I have another simple question for you, if you don't mind me asking. Do you understand what they're saying/reciting? And again, I'm just asking out of pure curiosity.
@@zxnxb @Zainab Shibly no prob, in the beginning they are asking Allah to put peace and blessings upon his messenger Muhammad peace be upon him. And here is nothing wrong with it. BUT what is wrong is the way they do it. They do it all together at the same time with one voice en singing. Another thing is somewhere around 19min30sec they are calling upon Muhammad peace be upon him by saying "yaa saidie ir7am lanaa, yaa rahmata al3alamien" what means "Oh my master have mercy on us, oh mercy of the worlds". And this is a BIG problem! Because they are calling upon Muhammad by saying "yaa" (and this calls in arabic grammar "yaa al-istidnaa") and yaa is only used to call someone who is near you or to call upon Allah because He is the all hearing. And every sound muslim knows that the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him can't here us now because he past away. So why do they call upon the Messenger of Allah and asking for his Shifaaya (intersession) when he can not here them? And if I may ask again to use our intellect by asking ourselves the question "did the companions of the prophet Muhammad do such kind of "dhikr"? The answer is NO! And again, the sahaaba were the closest to the prophet and best in following the Quran and the Sunnah. And then we have some Sufi who are thinking they can worship Allah better then the sahaaba?! Sub7aanAllah. If you are sincere, then you should ask yourself this question every time you see something that has to do with worshipping Allah or the sunnah "did Allah's messenger Muhammad did it OR his companions OR the 3 generations that came after te sahaaba". If they didn't do it, then we don't do it also not. Or you can ask the Sufi's the question "do you guys have a proof from the Quran or the sunnah for what you are doing?" The Sufi dont love the prophet, they love they're own desires for making music and singing. May Allah guide us.
@@ibrahimabu9530 Imam Shafi'i defined Bid'ah as: الْبِدْعَةُ بِدْعَتَانِ: بِدْعَةُ مَحْمُودَةٌ وَبِدْعَةُ مَذْمُومَةٍ، فَمَا وَافَقَ السُّنَّةَ فَهُوَ مَحْمُودٌ وَمَا خَالَفَ السُّنَّةَ فَهُوَ مَذْمُومٌ. Bid'ah is two bid'ahs: praiseworthy bid'ah and blameworthy bid'ah. Thus, whatever agrees with the Sunnah, it is praiseworthy and whatever conflicts with the Sunnah, it is blameworthy. (Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari, Vol. 4, p. 257) As regard to what is claimed as innovated after the death of the Prophet (saw), in fact, not every innovated act is legally prohibited. However, what is prohibited is the innovation disagrees with the established Sunnah or abolishes a legal command despite the existence of its underlying cause. Innovation, on the contrary, might have been obligated in some cases when the underlying cases changed. (Ghazali, Ihya Ulum al-Deen, Vol. 2, p. 3) Ali al-Qari’ said: In al-Azhar it says, “This means every evil bid’ah is misguidance, due to his (upon him blessing and peace) statement ‘One who establishes a good practice (sunnatan hasana) in Islam, he will have its reward and the reward of those who practice it.’1 Abu Bakr and ‘Umar collected the Qur’an, Zayd wrote it in the mushaf and it was reworked in the time of ‘Uthman.”
