A car that runs 200 miles on compressed air. 

@Cliff Yablonski all wrong. and formua 1 cars run on compressed air.

The Big Oil corporations have suppressed any type of other energy but they have to change because General Motors is going to all electric vehicles by 2030 and anyways hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are the future and Japan is already producing one along with greatly improved battery technologies that they already have ready to start producing America does not invest in these new technologies then China and Japan will and they will take all the money and jobs so yes America does need to invest in itself and its future or we will fall behind which we are already doing

Rightwing MAGA NAZI'S don't know how to research their indoctrinated

He should have made the car more appealing

Impractical and costing nothing is ridiculous

I think they are just using the leverage of compressed air, it still needs a bit of gas, or charging of some kind, otherwise it would be "200 miles on air" it would be till the wheels fall off.

you need kompresor like thing to kompress air into the air tanks you saw on video ..... .lSo you need elektricity

then you add a bit of solar and you add a few turbines and you add a little bike pump and youre good to go

that is the same what I think. I also think the car have two tanks. on is under charging. once the first tank pressure down, It would change over to the second tank by computer

@@whathefukk the energy to fill the second tank is coming from the first tank. Air vehicles are dead

@@rwyo83 theyre dead because they all miss one crucial ingredient. HEAT. engines dont run on fuel. they run on compressed air. your ICE is a compressed air engine. its only difference is it compresses it as it uses it, rather than storing it in a tank. it adds lots and lots of HEAT to this compressed air by mixing the air with something combustible and igniting it. doesnt matter how the fuel is ignited, compression or spark. doesnt matter what the fuel is, could be sawdust for all it matters. all that is required is that you take a certain amount of air, heat it up, and then let the subsequent increase in pressure perform work. you dont even have to compress the air first, ie... bisschop engine, lenoir cycle... not critical, but definitely helps. you dont have to add fuel to air to get it hot. or, at least, to get it hotter than it would be when simply compressed. you could, possibly, run it through a coiled pipe in a burner... or maybe discharge a bloody big capacitor through a spark and release heat that way... you do have issues such as thermal transfer and rates of conduction, surface area... steam can transfer lots of energy as it has one of the highest latent heats of any substance... but to heat that water, and deal with phase changes, is tricky. thats where the losses are in steam. whereas air... its pretty lousy at holding heat, but if you can heat enough of it fast enough, its quite good. thats what your ICE relies on. lots and lots of air being heated up. a stirling is limited mostly by the rate at which one can transfer heat through the cylinder walls to the volume of air trapped inside, and vice versa at the other end, getting the heat out of the air. this day and age, with EDM and metal printing, the types of heat exchangers needed for the things to be viable again is actually possible, as you couldnt make them any other way. massive surface areas, high temperature alloys, intricate porting, nice CAD designed paths with flow dynamics calculated... robert stirling could never come close... a boiler burning coal say, can easily be replaced with a PV powered heating element, or a solar thermal collector, or maybe a wind turbine if one likes whirligigs...

What happened to the design,can you duplicate it- for sure it has file copy in U.S. Patent office...Such invention of him will be a threat to those company selling home heater units...Just like prophet Daniel,he put himself inside the lions den,dungeon....

compressed air was popular in the 1800/1900s... what he had there was what we now call a heat pump but a bit better again, with no electrical parts other than a motor and switch to fail, the whole mechanical device being quite easy to fathom and analyse... another side effect is if he had designed the compressed air motor to absorb as much ambient heat as possible as it expanded, it could also refrigerate something... pretty well much as much heat as is squeezed out over there as its compressed, will be re-absorbed as it expands and reaches ambient pressure/density/temperature. optimise for losses, enhance that COP. just 1 atmosphere of pressure from ambient will cool to below freezing when expanded.

There where at least six car manufacturers before the 1900’s that sold free energy electric cars .. that got more miles per charge than a Tesla

@@IggyArssie Who were they?

@@IggyArssie Any surviving model of that car?...Such engine design can be easily improved today...

Just cancel physics, duh

Nobody in the video mentioned perpetual motion, or anything close to it. They clearly state that the air needs to be pressurized first, and that an air cylinder can be filled in less then 3 minutes. Such an air compressor can be driven by an electric motor, causing no emissions, and once the air is used to power the car there are no harmful emissions either. At least compared to an internal combustion engine there are much much less parasitic losses due to heat and friction and the inertia from moving parts. And no laws of physics are being broken.

@@insAneTunA Did you even watch the whole thing? At 3:05 "perpetual motion" is mentioned verbatim in reference to having an air powered generator in the car to power an air compressor to constantly refill the air tank.

@@chinoto1 They mean a system similar to regenerative braking, but instead of recharging a battery they refill the air cylinder with an air compressor as soon as the brakes are applied. And the initial filling of the aircyllinder can be done by solar or wind powered air compressors, which basically makes it perpetual motion, not literally, but very close to it. Let's not forget that this is a very old video. And in 13 years a lot has changed. Perpetual motion in the strict sense of the word is heavily exaggerated, I will admit that, although it is a highly efficient system, from start to end. It eliminates much of the mining for oil and lithium, no harmful emissions of any kind, low maintenance, very low parasitic losses due to heat and friction, fast refilling of the air cylinder anywhere where there is normal household electricity. No need for complex battery systems. I mean, for an urban setting in combination with solar and wind power this is an ideal solution, and easy to implement. And it cancels the whole extra step of producing any kind of energy carrier. Tata, the Indian car company, planned to launch the Airpod, an air powered car, back in 2020. I am not sure though if they actually did that because of the corona. An urban vehicle that should reach 70 km/h with a range of 220 km. With licensed technology from the french company MDI.

@@insAneTunA They mentioned nothing about regenerative braking in the video, which even if they did, would only recover some of the energy, not all, therefore not perpetual. The rest of what you said is nice, but irrelevant to the "perpetual motion" bit.

They didnt say that though. They said that net use and generation would be the same. that in itself is physically incorrect to claim (it would imply that it expends energy with a net zero consumption) but its not the same as saying it produces energy. It still expends it.

What happen to such invention,why it was not mass produced?...He must sell the blue print only,its up to the buyer to build their own,a do-it-yourself (DIY) system....Or he was threatened like Stan Meyers but opted for the offering- or else....S.Meyers refused the offering,so his life become the offering in the altar of greed,monopoly and conspiracy...Meyers died after drinking a poison laced drinks,as per autopsy report...Pls see You Tube video...

How did this go?

He is dead, he went to the patent office, that's how they get you and than suicide you.

Well I could certainly see having a little electric air compressor on board that could be charged like any other EV but I have to wonder about the efficiency of such a mechanism. It seems like there is a lot of potential for lost energy by converting electricity into pressure to convert into motion rather than just converting electricity into motion. I welcome correction though from someone who knows more about this as it is fascinating to me. I'm reminded of a similar mechanical system in a car called the Fisker Karma. Unlike most plug in hybrids this one did not have any mechanical connection from its ICE to the wheels and was insteal simply a generator under the hood to charge the batteries. This was great for mechanical simplicity but resulted in a deeply underwhelming fuel economy for a hybrid.

@@kayEnt3rtainm3nt you dont need electricity to compress air? what seems more logical? a wind turbine that has to be braked when wind is too high, and cant spin when its too low, and can only deliver power to a load when the load needs the power and the wind speed is in the "goldilocks zone"... or to say, compress air 24/7 with whatever wind that turbine is experiencing, regardless of speed, storing the resultant "energy" as pressure, that can then be easily transferred to a small portable vessel? and what will break down in ten years? the batteries constantly cycling, the electronic monitoring systems, the solid state inverters, or the well lubricated gears, shafts, and bearings of an air compressor? whats easier to repair? the sealed electronics with waterproof enclosures, proprietary software, unavailable schematics or data, or the metal shaft that was made on a lathe, and if it needs replacing, can again, be made on a lathe? what causes more harm when its decommisioned? the recyclable aluminium/steel air tank, the metal compressor components, or the leaking batteries with strange chemicals leaching out, that cant be easily reused as the energy required to dissasociate and refine the raw elements is more expensive and energy intensive than digging up ore? along with all those epoxy based circuit boards, petrochemical insulations and wrappings, the gallium and arsenic doped semiconductors, the epoxy component encapsulation? on that note, planes can be made with sheets of pressed aluminium pop rivetted together. look at a 747... so why do wind turbines have to be made from freaking epoxy "space age" materials? "garb-age" if you ask me. making garbage, and obsessed with garb... as for youre hybrid with its disconnected drivetrain.... the thing is, noone really talks about the efficiency of conversion... they conveniently overlook the 50/50 tradeoff that is present in all energy conversions... if you lift a weight up, then as it falls back down it will deliver all its energy. but... is that energy doing anything USEFUL? if you let it freefall due to gravity... it doesnt do any work on anything. it is all kinetic energy with no potential to do anything... (it will when it hits the ground though, but why bother doing work to lift the weight if you could have just delivered the same energy to the ground anyway? unless there is an advantage, say... a pile driver? the energy taken to lift the hammer is delivered to the stake, minus noise, heat, bounce... how much of it is used in driving the pile and how much is lost? still, the reason is its actually harder to try and apply that force directly. try pushing a nail in without a hammer. yet it takes the same amount of energy to swing the hammer as it would to just push the nail in... minus losses as noise, etc. theres also a thing about velocity, momentum...) if you dont let it fall at all... it doesnt do anything. it just sits there, its potential energy doing nothing. you let it fall at half the speed it would fall in freefall, and you can extract HALF the energy. the other half of its potential energy continues to be converted to kinetic energy simply to keep it MOVING. so when an electric motor is described as being "98% efficient", it is actually 98% of that theoretical 50% figure dictated by physics. half the power had to continue to flow through the motor for the motor to produce the other half of the power at the shaft. lifting a weight, driving current through a circuit... its all the same thing, energy wise... if it was 50% efficient... 3/4 of the power flows through the motor leaving 1/4 at the shaft as useful power. so your hybrid, despite it having super efficient motor and generator, can never do better than 50 percent from the engine to electricity, then another 50% again from electricity to the wheels. total? 1/4. 25%. thats ignoring energy lost as heat in wires, eddy currents, hysteresis, yknow... circuit losses... watch tom stantons video on "KERS". its not electric but its the exact same thing. also worth watching, his eddy current drive is electric, but its also a bit different, and its only one stage of conversion, for a best 50% efficiency. think, if the wheel rotates at the same speed as the magnets, theres all potential, doing no work. if the wheel stays still, despite all the power applied, it does no work. when theres a certain load, slip, the wheel spins at a certain speed whilst the magnets do roughly twice that speed, and a certain amount of energy is transmitted. ideally... half of it! his implementation suffers mostly from inadequate understanding of magnetic flux paths, reluctance, and the necessity of having iron. if you watch it, bear in mind that simple soft iron clips hooked over the outside of the magnet arrays would have improved performance tenfold... they complete the magnetic circuit and give minimum reluctance, concentrating the flux through the gap where it is required. whereas a gearbox and a shaft attached to the engines crankshaft? a chain drive? a belt and pulley? when they say it is 98% efficient? its 98% efficient. 100kw in will be 98kw out, 2kw dissipating as noise and heat. it isnt CONVERTING energy, its CONVEYING it. major difference. an area where the electric generator does work is trains. because you can easily plug more motors in as you make the train longer. it only requires full power when starting off, and the rate at which it accelerates is only limited by the power available. once its rolling, its rolling and takes nearly no power to keep moving. electric transmissions dont work when used in other conditions. for a truck? weight is everything. payload. what the truck and engine weighs for what it can carry. using a generator, weighing three times as much as a gearbox, needing double the engine or more to overcome losses... and having to reduce payload because of it makes no sense. whereas if they all hooked together and trundled along dead flat, traffic free roads... they would be fine... hang on. thats a train!

@@paradiselost9946 Was your novella meant to be a reply to a different comment and you simply clicked on mine in error? Because it really does not follow what I said either as agreement or argument.

@@kayEnt3rtainm3nt are you illiterate? maybe my "novella" was too lengthy for you to read all of it? it was directly related to your comment, if you spared five second to exercise your brain cells.

There are situations where this would be useful, and I imagine it is actually in use. Obviously you need an external source of power, but sometimes you want to be able to move things or people around and you do not want combustion.

Stupid because ?

A gas engine or electric engine. If they had “fuel stations” where you could go and fill up with compressed air that would be the goal. You pull into the station that is run on say solar panels or a wind turbine that powers the electric air compressor motors you could have in theory a zero emissions compressed-air powered car that you could fill up much the same way we fill up gas cars today. It would also be much quicker to fill up a car with compressed air than say the time it takes to charge electric battery cars today

Well said...The technology was long been perfected,it was only suppressed,the bussiness empires of those multi billionaire globalist will be put in danger...Ex.pres. Trump said that he will divulged to the public the hundreds,maybe thousands of inventions- being witheld from public knowledge- so that the whole world will enjoy its fruits...The unwritten code and tradition of monopolist,occultic globalist: Extinct inventor is cheaper than extinct bussiness...

I saw the video in You Tube...

It could happen

John milshnogenberg Who told you my secret identity?!

the fuck is your point? can you walk 200 miles without pumping out carbon dioxide? weirdo

how far could the first car ever built go it will improve

200 miles is actually pretty impressive.

+Vince Sibayan Because Europeans are so far removed from shitty lives, they have to drive in literal poop to live a balanced life.

Good point.

It's made in France.

yeah. i was kind of idly listening to this... while i looked at some other page and then I heard that totally retarded ending where they talked about an air generator being used to compress air. (facepalm) OMG! Please, could people be a little more knowledgeable about basic physics.

TheAngryCanary "yeah. i was kind of idly listening to this... while i looked at some other page and then I heard that totally retarded ending where they talked about an air generator being used to compress air. (facepalm) OMG! Please, could people be a little more knowledgeable about basic physics." I think it's completely possible for the car to fill another tank with compressed air while driving on the air from the first tank at 55 mph the other tank would be half filled in 2 hours

+dennis garber Good Questions. Just as people forget their "electricity" is often made from dirty coal, so it might be with the energy to compress air.

maybe stick to the dogs and kennels

Google 'energy density' to understand why it can never work.