8 Mistakes and Details in Gone In 60 Seconds Only Car Enthusiasts Would Notice | On Board 

Damn, well spotted! I must've been thinking about the Lexus that follows at that moment! Thanks for watching, Benny!

Ah.. nice...

@@AveragetoPoor oh.. well.. ok well. Ya gotta redo the whole video now... Lol

1 Mistake and Detail in 8 Mistakes and Details in Gone In 60 Seconds Only Car Enthusiasts Would Notice Only A Car Enthusiast Would Notice

@@AveragetoPoor You also got the Lamborghini Diablo wrong. It was never on his list. If one pulled into a container, it was probably to sub for the Jaguar XJ220, because they couldn't find an XJ220.

I don't think a gt40 as the hero car would have been a bad alternative car though.

But how would they make replicas?

@@orest395 Superformance will build you as many Shelby licensed GT40s as your heart desires.

Yea but building gt500 replicas are cheaper that gt40s replicas

Haliki was a millionaire and self funded the orginal film. Only reason GT40 would be cut as it was most of the films budget.

The director liked the improvisation so had the stunts and props crews reset the police car and reshoot the drop

I mean it’s a California Special so you still need help lol. Go find a Boss or grab the new Mach 1 as that was the original Gone in Sixty Seconds hero car. I’m being sarcastic of course. Those cars are crazy expensive. I have a 71 and 03 Mach 1 but I don’t know how I’m going to be justifying the price for the new one.

@@Beer-can_full_of_toes At the time when I bought my car in 2021 the mach 1’s were scarce and super marker up would love one though but ive modded my GT/CS to make around 485-500hp so im happy! Mach 1 and the GTCS arent that far away in price either!

@@Beer-can_full_of_toes the 71 Mach 1 will always be the true Eleanor in my eyes. Even though it wasn't my favorite body style, having grown up in the back of a 70 Mach 1 🤣

@@WhiteDwarfVR4 it was a 73 in the movie but I like the 71 because even though they had started putting smog tech on it they didn’t take anything away from its performance yet. It is the biggest mustang ever built dimensionally and also the ugliest compared to its predecessors. The 70 was about the coolest looking next to the Shelbys.

@@MWest31007 can’t knock a modern GT. I just like to talk smack about the CS as it’s basically a sticker. On the subject of talking smack: do you know what mustang stands for? Mostly Used Shit That Ain’t No Good 😎

Watch the original...truly amazing!

LOL was bad movie cras were only thing good Can name 5 better car movies ford v ferrari rush bullitt grand prix and smokey and the bandit and even cannon ball run all better movies and better cars and driving scenes not so over the top fast and furious fake BS

@@RT22-pb2pp Jeez who pissed on your cereal? Dont have to be a dick about it man.

​@@RT22-pb2pp "low rider Donny... Donny low rider"

If Doug Demuro can toss one around and give it some stick many years AFTER they increased in value and rarity I don't thin your thoughts on it hold up.

LM002s traded around $100k in the late 90s.

Like with the scene with the Cadillac with the exhaust getting rid of the Cocaine. A FWD Eldorado Convertible in the first movie and a 1990 Something Caddie in the second movie.

I very much doubt it was too expensive for Hollywood to afford.

@@elixier33 Not Hollywood. The Car Insurance Company for the movie. They are separate, and like all Insurance Companies are stingy with money. That is unless you are paying them. A Shelby Mustang from the Sixties, and depending on the original equipment, can be from a high seven figure dollar car to a six figure dollar car.

Or the Dodge Daytona which was pictured

As a Mopar guy I cringed so hard😂 Plymouth superbee😂

And the Superbird was not available in 1969

@@jackprice7992 Yes🤣

Beat me to it. :)

If she's still got them in storage and didn't have them all destroyed. His wasn't the only one, but it was the one that made the most noise and let the public in on what was happening. I'd love to see that build return to BifB channel, but he's got a much better one now, even if it isn't from as iconic of a movie.

A roadrunner is a bird. The car is 2 words. I don't even think they're supposed to be capitalized. Just road runner. At least that's how I remember the emblems on the cars back in the day.

@@408sixbbl9 It is a proper noun as a name for the car so it would normally be capitalized. If the word is not capitalized on the emblems, it is creative license.

He said super bee but showed the picture of a super bird.

I read an article, may have been improper info, but Nick Cage allegedly allowed his personal SE 30 to be used in the film, sorce stated he had an impressive lambo collection at the time.

Indeed.

You're forgetting that back in 2000 the 'show and display' rule would have exonerated the 959 though.

959's were illegal in the U.S.A, because Porsche refused to allow their 959's to be crash tested by the U.S. Department of Transportation and Highway safety, because of the sheer cost to produce the 959. After Porsche saw what the DOT had done to a couple of Ferrari F40's that were submitted by Ferrari for testing, which the DOT totally destroyed with their tests, Porsche refused to allow the DOT to destroy two 959's valued at a million dollars. It cost Porsche half a million dollars to produce a 959 in the late 1980's, and they were selling them for a quarter million dollars each, to advertise and expand their brand with a Supercar. So literally, Porsche was losing a quarter million dollars on each 959 they sold! Good for the well heeled Porsche buyer's of the time, but bad for Porsche, well, kind of. By refusing to allow crash tests by the U.S. DOT, Porsche could not get signed off by the DOT to sell the 959 in the U.S.. Later because of the show and display law, 959 owners were allowed to drive their 959's, no more than 2000 miles per year, and holds true to this day.

@@davidjoe3368 They're fully able to be imported and driven in the US without limitation now as they're over 25 years old.

@@mitchkelleher7972 Yes and maybe, it is very advisable to know the laws in the State you live in, and make certain that the car you are considering to buy, or own, are in fact exempt. The 25 year exemption may not be observed fully in every State. I live in California, and I own a 1986 Toyota Hi-Luxe Pickup truck, and even though the vehicle is well over 25 years old. I still am required to smog the truck, even though the truck is 37 years old! I asked why at my local DMV, and they told me it is their discretion, as to when and if the vehicle, will ever be exempt or not. You cannot assume exemption, you have to know you have exemption.

@@davidjoe3368 Yeah, you still have to pass emissions post '75 in CA, I believe, but Bruce Canepa got 959s to pass EPA somewhere over 20 years ago as I saw them at the first Rennsport Reunion in '01. Of course, that's not CARB, but I would guess they met that, too, since that's a big market.

Maybe there was an office in Hamburg that responsible for those laser cut transponder keys?

They kept calling it a Mach1 and it wasn't, oh and its good to here someone other then myself refer to Grabber Orange as School Bus Yellow, cause thats what it looks like to me LOL

I love the original! I've had to introduce people to it. I've always thought that a nice nod would have been to have a Billy Cadillac cruising around in the remake.

I always thought the remake used the GT500 as inspiration from the original film, back when I first watched both I had little knowledge on cars and looked quite similar in design and just thought nothing of it. I also love the original crash scene that was a 'mistake' and kept in the film.

Because? Not challenging, just interested!

Yep quite a different car, you could excuse the mistake between a 55 and 56 T bird, but not a 57

I wonder if this could an in-universe character mistake, like maybe there were no 1956 or 55 models in the general L.A. area, but just the 1957 one that was stolen? I mean there is no guarantee that every specific model+year will actually be available in a given region, so it stands to reason that they might sometimes have to go with whatever is closest in the available pool of cars.

@@szr8 I would agree with you on the 55/56 models as those 2 years are really similar in look, but a 57 T bird is a one year only styling. So if the person wanted a 57 it kinda has to be a 57 because of all the one year only stuff.

Also the 427 cobra photo used makes it look right hand drive (mirror imaged). I don't think there were any of those.

I was strolling through the comments hoping someone else besides me noticed that 😆

I wonder if the list really could have been 51 and the characters were just rounding to 50 or assumed it was 50 and no one fully counted them all on the black board.

@@szr8 Nice idea, but when watching the film, the cars are numbered & circled on the blackboard...still an epic film though.

🤣

yeah it sounded a lot like an F355 on the recording.

@@tomcharlton586 So 5 valves is probably the correct term then

U would not be a self indulging weiner sir....

Really?? You'd think they would be happy to have people copy the Eleanor design

I think there are more than 10 cobra replicas for every GT40 replica out there.

Well spotted! Thanks for giving the video a watch!

@@AveragetoPoor and another mistake, when you mentioned the “1969” Plymouth Superbird, it’s suppose to be the 1970 Superbird.

No the superbird came up later, but he called it a road runner superbee.Was in alphabetical order by make.

@@martindavis2317 And completely incorrect...lol. The 1969 Super Bee is a Dodge based off of the Coronet, not a Plymouth Road Runner based off of the Satellite.

Haha yes you're right, the list really did offer a fair few mistakes, in fact, there were several more that I didn't include in the video in order to keep the duration down. I agree with you regarding the GT40, although it would've been interesting to see how a GT40 Eleanor would've been presented for the movie, as I imagine it would also have been tastefully modified as the GT500 Eleanor was. Thanks for watching!

@@AveragetoPoor Have you heard of the Eleanor build that never happened on RU-vid? Copyright isn't favorable to anyone who's a content creator.

He was in this?!

@@skylined5534 No, but they made a joke about him.

I was about to ask that too

Thanks for watching, and good question! I hope you don't mind a lengthy response. So I decided to delete the Fast and Furious videos for a few reasons. Firstly, whilst they were by far my most popular videos I never really was very fond of them myself. I much prefer telling interesting stories such as those in my car history videos, so I was particularly attached to the Fast and Furious videos. Secondly, whilst they were supposed to be very light hearted and produced in fondness of the films, (the only reason I noticed some of the mistakes was because of how many times I've watched the movies) too many people seemed to see them as an attack on the franchise, and I didn't like the negativity that came with that. And thirdly, despite the video being well and truly covered under Fair Use Copyright Law, Universal Studios illegally claimed my video as their own and in doing so also claimed all ad revenue that came with it. Whilst I don't make any of my videos for financial reasons (I've barely made $100 over the last 2 years from running this channel), I found it annoying that this greedy, multi billion dollar company was breaking the law and essentially stealing money from me. So when considering all this last week I thought "to hell with it", and decided to just delete the videos. I hope that all makes sense, and again, thanks for watching and for your interest!

@@AveragetoPoor thanks for responding to us. While I'll miss those videos and they were fun i understand why you ended up deleting the video. Loved the new video keep up the great work friend!

Thanks, Brent! Shall do!

The original is the best.

very expensive too

💯

It's not about the cost of the cars, you are stealing some merchandise for a nice little pay packet, if one person won't take a job for that kind of money than Calitri would have just found someone else to do it. Calitri would have no doubt sold them all for a lot more than he was offering for the job.

The original film had a standard Mustang, not a Shelby.

Eleanor in the 1974 film was a common yellow '71 Mach1, not a GT500, though both were Mustangs.

Amazing for the amount of detail in your comment! Great catch!

Quit playing Gran Turismo and start working on cars a little more. Sheesh

I came here to say this. The mistake wasn't XK8;XJ8, it was XKR;XJR. Who wants an XK8 lol. And yes the inclusion of the 6 in this video was way off target

OMG! I had paused to write this comment, then when I resumed the video he literally says the XKR WAS the XJ8, no way bro keep your Ks and Js separate lol

@@dgpofficial3640 I mean back when the movie was made it was still a nice car

I was browsing the comments to see if anyone else had picked up on this...

Doesn't this only apply to the E body though? Yes I know " 'Cuda " was introduced in 69 but Im not aware of the A body fish being separated by VINs.

I was looking for this comment.