5:16 correction : Dosan Anh Changho Production 6 -> Production 9 (batch1 3, batch2 3, batch3 3) and 3,750 ton of displacement is only for batch1. batch2 is bigger(heavier) than batch1 and batch3 will be bigger than batch2.
@@burnseric64 It has been delivered and it works very well, please don't talk nonsense ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xGwHmxhehqk.html
Err, where's the Astute? Widely thought to be the best sensor platform in the world and will most likely make up at least part of the new Australian nuclear attack subs.
@@yeshiyangzom8532 Jewish is not a citizenship. Chinese does not designate a race here, but a nationality (Taiwanese people are Chinese Han by race but are not targeted here). But why am I arguing, you are probably paid to argue in the comment sections
Well attack subs will be always needed to maintain surveilance in the seas i am not updated on what these can do in todays scenarios i always thought that subs are better than ships so we chould make a lot more and keep peace in a ever changing world.
"Belgorod" isn't a ballistic missile submarine. So despite she possesses strategic nuclear strike capabilities she may be classified as an attack submarine.
During exercises with american navy , a small Swedish attack submarine, breeched the defensive ring guarding a major aircraft carrier, and Americans admitted that it was in a position to sink the carrier , size isn't everything
Yes, that was when the US rented the Swedish submarine from the Swedish Government to test their carrier strike groups ability to withstand the attacks of a Diesel powered submarine for which they admit was severely lacking.
Korean KSS-3 class(Dosan An Chang Ho class) will be a nuclear powerd attack sub in BATCH 3 phase Total 9 KSS-3 will be launched, 6 subs are conventional and 3 subs are SSNs 3 of Phase 2 subs will be bigger than 3 of phase 1 subs and it will carry total10 SLBMs
@@tonyvu2011 Batch 3 Phase subs are gonna be SSN. Its reactor developement is almost done. Only one thing that Korea must -politically- solve is enriched uranium. If they do it by themselves many countries are going to start asking questions. So they are trying to by 20% enriched uranium from the US, UK or France
Your information on the Iranian Fateh Submarine is completely wrong. It does not displace 3750 t but only 593 tons (submerged), it is only 48 m long not 83.5. You need to get your facts straight.
@@snardylarose1959 Yes, the Brazilian Navy is building 4 conventional Riachuelo submarines (which is a fraction of the larger scorpené with parts and national technologies), one is ready. But we also have a working nuclear reactor in tests, this is 100% national technologies, only the hull will get knowledge of the old Tikuna class (which we manufacture nationally with German technology transfer + that of the French Scorpené). This will give the nuclear-powered submarine SN-Álvaro Alberto, that if all goes well, the start of assembly and union of the reactor with the hull will take place between 2028 and 2030.
Amusing. The best attack submarine out there today is the Astute class, only matched by Seawolf. They are also the newest. The inclusion of Project 09852 is a joke. It was laid down in 1992.😂. Russian junk.
Bad analysis....Seems to me the Russian submarines are the best. Assuming all thing being equal, they can dive deeper and travel much faster at 35 knots.
Dude, you just straight up embarrassed yourself 🤣Larger submarine -> less vibration, less vibration -> harder to detect so you not only were wrong but wrong to the opposite 😂
@@ytn00b3 Jqpqn submarine Soryuu type carries6 torpides in his body, Japan has built 12 vessels of this type(4000t), all are in service in Japansea,and Pacific ocean. Japan holds 22 sub. total, and 8 for training.
@@ytn00b3 That is what the Navy call them in politics, Japan is an pasifist country on paper, thus the military have the name "self defense force". the Japanese Constitution, prohibiting the acquisition of offensive platforms That is also why they can say they are building a attack submarin, but a reconnaissance submarines, that just happens to be capable to hunt other vessels. or There big helicopter carriers is called "helicopter destroyer" or "ASW-carrier" or "multi-purpose operation destroyer" some of there bigger destroyer, that are even bigger then the Americans Destroyer, is called Destroyer, instead of Cruiser, even when they are build up as a cruiser. since in the name, it say it is a warship that cruiser to other place to "fight", well you can still say that you use a destroyer to defend your country. But There have been some changes to the constitution in Japan, in the past few years. Now the name "self defense force" isn't really that tru anymore, since the military of Japan is now allowed to be more "offensive"
@m n No, because it has proven itself to be so. There is a tie-in between the british BAe and american General Dynamics. Virginia is good but has older tech from the british Trafalgar class. The Seawolf overran budget, so Virginia is the cut-price version. Virginia does have more things that go bang, americans like that, but an Astute has enough to wipe out a fleet, which is probably enough. What Australia has stumped up for is an updated Astute version. Turned down the french sub at the last hurdle. If you're going to get an attack sub, get the best.
@m n One of the reasons the aussies cancelled the french sub was cost escalation. So I doubt there is much cost differential at all. The merikan sub costs more due to the way they manage and contract building of them. The Virginia is a little less capable than the Astute, so why pay more?
@m n The merikan subs cost more due to the way they sub-contract everything the american way. They're not all that different in size, the Astute 7000-8000 tons, the Virginia 8000-10000 tons. The merikans do like carrying more weapons than necessary. Astute has more torpedo tubes because RN has a tradition of loading bananas into them when setting sail.
One reason why the Australians went with UK/US subs is not having to to cut open the hull to refuel every 10 years and weld it back (French Barracuda). UK/US subs need no refuelling for the lifetime of the boat.
Fals on so many levels... The French submarine Australia was going to have, was not a nuclear powered submarine, it was a Diesel Electric submarine, just like the current Australian submarines, only difference is the French one, was to have a AIP-engine (Air independent propulsion). the UK/US Submarine deal, is an Nuclear submarin, it will have a nuclear reactor. Yes the nuclear reactor last the length of the expected life span of an submarin (in USA), but some countries keep running them for several years after, by just updating them. Mostly due to government forget how long it take to get new submarines, when you order some. So if Australia end up running them longer then they envisioned (after US standards, some all those numbers come from, USA have after all a continues building program) they have to refuel...
Not the reason of the cancellation. If Australia wanted nuclear subs, perhaps it was a solution to use the French system - but what's about proliferation in this case? Australia cancelled by convenance because the government preferred to be protected by Washington and obtain a politic guaranty, rather to be obliged to build an independant sub force and to pay for. Why not. But remember Australia is unable to produce the sort of uranium made in USA the UK/US subs need. So, it means perhaps Autralia will lease some foreign submarines, but the country will have no more australian boats (or if a big work begins now: perhaps later, in 2050?).
Try looking at the bigger picture. China is now threatening everyone. French boats were going to cost a huge amount (way more than UK/US nuclear). The diesel subs do not have the range. They needed a Nuclear sub. But, the barracuda just is not up to it (refuellin problems). So what to do, hence AUKUS. But, there is a LOT more to it. By AUS now building/maintaining their own boats, they will have the capability to have US/UK subs parked in Australia. This is just MASSIVE. There are lots of other benfits not related to the subs as well.
@@KangoVYou do not know exactly what you do mean... if China "is now (only ?) threatening everyone" as you pretend to consider why do Australian forces need a so big range for their subs in order to defence themselves? Anyway the choice of Camberra is no more to have some australian diesel-electric boats (designed from the Barracuda base but not Barracudas and made in Australia) but to host at home both UK and US subs. No contract was signed about a building "made in Australia" of any sort of nuclear subs. Not yet ? or Never ? Clearly, nobody can imagine that the US will give the technology to Aussies. US just need some harbors to attack if necessary some targets in southern part of China sea and will give a guarantee to Australia due to this deal. Another point: France did not ever talk with Australia about selling some Barracuda nuclear subs. But if it was the case, as you are suggesting (but untruly) when you compare Barracuda to UK and US submarines: say "ten years for a refueling, damn ! It's so short !" is just a ridiculous reason to choose heavier and so complicated but less furtive boats.
@@PIERRELAURENTVANDERPLANCKE Australis realised that the diesel subs were no longer an option, so needed a Nulear sub. The Franch sub just does not cut it.
France : Australia, you have upset us by cancelling the submarine contract and we lose $90 billion (Australian) dollars. Australia : Our defence position has changed in the south china sea and we need nuclear subs now. France : We don't care, we want our $90 billion dollars or we will send our ambassador home. Australia : But you have nuclear subs and ships? And new nuclear subs? France : Yes we have nuclear vessels because we need them and they are really good. Australia : But we need them for the same reason. France : We don't care, we want our $90 billion dollars. Australia : D'oh!!!!
It's a joke: Autralia did not want to buy some French nuclear subs, neither from any foreign country.. till Biden just phones to make change his Southern Buddy, as he named the australian PM (Yes, indeed: he forgot his name). Camberra is afraid of China and prefers to be protected by US than stay an independant power involved in a free open alliance with France, India and others. Everybody well understood that. But some do not agree with.
@@PIERRELAURENTVANDERPLANCKE Indeed, and you forgot the lobbying from London and others, afraid by the French business increasing in a major Commonwealth country.
@@unknownboi7785 The intellectual weakness of the Indians is no secret to anyone ... that is why Russia does not trust the Indians with advanced weapons ...
Wow, did you have to think to come up with such a stupid reply or is that your natural state? First, it will never be deployed because the Russian's are broke. Ukraine is kicking their ass. Also, it's kinda bad to have a sub that big, its really stupid just like 99.999% of Russian designs are. The only thing the Russians have which actually work (somewhat) are their nukes. Without the nukes Finland could invade and conquer Russia.
and wrong size of the yasen-M, Yasen is the one that is 136-139 meter long, due to the large sonar it have, while Yasen-M have the new-ish sonar that are more compact, thus making the submarine 6-9 meter shorter, Yasen-M is only 130 meter long!
@m n US have to upgrade a 20 year old design, that in reality is and late 80's design, being upgraded 4 times to try to make it relevant and they are planning on a 5 version... yeah. And they still use an old hull design. While we in Europa are building submarines, that can deflect active sonars + being so silent that passive sonars can't hear us, we basically take stealth technology underwater.
Great info especially Sing, Indon and Iran subs Love the quieter Russian and USA nuke subs TQVM YHWH = ALLAH =AHAD Yesuah = Muhammad Holy Spirit = Ruh Al Amin = RuhulQudus Proverbs 22:4 : The reward for humility and fear of the Lord is riches and honor and life. Surah Al-Mulk, Verse 29: قُلْ هُوَ الرَّحْمَٰنُ آمَنَّا بِهِ وَعَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْنَا فَسَتَعْلَمُونَ مَنْ هُوَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ Say: He is the Beneficent Allah, we believe in Him and on Him do we rely, so you shall come to know who it is that is in clear error. (English - Shakir) via iQuran Best Wishes George Town, Malaysia
@m n HMS Audacious was commissioned 2021, HMS Anson was launched 2021. What is on the bridge is classified, as is actual performance e.g. considered to be 'in excess of 30 knots' in usual british understatement, i.e. you have no idea what is on an Astute bridge nor more importantly what is in their sonar room (such as the ability to detect a chinese rattle can from the other side of the China Sea). Locating USS subs is a bit of a hobby for RN subs, because it is difficult. A three-way game played with the russians and occasionally bumping into the french ones (HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant bombers 2009)
@m n lol...I never said they were new designs, just upgraded!!...get your head out your backside and stop being triggered by everyone you keyboard Muppet!!
they probably wont but they can if they wanted to lol. they also have some of the most technologically advanced subs ever made but they dont last very long compared to the US's subs because they don't keep up with the maintenance as much as we do.
@John Grigg Well, it isn't cause of that. The liquid metal cooling might be the Alfa-class, which it's only job is to attack convoy's at 40+ Knots speeds but, as technology goes, it isn't very stealthy and they decommissioned it. The Mike-class, the one that has dual titanium hulls (If I remember correctly) was only a test submarine for 4th gen submarine technology. It is the deepest diving Nuclear submarine. Reached over 1 Km but, it sank cause of a fire.
That is not true. If we’re talking 1985, the difference was marginal. But today it’s an whole other story. Russia has missed 30 years of high tech innovations, both due to political instability, lack of funding and widespread corruption. That’s why Russia of today can only present propaganda clips with computer generated prototypes that can’t be built without foreign support. And who want to work with Russia of 2022? A country that make the savages of Isis look like kindergarten teachers.
Sorry but the British submarines are newer and would hammer these 😂😂 Astute and the Dreadnaught class when released. Even the vanguard class would be a good fight with these subs 🇬🇧
I think you should add Japan's Taigei class subs which utilize air independent Propulsion and lithium-ion batteries. They are scheduled to start service later this year
This video has missed ALOT like the Astute class, Sōryū class, Taigei class, Type 212 class, Type 214 class and the Scorpène class 😑 the fact the Suffren class is in there and the Astute class is not stops me from pressing like button😂 *Also the Project 855 Yasen-M is a Cruise Missile Submarine (SSGN) not a attack submarine (SSN) type, neither is the Project 09852.
@@andreactuel7209 by that logic then he is referring to the status of 'commissioned' and by looking into each type's classes details, that ranges between February 2019 to mid 2021. So then by that the standard Type 218SG is not yet 'commissioned' that is it in 'sea trails' so is still wrong. and some of the classes i have mentioned have recent commissioned dates also that fit better: Sōryū class/ named: Tōryū (translation: Fighting Dragon)/ Commissioned 24 March 2021. Scorpène class/ named: INS Karanj/ Commissioned 10 March 2021. *and note as i said 'Attack Submarine' (SSN) that the Project 855 Yasen-M and the Project 09852 are not!
What a waste of time, you missed the newest and most sophisticated attack submarine in the world off the list, the BRITISH ASTUTE , it's like doing a video on luxury cars and missing Rolls Royce off how can anyone take you seriously?🙈
@@thebuzz4108 Then Virginia class, shouldnt be on the list, since that class have been in productions since 2000....and the US Navy is already on block 4.... so there must be something wrong with the submarin since they need so many variants. They have already done block 1, block 2, block 3 and now block 4 and they have just started on block 5!.... There are several Version of the Astute class, 2007 is the block 1, RN is currently on Block 2 now, where the last one was just launched a few weeks ago.... So if Virginia class can be on the list with Block 4 then Astute class can be on the list with block 2... since it is a more modern submarine then Virginia class... that still use the old style submarine design, while Astute are using the new hull designe that even to a decree deflect sonar, in the same way a Stealth aircraft do... Just look at Norway's next submarine "attack submarin", the design have come out, in it is build to deflect sonar even more.... US navy submarines, are so yesterday. but what they are good at is there sensors and having equipment running silent... just look at those Chinese submarines, if they want to be silent, they have to shut down everything... including pumps, oh wait reactor needs cooling. Or Russian submarines, silent the first few years, but after some of there Equipment starting to get a bit "used", they start to get noisy... and they appears to not ave it in there Budget to replace noisy equipment, just try to fix it, something that never works, it only work for so long!
@@heuhen The variants might be America trying to put more tomahawk and weapons inside it. It also might be cause of the Mericans found out a better sonar suite.
