ladder carrying killer known to haunt the area that is 😉)
#2: Could have been the guy _pushing_ the wheelchair... might've killed the victim, then wheeled the body out and dumped it there. #3: In my neighborhood the paper carrier delivers the paper, not the mailman, so this one didn't occur to me. #5: It would've been very helpful to know that Lisa died from arsenic, specifically.... seems like a critical fact... #6: Where in the riddle does it say it was fall? It was only said that it was October... which would be spring for anyone living in the southern hemisphere.
#2: No one pushed the wheelchair, those are the victims footprints. #3: Understandable #5: Why so specific, you can also get poisoned from many more things, also, there are also kids watching this who are much, much younger then you and i, so they wouldn't know what it meant if they used that term, also if it didn't enter because of food, then his alibi + his job = Totally Guilty. #6: Ok sure, they didn't say anything about it but just look at the background, while the explanation they did even zoom in on that.
#5: Yeah, you *can* get poisoned by many things, that's my point! If we had known that it was arsenic we could've ruled out other poisons that could have been delivered in any other way. That's why I feel like we could have used more information.
SmallGreenPlanetoid I am 14 years old and i do know that the police cant get this information (if it's arsenic or not). Do u want to know what the victim ate yesterday too? (Srry for bad english)
Yes, the original riddle stated that the police only know that she was poisoned, and that there wasn't poison in her food. There are other poisons that can be inhaled, like cyanide and carbon monoxide. The solution could have been that it was the mailman, because he drives a truck which produces carbon monoxide. Or, as you said, the poison was in food she ate the previous day. The riddle doesn't give enough information.
I am really good at riddles and these just don’t make sense. There is no information in the first one that lets you know who is the youngest of the family. And if you’re in a wheelchair you won’t have footprints unless someone’s pushing you. And the mailman does not deliver the newspaper.
Heather McFarland number six was the weirdest answer. How do we know the area is covered with leaves even if it is fall? They don’t pay someone to rake them?
There was enough information in the first one to be able to identify who the youngest one was. You know that the victim and the youngest were different sexes and there was only one scenario that would've made the victim and the youngest two different people.
It doesn't. I had to list possibilities with both son or daughter being youngest. Daughter being youngest was the only option that allowed enough elimination to get an answer. Son didn't.
well I guess i'm a psychopath? XD I nearly guessed it... I was thinking "she was lonely... so she killed for... for what?..." Nearly there! XD One about the snow, is wrong... a far more likely, a man with a sled or cart dumping the body whilst carrying it... A man in a wheelchair wouldn't leave footprints.
I feel like a friggin genius....i only missed the wheelchair one and the burglar one....bu in my defense if you are in a wheelchair then you dont leave footprints....i pictured a walker
i guessed the burglar one differently because at first it said he was facing the house, then later said he emptied the house. how do you leave the house if you werent in it???
I guessed the burglar one was that if he had been knocked unconscious, how did he know the 'burglar' had ransacked the house? And the wheelchair one made me think of the Flintstones car. DONT JUDGE ME
Another problem with the guard's story in #6 is how he knew the house was emptied. If he only now just regained consciousness, he wouldn't have had time to go in and check the house before coming up to the detective, since it never said he was coming from the house. That was my explaination.
when he said the other percent icecream he meant as i scream japense writers use it to hide there sad emotions in a word the japanese word is hyouka meaning ice cream to its used a lot in animes and books
The very first riddle has two solutions , 1) Mom, with help from Dad, killed son. and 2)Dad, with help from mom, killed daughter. You have no where clearly stated that Daughter is the youngest member of the family.
Except that it says that the father is the oldest member of the family. Then that the oldest person in the family and the witness were a male and a female. So that makes dad the accomplice.
Not so. You can deduce the daughter is the youngest. Point 6 tellls you the youngest isn’t the murderer. The youngest can’t be the accomplice because the accomplice is older than the victim. Point 4 tells you the youngest and the victim are different sexes. Therefore the youngest must be the witness. Now point 1 says that the oldest and the witness are different sexes. We know dad is oldest so the witness, the youngest child, is a girl.
It says that the oldest (which is dad) and the witness were male and female. Therefore if the man was accomplice then the son would’ve had to be a female, so your second scenario is flawed.
Brandon Rooles Someone doesnt HAVE to push you as most people in wheelchairs build enough strength in their arms to be able to push themselves around. If there was someone pushing the one in the wheelchair, that means the person only recently got their wheelchair.
KingHoan Well then it should have said that the police would be looking for a man and a wheel chair AND a person who was pushing him. I think you’re the dumb one. And there is no need to be so rude, I’m just a kid stating my opinion and my reasoning. Gosh, man.
Ines _B At the end the police said that the police should be looking for a man in a wheelchair, not a man and a wheelchair AND his friend/brother/whoever was pushing him.
2 DEBUNKED!!!!!! If the killer was truly a man in a wheelchair... Then why weren't there two tracks? A wheelchair's wheels aren't on the same line, so that means there would be two lines and footprints. I blame the guy with the ladder.
For the Sally and Carol riddle, I thought it was because Sally's husband was cheating on Carol so if Sally killed Carol then they could be together again 🤣🤣
Sally wasn't married tho....I was thinking something like that but kinda different....like the guy who died was Carol's husband and Sally liked that guy too....after a few days Sally saw Carol cheating with another guy and in anger she killed carol....😂
In the second riddle. Everyone is wondering how the guy left footprints if he was in a wheelchair? Well he could have just been using the wheelchair as a cover up because no one would suspect a guy to leave footprints if they are in a wheelchair!
It wasn’t that bad . It was the only one I got right. It’s pretty easy to understand that the killer was the mother cause it said the oldest person (father) and the murderer were male and female. Therefore it’s either the daughter or the mother. But the killer is older and they are two different genders. So mom is the murderer . Get it?
Look up "Logic Puzzle" on Wikipedia. There's a section there called "Logic grid puzzle". Read it through. A logic grid puzzle is the best way to solve riddles with multiple sets of information. In this case: 1. Father/Mother/Daughter/Son (Male and female are in here already. No need for a seperate set of variables there) 2. Youngest/second/third/oldest 3. Victim/Witness/Murderer/Accomplish Put those in the grid puzzle and everything is rather simple then.
I got the first one right as well. It's a simple logic grid puzzle where you have a set of variables on the vertical axis and the other on the horizontal axis. As you look through the clues, you cross out squares that link 2 parts together (such as dad/witness) if it's found to be untrue and circling the ones that match up until you have your answer.
The snow scene made me feel like, why don't they just follow the footprint and look for some people that fits the sole size of the footprints and who are holding some stuffs that could create Parallel lines.
BRAVO, To the 98% out there!!! ... I "thought" I was a smart person... But, I only got "ONE" of them right...And, it was an EASY one! ............ Really, congratulations to the smart people out there!
I have a few questions that I want to ask you about 1: 1.Why do you think that the girl is the yourgest one？ 2.If the father is the witness but it will disagree wit the rule#2. (3.I think the father is the killer,the mother is the victim and the girl is the witness.) I am not a English so my English may not very well.
My favourite mystery riddle is: There are four boys playing with rocks in a man’s yard. One broke the window. The four boys were named Bob, Mark, John, and Billy Johnson. The next morning someone left a note saying, “? Johnson he threw the stone.” So who threw it?
Maimuna Alhaji Ali 1. Someone walked by and a person in a wheelchair tracked them, the on path was made by 2 people. 2. The tracks were made by a wagon used to transport the body there. 3. The tracks were made by someone who didn't need a wheelchair to confuse the police. 4. The track was made by a hot dog cart. The victim died of food poisoning from a rotten hotdog. 5. It was a skier who was bad at skiing. 6. Evil bobsledder.
3:55 The second one is objectively wrong. If the killer was confined to a wheelchair, the only set of footprints would be those of the victim. But since the footprints follow the tracks, that means the person is pushing or pulling something on wheels or tracks (wheelchair, cart, sled, etc). Since there are none of the victim's footprints, the victim was on whatever the killer was pushing or pulling. Please, if you're going to post riddles, make sure you have the right answers.
On the last one, I thought Sally killed Carol is because Carol's car hit that boy, but in fact Carol fancies that boy and then she decided to avenge that boy.
YEAH! I thought that I got it right but then it was wrong .I went over it again and it was right.I was wondering if it was just me but now I know there are two ways!thanks!
You know how riddles work, right? The answer is DEFINITIVE through the information given. For #5, Jim doesn’t necessarily know a lot about poison. You can only assume that, because it wasn’t part of the information given. If you are going to base your channel off of these, “riddles”, do them right. Or at least, read them over a few times before you steal them from someone else so you know that they make sense.
NONE of this makes sense. 1) I got this one but the information given was not sufficient. 2) People in wheelchairs wouldn't leave footprints. It makes more sense to say someone was carrying the man in a cart or something before dumping him there. 3) How are we supposed to assume that the paper I delivered everyday. Papers are not delivered everyday in many places, only every other day. 4) HOW quick do you expect us to get number four because 15 seconds is NOT enough time 5) So were supposed to assume it took her a MONTH before she died after her room was painted??? 6) Just because it's October does NOT mean that leaves are everywhere on the ground completely covering it. And are we supposed to just assume theres leaves at all? They could've lived in an area where there weren't any trees around. THIS RIDDLE IS FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED I CANNNNN'T 7) How are we supposed to know that was the reason. You didn't give us any type of information that let us know how she felt when her friends had returned prior. WHAT IS THIS These videos fail to give out sufficient information half the time (like the fact that their were leaves on the ground) and the other half they leave you to assume something very specific (like the fact that Sally wanted to see her friends again). Come ONNNN
