7 STRANGEST New Motor Designs 

High temperature adhesive need to come out. Maybe the glue can be used from aerospace applications from the space shuttle heat tiles

Why use pcb type when you have solid state design technology

@@chanakyasinha8046 Solid state technologies realm is in the micro world with tiny components. A stator is in the macro world carrying large amperages and voltages. I suggest you rethink your inks ..

0-200kph in 0.8 seconds is surprisingly only 7g. the occupant could easily survive that but the laws of traction say no and I suspect it will do 0-200 in 2.5seconds without some kind of secondary force to either create artificial down force, like a suction fan drawing air out from under the car , Or a active propulsion system like elons rockets.

@@another1commenter770 "active propulsion"? Is that like traction control (no peeling out)?

@@another1commenter770 I was wondering how many gs that would be pulling. Thank you

Top fuel dragsters can reach 160 km/h (100 mph) in 0.8 seconds, and reach speeds of 539 km/h (335 mph) at the end of their roughly 3.6 second runs. They pull somewhere around 4 - 5.6g throughout the run.

@@another1commenter770 Pretty much it's at the point you'd need a rack and pinion rather than track and wheels.

1300 is nothing, most top fuel dragster are well over 5000 HP, I haven't followed in years, but they are way above 1300, they do a 1/4 mile in under 5 seconds!

@@jamest.5001 10,000 in the top fuel dragsters now.

@@jamest.5001 well with them having 4, it would mean their car has 5200HP.

go ahead

Thanks, I bet the weather is nice there!

@@Tech_Planet no problem 👍👍🏿

P

Git it, dawg.

Thanks for watching, that would be interesting work!

German's have some Real Trick motors...Czech out the first D C motor.

I have questions as to the effectiveness of this in motors, but in terms of ease of construction and consistency, it seems like it would be really impressive.

True.....but the battery to power it is the weakest link.

That is true, I covered other types of spherical motors in the past but there is probably one out there I missed.

That's the thing with inventors and discoverers: they discover something, they make the real breakthrough, but nobody hears about it, until some rich motherfucker steals their idea and starts production in bulk, and then the stealer becomes famous as "the discoverer". Most people to this day believe that Eddison discovered light bulbs and electric motors, Marconi invented radio, Einstein discovered Relativity, and Newton invented calculus, etc.. They're all wrong. The real inventors and discoverers can be known only if you dig deep through obscure history of science.

Thanks, that's why I like making videos. People provide their own knowledge of the subject and it helps me understand it better.

I think it was in 1979 that I purchased a Technics turntable that used a PCB motor that was directly attached to its platter.

Yamaha is one of my favorite companies. It just seems like they care and they nail it with engineering every time.

@@Globbs Especially in the sound department. Sounds as good as their musical instruments.

Coupd be either mockup or coolant hoses

Their coolant hoses smartass!

Okay 45 sub no body

You bet, that e-mail is lost but my main account(this one) is still running.

Yup, what a relief to see new content keep coming. 👍

@Scott Menard . Magnets are well studied. a micro cassette tape, smaller than a DAT tape can now hold 500TB (0.5 Petabytes) of data... Hard drives. 'Permanent Magnet Printing' can manipulate the magnetic field with high resolution accuracy.. Unfortunately, a Neodymium + Lithium economy is far, far less green and easy to recycle than a Carbohydrate + iron and aluminium economy... I prefer my reciprocating, single cylinder, 1 STROKE I.C.E. design, with combined 'ring piston' heat engine.. The combustion chamber at each end is an impeller.. It's a radial engine - the whole, compact engine spins.. Compression and Power stroke combined and two way, hence 1 STROKE!

It looks to be designed for swapping into your decades old muscle car that doesn't run right now. If you don't already have an old car, this product is not for you.

It all depends on the rev range of the electric motor as well. There is actually no point in changing gears, as it will take off in top gear most of the time with the amount of torque that a electric motor produces. So it just depends on what sort of take off you want. When you compare it to how Telsa has set theirs up, which is just a single drive, but they have a ratio of 9.81 to 1 or something crazy like that, and it does that twice, but their motor also has a rev range of 17,000, so they are just utilizing their ability to rev like crazy and use the ratios to increase the torque output values. At the end of the day, it all depends on how much you want to be screwing around with your conversion as well. If you have a rear wheel drive car, then you'll need to work out how to get that power to the back, if you have a transmission already, then you can just go through that, the interior of your car stays the same and it's just powered by electrics. If you have a front wheel drive car, a lot of the time you'll have to change over your drive shafts to suit the position of the electric motor, and if there is any variation in the gap between the driveshafts as well within your transmission. You'll also be limited to the type of motor which you can use if you go this way, as you'll have to have one which already has a gear drive system built in like a Tesla, or the Yamaha. Also his argument with the auto transmission is a little incorrect, if you have similar power/torque ratings and rev range to the original ICE motor, then there is no risk of the transmission exploding, it's more so that especially with the older style powerglide, 3 speed, 4 speed transmission and the way in which they work, you will need to maintain constant rotation in order to ensure that there is enough hydraulic fluid to get the car moving when you have it in drive. If the motor isn't rotating then it's just not going to work and it will be a pig to drive. Of course they don't like to keep electric motors rotating because of the fact that the power source is a battery, and to keep a transmission spinning it will turn a setup which would be able to do about 200 k's (124 miles) in city traffic, would then be reduced down to about 130 k's (80 miles) if you're lucky, and if it's peak hour, then you'll probably use all of your charge just waiting about.

@@MassageWithKlay I agree.....making an electric drive and then adding a gearbox is not user friendly as it's six of one and half a dozen of the other with the power that an electric motor consumes in turning the wheels.

7g. 124mph = 55.433 m/s 55.433 m/s / 0.8 s = 69.29 m/s² 1g = 9.81m/s² 69.29 m/s² / 9.81m/s² = 7.06

Only if you really must be a clown and attempt the 1/4 mile in your sub urban road to impress the neighbors about your new toy.

What foundational idea? A flywheel only gives up energy by giving up angular velocity. If you use the flywheel as a rotor as well and maintain a set RPM, there is no inertial torque transfer except on very brief time scales. The flywheel in this sense is merely a conduit for the motor. So to get energy out in a longer term steady fashion, you would need a CVT. With a single motor-flywheel, constant-steady torque would require the motor to satisfy current requirements PLUS spin back up to target RPM, that is if you want to again .. use the rotor as flywheel.