when I have a child when they are old enough to handle paint I am going to give them a canvas and paints and say "Here take this paint squeeze it and put it onto the canvas and see what you can make
This girl gets more recognition at her age than i'll ever get in my entire life. Guess you have to start throwing pretty and "clashy" colors on a canvas to get known nowadays...
her mind be like when she's painting the canvas while someone is recording her: "I need it to look abstract" "I need it to look messy" "I need it to look like that it has deep message to it"
Og Honey its really not just "throwing shit together" if you look more carefully. you COULD throw paint on a canvas "randomly"( like a lot of people who don't understand modern painting might think the artist does) and it would not turn out as nicely if you didn't have the talent. the colors she purposely picks to be blended and throw together work well because she has an eye for that kind of stuff. she is also good at taking up right amounts of negative and positive space and its that kind of stuff that makes her paintings turn out as eye catching as they do.
a prodigy child is a kid who is extremely smart or talented for their age. for this girl’s age, honestly, i am not impressed by her work. i could do that and i am much older than her.
@@lillyxoxo5295 What is art to you? A popularity competition? If you make "real" or more conventional art, this girl obviously isn't taking anything away from you, the niche audience that is interested in what she does, is not the audience you are searching for. Make your art to express rather than impress. Rid yourself of this competitive capitalist mindset. Instead of supporting and celebrating those in the same field, occupation, workplace etc. as one self, capitalists strip us of utility and community, make us compete among each other for a higher position, to get a raise or simply just not be replaced by cheaper workforce. This infighting and competition is what secures that workers won't unite, form unions or demand better pay or treatment and the capitalists can stay in power. This mentality is so deeply rooted in us, that a girl making art and finding an audience that appreciated it cannot just be left to do her thing. We are competing for that, position, that raise, the recognition of being unique individuals that can't just be disposed by the next person. Why can't artists just support each other?
@@xxxfairycorpsexxx7592 first of all that's way too long I'm not reading that whole essay but anyway, I never said it was about popularity or any other bs. I'm just saying that anyone can splatter paint on a canvas and call it their own art. She only got famous and recognized for it because of her wealthy parents. If you look for yt videos about abstract painting or any painting in general, there are A LOT of people who do much better than her but aren't as "rich" or famous.
@@lillyxoxo5295 I addressed everything you said in the comment I'm not going to have a conversation with you if you can't comprehend reading a comment.
I mean her art isn’t anything special. Who didn’t make something like that when they were younger. My friend is an amazing artist but nobody realizes how good her art is. This girl just painted a picture when she was younger and her parents and almost every parent is like “ITS A MASTER PIECE. OMG!”
Yes, of course. All you need is some money to shoot a video, entrepreneurship, preferably let your child do it so that people get blamed when they criticize a child's creation, and teach the child to give the right comments like "I feel free" etc.
Bambi Mountaineggo you should be ashamed of your small self. Go learn a little bit before you try tearing someone down for following her heart. Shame on you
Person: *goes to private art school from an early age, gets into art high school, art collage and spends years learning the techniques, history and theory of art * *_not reconized_* 9 year old: * has rich parents and some paint * sploosh sploosh *_makes a living_*
I've been drawing since the age of two. I've been trying to improve, perfecting my art, controlling paint and pencils, but this girl goes 'splat splat splat uwu!!' and becomes famous.
It really annoys me cause my friends and I take days to finish 1 drawing and she splashes paint on a canvas that probably takes longer to dry than to paint it and she gets millions. 😭
Puppycat I doubt she gets millions... However, she probably is making a good amount. Which is a tad frustrating. But I just had to decide to be happy for her. She's hit the jackpot. Good for her. It can be a bit..frustrating considering I'll take dats, weeks, even months on certain projects then it'll take just as long to sell sometimes. But hey, hopefully she can truly harbor the craft and use the money to make something truly amazing of herself.
@@BMarie774 -- I doubt very much that "she's hit the jackpot". How long do you think she can sustain the image of the child art prodigy? My guess: it's already over. As soon as she gets into junior high, and is exposed to other kids making art, she's going to be nothing but another kid making art. And in her freshman year in college, I can guarantee that she will be busted down to ground level by the art teachers who will rightly *not* be impressed by her.
Seeing this kinda pisses me off. Anyone can generally do this. You don't need much time to finish a painting like this. Unlike people who draw 4 hours to draw a portrait. Spilling paint all over takes you 5 minutes to do.
Hαzel uωu well it would only piss you off if you had something invested such as jealousy. Why is it so hard for anyone to just be happy for somebody who is happy doing what they love to do.? Guess that’s not happened for you yet and that’s why you should so clueless about art in general.
Do you realize how stupid you sound??? It's usually the easiest looking ones that are the most complicated ones. And the complicated ones are the ones that are hard. I'm and artist, and I KNOW my shit before you go saying things. You obviously have zero knowledge in the art field. This pisses you off??? Well guess what ppl like you who got not art knowledge and talk shit pisses me off. Cause we gotta deal with stupid people like you
MuffinWomen101 ok woah! No need to call anyone stupid. I’m an artist too and trying to understand things in the art field still, but there’s no need for disrespectful people like yourself bashing on someone for their opinion. Calm down.
MuffinWomen101 she is totally right and u are the dumb one here, before sayng that Hazel UwU has no talent in art and she doesn’t paint , check her channel you dumbass. Btw I’m totally with her cause literally anyone at her age can do that, she isn’t hating on her because she paint but only the fact that she is spilling some paint on canvas and she is called GIFTED, when any child that like painting can do that, pisses her off
Calling her an “art prodigy” when all she does is scatter up paint is honestly a huge insult to artists that can actually create art and never get the chance to have their own gallery.
Rocket Small it is actually. It’s called “still life” art or painting objects. It takes REAL time and effort. Unlike splashing paint on a canvas like her.
art school has never ever produced an artist. Yes, some great artists went to art school but they are great or were great not because they went to art school. I find it hilarious that people think "good" abstract painting is easy. Sure, it is easy to throw paint around but it is not easy to make it have a profound effect on people. Realism is the easiest kind of art. It is so easy that it cannot be considered art.
Tango Kaleidos Realism is not easy It takes good observation skills and understanding of the shapes and proportions Also memory skills With abstract painting you literally take some paints and put it on a canvas how you feel, there’s no technique
@@enfpflower5751 It is also good to do a painting on your own terms as long as you are in a good mood, I feel that a person’s Energy carries onto their work depending on how they feel.
Izzy yes certainly not in the little sheltered box of a world you live in. Makes perfect sense to me. Maybe you should go do an art study on this style before you go ripping some little girl apart. Let me guess, you are about 20 right.
Kayci Twedell when I was her age I painted and drew as well, from the horses drawings that she did I was definitely at the same skill level if not better, but I was not special. Her parents buy her expensive paints that she throws onto a canvas, gives a “woke” name and sells.
So is the idea of allah waiting for you after killing many innocent people, to reward you with 72 virgin pussies. But look how many people believe in that.
And how old are you ... and what have you done with your life? Zero. And will stay that way because just look at your comment. This is your life, enjoy rotting slowly with jealousy.
For her to be famous, these things are MUST HAVE - Supportive Parents - Have A House And Her Own Room For Painting (or her bedroom could be a mess if she wanna) - Have Luck She isn't gifted.
You clearly aren’t a true artist. It seems like you lack an understanding of good abstract art and the real skill it takes to have your work be appreciated. Money doesn’t make your work become appreciated. I’m saddened by an adult having such jealousy and lack of self worth that you would mock a child with talent. Shame on you and your ignorance. Grow up.
These adults over think it. They think she put soul and emotion into the piece but honestly shes just splashing paint like a normal kid. This is just a child, they have to think like a child and these adults are making it seem like she thinks like a damn Leonardo Davinci. They honestly need to make her do an IQ test if shes an actual child genius🤷♀️🤦♀️
Ye if she is 2 yrs old how she could think emotionally? Her brain is still on progress and now knowing much about the world yet.... She started it at age 2....
RedXVendetta when you see a monkey or an elephant daub with a paint brush they do the same kind of stuff,the elephant or monkey isn’t thinking of technique it’s just daubing paint,l could draw stuff from an early age ,so her drawing a horse at 9 years old isn’t something genius ,
Olof Neppelberg children are free of concepts like time, money and limitations. Perhaps that’s what her buyers like most. It’s the story of the child in us all.
Ethan Radd good abstract art is a combination of artwork that is confusing and complex enough that you can't understand it. this is combined with a carefully weaved complex meaning and name that the artist describes to the rich man who eagerly agrees, not wanting to be embarrassed.
good abstract art is not just splashing colors willy nilly on a canvas- good abstract art has meaning- one example would be the color pink- a light airy color of 'cheer' but scumble that color over a black underpaint- and it turns into "Cheery but with dark undertones" - You can find an example of that in Henri Matisse painting- (although not techinically pure abstract- his style drew from the movement)- Also- Abstract art uses symbols and lines to portray statements such as squares drawn in a square frame- which can portray feeling cramped- bound- or just the opposite- if some of the squares move off the edge of the canvas- portraying 'breaking the boundaries of society' or whatever- Some of The 'greats' were into stuff like theosophy- where painting delved into the spiritual realm- drawing upon 'spirits' to 'guide them' - A now famous abstract artist from the 1800's, helena blavatsky- painted a pyramid moving up into a golden circle- where the tip of pyramid broke the outer circle- it was meant to portray 'the soul arriving at the pinnacle of spiritual understanding' - I really doubt that this young girl put any kind of thought into deeper meaning of line, color, shapes etc-
good abstract also explores things like color relationships- and exploits, manipulates, and pushes the boundaries of color theory- Some abstract artists more than others explored colors and their relationships to other colors, or to shapes-
+Nazareth434 - The problem with your definition is that some artists don't have a lot of control over their paintings and they do something opposite to what they had intended. Some abstract artists take days or weeks to create one painting. Others just slap a few hundred of dollars in paints on a canvas in an uncontrolled way and call it art. It is art but many artists would achieve similar results if they were willing to spend money and experiment with paint like that. I agree that her work might look good, especially in a very large space. In a small space, it's too bright, and the colors are too pure and too overwhelming.
There's no problem with my definition- please not that i said 'good abstract art' not 'happy accidental art that is nothing more than thoughtless splashes of paint with an obvious lack of intent and design'- while some accidents can produce interesting combinations, they certainly aren't controlled, and can't be labelled 'skilled accidents' for the most part- you can see that this girl thinks about where the paint is going to land, thinks about what colours are needed- thinks about the technique to use in a certain area- she isn't just blindly throwing the paint on and hoping it looks good afterwards- it's one thing to take a happy accident and turn it into something skilfully, after the fact, and quite another to rely on nothing but happy accidents without any forethought or control-
In my opinion, I think anyone can do that with practice and determination. She will grow up to be a great artist, but she is just splattering paint everywhere. To me I don’t get how this is as big as it is.
Jack Pibblington yes like they can totally just do it on the spot !. And just because she’s younger than most artists doesn’t mean she’s free from criticism
I have a feeling the parents just want the popularity. I don't like how the 9 year old gets that much popularity when other artists work harder and they are way better and they don't get popularity. If I did a painting like that people would call it crap.
No oh my god peter draws is INCREDIBLE. I love his large scale artwork using the banana's, that's what brought me to his channel. I thought he was insane but I love his work! I've tried countless times to replicate his style but it's impossible
@kazuo poo exactly, to me I absolutely hate realism, I admire the skill put into it but to me it lacks life and creativity. Art is not something that can be easily defined as it means something different to everyone
The standards of art have gone to absolute shit, just because she's a child doesn't mean it's good, all artists are fighting against abstract that gets praised. It can be a nice pc or mobile device background but abstract doesn't belong in galleries if it's just splatters, swoops and smudges of paint. Like if you agree
All artists? You're meaning to say that ALL artists are fighting against abstract that gets praised? From all over the world, they're fighting this war? Show the proof of this generalization of negativity of ALL artists, dude. If not, dig into your inner self because your hatred sounds like a personal problem within yourself.
@@teenywhispers Jesus Fking Crist, how can you call THIS EVEN AN ART? I understand that the society is gradually becoming less smarter than before but even so, what emotions do you feel when you watch at a splash work? Really now
@@alexandrasusanu497 'I understand society is gradually becoming less smarter....' nah, just more self-centered - how is your definition of 'Art' any better than someone else experiencing creative freedom in her own way? Your own personal self-centered definition is what is the problem of society gradually becoming less smarter. You're creating your own ignorance. Let people BE and DISCOVER their own creative freedom and shut the fuck up.
I’m actually confused, isn’t there some sort of standard for a work to be called ‘abstract’? She’s just spilling and splattering paint on a canvas 🤷🏽♀️ correct me if I’m wrong
As a relatively young artist I think that it’s great she got recognition like this, but I don’t believe her pieces deserve this much praise. As annoying as I know I sound, she doesn’t have much understanding of colour theory and calling her ‘spontaneous’ is another way of saying she doesn’t think before she acts when painting. I just think the public should be popularising artists on their skill, and not their age. (I’m aware they let her pieces in when she was 4, and I think for her age those pieces were good, but as she progressed, her art did not).
While now most of her praise is due to her age, her art got accepted by a curator who didn't know how old she was. That in itself should show that her art is at least worthy of some praise.
The paintings aren't that bad but they don't really require a lot of skill to make. Someone could spend hours on an amazing drawing or painted portrait but it's unlikely it would ever be featured in a gallery yet splashing some paints about in an eye pleasing way on a canvas suddenly gets it's own solo show?
this baseless argument against contemporary art is getting tiresome. the art world is tired of representational portraits. we've seen them regurgitated over and over again since the Renaissance. we've collectively stopped giving a shit. lets move on.
Sweet Peaches and another one being pissed because we ain’t living in the renaissance where painting was a craftsmanship and you had no way to express yourself when you wanted to live from your art. We live in a time of free art and even though I understand how hard it is to break free from those traditional art boundaries I recommend you to try abstract art out and see how long it takes until you’re happy with the results and that you can actually learn very much from the years of traditional painting
@@xxxfairycorpsexxx7592 because just like brianna said, just wait until that girl gets into high school to take art class to realize art is more than color dumped poorly on a canvas.
@@lillyxoxo5295 you should know art is more than thecnique and how conventionally pretty something looks. That's something you'll spend a lot of time working with in art school. Just because you don't find her work appealing it doesn't make it any less valuable or meaningful to those who do. You seem incredibly narrow minded. Just because something doesn't fit your particular tastes or standards it doesn't mean it's any less art.
@@xxxfairycorpsexxx7592 technically, art is about looking good, you can't just make a shitty drawing and expect people to think it's the better than art like starry night, and I know that just because something doesn't fit my tastes doesn't mean it's any less of an art piece but it really isn't art. Your logic of calling something art is literally anything. So if I took a piece of dog crap and smeared it on a canvas that would be art? It's kind of an insult to think that something like hers could be true "art". There's people with so much more talent but then we are given this.
I'm sorry, but this kind of pisses me of. Here I am, spending hours upon hours practicing and improving my drawing and painting skills in order to get good enough to get a job in the future. And then we have this girl who carelessly splats paint onto a canvas. And she is already way more successful than I will probably ever be.
Uni Corn yeah I'm sorry you're fucking bitter at somebody who's more successful. Is being jealous and lashing out gonna make your art more known?? So stfu and keep practicing and let the kid be. People (not me personally) like abstract art and like her stuff. Supply and demand. So people like her stuff, and she enjoys making it. GREAT. So gtfo with your bitter ass
Uni Corn yep, I hear ya. your pissed offness is totally justified I think. The whole thing is topsy turvey. The girl hasn't lived life enough to put any meaning into her art or have any concept. It's just playing a round With paint and sticking a dinosaur figure in it. My grandson does stuff like that.
she might have just been lucky when she was 2, but she's definitely gotten better since. everyone here can say 'oh i can splatter paint everywhere and make millions of dollars' but her color combinations are really striking and eye for density and negative space are on point. i'm not a millionaire who would ever pay for one of these paintings, and of course there is extra hype here bc she's a kid and the art world is all about fads, but objectively speaking having studied graphic design, she does display a keen understanding of high level concepts that seems to have come very naturally to her without being taught. for anyone who's actually ever seen a 2 year old paint, they usually pick one or every single color and mash it all up together until it's a grey blob. she didn't smear the colors together and let them bleed into one another...i don't know, i'm around kids and art a lot and i thought they were pretty remarkable.
yea, but I wouldn't call the artwork of a prodigy, a lot of kids could do that but get told by their teachers to not mess around and paint properly like other kids
Lots and lots of kids and adults would be able to do that if they had the opportunity. Paint is too expensive to slap it on canvas without any purpose. Also, I don't believe that a parent who would have these resources and understanding of what paints and tools to even buy wouldn't share any techniques with their child. Children don't learn math by themselves, someone has to show them, teach them what "one" is or what "two" is. Same goes for arts. How many kids could understand the difference between warm or cold blue paints or warm or cold reds unless they are given proper paint? This is not something you just pick up unless you have hundreds or thousands of dollars in paint around you. That's why art should be part of elementary school and high school regardless of whether someone goes into a science curriculum or arts. It is very expensive for an average person to spend this much on a hobby. As a beginner, I can't imagine slapping 50 dollars or more of paint on a canvas like that.
Hatti Lim But it's true. ANYONE can do that. I still can't understand how people think that abstract "art" is more than splattering random paints on a canvas, mainly because it IS splattering random paints on a canvas. I did a lot of "art" like that when I was 2 years old, why didn't people consider me a prodigy super cool kid?
Mable Clark this is total bullshit. A tiny man standing next to a giant man should be considered surrealism. Abstract IS non representational. The point of being abstract is that the elements of the original representational are distorted in such ways that you can no longer recognize their forms.
mas pok lucky what lol. She’s not even talented. She’ll be lucky when she got some REAL art skills. Not some splashing of paint and getting famous for doing nothing.
If I were to compare Pianists to Painters, as an analogy , would someone who bang on keys to make all kinds of sounds that are non-conventional to traditional classical or jazz, still be considered a music prodigy? So long as they can tell a story behind their way of playing with feelings and expressions? I have seen her style of art from my own children's school art classrooms, in fact most of them would love to shake off paint brushes on their canvas and maybe to each other, but I don't remember any of them becoming famous for it. Maybe the size of the canvas matter? Bottom line, I guess abstract art isn't for everyone...
If it sounds pleasing then yes. Just as these paintings can appear pleasing to some. If the music of banging random keys still evokes emotion, or thoughts, how is it different from any other work of art.
Everyone in the comments section are being rude. You guys really have no respect for art. Or should I say abstract. Every painting you see has a meaning behind it. She loves doing it. If you really focus it’s beautiful. It seems like you don’t see it. When you say “I guess some people aren’t into abstract” it sounds like you don’t even understand it at all. That’s just disrespectful.
@@ht1ps555 no you idiot, she had a sound point. Abstract is just plain shit for morons like you that want to feel intellectuals while babbling nonsense like "Every painting you see has a meaning behind it". BULLSHIT. Your stupidity, now THAT'S disrespectful, to the mankind.
porkybelly 1 agreed!!! It made me literally feel sick reading these comments. Hard to believe people, especially some who are claiming to be artists on here, would act like that. Thank you for your comment- what a relief I felt reading it.
I Like Penguins HA and who are you exactly? Michelangelo? Bob Ross? Leonardo DaVinci? Cause it seems like you know A LOT about art. 🤔😒 That little girl probably makes more money than you make in a year.
This isn't really talent, and I can see why actual artists who have been working their asses off for years would be upset that this child is getting all these undeserving opportunities.
To be honest, the People who think that is art , I should sign out my 2 year old niece she can do the same shit 🙄 I could be a millionaire if I did that
Agree, my children do the same or better and they are able to draw too :) All depends on that you have enough room and lot of paint and lot of canvas to let them do it. And possibility or connections to make the marketing to exhibit the result. I believe that everybody was born with creativity just in the meantime we lost it - started at kindergarden when they say how should something look like. So She has big success that she has wealthy parents and they arrange everything for her. :)
They don't deserve to be in museums, they're too comercial. And I don't see any effort there, just waste of money. Buy some expensive paints, give them to your kid, and enjoy being famous. Everyone could think they're artists, but only few are real artists. And this girl, isn't one of them.
All art is basically a waste of money I’ve seen it in my school and almost none of them make it into the art world so they’re left with a bunch of crap for storage. I know that art shouldn’t be belittled but people should have a career that can mix with art if they are artists..this is the real world after all
these paintings have nothing new. jackson pollock did this half a century ago and there are endless abstract artist like this. abstract painting has developed so much further than this: tomory dodge. gerhard richter. the only special thing is that she is a child, thats it.
Alexander Petrohv Abstract art is about randomness, not talent. You gotta admit, abstract art would make a house look damn nice if it were in a living room. and tbh, I hate abstract art and hate pollock's art, but the little kid's work does look really fucking good if you don't think about the "talent" it took. the amount of work it takes is irrelevant to the feel of the painting. That's why I believe art majors are all fucking retarded for thinking they can learn art as a career.
@@Submersed24 You had me up in your alley until you said art majors are retarded for learning art as a career. Seriously? There are people who have singing, dancing and other forms of art as their career and I don't see anything wrong with it. I thought all artists were open minded on everything, and willing to listen to both sides of the cup. But guess not, there are still 'artists' like you who think they are 'woke' because they realised that someone else's job isn't worth enough to count as a career.
dont say that man, if you could do it you shouldve done it first :D then youll get to have bragging rights, abstract art is complicated in a sense too when youre studying it.
It's not random. Aelita has clearly given some thought to which colours go together, and to composition and technique, where a lot of little kids would just paint sort of scribbles in the centre of the canvas, or in one corner/off to one side. She was able to do that as a toddler, before she was able to clearly articulate what her paintings were about, and as soon as she was able, you see her telling stories with her art, which is hard to do with abstract art, but she does it so effortlessly.
UNKNOWN what they are trying to say is that it can be done easily even by somebody who doesn’t know a single thing about art. But she is making money because people think she is a "genius", whenever people say a little kids is an art prodigy, but then they tack on abstract in front of it, I roll my eyes. Anybody can do it, why is she making money from something that takes little to no effort.
@@noliposie5527 yeah that is kinda the point, she splatters paint and the parents put her on a pedestal and people just give them their money while people who can actually draw go unoticed, I don't think the girl herself is bad because she is just doing her own thing and I do think the art looks nice, I think the problem is the parents whom are spoiling her.
People put days of work into their pieces, needing years and years of practice. This bothers people because a little girl is making more money than those who basically spent their entire lives practicing their art and some even spent tons of money on art school too.
Maliferous Grim art is just about what looks cooler tbh and what looks cool is entirely subjective. If a paint slap looks nicer in a livingroom than a super detailed portrait (which tbh Id rather abstract art for a living room because it is aesthetically pleasing), then it would sell for more money.
Raji Jojo you comment should say “You give a kid paint and a canvas and she makes a mess and you call it art? There is something “wrong with you.”” Not whatever you said. And you are clearly like 6 if your typing like that.
shes done some beautiful work! but to be called a prodigy is ridiculous! all kids love to throw colour around. its fun.... but it takes many years to understand and become an abstract artist. it just cheapens it for those of us who have been slogging away for decades.
she has the eye. balance, contrast, movement, most importantly feeling, its all there. she will grow out of sticking dinosaurs on things. if she has been doing it since 2 she already has 7 years under her belt, she was born with it some are and some aren't. "cheapens it for those of us who have been slogging away for decades" sounds like jealousy.
Some of her paintings are so beautiful and visual, but other are just a joke, it's not always random paint-throwing, but then it is... 0 talent and 0 art
Julia Fart not talent but skill, art is not a talent, no one is born and automatically a da Vinci. But I this is just a child throwing paint on a canvas who has learned to say that it's a dragon or a flower. I've don't this before. If she can get paid for this why can't others. Sorry added a little extra.
good art doesn't require those things. a good piece of art is good regardless of context, whether it be a happy accident or a lengthy process of methodical creation.
Kid: yeaaah, extreme fingerpainting time! Mum : ffs, look at this mess for me to clean up Art world: take my money Mum: holy crap, make all the mess you want... Here's more paint!
UkuleleDae Yes, even though she is cute little girl, it seems she has been indulged. My parents were buying food for us, not canvases and paint. It seems a like an expensive indulgance that paid off for them. Most of these I seen have money to being with. I hope she is a grounded human as she develops, so that when people aren't interested anymore , she doesn't fall apart.
Any kid could do this. I doubt she makes or selects her own canvases and paint. Her parents most definitely purchase all the materials she needs and probably select the colours she will use and all she has to do is throw it down on the canvas while they film her. A lot of young artists (with real talent) don't have parents who know anything about art. And so they have to learn about those materials on their own and experiment with them alone.
SALTY *splatters paint over canvas and smudges it around* to finish it up say something about thoughts. To be honest she's much better drawing horses than "painting"
Der Versteckte Elch good luck on selling that, that's right, it's not worth anything. I don't like abstract art but it doesn't give me a right to say it's not art. I like how people say abstract art isn't art and they don't even know what it means. Art is expression. (Also it's subjective)
SALTY "good luck on selling that, that's right, it's not worth anything", that's the point I'm making it's not worth anything. As you said art is subjective so in my opinion the paintings she makes aren't good. I'm glad she's at least having fun and all but she's just splattering paint on a canvas.
5:38 "I want to paint forever and ever, for the rest of my life and I also would like to be...ummmm...a painter!" Then maybe you should learn how to paint! SMH.
Sounds like you guys have some deep aggression towards abstract art or something. You cant say that art is just one thing. That defeats the purpose of it.
Georgia M People are so used to Modernized art that they don’t even know the real meaning or definition of art, it’s kinda sad.... What this girl is doing is art/painting, she just had money, a supportive family and luck, which is why she’s so famous.
@@ShinsRamyeon yeah and that's it , she's nothing near 'gifted' , i honestly feel bad for every talented person out there who can't even make a living , money buys everything 😔
@@gl3254 well if you want to see it from 'art' point of view , wouldn't that literally make every painting 'art' , every 'sketch' art, every LINE 'art'?you're the one who should wake up , she had money so she became famous , nothing more , end of story . What a unfair world we live in 😑
i sometimes spend DAYS on sketches and i put a lot of effort into them but she just splatters paint all over the canvas and calls that a ‘abstract painting’ no offence but it looks like poop.
L0vely she’s a 9 year old. how does she understand anything such as emotion? she only understands happiness and joy but not deeper things such as depression. i understand art. but to claim that to be artwork? seriously? if a adult painter did that no one would buy it. people are only wowed because of her age lmao
@@lorythmem230 there is no need. It's kinda obvious that anyone can act like a toddler and spill paint everywhere. We all just don't have rich parents to supply us with the items like the "paint prodigy" does.
Art isn’t about skill anymore. Modern artists making more money than the old masters is like pissing on their graves when they deserve 100 times the recognition and glory
@@lorythmem230 ooh, you think you're so hard hiding behind that screen of yours. Admit it. Even you could do better with your eyes closed. Unless your some 10 year old morgz subscriber who thinks they can say whatever they want behind a screen. There was really no need. Periodt.
This is bullshit. What happened to the craftsmanship in painting? The years when people who devoted their lives to learning what things *really* look like were rewarded. Where the meaning was archetypal and beautiful. Not splatters. Not dots. Meaning. Work. Years of effort. Community.
That's art? WTF people? She's just throwing paint all over that room, saying that is art. Seriously? I used to do "masterpieces" like those when I was a baby and no one called it art.
Lorenzo Mello Lorenzo Mello not as simple as just "throwing paint all over". Obviously you don't understand the definition of art. For someone as young as her, she is quite mature and has well thought up concepts for her art. It's not just how it looks visually but the thought that goes behind it as well, and understanding of what media you're using. You might've done those as a baby but did you even draw portraying emotion or complex ideas? I think not.
Eiso oh so she be like "ooh fairy" and go splash pink paint in her room and then "ooh brother taking a piss" and rip the toilet off and splash the water on the canvas?
Eiso you understand the only reason she does anything in the art world is because of her parents connections, and infinite money to dump into her painting... where she just takes buckets and dumps them on canvas. Liking her art is one thing, thats a matter of opinion; but in no way is she a talented artist. Just one with lots of connections.
2:58 we finally see some art not from a supposed two year old but they still aren't "WOW AMAZING" they are very average. I don't see the prodigy in her.
@@Truffle4 ummm just so you know it's doesn't matter how many hours you spend on a painting. It's about the talent. She's been gifted with a talent you obviously don't have. If you do not understand art then your in the wrong side of RU-vid.
It's all about her parents, who they know, and what influential connections they have... get the right person to rave about something, and the sheep will follow! As lovely as she is, she no more talented than the average 9 year old.
She is not an artist and she is not a painter, she is a kid, and what she is doing it is cute, indeed, but that's it. This is not art. Absurd world we are living in. .
Did you completely ignore her horse drawings or something bc for a 9 yr old, that's some dang good horse drawings. Therefore, that makes her an artist. As for the painting, she actually thinks about where she places her paint, what colors she wants to incorporate, how the composition will look. So yeah, that makes her a painter. Not the best painter out there but that doesn't make her *not* a painter.
Yes. Imagine all these pretentious douchebags insulting a child on the internet, because they know if they did it in person they'd get their asses beat.
mr weak asshole that’s just rude. I’ll like to watch you do it just because you say you just throw paint around doesn’t mean it’s a empty piece. People live the colors and really you can always find shapes in the artwork. When she was younger that was just for play arounds. Now she’s serious about it’s not like she plays around with it. It’s because every art piece you see at a museum has a meaning, imagination, and a heart. It seems like you don’t understand that.
I wouldn't say so about Kandinsky, because he actually made quite interesting pieces for an abstract artist I'd say it all went downhill with Pollock and the expressionnistic abstraction movement that came alongside him 😅😅
